Math reviews in “Zentralblatt für Mathematik und ihre Grenzgebiete”Reference Request: Steinberg's 1975...
Math reviews in “Zentralblatt für Mathematik und ihre Grenzgebiete”
Reference Request: Steinberg's 1975 paper “On a paper of Pittie”(retrieved)What has happened to Lang's Files and other political texts?A request for suggestions of advanced topics in representation theorySignal processing reference for pure mathematicianLooking for paper: The Cauchy integral by M. PrivalovHow does one find out what's happening in contemporary mathematics research?Learning roadmap to TQFT from a mathematics perspectiveIf the natural density (relative to the primes) exists, then the Dirichlet density also exists, and the two are equalDid Hilbert laugh?On Mathematical Analysis of MathSciNet & MathOverflow
$begingroup$
Is there a website where i could read/download math reviews appeared in the above Journal?
Of course, I guess all the reviews are available on ZBMATH https://zbmath.org/, which is not free for access. Besides, the reviews (before 1990s) on ZBMATH are uploaded as scanned files, not very clear and non-searchable.
reference-request
edited 11 hours ago
user64494
1,555515
asked 15 hours ago
studentstudent
161
New contributor
student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there a website where i could read/download math reviews appeared in the above Journal?
Of course, I guess all the reviews are available on ZBMATH https://zbmath.org/, which is not free for access. Besides, the reviews (before 1990s) on ZBMATH are uploaded as scanned files, not very clear and non-searchable.
reference-request
edited 11 hours ago
user64494
1,555515
asked 15 hours ago
studentstudent
161
New contributor
student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Sorry, zbMATH is free. There are some restrictions for users (see zbmath.org/terms-conditions).
$endgroup$
– user64494
15 hours ago
9
$begingroup$
@user64494 "Free access is limited to 3 results, and filter functions are disabled. For full access subscription is required."
$endgroup$
– student
15 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there a website where i could read/download math reviews appeared in the above Journal?
Of course, I guess all the reviews are available on ZBMATH https://zbmath.org/, which is not free for access. Besides, the reviews (before 1990s) on ZBMATH are uploaded as scanned files, not very clear and non-searchable.
reference-request
edited 11 hours ago
user64494
1,555515
asked 15 hours ago
studentstudent
161
New contributor
student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Is there a website where i could read/download math reviews appeared in the above Journal?
Of course, I guess all the reviews are available on ZBMATH https://zbmath.org/, which is not free for access. Besides, the reviews (before 1990s) on ZBMATH are uploaded as scanned files, not very clear and non-searchable.
reference-request
reference-request
edited 11 hours ago
user64494
1,555515
asked 15 hours ago
studentstudent
161
New contributor
student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 11 hours ago
user64494
1,555515
asked 15 hours ago
studentstudent
161
New contributor
student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 11 hours ago
user64494
1,555515
edited 11 hours ago
user64494
1,555515
edited 11 hours ago
user64494
1,555515
1,555515
asked 15 hours ago
studentstudent
161
New contributor
student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 15 hours ago
studentstudent
161
asked 15 hours ago
studentstudent
161
161
New contributor
student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
$begingroup$
Sorry, zbMATH is free. There are some restrictions for users (see zbmath.org/terms-conditions).
$endgroup$
– user64494
15 hours ago
9
$begingroup$
@user64494 "Free access is limited to 3 results, and filter functions are disabled. For full access subscription is required."
$endgroup$
– student
15 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Sorry, zbMATH is free. There are some restrictions for users (see zbmath.org/terms-conditions).
$endgroup$
– user64494
15 hours ago
9
$begingroup$
@user64494 "Free access is limited to 3 results, and filter functions are disabled. For full access subscription is required."
$endgroup$
– student
15 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Sorry, zbMATH is free. There are some restrictions for users (see zbmath.org/terms-conditions).
$endgroup$
– user64494
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sorry, zbMATH is free. There are some restrictions for users (see zbmath.org/terms-conditions).
$endgroup$
– user64494
15 hours ago
9
9
$begingroup$
@user64494 "Free access is limited to 3 results, and filter functions are disabled. For full access subscription is required."
$endgroup$
– student
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
@user64494 "Free access is limited to 3 results, and filter functions are disabled. For full access subscription is required."
$endgroup$
– student
15 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The site you mention is partially free. Without the subscription it gives you a reduced version. Basically, the reduction consists in giving you only 3 first items
on any search you try to make. If you state your search parameters smartly, you can extract a lot of information using this reduced version. It also gives you author's profiles.Those reviews that they have in TeX are available in pdf. Those which were written
before the spread of TeX are simply scanned. Your complain that they are poorly legible seems strange: how would you imagine old printed texts are converted to electronic formats? Only by scanning. Or do you think someone will hire great armies
of qualified people to put them in TeX, and then distribute them for free?
answered 15 hours ago
Alexandre EremenkoAlexandre Eremenko
50.5k6140257
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
@ Alexandre Eremenko: If the database is sold as "a product", then they could surely improve its quality, say, using more clear files. Some reviews are written by true experts and hence useful to other math workers. Simply uploading non-searchable scanned files greatly reduced its function.
$endgroup$
– student
14 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@student: the ZblMath database is indeed a very useful product. And it was useful also 20 years ago when it existed on paper only, when the only "search feature" was a paper index. Converting old mathematical literature into searchable files will not justify expenses.
$endgroup$
– Alexandre Eremenko
14 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@Alexandre Eremenko it is understandable that ZB simply scanned old stuff, but it is not inconceivable to retype old reviews in LaTeX. For example, MathSciNet has all of its past reviews back to 1940 in TeX format. I don't know if they hired "great armies" to accomplish that task, but obviously it was a substantial investment of time and resources. And ZB is less than 10 years older than Math Reviews. Maybe Ed Dunne will see this post and comment on the different approaches taken by MR and ZB to making old reviews electronically accessible (at least for those with subscriptions).
$endgroup$
– KConrad
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
"non-searchable" is a solved problem, though it is annoyingly hard to apply in practice (there are OCR libraries around, but no "one-click" solutions to my knowledge).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@KConrad MathSciNet is subscription only, and the cost of a subscription is more than $10,000. Aside from that one service, AMS has around 30,000 members with annual typical membership fees over $100. An organization with a multi-million-dollar annual budget can afford to "hire an army" if it feels so inclined. The European Mathematical Society (one of the sponsors of ZBMATH) has one-tenth as many members as AMS, and much smaller subscription fees.
$endgroup$
– alephzero
11 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
student is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f324531%2fmath-reviews-in-zentralblatt-f%25c3%25bcr-mathematik-und-ihre-grenzgebiete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The site you mention is partially free. Without the subscription it gives you a reduced version. Basically, the reduction consists in giving you only 3 first items
on any search you try to make. If you state your search parameters smartly, you can extract a lot of information using this reduced version. It also gives you author's profiles.Those reviews that they have in TeX are available in pdf. Those which were written
before the spread of TeX are simply scanned. Your complain that they are poorly legible seems strange: how would you imagine old printed texts are converted to electronic formats? Only by scanning. Or do you think someone will hire great armies
of qualified people to put them in TeX, and then distribute them for free?
answered 15 hours ago
Alexandre EremenkoAlexandre Eremenko
50.5k6140257
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
@ Alexandre Eremenko: If the database is sold as "a product", then they could surely improve its quality, say, using more clear files. Some reviews are written by true experts and hence useful to other math workers. Simply uploading non-searchable scanned files greatly reduced its function.
$endgroup$
– student
14 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@student: the ZblMath database is indeed a very useful product. And it was useful also 20 years ago when it existed on paper only, when the only "search feature" was a paper index. Converting old mathematical literature into searchable files will not justify expenses.
$endgroup$
– Alexandre Eremenko
14 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@Alexandre Eremenko it is understandable that ZB simply scanned old stuff, but it is not inconceivable to retype old reviews in LaTeX. For example, MathSciNet has all of its past reviews back to 1940 in TeX format. I don't know if they hired "great armies" to accomplish that task, but obviously it was a substantial investment of time and resources. And ZB is less than 10 years older than Math Reviews. Maybe Ed Dunne will see this post and comment on the different approaches taken by MR and ZB to making old reviews electronically accessible (at least for those with subscriptions).
$endgroup$
– KConrad
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
"non-searchable" is a solved problem, though it is annoyingly hard to apply in practice (there are OCR libraries around, but no "one-click" solutions to my knowledge).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@KConrad MathSciNet is subscription only, and the cost of a subscription is more than $10,000. Aside from that one service, AMS has around 30,000 members with annual typical membership fees over $100. An organization with a multi-million-dollar annual budget can afford to "hire an army" if it feels so inclined. The European Mathematical Society (one of the sponsors of ZBMATH) has one-tenth as many members as AMS, and much smaller subscription fees.
$endgroup$
– alephzero
11 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
The site you mention is partially free. Without the subscription it gives you a reduced version. Basically, the reduction consists in giving you only 3 first items
on any search you try to make. If you state your search parameters smartly, you can extract a lot of information using this reduced version. It also gives you author's profiles.Those reviews that they have in TeX are available in pdf. Those which were written
before the spread of TeX are simply scanned. Your complain that they are poorly legible seems strange: how would you imagine old printed texts are converted to electronic formats? Only by scanning. Or do you think someone will hire great armies
of qualified people to put them in TeX, and then distribute them for free?
answered 15 hours ago
Alexandre EremenkoAlexandre Eremenko
50.5k6140257
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
@ Alexandre Eremenko: If the database is sold as "a product", then they could surely improve its quality, say, using more clear files. Some reviews are written by true experts and hence useful to other math workers. Simply uploading non-searchable scanned files greatly reduced its function.
$endgroup$
– student
14 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@student: the ZblMath database is indeed a very useful product. And it was useful also 20 years ago when it existed on paper only, when the only "search feature" was a paper index. Converting old mathematical literature into searchable files will not justify expenses.
$endgroup$
– Alexandre Eremenko
14 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@Alexandre Eremenko it is understandable that ZB simply scanned old stuff, but it is not inconceivable to retype old reviews in LaTeX. For example, MathSciNet has all of its past reviews back to 1940 in TeX format. I don't know if they hired "great armies" to accomplish that task, but obviously it was a substantial investment of time and resources. And ZB is less than 10 years older than Math Reviews. Maybe Ed Dunne will see this post and comment on the different approaches taken by MR and ZB to making old reviews electronically accessible (at least for those with subscriptions).
$endgroup$
– KConrad
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
"non-searchable" is a solved problem, though it is annoyingly hard to apply in practice (there are OCR libraries around, but no "one-click" solutions to my knowledge).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@KConrad MathSciNet is subscription only, and the cost of a subscription is more than $10,000. Aside from that one service, AMS has around 30,000 members with annual typical membership fees over $100. An organization with a multi-million-dollar annual budget can afford to "hire an army" if it feels so inclined. The European Mathematical Society (one of the sponsors of ZBMATH) has one-tenth as many members as AMS, and much smaller subscription fees.
$endgroup$
– alephzero
11 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
The site you mention is partially free. Without the subscription it gives you a reduced version. Basically, the reduction consists in giving you only 3 first items
on any search you try to make. If you state your search parameters smartly, you can extract a lot of information using this reduced version. It also gives you author's profiles.Those reviews that they have in TeX are available in pdf. Those which were written
before the spread of TeX are simply scanned. Your complain that they are poorly legible seems strange: how would you imagine old printed texts are converted to electronic formats? Only by scanning. Or do you think someone will hire great armies
of qualified people to put them in TeX, and then distribute them for free?
answered 15 hours ago
Alexandre EremenkoAlexandre Eremenko
50.5k6140257
$endgroup$
The site you mention is partially free. Without the subscription it gives you a reduced version. Basically, the reduction consists in giving you only 3 first items
on any search you try to make. If you state your search parameters smartly, you can extract a lot of information using this reduced version. It also gives you author's profiles.Those reviews that they have in TeX are available in pdf. Those which were written
before the spread of TeX are simply scanned. Your complain that they are poorly legible seems strange: how would you imagine old printed texts are converted to electronic formats? Only by scanning. Or do you think someone will hire great armies
of qualified people to put them in TeX, and then distribute them for free?
answered 15 hours ago
Alexandre EremenkoAlexandre Eremenko
50.5k6140257
edited 2 hours ago
answered 15 hours ago
Alexandre EremenkoAlexandre Eremenko
50.5k6140257
answered 15 hours ago
Alexandre EremenkoAlexandre Eremenko
50.5k6140257
answered 15 hours ago
Alexandre EremenkoAlexandre Eremenko
50.5k6140257
50.5k6140257
1
$begingroup$
@ Alexandre Eremenko: If the database is sold as "a product", then they could surely improve its quality, say, using more clear files. Some reviews are written by true experts and hence useful to other math workers. Simply uploading non-searchable scanned files greatly reduced its function.
$endgroup$
– student
14 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@student: the ZblMath database is indeed a very useful product. And it was useful also 20 years ago when it existed on paper only, when the only "search feature" was a paper index. Converting old mathematical literature into searchable files will not justify expenses.
$endgroup$
– Alexandre Eremenko
14 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@Alexandre Eremenko it is understandable that ZB simply scanned old stuff, but it is not inconceivable to retype old reviews in LaTeX. For example, MathSciNet has all of its past reviews back to 1940 in TeX format. I don't know if they hired "great armies" to accomplish that task, but obviously it was a substantial investment of time and resources. And ZB is less than 10 years older than Math Reviews. Maybe Ed Dunne will see this post and comment on the different approaches taken by MR and ZB to making old reviews electronically accessible (at least for those with subscriptions).
$endgroup$
– KConrad
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
"non-searchable" is a solved problem, though it is annoyingly hard to apply in practice (there are OCR libraries around, but no "one-click" solutions to my knowledge).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@KConrad MathSciNet is subscription only, and the cost of a subscription is more than $10,000. Aside from that one service, AMS has around 30,000 members with annual typical membership fees over $100. An organization with a multi-million-dollar annual budget can afford to "hire an army" if it feels so inclined. The European Mathematical Society (one of the sponsors of ZBMATH) has one-tenth as many members as AMS, and much smaller subscription fees.
$endgroup$
– alephzero
11 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
1
$begingroup$
@ Alexandre Eremenko: If the database is sold as "a product", then they could surely improve its quality, say, using more clear files. Some reviews are written by true experts and hence useful to other math workers. Simply uploading non-searchable scanned files greatly reduced its function.
$endgroup$
– student
14 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@student: the ZblMath database is indeed a very useful product. And it was useful also 20 years ago when it existed on paper only, when the only "search feature" was a paper index. Converting old mathematical literature into searchable files will not justify expenses.
$endgroup$
– Alexandre Eremenko
14 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@Alexandre Eremenko it is understandable that ZB simply scanned old stuff, but it is not inconceivable to retype old reviews in LaTeX. For example, MathSciNet has all of its past reviews back to 1940 in TeX format. I don't know if they hired "great armies" to accomplish that task, but obviously it was a substantial investment of time and resources. And ZB is less than 10 years older than Math Reviews. Maybe Ed Dunne will see this post and comment on the different approaches taken by MR and ZB to making old reviews electronically accessible (at least for those with subscriptions).
$endgroup$
– KConrad
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
"non-searchable" is a solved problem, though it is annoyingly hard to apply in practice (there are OCR libraries around, but no "one-click" solutions to my knowledge).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@KConrad MathSciNet is subscription only, and the cost of a subscription is more than $10,000. Aside from that one service, AMS has around 30,000 members with annual typical membership fees over $100. An organization with a multi-million-dollar annual budget can afford to "hire an army" if it feels so inclined. The European Mathematical Society (one of the sponsors of ZBMATH) has one-tenth as many members as AMS, and much smaller subscription fees.
$endgroup$
– alephzero
11 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@ Alexandre Eremenko: If the database is sold as "a product", then they could surely improve its quality, say, using more clear files. Some reviews are written by true experts and hence useful to other math workers. Simply uploading non-searchable scanned files greatly reduced its function.
$endgroup$
– student
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ Alexandre Eremenko: If the database is sold as "a product", then they could surely improve its quality, say, using more clear files. Some reviews are written by true experts and hence useful to other math workers. Simply uploading non-searchable scanned files greatly reduced its function.
$endgroup$
– student
14 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
@student: the ZblMath database is indeed a very useful product. And it was useful also 20 years ago when it existed on paper only, when the only "search feature" was a paper index. Converting old mathematical literature into searchable files will not justify expenses.
$endgroup$
– Alexandre Eremenko
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
@student: the ZblMath database is indeed a very useful product. And it was useful also 20 years ago when it existed on paper only, when the only "search feature" was a paper index. Converting old mathematical literature into searchable files will not justify expenses.
$endgroup$
– Alexandre Eremenko
14 hours ago
5
5
$begingroup$
@Alexandre Eremenko it is understandable that ZB simply scanned old stuff, but it is not inconceivable to retype old reviews in LaTeX. For example, MathSciNet has all of its past reviews back to 1940 in TeX format. I don't know if they hired "great armies" to accomplish that task, but obviously it was a substantial investment of time and resources. And ZB is less than 10 years older than Math Reviews. Maybe Ed Dunne will see this post and comment on the different approaches taken by MR and ZB to making old reviews electronically accessible (at least for those with subscriptions).
$endgroup$
– KConrad
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Alexandre Eremenko it is understandable that ZB simply scanned old stuff, but it is not inconceivable to retype old reviews in LaTeX. For example, MathSciNet has all of its past reviews back to 1940 in TeX format. I don't know if they hired "great armies" to accomplish that task, but obviously it was a substantial investment of time and resources. And ZB is less than 10 years older than Math Reviews. Maybe Ed Dunne will see this post and comment on the different approaches taken by MR and ZB to making old reviews electronically accessible (at least for those with subscriptions).
$endgroup$
– KConrad
14 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
"non-searchable" is a solved problem, though it is annoyingly hard to apply in practice (there are OCR libraries around, but no "one-click" solutions to my knowledge).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
"non-searchable" is a solved problem, though it is annoyingly hard to apply in practice (there are OCR libraries around, but no "one-click" solutions to my knowledge).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
11 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@KConrad MathSciNet is subscription only, and the cost of a subscription is more than $10,000. Aside from that one service, AMS has around 30,000 members with annual typical membership fees over $100. An organization with a multi-million-dollar annual budget can afford to "hire an army" if it feels so inclined. The European Mathematical Society (one of the sponsors of ZBMATH) has one-tenth as many members as AMS, and much smaller subscription fees.
$endgroup$
– alephzero
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@KConrad MathSciNet is subscription only, and the cost of a subscription is more than $10,000. Aside from that one service, AMS has around 30,000 members with annual typical membership fees over $100. An organization with a multi-million-dollar annual budget can afford to "hire an army" if it feels so inclined. The European Mathematical Society (one of the sponsors of ZBMATH) has one-tenth as many members as AMS, and much smaller subscription fees.
$endgroup$
– alephzero
11 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
student is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
student is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
student is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
student is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f324531%2fmath-reviews-in-zentralblatt-f%25c3%25bcr-mathematik-und-ihre-grenzgebiete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Sorry, zbMATH is free. There are some restrictions for users (see zbmath.org/terms-conditions).
$endgroup$
– user64494
15 hours ago
9
$begingroup$
@user64494 "Free access is limited to 3 results, and filter functions are disabled. For full access subscription is required."
$endgroup$
– student
15 hours ago