Kdtyjb

Worn-tile Scrabble

What is preventing me from simply constructing a hash that's lower than the current target?

Why was M87 targeted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?

A word that means fill it to the required quantity

Getting crown tickets for Statue of Liberty

Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?

For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?

The phrase "to the numbers born"?

Loose spokes after only a few rides

How much of the clove should I use when using big garlic heads?

Kerning for subscripts of sigma?

How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?

Flight paths in orbit around Ceres?

Straighten subgroup lattice

If I can cast sorceries at instant speed, can I use sorcery-speed activated abilities at instant speed?

What is the most efficient way to store a numeric range?

How come people say “Would of”?

I am an eight letter word. What am I?

How to type a long/em dash `—`

Slides for 30 min~1 hr Skype tenure track application interview

If I score a critical hit on an 18 or higher, what are my chances of getting a critical hit if I roll 3d20?

Do ℕ, mathbb{N}, BbbN, symbb{N} effectively differ, and is there a “canonical” specification of the naturals?

0

Continuing https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/a/22167/, as far as I understand, all the four of ℕ, mathbb{N}, BbbN, symbb{N} work now, and BbbN is advised against. Is there any reasonably default context (e.g., a self-constructed context that would redefine these macros and symbols wouldn't count) in which some of ℕ, mathbb{N}, BbbN, symbb{N} produce different results than some others when using amssymb+unicode-math+{xe|lua}latex? Compiling the example

documentclass{book}

usepackage{fontspec}

usepackage{amssymb}

usepackage{unicode-math}

usepackage{microtype}

setmainfont{TeX Gyre Termes}

setsansfont{TeX Gyre Heros}[Scale=0.88]

setmonofont{TeX Gyre Cursor}

setmathfont{TeX Gyre Termes Math}

setmathfont{Asana Math}[

  range={setminus},

]

setmathfont{XITSMath-Regular}[

  Extension=.otf,

  range={"2A3E},

  BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,

]

begin{document}

(ℕ mathbb{N} BbbN symbb{N})

end{document}

with xelatex, e.g., I get visibly indistinguishable letters

ℕℕℕℕ

Moreover, is there a consensus in the {xe|lua}[La]TeX world to name any of these ways as the standard way to denote the set of natural numbers?

(Of course, I leave aside the question whether the zero should belong to this set or not; it could flame up a war here and is up to the author anyway.)

xetex symbols unicode-math amssymb blackboard

share

asked 1 min ago

user49915user49915

759122

add a comment | 

0

Continuing https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/a/22167/, as far as I understand, all the four of ℕ, mathbb{N}, BbbN, symbb{N} work now, and BbbN is advised against. Is there any reasonably default context (e.g., a self-constructed context that would redefine these macros and symbols wouldn't count) in which some of ℕ, mathbb{N}, BbbN, symbb{N} produce different results than some others when using amssymb+unicode-math+{xe|lua}latex? Compiling the example

documentclass{book}

usepackage{fontspec}

usepackage{amssymb}

usepackage{unicode-math}

usepackage{microtype}

setmainfont{TeX Gyre Termes}

setsansfont{TeX Gyre Heros}[Scale=0.88]

setmonofont{TeX Gyre Cursor}

setmathfont{TeX Gyre Termes Math}

setmathfont{Asana Math}[

  range={setminus},

]

setmathfont{XITSMath-Regular}[

  Extension=.otf,

  range={"2A3E},

  BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,

]

begin{document}

(ℕ mathbb{N} BbbN symbb{N})

end{document}

with xelatex, e.g., I get visibly indistinguishable letters

ℕℕℕℕ

Moreover, is there a consensus in the {xe|lua}[La]TeX world to name any of these ways as the standard way to denote the set of natural numbers?

(Of course, I leave aside the question whether the zero should belong to this set or not; it could flame up a war here and is up to the author anyway.)

xetex symbols unicode-math amssymb blackboard

share

asked 1 min ago

user49915user49915

759122

add a comment | 

Continuing https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/a/22167/, as far as I understand, all the four of ℕ, mathbb{N}, BbbN, symbb{N} work now, and BbbN is advised against. Is there any reasonably default context (e.g., a self-constructed context that would redefine these macros and symbols wouldn't count) in which some of ℕ, mathbb{N}, BbbN, symbb{N} produce different results than some others when using amssymb+unicode-math+{xe|lua}latex? Compiling the example

documentclass{book}

usepackage{fontspec}

usepackage{amssymb}

usepackage{unicode-math}

usepackage{microtype}

setmainfont{TeX Gyre Termes}

setsansfont{TeX Gyre Heros}[Scale=0.88]

setmonofont{TeX Gyre Cursor}

setmathfont{TeX Gyre Termes Math}

setmathfont{Asana Math}[

  range={setminus},

]

setmathfont{XITSMath-Regular}[

  Extension=.otf,

  range={"2A3E},

  BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,

]

begin{document}

(ℕ mathbb{N} BbbN symbb{N})

end{document}

with xelatex, e.g., I get visibly indistinguishable letters

ℕℕℕℕ

Moreover, is there a consensus in the {xe|lua}[La]TeX world to name any of these ways as the standard way to denote the set of natural numbers?

(Of course, I leave aside the question whether the zero should belong to this set or not; it could flame up a war here and is up to the author anyway.)

xetex symbols unicode-math amssymb blackboard

share

asked 1 min ago

user49915user49915

759122

documentclass{book}

usepackage{fontspec}

usepackage{amssymb}

usepackage{unicode-math}

usepackage{microtype}

setmainfont{TeX Gyre Termes}

setsansfont{TeX Gyre Heros}[Scale=0.88]

setmonofont{TeX Gyre Cursor}

setmathfont{TeX Gyre Termes Math}

setmathfont{Asana Math}[

  range={setminus},

]

setmathfont{XITSMath-Regular}[

  Extension=.otf,

  range={"2A3E},

  BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,

]

begin{document}

(ℕ mathbb{N} BbbN symbb{N})

end{document}

share

asked 1 min ago

user49915user49915

759122

share

asked 1 min ago

user49915user49915

759122

asked 1 min ago

user49915user49915

759122

asked 1 min ago

user49915user49915

759122