weren't playing vs didn't playConfusing mixing of tenses 2How to describe a habitual past event?Maise ate /...

At what distance can a bugbear, holding a reach weapon, with the Polearm Master feat, get their Opportunity Attack?

Can Mathematica be used to create an Artistic 3D extrusion from a 2D image and wrap a line pattern around it?

Why is computing ridge regression with a Cholesky decomposition much quicker than using SVD?

Does "Until when" sound natural for native speakers?

How can The Temple of Elementary Evil reliably protect itself against kinetic bombardment?

How to detect if C code (which needs 'extern C') is compiled in C++

PTIJ: Should I kill my computer after installing software?

What is the magic ball of every day?

Bash script should only kill those instances of another script's that it has launched

Does a warlock using the Darkness/Devil's Sight combo still have advantage on ranged attacks against a target outside the Darkness?

Do f-stop and exposure time perfectly cancel?

Are there historical instances of the capital of a colonising country being temporarily or permanently shifted to one of its colonies?

Doesn't allowing a user mode program to access kernel space memory and execute the IN and OUT instructions defeat the purpose of having CPU modes?

Are tamper resistant receptacles really safer?

Do I really need to have a scientific explanation for my premise?

Can I pump my MTB tire to max (55 psi / 380 kPa) without the tube inside bursting?

Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god exists

Examples of a statistic that is not independent of sample's distribution?

How do I express some one as a black person?

What are actual Tesla M60 models used by AWS?

What Happens when Passenger Refuses to Fly Boeing 737 Max?

What problems would a superhuman have whose skin is constantly hot?

Can you reject a postdoc offer after the PI has paid a large sum for flights/accommodation for your visit?

Should I tell my boss the work he did was worthless



weren't playing vs didn't play


Confusing mixing of tenses 2How to describe a habitual past event?Maise ate / had been eating sweets all evening so it was not suprising > she didn't want any supperUsing both past and present tenses in one sentence“had not done” vs “did not do” in a sentenceDidn't or haven't or hadn'tTo play/be playing for Real MadridDifference: “have been” and “was”past continuous or present perfect continuous“Have you known” or “Did you know”?













4
















Did your team win the football match yesterday?







The weather was very bad, so we weren't playing.




vs




The weather was very bad, so we didn't play.




Is the first one not correct? Why is it?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sergey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • You've asked the identical question at EL&U. Unless they are different in some way, one or the other should be closed. (I know you were directed here—so I might close the EL&U question.)

    – Jason Bassford
    6 hours ago













  • I received a comment to answer my question in this webpage!

    – Sergey
    6 hours ago
















4
















Did your team win the football match yesterday?







The weather was very bad, so we weren't playing.




vs




The weather was very bad, so we didn't play.




Is the first one not correct? Why is it?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sergey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • You've asked the identical question at EL&U. Unless they are different in some way, one or the other should be closed. (I know you were directed here—so I might close the EL&U question.)

    – Jason Bassford
    6 hours ago













  • I received a comment to answer my question in this webpage!

    – Sergey
    6 hours ago














4












4








4


1







Did your team win the football match yesterday?







The weather was very bad, so we weren't playing.




vs




The weather was very bad, so we didn't play.




Is the first one not correct? Why is it?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sergey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













Did your team win the football match yesterday?







The weather was very bad, so we weren't playing.




vs




The weather was very bad, so we didn't play.




Is the first one not correct? Why is it?







tense past-tense past-simple idiomatic-language past-continuous






share|improve this question









New contributor




Sergey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Sergey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago









SamBC

10.4k1437




10.4k1437






New contributor




Sergey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 7 hours ago









SergeySergey

211




211




New contributor




Sergey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Sergey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Sergey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • You've asked the identical question at EL&U. Unless they are different in some way, one or the other should be closed. (I know you were directed here—so I might close the EL&U question.)

    – Jason Bassford
    6 hours ago













  • I received a comment to answer my question in this webpage!

    – Sergey
    6 hours ago



















  • You've asked the identical question at EL&U. Unless they are different in some way, one or the other should be closed. (I know you were directed here—so I might close the EL&U question.)

    – Jason Bassford
    6 hours ago













  • I received a comment to answer my question in this webpage!

    – Sergey
    6 hours ago

















You've asked the identical question at EL&U. Unless they are different in some way, one or the other should be closed. (I know you were directed here—so I might close the EL&U question.)

– Jason Bassford
6 hours ago







You've asked the identical question at EL&U. Unless they are different in some way, one or the other should be closed. (I know you were directed here—so I might close the EL&U question.)

– Jason Bassford
6 hours ago















I received a comment to answer my question in this webpage!

– Sergey
6 hours ago





I received a comment to answer my question in this webpage!

– Sergey
6 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















9














Okay, so this is a very specific answer to a very specific question. In this specific case, where there are sports teams involved, there's actually a difference in how I, as a native speaker of British English, understand those terms.




We weren't playing.




This means that the team wasn't scheduled to play. So, in the case of the weather, you might say:




The weather was very bad, but we weren't playing anyway so it didn't really matter.




On the other hand, we have the meaning you want in the other option:




We didn't play.




That means that you didn't play. Playing was not done by you. For any reason, you didn't play. In certain contexts, it might have been that you were supposed to play but didn't, or it could mean you were never scheduled. Thus we get to your example sentence:




The weather was very bad, so we didn't play.




This means what you want - you were supposed to be playing, but the weather was bad so you didn't.



Now, the fact you have the so in the weren't playing example means that native speakers will understand what you meant. You've indicated a causal link between the two statements, and thus you must mean that you had been intending to play and then didn't. However, it's more idiomatic, in my experience, to use we didn't play in that situation.



I've no idea if this is unique to British English or not.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    As an American, I agree that "...so we didn't play" is more idiomatic, and what I'd probably say.

    – Mixolydian
    6 hours ago











  • So, this example is more idiomatic than grammar question, is it?

    – Sergey
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    Like I said, this is a very specific answer to your question. The answer to questions like this in English often depend on what you're talking about, and you'll get different answers depending on the activity and actors involved. So for any other activity than a game being cancelled, the answer can be different.

    – SamBC
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    The weather was very bad, so we were reading a book at home. The weather was very bad, so we didn't go out. The weather was very bad, so we were going to bed. The weather was very bad, so we didn't hear about it. The weather was very nice, so we weren't reading the book. Are here some mistakes or inaccuracies?

    – Sergey
    6 hours ago








  • 2





    To me (native American English speaker), "weren't X-ing" implies that not only did you not "X", you hadn't intended to. So for example, "we weren't drinking (because we were planning to drive)" vs "we didn't drink (because they were out of beer)". It's not perfect because sometimes you're just using a very specific verb tense. e.g. "Did you throw rocks?" In this case, "We weren't throwing rocks" and "We didn't throw rocks" are pretty much the same. You'd probably answer to match the original question- "Were you throwing rocks?" vs "Did you throw rocks?".

    – Scott
    5 hours ago





















0














Complementing the British English perspective provided by SamBC, here's an American English perspective (more specifically Midwestern American English).





There's a slight linguistic difference between the two forms. 'Did not play.' uses the past tense of 'to do', while 'Were not playing' uses the past tense of 'to be'. In many cases in casual English, there is little semantic difference between these two verbs other than making sure the rest of the sentence has the correct structure ('do' always1 pairs with a present tense verb, 'be' always1 pairs with an infinitive form).



Idiomatically, in informal American English, the two example responses are mostly interchangeable.



In formal American English, however, there is a potentially important difference.



In formal usage, the first example expresses through the use of 'were' that at a specific time in the past, the act of 'playing' was not being carried out by the group of people referred to by the pronoun 'we'. In contrast, the second example expresses through the use of 'did' that a specific past instance of the act of 'playing' was not carried out by the group of people referred to by the pronoun 'we'.



This difference leads in turn to most of what dictates preference in American English for which form (using 'were' or 'did') 'sounds' right, independent of whether it's formal or informal usage. In your particular case, the second form ('we didn't even play') is what most native speakers here in the US would pick when responding to the question, because the question is asking about a specific event. For the same reason, the first example, sounds a bit odd, at least by Midwestern standards of American English.



For what it's worth, you can blame this peculiarity of English on it's roots in Old French. Other Germanic languages use a single form for both meanings (without a couplar verb such as 'be' or 'do'), instead inferring this differentiation from context.





1 'Always', of course, having the usual 'almost all the time except when dealing with a small handful of truly random words that no sane person should have to remember' meaning that it typically does when discussing the English language.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "481"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Sergey is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200175%2fwerent-playing-vs-didnt-play%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    9














    Okay, so this is a very specific answer to a very specific question. In this specific case, where there are sports teams involved, there's actually a difference in how I, as a native speaker of British English, understand those terms.




    We weren't playing.




    This means that the team wasn't scheduled to play. So, in the case of the weather, you might say:




    The weather was very bad, but we weren't playing anyway so it didn't really matter.




    On the other hand, we have the meaning you want in the other option:




    We didn't play.




    That means that you didn't play. Playing was not done by you. For any reason, you didn't play. In certain contexts, it might have been that you were supposed to play but didn't, or it could mean you were never scheduled. Thus we get to your example sentence:




    The weather was very bad, so we didn't play.




    This means what you want - you were supposed to be playing, but the weather was bad so you didn't.



    Now, the fact you have the so in the weren't playing example means that native speakers will understand what you meant. You've indicated a causal link between the two statements, and thus you must mean that you had been intending to play and then didn't. However, it's more idiomatic, in my experience, to use we didn't play in that situation.



    I've no idea if this is unique to British English or not.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      As an American, I agree that "...so we didn't play" is more idiomatic, and what I'd probably say.

      – Mixolydian
      6 hours ago











    • So, this example is more idiomatic than grammar question, is it?

      – Sergey
      6 hours ago






    • 2





      Like I said, this is a very specific answer to your question. The answer to questions like this in English often depend on what you're talking about, and you'll get different answers depending on the activity and actors involved. So for any other activity than a game being cancelled, the answer can be different.

      – SamBC
      6 hours ago






    • 1





      The weather was very bad, so we were reading a book at home. The weather was very bad, so we didn't go out. The weather was very bad, so we were going to bed. The weather was very bad, so we didn't hear about it. The weather was very nice, so we weren't reading the book. Are here some mistakes or inaccuracies?

      – Sergey
      6 hours ago








    • 2





      To me (native American English speaker), "weren't X-ing" implies that not only did you not "X", you hadn't intended to. So for example, "we weren't drinking (because we were planning to drive)" vs "we didn't drink (because they were out of beer)". It's not perfect because sometimes you're just using a very specific verb tense. e.g. "Did you throw rocks?" In this case, "We weren't throwing rocks" and "We didn't throw rocks" are pretty much the same. You'd probably answer to match the original question- "Were you throwing rocks?" vs "Did you throw rocks?".

      – Scott
      5 hours ago


















    9














    Okay, so this is a very specific answer to a very specific question. In this specific case, where there are sports teams involved, there's actually a difference in how I, as a native speaker of British English, understand those terms.




    We weren't playing.




    This means that the team wasn't scheduled to play. So, in the case of the weather, you might say:




    The weather was very bad, but we weren't playing anyway so it didn't really matter.




    On the other hand, we have the meaning you want in the other option:




    We didn't play.




    That means that you didn't play. Playing was not done by you. For any reason, you didn't play. In certain contexts, it might have been that you were supposed to play but didn't, or it could mean you were never scheduled. Thus we get to your example sentence:




    The weather was very bad, so we didn't play.




    This means what you want - you were supposed to be playing, but the weather was bad so you didn't.



    Now, the fact you have the so in the weren't playing example means that native speakers will understand what you meant. You've indicated a causal link between the two statements, and thus you must mean that you had been intending to play and then didn't. However, it's more idiomatic, in my experience, to use we didn't play in that situation.



    I've no idea if this is unique to British English or not.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      As an American, I agree that "...so we didn't play" is more idiomatic, and what I'd probably say.

      – Mixolydian
      6 hours ago











    • So, this example is more idiomatic than grammar question, is it?

      – Sergey
      6 hours ago






    • 2





      Like I said, this is a very specific answer to your question. The answer to questions like this in English often depend on what you're talking about, and you'll get different answers depending on the activity and actors involved. So for any other activity than a game being cancelled, the answer can be different.

      – SamBC
      6 hours ago






    • 1





      The weather was very bad, so we were reading a book at home. The weather was very bad, so we didn't go out. The weather was very bad, so we were going to bed. The weather was very bad, so we didn't hear about it. The weather was very nice, so we weren't reading the book. Are here some mistakes or inaccuracies?

      – Sergey
      6 hours ago








    • 2





      To me (native American English speaker), "weren't X-ing" implies that not only did you not "X", you hadn't intended to. So for example, "we weren't drinking (because we were planning to drive)" vs "we didn't drink (because they were out of beer)". It's not perfect because sometimes you're just using a very specific verb tense. e.g. "Did you throw rocks?" In this case, "We weren't throwing rocks" and "We didn't throw rocks" are pretty much the same. You'd probably answer to match the original question- "Were you throwing rocks?" vs "Did you throw rocks?".

      – Scott
      5 hours ago
















    9












    9








    9







    Okay, so this is a very specific answer to a very specific question. In this specific case, where there are sports teams involved, there's actually a difference in how I, as a native speaker of British English, understand those terms.




    We weren't playing.




    This means that the team wasn't scheduled to play. So, in the case of the weather, you might say:




    The weather was very bad, but we weren't playing anyway so it didn't really matter.




    On the other hand, we have the meaning you want in the other option:




    We didn't play.




    That means that you didn't play. Playing was not done by you. For any reason, you didn't play. In certain contexts, it might have been that you were supposed to play but didn't, or it could mean you were never scheduled. Thus we get to your example sentence:




    The weather was very bad, so we didn't play.




    This means what you want - you were supposed to be playing, but the weather was bad so you didn't.



    Now, the fact you have the so in the weren't playing example means that native speakers will understand what you meant. You've indicated a causal link between the two statements, and thus you must mean that you had been intending to play and then didn't. However, it's more idiomatic, in my experience, to use we didn't play in that situation.



    I've no idea if this is unique to British English or not.






    share|improve this answer













    Okay, so this is a very specific answer to a very specific question. In this specific case, where there are sports teams involved, there's actually a difference in how I, as a native speaker of British English, understand those terms.




    We weren't playing.




    This means that the team wasn't scheduled to play. So, in the case of the weather, you might say:




    The weather was very bad, but we weren't playing anyway so it didn't really matter.




    On the other hand, we have the meaning you want in the other option:




    We didn't play.




    That means that you didn't play. Playing was not done by you. For any reason, you didn't play. In certain contexts, it might have been that you were supposed to play but didn't, or it could mean you were never scheduled. Thus we get to your example sentence:




    The weather was very bad, so we didn't play.




    This means what you want - you were supposed to be playing, but the weather was bad so you didn't.



    Now, the fact you have the so in the weren't playing example means that native speakers will understand what you meant. You've indicated a causal link between the two statements, and thus you must mean that you had been intending to play and then didn't. However, it's more idiomatic, in my experience, to use we didn't play in that situation.



    I've no idea if this is unique to British English or not.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 7 hours ago









    SamBCSamBC

    10.4k1437




    10.4k1437








    • 1





      As an American, I agree that "...so we didn't play" is more idiomatic, and what I'd probably say.

      – Mixolydian
      6 hours ago











    • So, this example is more idiomatic than grammar question, is it?

      – Sergey
      6 hours ago






    • 2





      Like I said, this is a very specific answer to your question. The answer to questions like this in English often depend on what you're talking about, and you'll get different answers depending on the activity and actors involved. So for any other activity than a game being cancelled, the answer can be different.

      – SamBC
      6 hours ago






    • 1





      The weather was very bad, so we were reading a book at home. The weather was very bad, so we didn't go out. The weather was very bad, so we were going to bed. The weather was very bad, so we didn't hear about it. The weather was very nice, so we weren't reading the book. Are here some mistakes or inaccuracies?

      – Sergey
      6 hours ago








    • 2





      To me (native American English speaker), "weren't X-ing" implies that not only did you not "X", you hadn't intended to. So for example, "we weren't drinking (because we were planning to drive)" vs "we didn't drink (because they were out of beer)". It's not perfect because sometimes you're just using a very specific verb tense. e.g. "Did you throw rocks?" In this case, "We weren't throwing rocks" and "We didn't throw rocks" are pretty much the same. You'd probably answer to match the original question- "Were you throwing rocks?" vs "Did you throw rocks?".

      – Scott
      5 hours ago
















    • 1





      As an American, I agree that "...so we didn't play" is more idiomatic, and what I'd probably say.

      – Mixolydian
      6 hours ago











    • So, this example is more idiomatic than grammar question, is it?

      – Sergey
      6 hours ago






    • 2





      Like I said, this is a very specific answer to your question. The answer to questions like this in English often depend on what you're talking about, and you'll get different answers depending on the activity and actors involved. So for any other activity than a game being cancelled, the answer can be different.

      – SamBC
      6 hours ago






    • 1





      The weather was very bad, so we were reading a book at home. The weather was very bad, so we didn't go out. The weather was very bad, so we were going to bed. The weather was very bad, so we didn't hear about it. The weather was very nice, so we weren't reading the book. Are here some mistakes or inaccuracies?

      – Sergey
      6 hours ago








    • 2





      To me (native American English speaker), "weren't X-ing" implies that not only did you not "X", you hadn't intended to. So for example, "we weren't drinking (because we were planning to drive)" vs "we didn't drink (because they were out of beer)". It's not perfect because sometimes you're just using a very specific verb tense. e.g. "Did you throw rocks?" In this case, "We weren't throwing rocks" and "We didn't throw rocks" are pretty much the same. You'd probably answer to match the original question- "Were you throwing rocks?" vs "Did you throw rocks?".

      – Scott
      5 hours ago










    1




    1





    As an American, I agree that "...so we didn't play" is more idiomatic, and what I'd probably say.

    – Mixolydian
    6 hours ago





    As an American, I agree that "...so we didn't play" is more idiomatic, and what I'd probably say.

    – Mixolydian
    6 hours ago













    So, this example is more idiomatic than grammar question, is it?

    – Sergey
    6 hours ago





    So, this example is more idiomatic than grammar question, is it?

    – Sergey
    6 hours ago




    2




    2





    Like I said, this is a very specific answer to your question. The answer to questions like this in English often depend on what you're talking about, and you'll get different answers depending on the activity and actors involved. So for any other activity than a game being cancelled, the answer can be different.

    – SamBC
    6 hours ago





    Like I said, this is a very specific answer to your question. The answer to questions like this in English often depend on what you're talking about, and you'll get different answers depending on the activity and actors involved. So for any other activity than a game being cancelled, the answer can be different.

    – SamBC
    6 hours ago




    1




    1





    The weather was very bad, so we were reading a book at home. The weather was very bad, so we didn't go out. The weather was very bad, so we were going to bed. The weather was very bad, so we didn't hear about it. The weather was very nice, so we weren't reading the book. Are here some mistakes or inaccuracies?

    – Sergey
    6 hours ago







    The weather was very bad, so we were reading a book at home. The weather was very bad, so we didn't go out. The weather was very bad, so we were going to bed. The weather was very bad, so we didn't hear about it. The weather was very nice, so we weren't reading the book. Are here some mistakes or inaccuracies?

    – Sergey
    6 hours ago






    2




    2





    To me (native American English speaker), "weren't X-ing" implies that not only did you not "X", you hadn't intended to. So for example, "we weren't drinking (because we were planning to drive)" vs "we didn't drink (because they were out of beer)". It's not perfect because sometimes you're just using a very specific verb tense. e.g. "Did you throw rocks?" In this case, "We weren't throwing rocks" and "We didn't throw rocks" are pretty much the same. You'd probably answer to match the original question- "Were you throwing rocks?" vs "Did you throw rocks?".

    – Scott
    5 hours ago







    To me (native American English speaker), "weren't X-ing" implies that not only did you not "X", you hadn't intended to. So for example, "we weren't drinking (because we were planning to drive)" vs "we didn't drink (because they were out of beer)". It's not perfect because sometimes you're just using a very specific verb tense. e.g. "Did you throw rocks?" In this case, "We weren't throwing rocks" and "We didn't throw rocks" are pretty much the same. You'd probably answer to match the original question- "Were you throwing rocks?" vs "Did you throw rocks?".

    – Scott
    5 hours ago















    0














    Complementing the British English perspective provided by SamBC, here's an American English perspective (more specifically Midwestern American English).





    There's a slight linguistic difference between the two forms. 'Did not play.' uses the past tense of 'to do', while 'Were not playing' uses the past tense of 'to be'. In many cases in casual English, there is little semantic difference between these two verbs other than making sure the rest of the sentence has the correct structure ('do' always1 pairs with a present tense verb, 'be' always1 pairs with an infinitive form).



    Idiomatically, in informal American English, the two example responses are mostly interchangeable.



    In formal American English, however, there is a potentially important difference.



    In formal usage, the first example expresses through the use of 'were' that at a specific time in the past, the act of 'playing' was not being carried out by the group of people referred to by the pronoun 'we'. In contrast, the second example expresses through the use of 'did' that a specific past instance of the act of 'playing' was not carried out by the group of people referred to by the pronoun 'we'.



    This difference leads in turn to most of what dictates preference in American English for which form (using 'were' or 'did') 'sounds' right, independent of whether it's formal or informal usage. In your particular case, the second form ('we didn't even play') is what most native speakers here in the US would pick when responding to the question, because the question is asking about a specific event. For the same reason, the first example, sounds a bit odd, at least by Midwestern standards of American English.



    For what it's worth, you can blame this peculiarity of English on it's roots in Old French. Other Germanic languages use a single form for both meanings (without a couplar verb such as 'be' or 'do'), instead inferring this differentiation from context.





    1 'Always', of course, having the usual 'almost all the time except when dealing with a small handful of truly random words that no sane person should have to remember' meaning that it typically does when discussing the English language.






    share|improve this answer




























      0














      Complementing the British English perspective provided by SamBC, here's an American English perspective (more specifically Midwestern American English).





      There's a slight linguistic difference between the two forms. 'Did not play.' uses the past tense of 'to do', while 'Were not playing' uses the past tense of 'to be'. In many cases in casual English, there is little semantic difference between these two verbs other than making sure the rest of the sentence has the correct structure ('do' always1 pairs with a present tense verb, 'be' always1 pairs with an infinitive form).



      Idiomatically, in informal American English, the two example responses are mostly interchangeable.



      In formal American English, however, there is a potentially important difference.



      In formal usage, the first example expresses through the use of 'were' that at a specific time in the past, the act of 'playing' was not being carried out by the group of people referred to by the pronoun 'we'. In contrast, the second example expresses through the use of 'did' that a specific past instance of the act of 'playing' was not carried out by the group of people referred to by the pronoun 'we'.



      This difference leads in turn to most of what dictates preference in American English for which form (using 'were' or 'did') 'sounds' right, independent of whether it's formal or informal usage. In your particular case, the second form ('we didn't even play') is what most native speakers here in the US would pick when responding to the question, because the question is asking about a specific event. For the same reason, the first example, sounds a bit odd, at least by Midwestern standards of American English.



      For what it's worth, you can blame this peculiarity of English on it's roots in Old French. Other Germanic languages use a single form for both meanings (without a couplar verb such as 'be' or 'do'), instead inferring this differentiation from context.





      1 'Always', of course, having the usual 'almost all the time except when dealing with a small handful of truly random words that no sane person should have to remember' meaning that it typically does when discussing the English language.






      share|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0







        Complementing the British English perspective provided by SamBC, here's an American English perspective (more specifically Midwestern American English).





        There's a slight linguistic difference between the two forms. 'Did not play.' uses the past tense of 'to do', while 'Were not playing' uses the past tense of 'to be'. In many cases in casual English, there is little semantic difference between these two verbs other than making sure the rest of the sentence has the correct structure ('do' always1 pairs with a present tense verb, 'be' always1 pairs with an infinitive form).



        Idiomatically, in informal American English, the two example responses are mostly interchangeable.



        In formal American English, however, there is a potentially important difference.



        In formal usage, the first example expresses through the use of 'were' that at a specific time in the past, the act of 'playing' was not being carried out by the group of people referred to by the pronoun 'we'. In contrast, the second example expresses through the use of 'did' that a specific past instance of the act of 'playing' was not carried out by the group of people referred to by the pronoun 'we'.



        This difference leads in turn to most of what dictates preference in American English for which form (using 'were' or 'did') 'sounds' right, independent of whether it's formal or informal usage. In your particular case, the second form ('we didn't even play') is what most native speakers here in the US would pick when responding to the question, because the question is asking about a specific event. For the same reason, the first example, sounds a bit odd, at least by Midwestern standards of American English.



        For what it's worth, you can blame this peculiarity of English on it's roots in Old French. Other Germanic languages use a single form for both meanings (without a couplar verb such as 'be' or 'do'), instead inferring this differentiation from context.





        1 'Always', of course, having the usual 'almost all the time except when dealing with a small handful of truly random words that no sane person should have to remember' meaning that it typically does when discussing the English language.






        share|improve this answer













        Complementing the British English perspective provided by SamBC, here's an American English perspective (more specifically Midwestern American English).





        There's a slight linguistic difference between the two forms. 'Did not play.' uses the past tense of 'to do', while 'Were not playing' uses the past tense of 'to be'. In many cases in casual English, there is little semantic difference between these two verbs other than making sure the rest of the sentence has the correct structure ('do' always1 pairs with a present tense verb, 'be' always1 pairs with an infinitive form).



        Idiomatically, in informal American English, the two example responses are mostly interchangeable.



        In formal American English, however, there is a potentially important difference.



        In formal usage, the first example expresses through the use of 'were' that at a specific time in the past, the act of 'playing' was not being carried out by the group of people referred to by the pronoun 'we'. In contrast, the second example expresses through the use of 'did' that a specific past instance of the act of 'playing' was not carried out by the group of people referred to by the pronoun 'we'.



        This difference leads in turn to most of what dictates preference in American English for which form (using 'were' or 'did') 'sounds' right, independent of whether it's formal or informal usage. In your particular case, the second form ('we didn't even play') is what most native speakers here in the US would pick when responding to the question, because the question is asking about a specific event. For the same reason, the first example, sounds a bit odd, at least by Midwestern standards of American English.



        For what it's worth, you can blame this peculiarity of English on it's roots in Old French. Other Germanic languages use a single form for both meanings (without a couplar verb such as 'be' or 'do'), instead inferring this differentiation from context.





        1 'Always', of course, having the usual 'almost all the time except when dealing with a small handful of truly random words that no sane person should have to remember' meaning that it typically does when discussing the English language.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 3 hours ago









        Austin HemmelgarnAustin Hemmelgarn

        1674




        1674






















            Sergey is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Sergey is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Sergey is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Sergey is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200175%2fwerent-playing-vs-didnt-play%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            El tren de la libertad Índice Antecedentes "Porque yo decido" Desarrollo de la...

            Castillo d'Acher Características Menú de navegación

            Puerta de Hutt Referencias Enlaces externos Menú de navegación15°58′00″S 5°42′00″O /...