LaTeX adjusting sum limitsHow can I force the argument of a summation to not be offsetBig sum instead of...
How do I express some one as a black person?
Why doesn't this Google Translate ad use the word "Translation" instead of "Translate"?
Single word request: Harming the benefactor
Good for you! in Russian
Is "conspicuously missing" or "conspicuously" the subject of this sentence?
Difference on montgomery curve equation between EFD and RFC7748
weren't playing vs didn't play
List elements digit difference sort
What Happens when Passenger Refuses to Fly Boeing 737 Max?
How is the wildcard * interpreted as a command?
Do items de-spawn in Diablo?
Declaring and defining template, and specialising them
Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god exists
Why the color red for the Republican Party
Accountant/ lawyer will not return my call
They call me Inspector Morse
Vocabulary for giving just numbers, not a full answer
PTIJ: wiping amalek’s memory?
'The literal of type int is out of range' con número enteros pequeños (2 dígitos)
Can I pump my MTB tire to max (55 psi / 380 kPa) without the tube inside bursting?
How to detect if C code (which needs 'extern C') is compiled in C++
When a wind turbine does not produce enough electricity how does the power company compensate for the loss?
Database Backup for data and log files
Should I tell my boss the work he did was worthless
LaTeX adjusting sum limits
How can I force the argument of a summation to not be offsetBig sum instead of small sum in array environmentsum-like command with subscripts both below and next to itLimits under multiple sumFormula in displaystyle but operator limit in normal subscript positionProblems while displaying sum limits belowsum not properly displayed?How to write the limits under all three summation : $sum sum sum_{0 leq i < j <kleq n} 1$How to define ReDeclareLargeMathOperatorPlacement of limitsPosition the limits of SumLower and Upper LimitsHow to create an expectation symbol that behave similarly to sum?
is there a way to show sum limits partially in inline mode and partially in display mode? i.e., I want to write
begin{equation}
sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty} [...]
end{equation}
but this way the lower limit is too wide, and I don't like it. So I was hoping to write something like this:
begin{equation}
sum_{-infty}^{+infty}nolimits_{n} [...]
end{equation}
to write the index n on the right side of the sum symbol, while the limits of the summation remain above and below.
Of course it doesn't work, LaTeX is pissed because there is a double subscript. Anyone knows if it's possible to do what I want to?
math-operators
edited Jan 5 '13 at 12:57
mafp
14.5k252100
asked Jan 4 '13 at 2:27
gbasogbaso
181126
migrated from stackoverflow.com Jan 5 '13 at 12:45
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
add a comment |
is there a way to show sum limits partially in inline mode and partially in display mode? i.e., I want to write
begin{equation}
sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty} [...]
end{equation}
but this way the lower limit is too wide, and I don't like it. So I was hoping to write something like this:
begin{equation}
sum_{-infty}^{+infty}nolimits_{n} [...]
end{equation}
to write the index n on the right side of the sum symbol, while the limits of the summation remain above and below.
Of course it doesn't work, LaTeX is pissed because there is a double subscript. Anyone knows if it's possible to do what I want to?
math-operators
edited Jan 5 '13 at 12:57
mafp
14.5k252100
asked Jan 4 '13 at 2:27
gbasogbaso
181126
migrated from stackoverflow.com Jan 5 '13 at 12:45
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
add a comment |
is there a way to show sum limits partially in inline mode and partially in display mode? i.e., I want to write
begin{equation}
sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty} [...]
end{equation}
but this way the lower limit is too wide, and I don't like it. So I was hoping to write something like this:
begin{equation}
sum_{-infty}^{+infty}nolimits_{n} [...]
end{equation}
to write the index n on the right side of the sum symbol, while the limits of the summation remain above and below.
Of course it doesn't work, LaTeX is pissed because there is a double subscript. Anyone knows if it's possible to do what I want to?
math-operators
edited Jan 5 '13 at 12:57
mafp
14.5k252100
asked Jan 4 '13 at 2:27
gbasogbaso
181126
is there a way to show sum limits partially in inline mode and partially in display mode? i.e., I want to write
begin{equation}
sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty} [...]
end{equation}
but this way the lower limit is too wide, and I don't like it. So I was hoping to write something like this:
begin{equation}
sum_{-infty}^{+infty}nolimits_{n} [...]
end{equation}
to write the index n on the right side of the sum symbol, while the limits of the summation remain above and below.
Of course it doesn't work, LaTeX is pissed because there is a double subscript. Anyone knows if it's possible to do what I want to?
math-operators
math-operators
edited Jan 5 '13 at 12:57
mafp
14.5k252100
asked Jan 4 '13 at 2:27
gbasogbaso
181126
edited Jan 5 '13 at 12:57
mafp
14.5k252100
asked Jan 4 '13 at 2:27
gbasogbaso
181126
edited Jan 5 '13 at 12:57
mafp
14.5k252100
edited Jan 5 '13 at 12:57
mafp
14.5k252100
edited Jan 5 '13 at 12:57
mafp
14.5k252100
14.5k252100
asked Jan 4 '13 at 2:27
gbasogbaso
181126
asked Jan 4 '13 at 2:27
gbasogbaso
181126
asked Jan 4 '13 at 2:27
gbasogbaso
181126
181126
migrated from stackoverflow.com Jan 5 '13 at 12:45
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
migrated from stackoverflow.com Jan 5 '13 at 12:45
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
In this instance a better approach would be to use mathtools's mathclap, which provides a centred overlap in math mode. The centred overlap implies a zero-width box containing stuff that overlaps on the left and right:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}% http://ctan.org/pkg/mathtools
begin{document}
begin{align*}
A &= sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty} f(x) \
B &= smashoperator[r]{sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty}} f(x) \
C &= sum_{mathclap{n=-infty}}^{+infty} f(x) \
D &= sum_{substack{n={}\-infty}}^{+infty} f(x) \
E &= sum_{-infty}^{infty}mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} f(x)
end{align*}
end{document}
Sure mathtools also loads amsmath, but both these provide excellent tools in terms of typesetting mathematical content (and otherwise).
To add multiple things under a math operator (like sum), see How do you put multiple things under a limit?, which suggests substack (as I've done in the last horrible visual).
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36
Community♦
1
answered Jan 4 '13 at 3:21
WernerWerner
447k699891695
1
If you asked me, I vote for option no. 2.
– yo'
Jan 5 '13 at 13:13
Thank you. I am looking for something like point E., but with prod, not sum. When I tried copying using mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} it did not look so good. How would you do it with prod?
– user119615
Feb 9 '17 at 12:09
add a comment |
I was looking for this nice work, and I wanna add something you may find it good. Try to use displaystyle in any equation to see how nice it is. For example, write the sum with down limits only:
$displaystyle sum_{n=1} f(x)$.
Good luck
answered 1 hour ago
MathGuyMathGuy
11
New contributor
MathGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This could be a comment instead.
– zyy
7 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f89447%2flatex-adjusting-sum-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In this instance a better approach would be to use mathtools's mathclap, which provides a centred overlap in math mode. The centred overlap implies a zero-width box containing stuff that overlaps on the left and right:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}% http://ctan.org/pkg/mathtools
begin{document}
begin{align*}
A &= sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty} f(x) \
B &= smashoperator[r]{sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty}} f(x) \
C &= sum_{mathclap{n=-infty}}^{+infty} f(x) \
D &= sum_{substack{n={}\-infty}}^{+infty} f(x) \
E &= sum_{-infty}^{infty}mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} f(x)
end{align*}
end{document}
Sure mathtools also loads amsmath, but both these provide excellent tools in terms of typesetting mathematical content (and otherwise).
To add multiple things under a math operator (like sum), see How do you put multiple things under a limit?, which suggests substack (as I've done in the last horrible visual).
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36
Community♦
1
answered Jan 4 '13 at 3:21
WernerWerner
447k699891695
1
If you asked me, I vote for option no. 2.
– yo'
Jan 5 '13 at 13:13
Thank you. I am looking for something like point E., but with prod, not sum. When I tried copying using mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} it did not look so good. How would you do it with prod?
– user119615
Feb 9 '17 at 12:09
add a comment |
In this instance a better approach would be to use mathtools's mathclap, which provides a centred overlap in math mode. The centred overlap implies a zero-width box containing stuff that overlaps on the left and right:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}% http://ctan.org/pkg/mathtools
begin{document}
begin{align*}
A &= sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty} f(x) \
B &= smashoperator[r]{sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty}} f(x) \
C &= sum_{mathclap{n=-infty}}^{+infty} f(x) \
D &= sum_{substack{n={}\-infty}}^{+infty} f(x) \
E &= sum_{-infty}^{infty}mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} f(x)
end{align*}
end{document}
Sure mathtools also loads amsmath, but both these provide excellent tools in terms of typesetting mathematical content (and otherwise).
To add multiple things under a math operator (like sum), see How do you put multiple things under a limit?, which suggests substack (as I've done in the last horrible visual).
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36
Community♦
1
answered Jan 4 '13 at 3:21
WernerWerner
447k699891695
1
If you asked me, I vote for option no. 2.
– yo'
Jan 5 '13 at 13:13
Thank you. I am looking for something like point E., but with prod, not sum. When I tried copying using mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} it did not look so good. How would you do it with prod?
– user119615
Feb 9 '17 at 12:09
add a comment |
In this instance a better approach would be to use mathtools's mathclap, which provides a centred overlap in math mode. The centred overlap implies a zero-width box containing stuff that overlaps on the left and right:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}% http://ctan.org/pkg/mathtools
begin{document}
begin{align*}
A &= sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty} f(x) \
B &= smashoperator[r]{sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty}} f(x) \
C &= sum_{mathclap{n=-infty}}^{+infty} f(x) \
D &= sum_{substack{n={}\-infty}}^{+infty} f(x) \
E &= sum_{-infty}^{infty}mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} f(x)
end{align*}
end{document}
Sure mathtools also loads amsmath, but both these provide excellent tools in terms of typesetting mathematical content (and otherwise).
To add multiple things under a math operator (like sum), see How do you put multiple things under a limit?, which suggests substack (as I've done in the last horrible visual).
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36
Community♦
1
answered Jan 4 '13 at 3:21
WernerWerner
447k699891695
In this instance a better approach would be to use mathtools's mathclap, which provides a centred overlap in math mode. The centred overlap implies a zero-width box containing stuff that overlaps on the left and right:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}% http://ctan.org/pkg/mathtools
begin{document}
begin{align*}
A &= sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty} f(x) \
B &= smashoperator[r]{sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty}} f(x) \
C &= sum_{mathclap{n=-infty}}^{+infty} f(x) \
D &= sum_{substack{n={}\-infty}}^{+infty} f(x) \
E &= sum_{-infty}^{infty}mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} f(x)
end{align*}
end{document}
Sure mathtools also loads amsmath, but both these provide excellent tools in terms of typesetting mathematical content (and otherwise).
To add multiple things under a math operator (like sum), see How do you put multiple things under a limit?, which suggests substack (as I've done in the last horrible visual).
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36
Community♦
1
answered Jan 4 '13 at 3:21
WernerWerner
447k699891695
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36
Community♦
1
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36
Community♦
1
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36
Community♦
1
1
answered Jan 4 '13 at 3:21
WernerWerner
447k699891695
answered Jan 4 '13 at 3:21
WernerWerner
447k699891695
answered Jan 4 '13 at 3:21
WernerWerner
447k699891695
447k699891695
1
If you asked me, I vote for option no. 2.
– yo'
Jan 5 '13 at 13:13
Thank you. I am looking for something like point E., but with prod, not sum. When I tried copying using mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} it did not look so good. How would you do it with prod?
– user119615
Feb 9 '17 at 12:09
add a comment |
1
If you asked me, I vote for option no. 2.
– yo'
Jan 5 '13 at 13:13
Thank you. I am looking for something like point E., but with prod, not sum. When I tried copying using mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} it did not look so good. How would you do it with prod?
– user119615
Feb 9 '17 at 12:09
1
1
If you asked me, I vote for option no. 2.
– yo'
Jan 5 '13 at 13:13
If you asked me, I vote for option no. 2.
– yo'
Jan 5 '13 at 13:13
Thank you. I am looking for something like point E., but with prod, not sum. When I tried copying using mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} it did not look so good. How would you do it with prod?
– user119615
Feb 9 '17 at 12:09
Thank you. I am looking for something like point E., but with prod, not sum. When I tried copying using mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} it did not look so good. How would you do it with prod?
– user119615
Feb 9 '17 at 12:09
add a comment |
I was looking for this nice work, and I wanna add something you may find it good. Try to use displaystyle in any equation to see how nice it is. For example, write the sum with down limits only:
$displaystyle sum_{n=1} f(x)$.
Good luck
answered 1 hour ago
MathGuyMathGuy
11
New contributor
MathGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This could be a comment instead.
– zyy
7 mins ago
add a comment |
I was looking for this nice work, and I wanna add something you may find it good. Try to use displaystyle in any equation to see how nice it is. For example, write the sum with down limits only:
$displaystyle sum_{n=1} f(x)$.
Good luck
answered 1 hour ago
MathGuyMathGuy
11
New contributor
MathGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This could be a comment instead.
– zyy
7 mins ago
add a comment |
I was looking for this nice work, and I wanna add something you may find it good. Try to use displaystyle in any equation to see how nice it is. For example, write the sum with down limits only:
$displaystyle sum_{n=1} f(x)$.
Good luck
answered 1 hour ago
MathGuyMathGuy
11
New contributor
MathGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I was looking for this nice work, and I wanna add something you may find it good. Try to use displaystyle in any equation to see how nice it is. For example, write the sum with down limits only:
$displaystyle sum_{n=1} f(x)$.
Good luck
answered 1 hour ago
MathGuyMathGuy
11
New contributor
MathGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 1 hour ago
MathGuyMathGuy
11
New contributor
MathGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 1 hour ago
MathGuyMathGuy
11
answered 1 hour ago
MathGuyMathGuy
11
11
New contributor
MathGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
MathGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
MathGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This could be a comment instead.
– zyy
7 mins ago
add a comment |
This could be a comment instead.
– zyy
7 mins ago
This could be a comment instead.
– zyy
7 mins ago
This could be a comment instead.
– zyy
7 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f89447%2flatex-adjusting-sum-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
