Is there a way to generate a point on a sphere from a fixed amount of random real numbers? The...

How can I add encounters in the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign without giving PCs too much XP?

Finding the area between two curves with Integrate

What is this sharp, curved notch on my knife for?

Is it a good practice to use a static variable in a Test Class and use that in the actual class instead of Test.isRunningTest()?

Output the Arecibo Message

Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

What is the most efficient way to store a numeric range?

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation

Mathematics of imaging the black hole

Inverse Relationship Between Precision and Recall

How to obtain a position of last non-zero element

Why was M87 targeted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?

Is it okay to consider publishing in my first year of PhD?

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?

Can there be female White Walkers?

Falsification in Math vs Science

"as much details as you can remember"

What is preventing me from simply constructing a hash that's lower than the current target?

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

Why are there uneven bright areas in this photo of black hole?

Is bread bad for ducks?

How come people say “Would of”?



Is there a way to generate a point on a sphere from a fixed amount of random real numbers?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow to find a random axis or unit vector in 3D?Picking random points in the volume of sphere with uniform probabilityIs a sphere a closed set?Random Point Sampling From a Set with Certain GeometryHow to Create a Plane Inside A CubeAlgorithm to generate random points in n-Sphere?Sampling on Axis-Aligned Spherical QuadRandom 3D points uniformly distributed on an ellipse shaped window of a sphereCompensating for distortion when projecting a 2D texture onto a sphereFind the relative radial position of a point within an ellipsoid












2












$begingroup$


The obvious solution of Lattitude & Longitude doesn't work because it generates points more densely near the poles, and the other thing I came up with (Pick a random point in the unit cube, if it's in the sphere map it to the surface, and restart if it's outside) doesn't always find a point within a fixed number of tries.






geometry







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So what you want is a uniform distribution. It would be helpful to state this explicitly.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn♦
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Distribute longitude uniformly and the sine of the latitude uniformly. Then the distribution of points on the sphere will be uniform.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn♦
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @robjohn thank you, you're right that I forgot to specify that.
    $endgroup$
    – The Zach Man
    18 mins ago
















2












$begingroup$


The obvious solution of Lattitude & Longitude doesn't work because it generates points more densely near the poles, and the other thing I came up with (Pick a random point in the unit cube, if it's in the sphere map it to the surface, and restart if it's outside) doesn't always find a point within a fixed number of tries.






geometry







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So what you want is a uniform distribution. It would be helpful to state this explicitly.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn♦
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Distribute longitude uniformly and the sine of the latitude uniformly. Then the distribution of points on the sphere will be uniform.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn♦
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @robjohn thank you, you're right that I forgot to specify that.
    $endgroup$
    – The Zach Man
    18 mins ago














2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


The obvious solution of Lattitude & Longitude doesn't work because it generates points more densely near the poles, and the other thing I came up with (Pick a random point in the unit cube, if it's in the sphere map it to the surface, and restart if it's outside) doesn't always find a point within a fixed number of tries.






geometry







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




The obvious solution of Lattitude & Longitude doesn't work because it generates points more densely near the poles, and the other thing I came up with (Pick a random point in the unit cube, if it's in the sphere map it to the surface, and restart if it's outside) doesn't always find a point within a fixed number of tries.






geometry




geometry






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









The Zach ManThe Zach Man

1007




1007












  • $begingroup$
    So what you want is a uniform distribution. It would be helpful to state this explicitly.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn♦
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Distribute longitude uniformly and the sine of the latitude uniformly. Then the distribution of points on the sphere will be uniform.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn♦
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @robjohn thank you, you're right that I forgot to specify that.
    $endgroup$
    – The Zach Man
    18 mins ago


















  • $begingroup$
    So what you want is a uniform distribution. It would be helpful to state this explicitly.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn♦
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Distribute longitude uniformly and the sine of the latitude uniformly. Then the distribution of points on the sphere will be uniform.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn♦
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @robjohn thank you, you're right that I forgot to specify that.
    $endgroup$
    – The Zach Man
    18 mins ago
















$begingroup$
So what you want is a uniform distribution. It would be helpful to state this explicitly.
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
So what you want is a uniform distribution. It would be helpful to state this explicitly.
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
2 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Distribute longitude uniformly and the sine of the latitude uniformly. Then the distribution of points on the sphere will be uniform.
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Distribute longitude uniformly and the sine of the latitude uniformly. Then the distribution of points on the sphere will be uniform.
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
@robjohn thank you, you're right that I forgot to specify that.
$endgroup$
– The Zach Man
18 mins ago




$begingroup$
@robjohn thank you, you're right that I forgot to specify that.
$endgroup$
– The Zach Man
18 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

The Lambert cylindrical equal area projection maps the sphere to a cylinder, area to equal area. It is easy to generate a uniform distribution on a cylinder. Simply map it back to the sphere.



For $(u_1,u_2)$ uniform on $[0,1]^2$, either



$mathrm{lat}=arcsin(2u_1-1),mathrm{lon}=2pi u_2$



or



$z=2u_1-1,x=sqrt{1-z^2}cos(2pi u_2),y=sqrt{1-z^2}sin(2pi u_2)$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    Your method, even though it doesn't finish in a fixed number of times, is a reasonable way to do it. Each trial succeeds with probability $fracpi6$, which is better than $frac12$: the average number of trials is less than $2$.



    Another standard method is to use the normal distribution. Generate $x, y, z$ independently from a standard normal distribution, then take the point $(x,y,z)$ and divide it by $sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}$ as you did for points inside the cube. The multivariate normal distribution is rotationally symmetric, so this will get you evenly distributed points on the sphere.



    (The Box–Muller transform is one way to generate normally distributed random numbers, and some versions of it do not use rejection sampling, so they can be done with a "fixed amount" of randomness.)






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3184449%2fis-there-a-way-to-generate-a-point-on-a-sphere-from-a-fixed-amount-of-random-rea%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2












      $begingroup$

      The Lambert cylindrical equal area projection maps the sphere to a cylinder, area to equal area. It is easy to generate a uniform distribution on a cylinder. Simply map it back to the sphere.



      For $(u_1,u_2)$ uniform on $[0,1]^2$, either



      $mathrm{lat}=arcsin(2u_1-1),mathrm{lon}=2pi u_2$



      or



      $z=2u_1-1,x=sqrt{1-z^2}cos(2pi u_2),y=sqrt{1-z^2}sin(2pi u_2)$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        2












        $begingroup$

        The Lambert cylindrical equal area projection maps the sphere to a cylinder, area to equal area. It is easy to generate a uniform distribution on a cylinder. Simply map it back to the sphere.



        For $(u_1,u_2)$ uniform on $[0,1]^2$, either



        $mathrm{lat}=arcsin(2u_1-1),mathrm{lon}=2pi u_2$



        or



        $z=2u_1-1,x=sqrt{1-z^2}cos(2pi u_2),y=sqrt{1-z^2}sin(2pi u_2)$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          The Lambert cylindrical equal area projection maps the sphere to a cylinder, area to equal area. It is easy to generate a uniform distribution on a cylinder. Simply map it back to the sphere.



          For $(u_1,u_2)$ uniform on $[0,1]^2$, either



          $mathrm{lat}=arcsin(2u_1-1),mathrm{lon}=2pi u_2$



          or



          $z=2u_1-1,x=sqrt{1-z^2}cos(2pi u_2),y=sqrt{1-z^2}sin(2pi u_2)$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The Lambert cylindrical equal area projection maps the sphere to a cylinder, area to equal area. It is easy to generate a uniform distribution on a cylinder. Simply map it back to the sphere.



          For $(u_1,u_2)$ uniform on $[0,1]^2$, either



          $mathrm{lat}=arcsin(2u_1-1),mathrm{lon}=2pi u_2$



          or



          $z=2u_1-1,x=sqrt{1-z^2}cos(2pi u_2),y=sqrt{1-z^2}sin(2pi u_2)$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 34 mins ago









          robjohn♦robjohn

          271k27313642




          271k27313642























              2












              $begingroup$

              Your method, even though it doesn't finish in a fixed number of times, is a reasonable way to do it. Each trial succeeds with probability $fracpi6$, which is better than $frac12$: the average number of trials is less than $2$.



              Another standard method is to use the normal distribution. Generate $x, y, z$ independently from a standard normal distribution, then take the point $(x,y,z)$ and divide it by $sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}$ as you did for points inside the cube. The multivariate normal distribution is rotationally symmetric, so this will get you evenly distributed points on the sphere.



              (The Box–Muller transform is one way to generate normally distributed random numbers, and some versions of it do not use rejection sampling, so they can be done with a "fixed amount" of randomness.)






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                Your method, even though it doesn't finish in a fixed number of times, is a reasonable way to do it. Each trial succeeds with probability $fracpi6$, which is better than $frac12$: the average number of trials is less than $2$.



                Another standard method is to use the normal distribution. Generate $x, y, z$ independently from a standard normal distribution, then take the point $(x,y,z)$ and divide it by $sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}$ as you did for points inside the cube. The multivariate normal distribution is rotationally symmetric, so this will get you evenly distributed points on the sphere.



                (The Box–Muller transform is one way to generate normally distributed random numbers, and some versions of it do not use rejection sampling, so they can be done with a "fixed amount" of randomness.)






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  Your method, even though it doesn't finish in a fixed number of times, is a reasonable way to do it. Each trial succeeds with probability $fracpi6$, which is better than $frac12$: the average number of trials is less than $2$.



                  Another standard method is to use the normal distribution. Generate $x, y, z$ independently from a standard normal distribution, then take the point $(x,y,z)$ and divide it by $sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}$ as you did for points inside the cube. The multivariate normal distribution is rotationally symmetric, so this will get you evenly distributed points on the sphere.



                  (The Box–Muller transform is one way to generate normally distributed random numbers, and some versions of it do not use rejection sampling, so they can be done with a "fixed amount" of randomness.)






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Your method, even though it doesn't finish in a fixed number of times, is a reasonable way to do it. Each trial succeeds with probability $fracpi6$, which is better than $frac12$: the average number of trials is less than $2$.



                  Another standard method is to use the normal distribution. Generate $x, y, z$ independently from a standard normal distribution, then take the point $(x,y,z)$ and divide it by $sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}$ as you did for points inside the cube. The multivariate normal distribution is rotationally symmetric, so this will get you evenly distributed points on the sphere.



                  (The Box–Muller transform is one way to generate normally distributed random numbers, and some versions of it do not use rejection sampling, so they can be done with a "fixed amount" of randomness.)







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 2 hours ago









                  Misha LavrovMisha Lavrov

                  49k757107




                  49k757107






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3184449%2fis-there-a-way-to-generate-a-point-on-a-sphere-from-a-fixed-amount-of-random-rea%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      El tren de la libertad Índice Antecedentes "Porque yo decido" Desarrollo de la...

                      Image
                      Feminismo en EspañaAborto en EspañaManifestaciones y protestas en EspañaManifestaciones y protestas en 2014España en 2014Historia de las mujeres en España movimiento socialfeministaderechos sexuales y reproductivosmujeresLey del aborto en España1 de febrero2014MadridAlberto Ruíz Gallardónla ley del aborto vigente del 2010AsturiasTertulia Feminista Les ComadresCongreso de DiputadosAlicia MiyaresAna MatoAlberto Ruiz GallardónEdimburgoRomaParísLuxemburgoBuenos AiresGracia QuerejetaÁngeles González-SindeMabel LozanoIcíar BollaínIsabel CoixetGeorgina CisquellaTeresa FontVirginia Yagüe2010José Luis Rodríguez ZapateroCongreso de Diputados19 de diciembre20095 de julio2010Partido PopularTribunal Constitucional201120 de diciembre2013Partido PopularMariano RajoyGijónTertulia Feminista Les ComadresBegoña PiñeroRenfeAlicia MiyaresTertulia Feminista Les Comadres1 de febrero2014Congreso de DiputadosMariano RajoyAlberto Ruiz GallardónAna MatoAsturiasAndalucíaCanariasCataluñaComunidad ValencianaCasti
                      Read more

                      Puerta de Hutt Referencias Enlaces externos Menú de navegación15°58′00″S 5°42′00″O /...

                      Image
                      Localidades de Santa Elena inglésasentamientoisla Santa ElenaLongwoodIglesia de San MateoPico de DianaNapoleón BonaparteHenri Gratien BertrandAlarma ForestalLevelwoodSan Pablo Puerta de Hutt Hutt's Gate Asentamiento Puerta de Hutt Hutt's Gate Coordenadas 15°58′00″S 5°42′00″O  /  -15.96666667, -5.7 Coordenadas: 15°58′00″S 5°42′00″O  /  -15.96666667, -5.7 Entidad Asentamiento  • País   Reino Unido  • Territorio de ultramar   Santa Elena, Ascensión y Tristán de Acuña  • Isla Santa Elena Huso horario UTC+0 [editar datos en Wikidata] Puerta de Hutt (en inglés: Hutt's Gate ) es un pequeño asentamiento ubicado en la isla Santa Elena, que forma parte del distrito de Longwood. Se ubica en las coordenadas 15°58′00″S 5°42′00″O  /  -15.96667, -5.70000 . [ 1 ] ​ Aquí se localiza la Iglesia de San Mateo y en sus cercanías el Pico de Diana [ 2 ] ​ y la tumba de Napoleón Bonaparte. Es una amplia zona residencial y cuent
                      Read more

                      Castillo d'Acher Características Menú de navegación

                      Image
                      Montañas de los Pirineos de AragónMontañas de la provincia de Huesca msnmSelva de OzaPirineo aragonésEspañabosque Este artículo o sección necesita referencias que aparezcan en una publicación acreditada. Este aviso fue puesto el 11 de agosto de 2011. El pico desde Selva de Oza. El Castillo d' Acher es una cima de 2.384msnm en la zona de la Selva de Oza en la parte occidental del Pirineo aragonés, en España. Debe su nombre a su aspecto de fortaleza que presenta hacia todas sus vertientes. Características En orden ascendente, la cima pasa de un bosque frondoso de tonalidades verde-amarillenta a laderas rojizas. Su cima, que suele presentarse mucha nieve, es un pequeño valle rectangular rodeado en sus cuatro caras por una muralla que le da un aspecto de fortaleza. This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here
                      Read more