0 rank tensor vs 1D vector The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHistory of Electromagnetic Field...

How did people program for Consoles with multiple CPUs?

Unclear about dynamic binding

0 rank tensor vs 1D vector

How to count occurrences of text in a file?

Does increasing your ability score affect your main stat?

Are police here, aren't itthey?

Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?

Running a General Election and the European Elections together

Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?

Reference request: Grassmannian and Plucker coordinates in type B, C, D

What does "Its cash flow is deeply negative" mean?

Recycling old answers

If Nick Fury and Coulson already knew about aliens (Kree and Skrull) why did they wait until Thor's appearance to start making weapons?

How to scale a tikZ image which is within a figure environment

Why did CATV standarize in 75 ohms and everyone else in 50?

Why don't programming languages automatically manage the synchronous/asynchronous problem?

Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed considered Gaussian?

Break Away Valves for Launch

Newlines in BSD sed vs gsed

Do I need to write [sic] when a number is less than 10 but isn't written out?

What was the first Unix version to run on a microcomputer?

Bartok - Syncopation (1): Meaning of notes in between Grand Staff

Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?

How to invert MapIndexed on a ragged structure? How to construct a tree from rules?



0 rank tensor vs 1D vector



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHistory of Electromagnetic Field TensorIn field theory, why are some symmetry transformations applied to the field values while other act on the space that the fields are defined on?Possible confusion, the inertia of something yields a tensor? (trying to understand an example)Confusion about the mathematical nature of Elecromagnetic tensor end the E, B fieldsWhat exactly is the Parity transformation? Parity in spherical coordinatesHow to represent tensors in a base? And some questions about indicesA fundamental question about tensors and vectors4-Vector DefinitionDoubts on covariant and contravariant vectors and on double tensorsZero order Tensor












4












$begingroup$


What is the difference between zero-rank tensor $x$ (scalar) and 1D vector $[x]$?



As far as I understand tensor is anything which can be measured and different measures can be transformed into eachother. That is, there are different basises for looking at one object.



Is lengh a scalar (zero rank tensor)?
I think it is not.
ex.:




  • physical parameter: writing pen's length

  • tensor: $l$

  • length in inches: $[5.511811023622]$

  • length in centimeters: $[14]$

  • transformation law: 1cm = 2.54inch


so $l$ is a scalar, but on the other hand it's a tensor of rank 1 since "physical parameter of length is invariant, only it's measures (in different units) are".



The same example can be made with classical example of temperature (which is used as a primer of zero rank tensor most in any book) in C and K units. I'm confused.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    4












    $begingroup$


    What is the difference between zero-rank tensor $x$ (scalar) and 1D vector $[x]$?



    As far as I understand tensor is anything which can be measured and different measures can be transformed into eachother. That is, there are different basises for looking at one object.



    Is lengh a scalar (zero rank tensor)?
    I think it is not.
    ex.:




    • physical parameter: writing pen's length

    • tensor: $l$

    • length in inches: $[5.511811023622]$

    • length in centimeters: $[14]$

    • transformation law: 1cm = 2.54inch


    so $l$ is a scalar, but on the other hand it's a tensor of rank 1 since "physical parameter of length is invariant, only it's measures (in different units) are".



    The same example can be made with classical example of temperature (which is used as a primer of zero rank tensor most in any book) in C and K units. I'm confused.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      What is the difference between zero-rank tensor $x$ (scalar) and 1D vector $[x]$?



      As far as I understand tensor is anything which can be measured and different measures can be transformed into eachother. That is, there are different basises for looking at one object.



      Is lengh a scalar (zero rank tensor)?
      I think it is not.
      ex.:




      • physical parameter: writing pen's length

      • tensor: $l$

      • length in inches: $[5.511811023622]$

      • length in centimeters: $[14]$

      • transformation law: 1cm = 2.54inch


      so $l$ is a scalar, but on the other hand it's a tensor of rank 1 since "physical parameter of length is invariant, only it's measures (in different units) are".



      The same example can be made with classical example of temperature (which is used as a primer of zero rank tensor most in any book) in C and K units. I'm confused.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      What is the difference between zero-rank tensor $x$ (scalar) and 1D vector $[x]$?



      As far as I understand tensor is anything which can be measured and different measures can be transformed into eachother. That is, there are different basises for looking at one object.



      Is lengh a scalar (zero rank tensor)?
      I think it is not.
      ex.:




      • physical parameter: writing pen's length

      • tensor: $l$

      • length in inches: $[5.511811023622]$

      • length in centimeters: $[14]$

      • transformation law: 1cm = 2.54inch


      so $l$ is a scalar, but on the other hand it's a tensor of rank 1 since "physical parameter of length is invariant, only it's measures (in different units) are".



      The same example can be made with classical example of temperature (which is used as a primer of zero rank tensor most in any book) in C and K units. I'm confused.







      tensor-calculus






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago









      Szabolcs Berecz

      1031




      1031










      asked 2 hours ago









      coobitcoobit

      350110




      350110






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6












          $begingroup$

          “Scalar”, “vector”, and “tensor” have no meaning without specifying the group of transformations. In physics we focus on groups such as rotations, Galilean transformations, Lorentz transformations, Poincaire transformations, and gauge transformations because these are symmetries of various physical theories, built in to reflect symmetries of the natural world.



          The length of a writing pen is a scalar under rotations and Galilean transformations. This is a significant physical fact about our world.



          But the fact that you can measure its length in various units is not significant, because units are inventions of humans, not of Nature. Physicists never say that the length of a writing pen “transforms” because you can choose to measure it in different length units. Different units such as inches and centimeters for a particular physical quantity like length do not have any physical significance at all.



          Going back to your original question, the difference between a scalar and a vector under rotations should now be obvious: a scalar is a single number that stays the same under a rotation, while a vector is a directed quantity that requires three numbers to describe it, and under rotations these numbers transform into linear combinations of each other, as specified by the relevant rotation matrix.



          Under any other transformation group, the distinction between scalars and vectors is similar.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I'm sorry if it might sound dumb, but ... Is 1D vector invariant under rotation? I mean is there rotation in 1D space? If so how it's different from scalar?
            $endgroup$
            – coobit
            57 mins ago












          • $begingroup$
            @coobit Consider the group of reflections along that one dimension. A vector changes sign, but a scalar doesn't.
            $endgroup$
            – Chiral Anomaly
            46 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            Whoops, I completely overlooked the fact that you were asking about 1D. (Since you had referred to scalars as rank 0, I was thinking "rank 1" , not "1D", when you said "vector".) There are no proper rotations in 1D. As @ChiralAnomaly explains, you can consider 1D reflections, and scalar and vectors transform differently under these, even though both are only a single number.
            $endgroup$
            – G. Smith
            21 mins ago














          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "151"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469598%2f0-rank-tensor-vs-1d-vector%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          6












          $begingroup$

          “Scalar”, “vector”, and “tensor” have no meaning without specifying the group of transformations. In physics we focus on groups such as rotations, Galilean transformations, Lorentz transformations, Poincaire transformations, and gauge transformations because these are symmetries of various physical theories, built in to reflect symmetries of the natural world.



          The length of a writing pen is a scalar under rotations and Galilean transformations. This is a significant physical fact about our world.



          But the fact that you can measure its length in various units is not significant, because units are inventions of humans, not of Nature. Physicists never say that the length of a writing pen “transforms” because you can choose to measure it in different length units. Different units such as inches and centimeters for a particular physical quantity like length do not have any physical significance at all.



          Going back to your original question, the difference between a scalar and a vector under rotations should now be obvious: a scalar is a single number that stays the same under a rotation, while a vector is a directed quantity that requires three numbers to describe it, and under rotations these numbers transform into linear combinations of each other, as specified by the relevant rotation matrix.



          Under any other transformation group, the distinction between scalars and vectors is similar.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I'm sorry if it might sound dumb, but ... Is 1D vector invariant under rotation? I mean is there rotation in 1D space? If so how it's different from scalar?
            $endgroup$
            – coobit
            57 mins ago












          • $begingroup$
            @coobit Consider the group of reflections along that one dimension. A vector changes sign, but a scalar doesn't.
            $endgroup$
            – Chiral Anomaly
            46 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            Whoops, I completely overlooked the fact that you were asking about 1D. (Since you had referred to scalars as rank 0, I was thinking "rank 1" , not "1D", when you said "vector".) There are no proper rotations in 1D. As @ChiralAnomaly explains, you can consider 1D reflections, and scalar and vectors transform differently under these, even though both are only a single number.
            $endgroup$
            – G. Smith
            21 mins ago


















          6












          $begingroup$

          “Scalar”, “vector”, and “tensor” have no meaning without specifying the group of transformations. In physics we focus on groups such as rotations, Galilean transformations, Lorentz transformations, Poincaire transformations, and gauge transformations because these are symmetries of various physical theories, built in to reflect symmetries of the natural world.



          The length of a writing pen is a scalar under rotations and Galilean transformations. This is a significant physical fact about our world.



          But the fact that you can measure its length in various units is not significant, because units are inventions of humans, not of Nature. Physicists never say that the length of a writing pen “transforms” because you can choose to measure it in different length units. Different units such as inches and centimeters for a particular physical quantity like length do not have any physical significance at all.



          Going back to your original question, the difference between a scalar and a vector under rotations should now be obvious: a scalar is a single number that stays the same under a rotation, while a vector is a directed quantity that requires three numbers to describe it, and under rotations these numbers transform into linear combinations of each other, as specified by the relevant rotation matrix.



          Under any other transformation group, the distinction between scalars and vectors is similar.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I'm sorry if it might sound dumb, but ... Is 1D vector invariant under rotation? I mean is there rotation in 1D space? If so how it's different from scalar?
            $endgroup$
            – coobit
            57 mins ago












          • $begingroup$
            @coobit Consider the group of reflections along that one dimension. A vector changes sign, but a scalar doesn't.
            $endgroup$
            – Chiral Anomaly
            46 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            Whoops, I completely overlooked the fact that you were asking about 1D. (Since you had referred to scalars as rank 0, I was thinking "rank 1" , not "1D", when you said "vector".) There are no proper rotations in 1D. As @ChiralAnomaly explains, you can consider 1D reflections, and scalar and vectors transform differently under these, even though both are only a single number.
            $endgroup$
            – G. Smith
            21 mins ago
















          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          “Scalar”, “vector”, and “tensor” have no meaning without specifying the group of transformations. In physics we focus on groups such as rotations, Galilean transformations, Lorentz transformations, Poincaire transformations, and gauge transformations because these are symmetries of various physical theories, built in to reflect symmetries of the natural world.



          The length of a writing pen is a scalar under rotations and Galilean transformations. This is a significant physical fact about our world.



          But the fact that you can measure its length in various units is not significant, because units are inventions of humans, not of Nature. Physicists never say that the length of a writing pen “transforms” because you can choose to measure it in different length units. Different units such as inches and centimeters for a particular physical quantity like length do not have any physical significance at all.



          Going back to your original question, the difference between a scalar and a vector under rotations should now be obvious: a scalar is a single number that stays the same under a rotation, while a vector is a directed quantity that requires three numbers to describe it, and under rotations these numbers transform into linear combinations of each other, as specified by the relevant rotation matrix.



          Under any other transformation group, the distinction between scalars and vectors is similar.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          “Scalar”, “vector”, and “tensor” have no meaning without specifying the group of transformations. In physics we focus on groups such as rotations, Galilean transformations, Lorentz transformations, Poincaire transformations, and gauge transformations because these are symmetries of various physical theories, built in to reflect symmetries of the natural world.



          The length of a writing pen is a scalar under rotations and Galilean transformations. This is a significant physical fact about our world.



          But the fact that you can measure its length in various units is not significant, because units are inventions of humans, not of Nature. Physicists never say that the length of a writing pen “transforms” because you can choose to measure it in different length units. Different units such as inches and centimeters for a particular physical quantity like length do not have any physical significance at all.



          Going back to your original question, the difference between a scalar and a vector under rotations should now be obvious: a scalar is a single number that stays the same under a rotation, while a vector is a directed quantity that requires three numbers to describe it, and under rotations these numbers transform into linear combinations of each other, as specified by the relevant rotation matrix.



          Under any other transformation group, the distinction between scalars and vectors is similar.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago

























          answered 2 hours ago









          G. SmithG. Smith

          10.2k11428




          10.2k11428












          • $begingroup$
            I'm sorry if it might sound dumb, but ... Is 1D vector invariant under rotation? I mean is there rotation in 1D space? If so how it's different from scalar?
            $endgroup$
            – coobit
            57 mins ago












          • $begingroup$
            @coobit Consider the group of reflections along that one dimension. A vector changes sign, but a scalar doesn't.
            $endgroup$
            – Chiral Anomaly
            46 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            Whoops, I completely overlooked the fact that you were asking about 1D. (Since you had referred to scalars as rank 0, I was thinking "rank 1" , not "1D", when you said "vector".) There are no proper rotations in 1D. As @ChiralAnomaly explains, you can consider 1D reflections, and scalar and vectors transform differently under these, even though both are only a single number.
            $endgroup$
            – G. Smith
            21 mins ago




















          • $begingroup$
            I'm sorry if it might sound dumb, but ... Is 1D vector invariant under rotation? I mean is there rotation in 1D space? If so how it's different from scalar?
            $endgroup$
            – coobit
            57 mins ago












          • $begingroup$
            @coobit Consider the group of reflections along that one dimension. A vector changes sign, but a scalar doesn't.
            $endgroup$
            – Chiral Anomaly
            46 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            Whoops, I completely overlooked the fact that you were asking about 1D. (Since you had referred to scalars as rank 0, I was thinking "rank 1" , not "1D", when you said "vector".) There are no proper rotations in 1D. As @ChiralAnomaly explains, you can consider 1D reflections, and scalar and vectors transform differently under these, even though both are only a single number.
            $endgroup$
            – G. Smith
            21 mins ago


















          $begingroup$
          I'm sorry if it might sound dumb, but ... Is 1D vector invariant under rotation? I mean is there rotation in 1D space? If so how it's different from scalar?
          $endgroup$
          – coobit
          57 mins ago






          $begingroup$
          I'm sorry if it might sound dumb, but ... Is 1D vector invariant under rotation? I mean is there rotation in 1D space? If so how it's different from scalar?
          $endgroup$
          – coobit
          57 mins ago














          $begingroup$
          @coobit Consider the group of reflections along that one dimension. A vector changes sign, but a scalar doesn't.
          $endgroup$
          – Chiral Anomaly
          46 mins ago




          $begingroup$
          @coobit Consider the group of reflections along that one dimension. A vector changes sign, but a scalar doesn't.
          $endgroup$
          – Chiral Anomaly
          46 mins ago












          $begingroup$
          Whoops, I completely overlooked the fact that you were asking about 1D. (Since you had referred to scalars as rank 0, I was thinking "rank 1" , not "1D", when you said "vector".) There are no proper rotations in 1D. As @ChiralAnomaly explains, you can consider 1D reflections, and scalar and vectors transform differently under these, even though both are only a single number.
          $endgroup$
          – G. Smith
          21 mins ago






          $begingroup$
          Whoops, I completely overlooked the fact that you were asking about 1D. (Since you had referred to scalars as rank 0, I was thinking "rank 1" , not "1D", when you said "vector".) There are no proper rotations in 1D. As @ChiralAnomaly explains, you can consider 1D reflections, and scalar and vectors transform differently under these, even though both are only a single number.
          $endgroup$
          – G. Smith
          21 mins ago




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469598%2f0-rank-tensor-vs-1d-vector%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Installing LyX: “No textclass is found.”LyX installation error- text class not found- 'Reconfigure' or...

          (1602) Indiana Índice Designación y nombre Características orbitales Véase...

          Universidad Autónoma de Occidente Índice Historia Campus Facultades Programas Académicos Medios de...