Minimal Makefile for pdflatex bibtex with output-directory [duplicate]How do I run bibtex after using the...
Is there a frame of reference in which I was born before I was conceived?
Is there any relevance to Thor getting his hair cut other than comedic value?
Non-Italian European mafias in USA?
What should the omniscient narrator call a character?
How can I handle a player who pre-plans arguments about my rulings on RAW?
Can we carry rice to Japan?
The need of reserving one's ability in job interviews
Six real numbers so that product of any five is the sixth one
How to substitute values from a list into a function?
Called into a meeting and told we are being made redundant (laid off) and "not to share outside". Can I tell my partner?
Wrap all numerics in JSON with quotes
Is divide-by-zero a security vulnerability?
A bug in Excel? Conditional formatting for marking duplicates also highlights unique value
How to evaluate the limit where something is raised to a power of x?
Giving a talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?
For the Kanji 校 is the fifth stroke connected to the sixth stroke?
I encountered my boss during an on-site interview at another company. Should I bring it up when seeing him next time?
What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?
How to play ethic aspects my character is said to have, I as player don't understand?
What are the issues with an additional (limited) concentration slot instead of Bladesong?
What happened to QGIS 2.x LTR?
Are small insurances worth it
What is a term for a function that when called repeatedly, has the same effect as calling once?
Calculating Hyperbolic Sin faster than using a standard power series
Minimal Makefile for pdflatex bibtex with output-directory [duplicate]
How do I run bibtex after using the -output-directory flag with pdflatex, when files are included from subdirectories?Makefile that prevents tex directory from being cluttered with build outputLyX cannot output to pdflatex for a specific fileAccess value of -output-directoryMakefile for a latex reportBibTeX error persists after pdflatex-->bibtex-->pdflatex-->pdflatex compilationpdflatex specifying output directory doesn't find images in subdirectorieslatexmk and Makefile with multiple sourcespdftex/pdflatex change directory of auxiliary filesbibtex aux-files directoryoutput directory Asymptote in TeXLive
This question already has an answer here:
How do I run bibtex after using the -output-directory flag with pdflatex, when files are included from subdirectories?
5 answers
Does someone have a minimal Makefile, that compiles a latex document using
- pdflatex
- bibtex
- pdflatex
- pdflatex
while putting all ouput files in a special output-directory to avoid cluttering the root-directory?
bibtex pdftex makefile
asked Jan 7 at 14:43
mcExchangemcExchange
1455
marked as duplicate by JouleV, Kurt, Stefan Pinnow, TeXnician, Raaja 22 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
|
show 1 more comment
This question already has an answer here:
How do I run bibtex after using the -output-directory flag with pdflatex, when files are included from subdirectories?
5 answers
Does someone have a minimal Makefile, that compiles a latex document using
- pdflatex
- bibtex
- pdflatex
- pdflatex
while putting all ouput files in a special output-directory to avoid cluttering the root-directory?
bibtex pdftex makefile
asked Jan 7 at 14:43
mcExchangemcExchange
1455
marked as duplicate by JouleV, Kurt, Stefan Pinnow, TeXnician, Raaja 22 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
Why don't you useararaorlatexmk?
– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:51
2
As soon as you mention output-directories, you do know that they make things much more complicated? A few extra files are nothing compared to the extra level of stress you have to make all programs find the files you hid away.
– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:52
I see. Well that is sad. In my case it's really a mess of a gazillion .mtc .aux .blg .maf .lot .nlo etc pp files :-/. I don't know about arara / latexmk
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 14:54
3
@mcExchange why do the files matter, I just checked and in the directory I use for writing answers for this site there are currently over 2000 aux files, occasionally Irm *.auxand remove them all but mostly I don't bother and they do no harm. If you move the output from tex to another directory, you need to configure everything else to be able to find them and read them back, it's possible but tricky to get right and serves no great purpose.
– David Carlisle
Jan 7 at 15:06
Yeah, I'll give up. It's taking too much time already. My project is quite large and involves a lot of files therefore keeping an overview would be nice. A subfolder for compilation would be nice.
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 16:08
|
show 1 more comment
This question already has an answer here:
How do I run bibtex after using the -output-directory flag with pdflatex, when files are included from subdirectories?
5 answers
Does someone have a minimal Makefile, that compiles a latex document using
- pdflatex
- bibtex
- pdflatex
- pdflatex
while putting all ouput files in a special output-directory to avoid cluttering the root-directory?
bibtex pdftex makefile
asked Jan 7 at 14:43
mcExchangemcExchange
1455
This question already has an answer here:
How do I run bibtex after using the -output-directory flag with pdflatex, when files are included from subdirectories?
5 answers
Does someone have a minimal Makefile, that compiles a latex document using
- pdflatex
- bibtex
- pdflatex
- pdflatex
while putting all ouput files in a special output-directory to avoid cluttering the root-directory?
This question already has an answer here:
How do I run bibtex after using the -output-directory flag with pdflatex, when files are included from subdirectories?
5 answers
bibtex pdftex makefile
bibtex pdftex makefile
asked Jan 7 at 14:43
mcExchangemcExchange
1455
asked Jan 7 at 14:43
mcExchangemcExchange
1455
asked Jan 7 at 14:43
mcExchangemcExchange
1455
asked Jan 7 at 14:43
mcExchangemcExchange
1455
asked Jan 7 at 14:43
mcExchangemcExchange
1455
1455
marked as duplicate by JouleV, Kurt, Stefan Pinnow, TeXnician, Raaja 22 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by JouleV, Kurt, Stefan Pinnow, TeXnician, Raaja 22 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
Why don't you useararaorlatexmk?
– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:51
2
As soon as you mention output-directories, you do know that they make things much more complicated? A few extra files are nothing compared to the extra level of stress you have to make all programs find the files you hid away.
– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:52
I see. Well that is sad. In my case it's really a mess of a gazillion .mtc .aux .blg .maf .lot .nlo etc pp files :-/. I don't know about arara / latexmk
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 14:54
3
@mcExchange why do the files matter, I just checked and in the directory I use for writing answers for this site there are currently over 2000 aux files, occasionally Irm *.auxand remove them all but mostly I don't bother and they do no harm. If you move the output from tex to another directory, you need to configure everything else to be able to find them and read them back, it's possible but tricky to get right and serves no great purpose.
– David Carlisle
Jan 7 at 15:06
Yeah, I'll give up. It's taking too much time already. My project is quite large and involves a lot of files therefore keeping an overview would be nice. A subfolder for compilation would be nice.
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 16:08
|
show 1 more comment
Why don't you useararaorlatexmk?
– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:51
2
As soon as you mention output-directories, you do know that they make things much more complicated? A few extra files are nothing compared to the extra level of stress you have to make all programs find the files you hid away.
– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:52
I see. Well that is sad. In my case it's really a mess of a gazillion .mtc .aux .blg .maf .lot .nlo etc pp files :-/. I don't know about arara / latexmk
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 14:54
3
@mcExchange why do the files matter, I just checked and in the directory I use for writing answers for this site there are currently over 2000 aux files, occasionally Irm *.auxand remove them all but mostly I don't bother and they do no harm. If you move the output from tex to another directory, you need to configure everything else to be able to find them and read them back, it's possible but tricky to get right and serves no great purpose.
– David Carlisle
Jan 7 at 15:06
Yeah, I'll give up. It's taking too much time already. My project is quite large and involves a lot of files therefore keeping an overview would be nice. A subfolder for compilation would be nice.
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 16:08
Why don't you use
arara or latexmk?– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:51
Why don't you use
arara or latexmk?– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:51
2
2
As soon as you mention output-directories, you do know that they make things much more complicated? A few extra files are nothing compared to the extra level of stress you have to make all programs find the files you hid away.
– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:52
As soon as you mention output-directories, you do know that they make things much more complicated? A few extra files are nothing compared to the extra level of stress you have to make all programs find the files you hid away.
– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:52
I see. Well that is sad. In my case it's really a mess of a gazillion .mtc .aux .blg .maf .lot .nlo etc pp files :-/. I don't know about arara / latexmk
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 14:54
I see. Well that is sad. In my case it's really a mess of a gazillion .mtc .aux .blg .maf .lot .nlo etc pp files :-/. I don't know about arara / latexmk
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 14:54
3
3
@mcExchange why do the files matter, I just checked and in the directory I use for writing answers for this site there are currently over 2000 aux files, occasionally I
rm *.aux and remove them all but mostly I don't bother and they do no harm. If you move the output from tex to another directory, you need to configure everything else to be able to find them and read them back, it's possible but tricky to get right and serves no great purpose.– David Carlisle
Jan 7 at 15:06
@mcExchange why do the files matter, I just checked and in the directory I use for writing answers for this site there are currently over 2000 aux files, occasionally I
rm *.aux and remove them all but mostly I don't bother and they do no harm. If you move the output from tex to another directory, you need to configure everything else to be able to find them and read them back, it's possible but tricky to get right and serves no great purpose.– David Carlisle
Jan 7 at 15:06
Yeah, I'll give up. It's taking too much time already. My project is quite large and involves a lot of files therefore keeping an overview would be nice. A subfolder for compilation would be nice.
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 16:08
Yeah, I'll give up. It's taking too much time already. My project is quite large and involves a lot of files therefore keeping an overview would be nice. A subfolder for compilation would be nice.
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 16:08
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
There's another question like this here:
How do I run bibtex after using the -output-directory flag with pdflatex, when files are included from subdirectories?
Here's my (slightly edited) answer:
Now, running something like
mkdir OUT
TEXMFOUTPUT="OUT"
pdflatex --output-directory OUT myfile
bibtex OUT/myfile
pdflatex --output-directory OUT myfile
pdflatex --output-directory OUT myfile
produces the expected results, and is fully scriptable.
If you are getting the message:
bibtex: Not writing to $TEXMFOUTPUT/src.blg (openout_any = p).
then you need the following little hack. The issue is that bibtex ability to write to $TEXMFOUTPUT is restricted to avoid file overwriting and the bibtex command returns an error message.
Open the file texmf.cnf, dunno about windows, but on linux:
/usr/share/texlive/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf (UBUNTU TEXLIVE)
/usr/share/texmf-dist/web2c/texmf.cnf (ARCH LINUX TEXLIVE)
find the openout_any = p line and change it either to a for always or r for restricted (p stands for paranoid fyi).
answered 23 hours ago
Three DiagThree Diag
20928
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There's another question like this here:
How do I run bibtex after using the -output-directory flag with pdflatex, when files are included from subdirectories?
Here's my (slightly edited) answer:
Now, running something like
mkdir OUT
TEXMFOUTPUT="OUT"
pdflatex --output-directory OUT myfile
bibtex OUT/myfile
pdflatex --output-directory OUT myfile
pdflatex --output-directory OUT myfile
produces the expected results, and is fully scriptable.
If you are getting the message:
bibtex: Not writing to $TEXMFOUTPUT/src.blg (openout_any = p).
then you need the following little hack. The issue is that bibtex ability to write to $TEXMFOUTPUT is restricted to avoid file overwriting and the bibtex command returns an error message.
Open the file texmf.cnf, dunno about windows, but on linux:
/usr/share/texlive/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf (UBUNTU TEXLIVE)
/usr/share/texmf-dist/web2c/texmf.cnf (ARCH LINUX TEXLIVE)
find the openout_any = p line and change it either to a for always or r for restricted (p stands for paranoid fyi).
answered 23 hours ago
Three DiagThree Diag
20928
add a comment |
There's another question like this here:
How do I run bibtex after using the -output-directory flag with pdflatex, when files are included from subdirectories?
Here's my (slightly edited) answer:
Now, running something like
mkdir OUT
TEXMFOUTPUT="OUT"
pdflatex --output-directory OUT myfile
bibtex OUT/myfile
pdflatex --output-directory OUT myfile
pdflatex --output-directory OUT myfile
produces the expected results, and is fully scriptable.
If you are getting the message:
bibtex: Not writing to $TEXMFOUTPUT/src.blg (openout_any = p).
then you need the following little hack. The issue is that bibtex ability to write to $TEXMFOUTPUT is restricted to avoid file overwriting and the bibtex command returns an error message.
Open the file texmf.cnf, dunno about windows, but on linux:
/usr/share/texlive/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf (UBUNTU TEXLIVE)
/usr/share/texmf-dist/web2c/texmf.cnf (ARCH LINUX TEXLIVE)
find the openout_any = p line and change it either to a for always or r for restricted (p stands for paranoid fyi).
answered 23 hours ago
Three DiagThree Diag
20928
add a comment |
There's another question like this here:
How do I run bibtex after using the -output-directory flag with pdflatex, when files are included from subdirectories?
Here's my (slightly edited) answer:
Now, running something like
mkdir OUT
TEXMFOUTPUT="OUT"
pdflatex --output-directory OUT myfile
bibtex OUT/myfile
pdflatex --output-directory OUT myfile
pdflatex --output-directory OUT myfile
produces the expected results, and is fully scriptable.
If you are getting the message:
bibtex: Not writing to $TEXMFOUTPUT/src.blg (openout_any = p).
then you need the following little hack. The issue is that bibtex ability to write to $TEXMFOUTPUT is restricted to avoid file overwriting and the bibtex command returns an error message.
Open the file texmf.cnf, dunno about windows, but on linux:
/usr/share/texlive/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf (UBUNTU TEXLIVE)
/usr/share/texmf-dist/web2c/texmf.cnf (ARCH LINUX TEXLIVE)
find the openout_any = p line and change it either to a for always or r for restricted (p stands for paranoid fyi).
answered 23 hours ago
Three DiagThree Diag
20928
There's another question like this here:
How do I run bibtex after using the -output-directory flag with pdflatex, when files are included from subdirectories?
Here's my (slightly edited) answer:
Now, running something like
mkdir OUT
TEXMFOUTPUT="OUT"
pdflatex --output-directory OUT myfile
bibtex OUT/myfile
pdflatex --output-directory OUT myfile
pdflatex --output-directory OUT myfile
produces the expected results, and is fully scriptable.
If you are getting the message:
bibtex: Not writing to $TEXMFOUTPUT/src.blg (openout_any = p).
then you need the following little hack. The issue is that bibtex ability to write to $TEXMFOUTPUT is restricted to avoid file overwriting and the bibtex command returns an error message.
Open the file texmf.cnf, dunno about windows, but on linux:
/usr/share/texlive/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf (UBUNTU TEXLIVE)
/usr/share/texmf-dist/web2c/texmf.cnf (ARCH LINUX TEXLIVE)
find the openout_any = p line and change it either to a for always or r for restricted (p stands for paranoid fyi).
answered 23 hours ago
Three DiagThree Diag
20928
answered 23 hours ago
Three DiagThree Diag
20928
answered 23 hours ago
Three DiagThree Diag
20928
answered 23 hours ago
Three DiagThree Diag
20928
20928
add a comment |
add a comment |
Why don't you use
araraorlatexmk?– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:51
2
As soon as you mention output-directories, you do know that they make things much more complicated? A few extra files are nothing compared to the extra level of stress you have to make all programs find the files you hid away.
– Johannes_B
Jan 7 at 14:52
I see. Well that is sad. In my case it's really a mess of a gazillion .mtc .aux .blg .maf .lot .nlo etc pp files :-/. I don't know about arara / latexmk
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 14:54
3
@mcExchange why do the files matter, I just checked and in the directory I use for writing answers for this site there are currently over 2000 aux files, occasionally I
rm *.auxand remove them all but mostly I don't bother and they do no harm. If you move the output from tex to another directory, you need to configure everything else to be able to find them and read them back, it's possible but tricky to get right and serves no great purpose.– David Carlisle
Jan 7 at 15:06
Yeah, I'll give up. It's taking too much time already. My project is quite large and involves a lot of files therefore keeping an overview would be nice. A subfolder for compilation would be nice.
– mcExchange
Jan 7 at 16:08