What will be the temperature on Earth when Sun finishes its main sequence?What would be the first thing which...
Giant Toughroad SLR 2 for 200 miles in two days, will it make it?
Can a Bard use an arcane focus?
Installing PowerShell on 32-bit Kali OS fails
How can a jailer prevent the Forge Cleric's Artisan's Blessing from being used?
Can the harmonic series explain the origin of the major scale?
What if somebody invests in my application?
Reply ‘no position’ while the job posting is still there (‘HiWi’ position in Germany)
Can a Gentile theist be saved?
How can I successfully establish a nationwide combat training program for a large country?
Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?
Is there an Impartial Brexit Deal comparison site?
How will losing mobility of one hand affect my career as a programmer?
Simple image editor tool to draw a simple box/rectangle in an existing image
A known event to a history junkie
Science Fiction story where a man invents a machine that can help him watch history unfold
Why does this part of the Space Shuttle launch pad seem to be floating in air?
What does the "3am" section means in manpages?
Is a naturally all "male" species possible?
Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?
How can I raise concerns with a new DM about XP splitting?
Hostile work environment after whistle-blowing on coworker and our boss. What do I do?
Organic chemistry Iodoform Reaction
What is the opposite of 'gravitas'?
Word describing multiple paths to the same abstract outcome
What will be the temperature on Earth when Sun finishes its main sequence?
What would be the first thing which will render the Earth uninhabitable?Will the Earth ever stop rotating?Hypothetically, what would happen to the earth if a large hole was drilled through the center?What would be the first thing which will render the Earth uninhabitable?When will the Final Ice Age happen?Would life on Earth survive without the Sun?What would the equilibrium temperature be at the poles in a world without seasonality?What would happen if Earth suddenly stopped rotating and revolving at the same time?Will the Earth's core cool?Does the Earth 'Flare' like the Sun does?Where on Earth is the most windless lake with its own sea breeze?
$begingroup$
We know that presently Sun is 4.5 billion years into its main sequence. It has another 5 billion years before it enters the Red Giant phase. We also know that Sun's luminosity increases by 10% every billion years during the main sequence. I am interested in finding the temperature rise as we approach the end of main sequence. I got two different values for temperature on Earth.
Wikipedia entry says that temperature on Earth would be 422 k in 2.8 billion years. However, if we use the formula for effective temperature as discussed in this answer
https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/a/4274/15299 and L = 1.8 then, the temperature on Earth would be 330K. Also in this book, the author does the same calculations on page 255.
geophysics hypothetical
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We know that presently Sun is 4.5 billion years into its main sequence. It has another 5 billion years before it enters the Red Giant phase. We also know that Sun's luminosity increases by 10% every billion years during the main sequence. I am interested in finding the temperature rise as we approach the end of main sequence. I got two different values for temperature on Earth.
Wikipedia entry says that temperature on Earth would be 422 k in 2.8 billion years. However, if we use the formula for effective temperature as discussed in this answer
https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/a/4274/15299 and L = 1.8 then, the temperature on Earth would be 330K. Also in this book, the author does the same calculations on page 255.
geophysics hypothetical
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@arkaia I have shared another answer in the question which is similar and was answered by experts here. I request you to let my question stay here as there are many intelligent folks here who may resolve this question quickly.
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@arkaia It is true that this question has a lot of astronomy, but heat balance and effective temperature is Earth Science-ish, and if somebody masters an answer including greenhouse effect, that would definitely be Earth Sciences.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I understand your point. Close vote removed
$endgroup$
– arkaia
27 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We know that presently Sun is 4.5 billion years into its main sequence. It has another 5 billion years before it enters the Red Giant phase. We also know that Sun's luminosity increases by 10% every billion years during the main sequence. I am interested in finding the temperature rise as we approach the end of main sequence. I got two different values for temperature on Earth.
Wikipedia entry says that temperature on Earth would be 422 k in 2.8 billion years. However, if we use the formula for effective temperature as discussed in this answer
https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/a/4274/15299 and L = 1.8 then, the temperature on Earth would be 330K. Also in this book, the author does the same calculations on page 255.
geophysics hypothetical
$endgroup$
We know that presently Sun is 4.5 billion years into its main sequence. It has another 5 billion years before it enters the Red Giant phase. We also know that Sun's luminosity increases by 10% every billion years during the main sequence. I am interested in finding the temperature rise as we approach the end of main sequence. I got two different values for temperature on Earth.
Wikipedia entry says that temperature on Earth would be 422 k in 2.8 billion years. However, if we use the formula for effective temperature as discussed in this answer
https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/a/4274/15299 and L = 1.8 then, the temperature on Earth would be 330K. Also in this book, the author does the same calculations on page 255.
geophysics hypothetical
geophysics hypothetical
asked 4 hours ago
sidharth chhabrasidharth chhabra
1534
1534
$begingroup$
@arkaia I have shared another answer in the question which is similar and was answered by experts here. I request you to let my question stay here as there are many intelligent folks here who may resolve this question quickly.
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@arkaia It is true that this question has a lot of astronomy, but heat balance and effective temperature is Earth Science-ish, and if somebody masters an answer including greenhouse effect, that would definitely be Earth Sciences.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I understand your point. Close vote removed
$endgroup$
– arkaia
27 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
@arkaia I have shared another answer in the question which is similar and was answered by experts here. I request you to let my question stay here as there are many intelligent folks here who may resolve this question quickly.
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@arkaia It is true that this question has a lot of astronomy, but heat balance and effective temperature is Earth Science-ish, and if somebody masters an answer including greenhouse effect, that would definitely be Earth Sciences.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I understand your point. Close vote removed
$endgroup$
– arkaia
27 mins ago
$begingroup$
@arkaia I have shared another answer in the question which is similar and was answered by experts here. I request you to let my question stay here as there are many intelligent folks here who may resolve this question quickly.
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@arkaia I have shared another answer in the question which is similar and was answered by experts here. I request you to let my question stay here as there are many intelligent folks here who may resolve this question quickly.
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@arkaia It is true that this question has a lot of astronomy, but heat balance and effective temperature is Earth Science-ish, and if somebody masters an answer including greenhouse effect, that would definitely be Earth Sciences.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@arkaia It is true that this question has a lot of astronomy, but heat balance and effective temperature is Earth Science-ish, and if somebody masters an answer including greenhouse effect, that would definitely be Earth Sciences.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I understand your point. Close vote removed
$endgroup$
– arkaia
27 mins ago
$begingroup$
I understand your point. Close vote removed
$endgroup$
– arkaia
27 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Answers will be different because they must be tied to a model of solar evolution, and all models are a bit different.
So to answer your question we have to select a model. A pretty standard and trusted one, is the one used in the paper Stellar evolution models for Z = 0.0001 to 0.03. Where Z stands for the metalicity of the star, that for the Sun they indicate would be 0.0188.
In figure 2, they show the trajectory of a star like the sun in the H-R diagram (look for the line labeled "1.0").
The data output of this model is available at the VizieR catalog. I just downloaded the data for starts of one solar mass and Z=0.02 (like the Sun), and computed the effective temperature of Earth using the formula in the linked question
$Large frac{T}{T_0}=left(frac{L}{L_0}right)^{frac{1}{4}}$
Using a current effective temperature $T_0$ of -19°C (you will find values between -18 and -21°C), we get that the plot pf Luminosity and temperature versus time looks like this
And given that you are interested in specific values here is some tabulated data including also the solar radius. Note that most of these points are linear interpolations of the original data, that had only six points in this age range.
Age Radius Lumin. Temperature
[Billion [solar [Solar [°C]
years] radius] Lumin.]
0.00 0.89 0.7 -41.4
0.25 0.90 0.7 -40.2
0.50 0.91 0.7 -39.0
0.75 0.91 0.7 -37.8
1.00 0.92 0.8 -36.6
1.25 0.93 0.8 -35.4
1.50 0.94 0.8 -34.2
1.75 0.95 0.8 -32.9
2.00 0.95 0.8 -31.7
2.25 0.96 0.8 -30.4
2.50 0.97 0.8 -29.2
2.75 0.98 0.9 -27.9
3.00 0.99 0.9 -26.7
3.25 1.00 0.9 -25.4
3.50 1.00 0.9 -24.1
3.75 1.01 0.9 -22.8
4.00 1.02 1.0 -21.5
4.25 1.03 1.0 -20.2
4.50 1.04 1.0 -18.9
4.75 1.05 1.0 -17.6
5.00 1.06 1.0 -16.3
5.25 1.07 1.1 -15.0
5.50 1.08 1.1 -13.7
5.75 1.08 1.1 -12.3
6.00 1.09 1.1 -11.0
6.25 1.10 1.2 -9.6
6.50 1.11 1.2 -8.3
6.75 1.12 1.2 -6.9
7.00 1.13 1.2 -5.5
7.25 1.14 1.3 -4.1
7.50 1.15 1.3 -2.8
7.75 1.16 1.3 -1.4
8.00 1.17 1.3 0.0
8.25 1.18 1.4 1.4
8.50 1.19 1.4 2.9
8.75 1.20 1.4 4.3
9.00 1.21 1.4 5.7
9.25 1.22 1.5 7.2
9.50 1.26 1.5 9.2
9.75 1.32 1.6 11.9
10.00 1.38 1.6 14.7
10.25 1.44 1.7 17.5
10.50 1.51 1.8 20.3
10.75 1.58 1.8 23.1
11.00 1.66 1.9 25.9
11.25 1.74 2.0 28.8
11.50 1.82 2.1 31.7
11.75 1.90 2.2 34.7
12.00 2.40 3.1 65.0
12.25 4.08 7.8 151.9
12.50 6.94 19.6 261.2
12.75 11.68 57.8 427.2
Note that you can only know the effective temperature, the actual temperature will depend on the strength of the greenhouse effect, and modeling that is a whole new problem with huge uncertainties.
According to this model, the terminal age main sequence of the Sun would be 9.38 Billion years, and according to the data above, the effective temperature then would be 8.2 °C (281 K), that's 27.2 °C hotter than today.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for the detailed answer. Can you suggest any recent papers which have modeled the actual temperature? or any books which discuss compare various models for actual temperatures.
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm doubt anyone have dare to model greenhouse effect in multi-billion years timescale. Or at least I'm not aware of such research. I don't know why exactly do you need this number, but I think you are better off, figuring our at what temperature using normal green house effects, a runaway greenhouse effect would be inevitable.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Or as a mental exercise, it would be possible to calculate what would be the temperature if we have the same greenhouse effect than today but the solar luminosity of four billion years in the future.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I am trying to understand the future of Earth when the Sun becomes a red giant. Do you have any books or latest papers which discuss the future 5 billion years from now?
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
This article is nice academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/42/6/6.26/293074
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "553"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fearthscience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f16580%2fwhat-will-be-the-temperature-on-earth-when-sun-finishes-its-main-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Answers will be different because they must be tied to a model of solar evolution, and all models are a bit different.
So to answer your question we have to select a model. A pretty standard and trusted one, is the one used in the paper Stellar evolution models for Z = 0.0001 to 0.03. Where Z stands for the metalicity of the star, that for the Sun they indicate would be 0.0188.
In figure 2, they show the trajectory of a star like the sun in the H-R diagram (look for the line labeled "1.0").
The data output of this model is available at the VizieR catalog. I just downloaded the data for starts of one solar mass and Z=0.02 (like the Sun), and computed the effective temperature of Earth using the formula in the linked question
$Large frac{T}{T_0}=left(frac{L}{L_0}right)^{frac{1}{4}}$
Using a current effective temperature $T_0$ of -19°C (you will find values between -18 and -21°C), we get that the plot pf Luminosity and temperature versus time looks like this
And given that you are interested in specific values here is some tabulated data including also the solar radius. Note that most of these points are linear interpolations of the original data, that had only six points in this age range.
Age Radius Lumin. Temperature
[Billion [solar [Solar [°C]
years] radius] Lumin.]
0.00 0.89 0.7 -41.4
0.25 0.90 0.7 -40.2
0.50 0.91 0.7 -39.0
0.75 0.91 0.7 -37.8
1.00 0.92 0.8 -36.6
1.25 0.93 0.8 -35.4
1.50 0.94 0.8 -34.2
1.75 0.95 0.8 -32.9
2.00 0.95 0.8 -31.7
2.25 0.96 0.8 -30.4
2.50 0.97 0.8 -29.2
2.75 0.98 0.9 -27.9
3.00 0.99 0.9 -26.7
3.25 1.00 0.9 -25.4
3.50 1.00 0.9 -24.1
3.75 1.01 0.9 -22.8
4.00 1.02 1.0 -21.5
4.25 1.03 1.0 -20.2
4.50 1.04 1.0 -18.9
4.75 1.05 1.0 -17.6
5.00 1.06 1.0 -16.3
5.25 1.07 1.1 -15.0
5.50 1.08 1.1 -13.7
5.75 1.08 1.1 -12.3
6.00 1.09 1.1 -11.0
6.25 1.10 1.2 -9.6
6.50 1.11 1.2 -8.3
6.75 1.12 1.2 -6.9
7.00 1.13 1.2 -5.5
7.25 1.14 1.3 -4.1
7.50 1.15 1.3 -2.8
7.75 1.16 1.3 -1.4
8.00 1.17 1.3 0.0
8.25 1.18 1.4 1.4
8.50 1.19 1.4 2.9
8.75 1.20 1.4 4.3
9.00 1.21 1.4 5.7
9.25 1.22 1.5 7.2
9.50 1.26 1.5 9.2
9.75 1.32 1.6 11.9
10.00 1.38 1.6 14.7
10.25 1.44 1.7 17.5
10.50 1.51 1.8 20.3
10.75 1.58 1.8 23.1
11.00 1.66 1.9 25.9
11.25 1.74 2.0 28.8
11.50 1.82 2.1 31.7
11.75 1.90 2.2 34.7
12.00 2.40 3.1 65.0
12.25 4.08 7.8 151.9
12.50 6.94 19.6 261.2
12.75 11.68 57.8 427.2
Note that you can only know the effective temperature, the actual temperature will depend on the strength of the greenhouse effect, and modeling that is a whole new problem with huge uncertainties.
According to this model, the terminal age main sequence of the Sun would be 9.38 Billion years, and according to the data above, the effective temperature then would be 8.2 °C (281 K), that's 27.2 °C hotter than today.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for the detailed answer. Can you suggest any recent papers which have modeled the actual temperature? or any books which discuss compare various models for actual temperatures.
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm doubt anyone have dare to model greenhouse effect in multi-billion years timescale. Or at least I'm not aware of such research. I don't know why exactly do you need this number, but I think you are better off, figuring our at what temperature using normal green house effects, a runaway greenhouse effect would be inevitable.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Or as a mental exercise, it would be possible to calculate what would be the temperature if we have the same greenhouse effect than today but the solar luminosity of four billion years in the future.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I am trying to understand the future of Earth when the Sun becomes a red giant. Do you have any books or latest papers which discuss the future 5 billion years from now?
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
This article is nice academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/42/6/6.26/293074
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Answers will be different because they must be tied to a model of solar evolution, and all models are a bit different.
So to answer your question we have to select a model. A pretty standard and trusted one, is the one used in the paper Stellar evolution models for Z = 0.0001 to 0.03. Where Z stands for the metalicity of the star, that for the Sun they indicate would be 0.0188.
In figure 2, they show the trajectory of a star like the sun in the H-R diagram (look for the line labeled "1.0").
The data output of this model is available at the VizieR catalog. I just downloaded the data for starts of one solar mass and Z=0.02 (like the Sun), and computed the effective temperature of Earth using the formula in the linked question
$Large frac{T}{T_0}=left(frac{L}{L_0}right)^{frac{1}{4}}$
Using a current effective temperature $T_0$ of -19°C (you will find values between -18 and -21°C), we get that the plot pf Luminosity and temperature versus time looks like this
And given that you are interested in specific values here is some tabulated data including also the solar radius. Note that most of these points are linear interpolations of the original data, that had only six points in this age range.
Age Radius Lumin. Temperature
[Billion [solar [Solar [°C]
years] radius] Lumin.]
0.00 0.89 0.7 -41.4
0.25 0.90 0.7 -40.2
0.50 0.91 0.7 -39.0
0.75 0.91 0.7 -37.8
1.00 0.92 0.8 -36.6
1.25 0.93 0.8 -35.4
1.50 0.94 0.8 -34.2
1.75 0.95 0.8 -32.9
2.00 0.95 0.8 -31.7
2.25 0.96 0.8 -30.4
2.50 0.97 0.8 -29.2
2.75 0.98 0.9 -27.9
3.00 0.99 0.9 -26.7
3.25 1.00 0.9 -25.4
3.50 1.00 0.9 -24.1
3.75 1.01 0.9 -22.8
4.00 1.02 1.0 -21.5
4.25 1.03 1.0 -20.2
4.50 1.04 1.0 -18.9
4.75 1.05 1.0 -17.6
5.00 1.06 1.0 -16.3
5.25 1.07 1.1 -15.0
5.50 1.08 1.1 -13.7
5.75 1.08 1.1 -12.3
6.00 1.09 1.1 -11.0
6.25 1.10 1.2 -9.6
6.50 1.11 1.2 -8.3
6.75 1.12 1.2 -6.9
7.00 1.13 1.2 -5.5
7.25 1.14 1.3 -4.1
7.50 1.15 1.3 -2.8
7.75 1.16 1.3 -1.4
8.00 1.17 1.3 0.0
8.25 1.18 1.4 1.4
8.50 1.19 1.4 2.9
8.75 1.20 1.4 4.3
9.00 1.21 1.4 5.7
9.25 1.22 1.5 7.2
9.50 1.26 1.5 9.2
9.75 1.32 1.6 11.9
10.00 1.38 1.6 14.7
10.25 1.44 1.7 17.5
10.50 1.51 1.8 20.3
10.75 1.58 1.8 23.1
11.00 1.66 1.9 25.9
11.25 1.74 2.0 28.8
11.50 1.82 2.1 31.7
11.75 1.90 2.2 34.7
12.00 2.40 3.1 65.0
12.25 4.08 7.8 151.9
12.50 6.94 19.6 261.2
12.75 11.68 57.8 427.2
Note that you can only know the effective temperature, the actual temperature will depend on the strength of the greenhouse effect, and modeling that is a whole new problem with huge uncertainties.
According to this model, the terminal age main sequence of the Sun would be 9.38 Billion years, and according to the data above, the effective temperature then would be 8.2 °C (281 K), that's 27.2 °C hotter than today.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for the detailed answer. Can you suggest any recent papers which have modeled the actual temperature? or any books which discuss compare various models for actual temperatures.
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm doubt anyone have dare to model greenhouse effect in multi-billion years timescale. Or at least I'm not aware of such research. I don't know why exactly do you need this number, but I think you are better off, figuring our at what temperature using normal green house effects, a runaway greenhouse effect would be inevitable.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Or as a mental exercise, it would be possible to calculate what would be the temperature if we have the same greenhouse effect than today but the solar luminosity of four billion years in the future.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I am trying to understand the future of Earth when the Sun becomes a red giant. Do you have any books or latest papers which discuss the future 5 billion years from now?
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
This article is nice academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/42/6/6.26/293074
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Answers will be different because they must be tied to a model of solar evolution, and all models are a bit different.
So to answer your question we have to select a model. A pretty standard and trusted one, is the one used in the paper Stellar evolution models for Z = 0.0001 to 0.03. Where Z stands for the metalicity of the star, that for the Sun they indicate would be 0.0188.
In figure 2, they show the trajectory of a star like the sun in the H-R diagram (look for the line labeled "1.0").
The data output of this model is available at the VizieR catalog. I just downloaded the data for starts of one solar mass and Z=0.02 (like the Sun), and computed the effective temperature of Earth using the formula in the linked question
$Large frac{T}{T_0}=left(frac{L}{L_0}right)^{frac{1}{4}}$
Using a current effective temperature $T_0$ of -19°C (you will find values between -18 and -21°C), we get that the plot pf Luminosity and temperature versus time looks like this
And given that you are interested in specific values here is some tabulated data including also the solar radius. Note that most of these points are linear interpolations of the original data, that had only six points in this age range.
Age Radius Lumin. Temperature
[Billion [solar [Solar [°C]
years] radius] Lumin.]
0.00 0.89 0.7 -41.4
0.25 0.90 0.7 -40.2
0.50 0.91 0.7 -39.0
0.75 0.91 0.7 -37.8
1.00 0.92 0.8 -36.6
1.25 0.93 0.8 -35.4
1.50 0.94 0.8 -34.2
1.75 0.95 0.8 -32.9
2.00 0.95 0.8 -31.7
2.25 0.96 0.8 -30.4
2.50 0.97 0.8 -29.2
2.75 0.98 0.9 -27.9
3.00 0.99 0.9 -26.7
3.25 1.00 0.9 -25.4
3.50 1.00 0.9 -24.1
3.75 1.01 0.9 -22.8
4.00 1.02 1.0 -21.5
4.25 1.03 1.0 -20.2
4.50 1.04 1.0 -18.9
4.75 1.05 1.0 -17.6
5.00 1.06 1.0 -16.3
5.25 1.07 1.1 -15.0
5.50 1.08 1.1 -13.7
5.75 1.08 1.1 -12.3
6.00 1.09 1.1 -11.0
6.25 1.10 1.2 -9.6
6.50 1.11 1.2 -8.3
6.75 1.12 1.2 -6.9
7.00 1.13 1.2 -5.5
7.25 1.14 1.3 -4.1
7.50 1.15 1.3 -2.8
7.75 1.16 1.3 -1.4
8.00 1.17 1.3 0.0
8.25 1.18 1.4 1.4
8.50 1.19 1.4 2.9
8.75 1.20 1.4 4.3
9.00 1.21 1.4 5.7
9.25 1.22 1.5 7.2
9.50 1.26 1.5 9.2
9.75 1.32 1.6 11.9
10.00 1.38 1.6 14.7
10.25 1.44 1.7 17.5
10.50 1.51 1.8 20.3
10.75 1.58 1.8 23.1
11.00 1.66 1.9 25.9
11.25 1.74 2.0 28.8
11.50 1.82 2.1 31.7
11.75 1.90 2.2 34.7
12.00 2.40 3.1 65.0
12.25 4.08 7.8 151.9
12.50 6.94 19.6 261.2
12.75 11.68 57.8 427.2
Note that you can only know the effective temperature, the actual temperature will depend on the strength of the greenhouse effect, and modeling that is a whole new problem with huge uncertainties.
According to this model, the terminal age main sequence of the Sun would be 9.38 Billion years, and according to the data above, the effective temperature then would be 8.2 °C (281 K), that's 27.2 °C hotter than today.
$endgroup$
Answers will be different because they must be tied to a model of solar evolution, and all models are a bit different.
So to answer your question we have to select a model. A pretty standard and trusted one, is the one used in the paper Stellar evolution models for Z = 0.0001 to 0.03. Where Z stands for the metalicity of the star, that for the Sun they indicate would be 0.0188.
In figure 2, they show the trajectory of a star like the sun in the H-R diagram (look for the line labeled "1.0").
The data output of this model is available at the VizieR catalog. I just downloaded the data for starts of one solar mass and Z=0.02 (like the Sun), and computed the effective temperature of Earth using the formula in the linked question
$Large frac{T}{T_0}=left(frac{L}{L_0}right)^{frac{1}{4}}$
Using a current effective temperature $T_0$ of -19°C (you will find values between -18 and -21°C), we get that the plot pf Luminosity and temperature versus time looks like this
And given that you are interested in specific values here is some tabulated data including also the solar radius. Note that most of these points are linear interpolations of the original data, that had only six points in this age range.
Age Radius Lumin. Temperature
[Billion [solar [Solar [°C]
years] radius] Lumin.]
0.00 0.89 0.7 -41.4
0.25 0.90 0.7 -40.2
0.50 0.91 0.7 -39.0
0.75 0.91 0.7 -37.8
1.00 0.92 0.8 -36.6
1.25 0.93 0.8 -35.4
1.50 0.94 0.8 -34.2
1.75 0.95 0.8 -32.9
2.00 0.95 0.8 -31.7
2.25 0.96 0.8 -30.4
2.50 0.97 0.8 -29.2
2.75 0.98 0.9 -27.9
3.00 0.99 0.9 -26.7
3.25 1.00 0.9 -25.4
3.50 1.00 0.9 -24.1
3.75 1.01 0.9 -22.8
4.00 1.02 1.0 -21.5
4.25 1.03 1.0 -20.2
4.50 1.04 1.0 -18.9
4.75 1.05 1.0 -17.6
5.00 1.06 1.0 -16.3
5.25 1.07 1.1 -15.0
5.50 1.08 1.1 -13.7
5.75 1.08 1.1 -12.3
6.00 1.09 1.1 -11.0
6.25 1.10 1.2 -9.6
6.50 1.11 1.2 -8.3
6.75 1.12 1.2 -6.9
7.00 1.13 1.2 -5.5
7.25 1.14 1.3 -4.1
7.50 1.15 1.3 -2.8
7.75 1.16 1.3 -1.4
8.00 1.17 1.3 0.0
8.25 1.18 1.4 1.4
8.50 1.19 1.4 2.9
8.75 1.20 1.4 4.3
9.00 1.21 1.4 5.7
9.25 1.22 1.5 7.2
9.50 1.26 1.5 9.2
9.75 1.32 1.6 11.9
10.00 1.38 1.6 14.7
10.25 1.44 1.7 17.5
10.50 1.51 1.8 20.3
10.75 1.58 1.8 23.1
11.00 1.66 1.9 25.9
11.25 1.74 2.0 28.8
11.50 1.82 2.1 31.7
11.75 1.90 2.2 34.7
12.00 2.40 3.1 65.0
12.25 4.08 7.8 151.9
12.50 6.94 19.6 261.2
12.75 11.68 57.8 427.2
Note that you can only know the effective temperature, the actual temperature will depend on the strength of the greenhouse effect, and modeling that is a whole new problem with huge uncertainties.
According to this model, the terminal age main sequence of the Sun would be 9.38 Billion years, and according to the data above, the effective temperature then would be 8.2 °C (281 K), that's 27.2 °C hotter than today.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 2 hours ago
Camilo RadaCamilo Rada
13.5k54396
13.5k54396
$begingroup$
Thank you for the detailed answer. Can you suggest any recent papers which have modeled the actual temperature? or any books which discuss compare various models for actual temperatures.
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm doubt anyone have dare to model greenhouse effect in multi-billion years timescale. Or at least I'm not aware of such research. I don't know why exactly do you need this number, but I think you are better off, figuring our at what temperature using normal green house effects, a runaway greenhouse effect would be inevitable.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Or as a mental exercise, it would be possible to calculate what would be the temperature if we have the same greenhouse effect than today but the solar luminosity of four billion years in the future.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I am trying to understand the future of Earth when the Sun becomes a red giant. Do you have any books or latest papers which discuss the future 5 billion years from now?
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
This article is nice academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/42/6/6.26/293074
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you for the detailed answer. Can you suggest any recent papers which have modeled the actual temperature? or any books which discuss compare various models for actual temperatures.
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm doubt anyone have dare to model greenhouse effect in multi-billion years timescale. Or at least I'm not aware of such research. I don't know why exactly do you need this number, but I think you are better off, figuring our at what temperature using normal green house effects, a runaway greenhouse effect would be inevitable.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Or as a mental exercise, it would be possible to calculate what would be the temperature if we have the same greenhouse effect than today but the solar luminosity of four billion years in the future.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I am trying to understand the future of Earth when the Sun becomes a red giant. Do you have any books or latest papers which discuss the future 5 billion years from now?
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
This article is nice academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/42/6/6.26/293074
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thank you for the detailed answer. Can you suggest any recent papers which have modeled the actual temperature? or any books which discuss compare various models for actual temperatures.
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you for the detailed answer. Can you suggest any recent papers which have modeled the actual temperature? or any books which discuss compare various models for actual temperatures.
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm doubt anyone have dare to model greenhouse effect in multi-billion years timescale. Or at least I'm not aware of such research. I don't know why exactly do you need this number, but I think you are better off, figuring our at what temperature using normal green house effects, a runaway greenhouse effect would be inevitable.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm doubt anyone have dare to model greenhouse effect in multi-billion years timescale. Or at least I'm not aware of such research. I don't know why exactly do you need this number, but I think you are better off, figuring our at what temperature using normal green house effects, a runaway greenhouse effect would be inevitable.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Or as a mental exercise, it would be possible to calculate what would be the temperature if we have the same greenhouse effect than today but the solar luminosity of four billion years in the future.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Or as a mental exercise, it would be possible to calculate what would be the temperature if we have the same greenhouse effect than today but the solar luminosity of four billion years in the future.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I am trying to understand the future of Earth when the Sun becomes a red giant. Do you have any books or latest papers which discuss the future 5 billion years from now?
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I am trying to understand the future of Earth when the Sun becomes a red giant. Do you have any books or latest papers which discuss the future 5 billion years from now?
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
2 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
This article is nice academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/42/6/6.26/293074
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This article is nice academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/42/6/6.26/293074
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Earth Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fearthscience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f16580%2fwhat-will-be-the-temperature-on-earth-when-sun-finishes-its-main-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
@arkaia I have shared another answer in the question which is similar and was answered by experts here. I request you to let my question stay here as there are many intelligent folks here who may resolve this question quickly.
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@arkaia It is true that this question has a lot of astronomy, but heat balance and effective temperature is Earth Science-ish, and if somebody masters an answer including greenhouse effect, that would definitely be Earth Sciences.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I understand your point. Close vote removed
$endgroup$
– arkaia
27 mins ago