Why can I easily sing or whistle a tune I've just heard, but not as easily reproduce it on an...
Avoiding morning and evening handshakes
How to avoid being sexist when trying to employ someone to function in a very sexist environment?
How to satisfy a player character's curiosity about another player character?
Obtaining a matrix of complex values from associations giving the real and imaginary parts of each element?
Table enclosed in curly brackets
How to properly claim credit for peer review?
raspberry pi change directory (cd) command not working with USB drive
What's a good word to describe a public place that looks like it wouldn't be rough?
Meth dealer reference in Family Guy
Can chords be played on the flute?
Can a person refuse a presidential pardon?
Why is commutativity optional in multiplication for rings?
What is Crew Dragon approaching in this picture?
A Wacky, Wacky Chessboard (That Makes No Sense)
Prove that every even perfect number is a triangular number.
Can the Assuming function be used with ContourPlot or DensityPlot?
Finding an integral using a table?
Where was Karl Mordo in Infinity War?
Why do members of Congress in committee hearings ask witnesses the same question multiple times?
What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?
Find the number of ways to express 1050 as sum of consecutive integers
On what did Lego base the appearance of the new Hogwarts minifigs?
Meaning of すきっとした
What happens if a wizard reaches level 20 but has no 3rd-level spells that they can use with the Signature Spells feature?
Why can I easily sing or whistle a tune I've just heard, but not as easily reproduce it on an instrument?
common mistakes made when singingWhat parameters decide one's vocal range?Why can I sing in key?How can you tell if the singer is in pitch?Do capable harmony singers sing in just intonation or tempered tuning?Role of muscle memory vs. ear-based micro-adjustments in non-fixed-note instrumentsCan't sing high or projectUnable to properly hear myself singing, but can hear well playing or singing othersI cannot hold my pitch when accompanied. How to best practice this?How to sing as the soloists in Latvia State Choir's recording of Ēriks Ešenvalds' “Landscape With Herdsmen”
People with perfect pitch can easily reproduce a tune they've just heard on their instrument of choice.
Most trained musicians without perfect pitch can also do this, but they would have to experiment a bit first to find the correct notes.
However most people, without perfect pitch, and even without singing experience can easily sing or whistle a tune they've just heard which they haven't heard before. Or at least find it much less difficult to do so than with an instrument.
I would have thought that this is down to relative experience between the use of vocal chords and instruments. I am much more experienced in using my vocal chords to make sounds than any other instrument because I've used them for talking every day for most of my life.
However, there seems to be a contradiction in this logic because even people with no singing experience can reproduce a tune with their voice much more easily than a professional pianist can reproduce a tune by ear on the piano (without perfect pitch).
Why do I find it easier to reproduce tunes with my voice than with an instrument? Even if I am highly trained with that instrument?
Why do I have to experiment with pitches on an instrument to reproduce a tune by ear, but I don't have to experiment with pitches when using my voice?
voice
New contributor
|
show 3 more comments
People with perfect pitch can easily reproduce a tune they've just heard on their instrument of choice.
Most trained musicians without perfect pitch can also do this, but they would have to experiment a bit first to find the correct notes.
However most people, without perfect pitch, and even without singing experience can easily sing or whistle a tune they've just heard which they haven't heard before. Or at least find it much less difficult to do so than with an instrument.
I would have thought that this is down to relative experience between the use of vocal chords and instruments. I am much more experienced in using my vocal chords to make sounds than any other instrument because I've used them for talking every day for most of my life.
However, there seems to be a contradiction in this logic because even people with no singing experience can reproduce a tune with their voice much more easily than a professional pianist can reproduce a tune by ear on the piano (without perfect pitch).
Why do I find it easier to reproduce tunes with my voice than with an instrument? Even if I am highly trained with that instrument?
Why do I have to experiment with pitches on an instrument to reproduce a tune by ear, but I don't have to experiment with pitches when using my voice?
voice
New contributor
5
It is not true that most trained musicians without perfect pitch have to experiment to find the correct notes (depending on what you mean by "trained"). Experienced and skilled musicians can immediately play what they hear. Untrained singers do the same thing that untrained players of instruments to: they slide pitches around until they seem to work. Experience talking is not remotely close to experience discriminating and executing accurate pitches. Really, all of your premises seem wrong to me.
– David Bowling
14 hours ago
What instrument do you play? From my own experience I can tell you that my relative pitch was better because ai played a brass instrument as there you always have to mind the interval ... but then playing piano I improved my knowledge of harmony that helped me to derive the chords and tones I heard.
– Albrecht Hügli
13 hours ago
1
Perfect or absolute pitch has little to do with the capability of being able to reproduce a tune once it's been heard.Absolute pitch is being able to hear a sound and identify what pitch, or note it actually is. Second sentence is also not accurate. Many competent musicians who rely heavily on sight-reading to play may not be able to re-play something heard. Others, who have a 'good ear' will be able to reproduce a tune accurately.You are basically talking about a single note tune, as sing/whistle is all that can be.So anyone who knows their instrument as well as their voice will find it easy.
– Tim
13 hours ago
1
@AlbrechtHügli - that's as maybe. Whistling or singing produces only one note at a time, so no harmony in the question, which, to my mind, is asked using flawed premises.
– Tim
13 hours ago
1
I don't think people with absolute pitch would think in terms of a series of note names when trying to pick out a tune, even on a familiar instrument. I don't think it's what many folk do anyway. Absolute pitch is useful to recogise what note is being heard, not categorise a string of notes. As others say, relative pitch is far more useful here. And although those with a.p. probably have good r.p., it's the latter they'll use more.
– Tim
12 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
People with perfect pitch can easily reproduce a tune they've just heard on their instrument of choice.
Most trained musicians without perfect pitch can also do this, but they would have to experiment a bit first to find the correct notes.
However most people, without perfect pitch, and even without singing experience can easily sing or whistle a tune they've just heard which they haven't heard before. Or at least find it much less difficult to do so than with an instrument.
I would have thought that this is down to relative experience between the use of vocal chords and instruments. I am much more experienced in using my vocal chords to make sounds than any other instrument because I've used them for talking every day for most of my life.
However, there seems to be a contradiction in this logic because even people with no singing experience can reproduce a tune with their voice much more easily than a professional pianist can reproduce a tune by ear on the piano (without perfect pitch).
Why do I find it easier to reproduce tunes with my voice than with an instrument? Even if I am highly trained with that instrument?
Why do I have to experiment with pitches on an instrument to reproduce a tune by ear, but I don't have to experiment with pitches when using my voice?
voice
New contributor
People with perfect pitch can easily reproduce a tune they've just heard on their instrument of choice.
Most trained musicians without perfect pitch can also do this, but they would have to experiment a bit first to find the correct notes.
However most people, without perfect pitch, and even without singing experience can easily sing or whistle a tune they've just heard which they haven't heard before. Or at least find it much less difficult to do so than with an instrument.
I would have thought that this is down to relative experience between the use of vocal chords and instruments. I am much more experienced in using my vocal chords to make sounds than any other instrument because I've used them for talking every day for most of my life.
However, there seems to be a contradiction in this logic because even people with no singing experience can reproduce a tune with their voice much more easily than a professional pianist can reproduce a tune by ear on the piano (without perfect pitch).
Why do I find it easier to reproduce tunes with my voice than with an instrument? Even if I am highly trained with that instrument?
Why do I have to experiment with pitches on an instrument to reproduce a tune by ear, but I don't have to experiment with pitches when using my voice?
voice
voice
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 14 hours ago
KarlKarl
864
864
New contributor
New contributor
5
It is not true that most trained musicians without perfect pitch have to experiment to find the correct notes (depending on what you mean by "trained"). Experienced and skilled musicians can immediately play what they hear. Untrained singers do the same thing that untrained players of instruments to: they slide pitches around until they seem to work. Experience talking is not remotely close to experience discriminating and executing accurate pitches. Really, all of your premises seem wrong to me.
– David Bowling
14 hours ago
What instrument do you play? From my own experience I can tell you that my relative pitch was better because ai played a brass instrument as there you always have to mind the interval ... but then playing piano I improved my knowledge of harmony that helped me to derive the chords and tones I heard.
– Albrecht Hügli
13 hours ago
1
Perfect or absolute pitch has little to do with the capability of being able to reproduce a tune once it's been heard.Absolute pitch is being able to hear a sound and identify what pitch, or note it actually is. Second sentence is also not accurate. Many competent musicians who rely heavily on sight-reading to play may not be able to re-play something heard. Others, who have a 'good ear' will be able to reproduce a tune accurately.You are basically talking about a single note tune, as sing/whistle is all that can be.So anyone who knows their instrument as well as their voice will find it easy.
– Tim
13 hours ago
1
@AlbrechtHügli - that's as maybe. Whistling or singing produces only one note at a time, so no harmony in the question, which, to my mind, is asked using flawed premises.
– Tim
13 hours ago
1
I don't think people with absolute pitch would think in terms of a series of note names when trying to pick out a tune, even on a familiar instrument. I don't think it's what many folk do anyway. Absolute pitch is useful to recogise what note is being heard, not categorise a string of notes. As others say, relative pitch is far more useful here. And although those with a.p. probably have good r.p., it's the latter they'll use more.
– Tim
12 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
5
It is not true that most trained musicians without perfect pitch have to experiment to find the correct notes (depending on what you mean by "trained"). Experienced and skilled musicians can immediately play what they hear. Untrained singers do the same thing that untrained players of instruments to: they slide pitches around until they seem to work. Experience talking is not remotely close to experience discriminating and executing accurate pitches. Really, all of your premises seem wrong to me.
– David Bowling
14 hours ago
What instrument do you play? From my own experience I can tell you that my relative pitch was better because ai played a brass instrument as there you always have to mind the interval ... but then playing piano I improved my knowledge of harmony that helped me to derive the chords and tones I heard.
– Albrecht Hügli
13 hours ago
1
Perfect or absolute pitch has little to do with the capability of being able to reproduce a tune once it's been heard.Absolute pitch is being able to hear a sound and identify what pitch, or note it actually is. Second sentence is also not accurate. Many competent musicians who rely heavily on sight-reading to play may not be able to re-play something heard. Others, who have a 'good ear' will be able to reproduce a tune accurately.You are basically talking about a single note tune, as sing/whistle is all that can be.So anyone who knows their instrument as well as their voice will find it easy.
– Tim
13 hours ago
1
@AlbrechtHügli - that's as maybe. Whistling or singing produces only one note at a time, so no harmony in the question, which, to my mind, is asked using flawed premises.
– Tim
13 hours ago
1
I don't think people with absolute pitch would think in terms of a series of note names when trying to pick out a tune, even on a familiar instrument. I don't think it's what many folk do anyway. Absolute pitch is useful to recogise what note is being heard, not categorise a string of notes. As others say, relative pitch is far more useful here. And although those with a.p. probably have good r.p., it's the latter they'll use more.
– Tim
12 hours ago
5
5
It is not true that most trained musicians without perfect pitch have to experiment to find the correct notes (depending on what you mean by "trained"). Experienced and skilled musicians can immediately play what they hear. Untrained singers do the same thing that untrained players of instruments to: they slide pitches around until they seem to work. Experience talking is not remotely close to experience discriminating and executing accurate pitches. Really, all of your premises seem wrong to me.
– David Bowling
14 hours ago
It is not true that most trained musicians without perfect pitch have to experiment to find the correct notes (depending on what you mean by "trained"). Experienced and skilled musicians can immediately play what they hear. Untrained singers do the same thing that untrained players of instruments to: they slide pitches around until they seem to work. Experience talking is not remotely close to experience discriminating and executing accurate pitches. Really, all of your premises seem wrong to me.
– David Bowling
14 hours ago
What instrument do you play? From my own experience I can tell you that my relative pitch was better because ai played a brass instrument as there you always have to mind the interval ... but then playing piano I improved my knowledge of harmony that helped me to derive the chords and tones I heard.
– Albrecht Hügli
13 hours ago
What instrument do you play? From my own experience I can tell you that my relative pitch was better because ai played a brass instrument as there you always have to mind the interval ... but then playing piano I improved my knowledge of harmony that helped me to derive the chords and tones I heard.
– Albrecht Hügli
13 hours ago
1
1
Perfect or absolute pitch has little to do with the capability of being able to reproduce a tune once it's been heard.Absolute pitch is being able to hear a sound and identify what pitch, or note it actually is. Second sentence is also not accurate. Many competent musicians who rely heavily on sight-reading to play may not be able to re-play something heard. Others, who have a 'good ear' will be able to reproduce a tune accurately.You are basically talking about a single note tune, as sing/whistle is all that can be.So anyone who knows their instrument as well as their voice will find it easy.
– Tim
13 hours ago
Perfect or absolute pitch has little to do with the capability of being able to reproduce a tune once it's been heard.Absolute pitch is being able to hear a sound and identify what pitch, or note it actually is. Second sentence is also not accurate. Many competent musicians who rely heavily on sight-reading to play may not be able to re-play something heard. Others, who have a 'good ear' will be able to reproduce a tune accurately.You are basically talking about a single note tune, as sing/whistle is all that can be.So anyone who knows their instrument as well as their voice will find it easy.
– Tim
13 hours ago
1
1
@AlbrechtHügli - that's as maybe. Whistling or singing produces only one note at a time, so no harmony in the question, which, to my mind, is asked using flawed premises.
– Tim
13 hours ago
@AlbrechtHügli - that's as maybe. Whistling or singing produces only one note at a time, so no harmony in the question, which, to my mind, is asked using flawed premises.
– Tim
13 hours ago
1
1
I don't think people with absolute pitch would think in terms of a series of note names when trying to pick out a tune, even on a familiar instrument. I don't think it's what many folk do anyway. Absolute pitch is useful to recogise what note is being heard, not categorise a string of notes. As others say, relative pitch is far more useful here. And although those with a.p. probably have good r.p., it's the latter they'll use more.
– Tim
12 hours ago
I don't think people with absolute pitch would think in terms of a series of note names when trying to pick out a tune, even on a familiar instrument. I don't think it's what many folk do anyway. Absolute pitch is useful to recogise what note is being heard, not categorise a string of notes. As others say, relative pitch is far more useful here. And although those with a.p. probably have good r.p., it's the latter they'll use more.
– Tim
12 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Voice is an 'instrument' that many people learn in almost an ideal way. We start young, and practice with it very frequently - even speaking teaches you how to control the pitch of your voice. And because it's an instrument that everyone has, almost everyone also learns to sing in various environments, from singing rhymes in nursery school, to singing along in school assemblies or as parts of a sports crowd - not to mention those who learn in a slightly more formal way.
Voice is also an instrument we have very direct control over. We don't have to worry about things like finger positions - people develop a subconscious mental map of how to control their vocal cords to hit a certain note; it almost becomes like a "thought-controlled' instrument. Due to the immediacy of control, we can also correct ourselves very quickly, so small mistakes can be corrected quickly.
Due to all these advantages that being 'built-in' to the body gives, it's true that many - perhaps most - people do have the ability to sing back a tune.
However, I think you're underestimating how good professional musicians are at reproducing tunes by ear. As per David Bowling's comment, I'd expect most professional instrumentalists to be able to play back tunes on their instrument by ear. It may be that they aren't able to do so with quite as little conscious thought as someone can when they are singing, but their experience with mapping heard notes to scales, and their scales to positions on the instrument, will make up for that.
Why do I have to experiment with pitches on an instrument to reproduce a tune by ear?
Probably simply because you haven't attained enough experience in reproducing tunes by ear on an instrument! To get good at this you probably need to learn from various angles. One angle would be doing some ear training exercises to help the mapping between the sound and the notion of which note of the scale; another exercise would be to practice scales and arpeggios on the instrument to reinforce the mapping between the concept of the note and the physical finger position. Practicing improvisation will also help to make your playing more instinctive. Even some quite 'passive' exercises - like noodling on the instrument while watching on TV - will help with this.
add a comment |
I would have thought that this is down to relative experience between the use of vocal chords and instruments. I am much more experienced in using my vocal chords to make sounds than any other instrument because I've used them for talking every day for most of my life.
As you say: even not trained people are able to reproduce a tune (singing or whistling). This must have become an unconditioned reflex by our language acquisition.
In opposition to your assumptions it can be aid that some musicians become a unison with their instrument that they can play every tune they hear without reflecting (right in the same way you are able to reproduce a tune.
To the most part of people the training of solfege and relative pitch is what they need to identify the tones of a melody.
The reflection of the names of the notes you sing or whistle will be necessary to play the right tones or keys on an instrument. It will take years of practice until this may become a conditioned reflex.
add a comment |
The way we produce sound with our voice is the simplest thing on earth: if you want to sing low, you open your throat as much as possible, and then gradually close it to produce higher sounds. So all you need to sing is the ability to recognize wether you are too low or too high.
On the other hand, when you play an instrument such as the piano, you can't adjust your note as fast as you'd do when you singing. So if you are playing a note which is to low, you will have to make a guess on how much it is too low, and if you don't get it right away (which will probably happen) you'll have to do it again and again. This will take way more time than adjusting your throat takes.
I think this is also why when someone starts to whistle, he gets good really fast, even though he has not been practicing since being a kid.
If you play saxophone, clarinet, bassoon, trumpet, or anything that has an embouchure, try playing a song with only your embouchure, and you'll see it's not so hard (even though some do not have a huge range, like the saxophone's embouchure in which you can barely get an octave).
So yes, I'd say it's the way the voice works which makes it so easy to use.
add a comment |
Singing is monophonic - only one note at a time. Piano and guitar and drums and so forth can play lots of notes at once. each extra note will take another human to sing it.
Also, you can feel whether the note is right or not immediately when singing and quickly glissando to the proper note if you hit it wrong. hit the wrong note on an instrument and there's usually no saving yourself - it was just wrong and there's no hiding it.
But provided your instrument is monophonic, you'll eventually get to the point where you can "sing" with it.
With instruments that can play 2+ notes at once, you will always have to "just learn and practice it"... It's just gonna be harder because you're doing multiple things at once.
Singers have it easy (ok ok sorry sheesh).
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Karl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80840%2fwhy-can-i-easily-sing-or-whistle-a-tune-ive-just-heard-but-not-as-easily-repro%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Voice is an 'instrument' that many people learn in almost an ideal way. We start young, and practice with it very frequently - even speaking teaches you how to control the pitch of your voice. And because it's an instrument that everyone has, almost everyone also learns to sing in various environments, from singing rhymes in nursery school, to singing along in school assemblies or as parts of a sports crowd - not to mention those who learn in a slightly more formal way.
Voice is also an instrument we have very direct control over. We don't have to worry about things like finger positions - people develop a subconscious mental map of how to control their vocal cords to hit a certain note; it almost becomes like a "thought-controlled' instrument. Due to the immediacy of control, we can also correct ourselves very quickly, so small mistakes can be corrected quickly.
Due to all these advantages that being 'built-in' to the body gives, it's true that many - perhaps most - people do have the ability to sing back a tune.
However, I think you're underestimating how good professional musicians are at reproducing tunes by ear. As per David Bowling's comment, I'd expect most professional instrumentalists to be able to play back tunes on their instrument by ear. It may be that they aren't able to do so with quite as little conscious thought as someone can when they are singing, but their experience with mapping heard notes to scales, and their scales to positions on the instrument, will make up for that.
Why do I have to experiment with pitches on an instrument to reproduce a tune by ear?
Probably simply because you haven't attained enough experience in reproducing tunes by ear on an instrument! To get good at this you probably need to learn from various angles. One angle would be doing some ear training exercises to help the mapping between the sound and the notion of which note of the scale; another exercise would be to practice scales and arpeggios on the instrument to reinforce the mapping between the concept of the note and the physical finger position. Practicing improvisation will also help to make your playing more instinctive. Even some quite 'passive' exercises - like noodling on the instrument while watching on TV - will help with this.
add a comment |
Voice is an 'instrument' that many people learn in almost an ideal way. We start young, and practice with it very frequently - even speaking teaches you how to control the pitch of your voice. And because it's an instrument that everyone has, almost everyone also learns to sing in various environments, from singing rhymes in nursery school, to singing along in school assemblies or as parts of a sports crowd - not to mention those who learn in a slightly more formal way.
Voice is also an instrument we have very direct control over. We don't have to worry about things like finger positions - people develop a subconscious mental map of how to control their vocal cords to hit a certain note; it almost becomes like a "thought-controlled' instrument. Due to the immediacy of control, we can also correct ourselves very quickly, so small mistakes can be corrected quickly.
Due to all these advantages that being 'built-in' to the body gives, it's true that many - perhaps most - people do have the ability to sing back a tune.
However, I think you're underestimating how good professional musicians are at reproducing tunes by ear. As per David Bowling's comment, I'd expect most professional instrumentalists to be able to play back tunes on their instrument by ear. It may be that they aren't able to do so with quite as little conscious thought as someone can when they are singing, but their experience with mapping heard notes to scales, and their scales to positions on the instrument, will make up for that.
Why do I have to experiment with pitches on an instrument to reproduce a tune by ear?
Probably simply because you haven't attained enough experience in reproducing tunes by ear on an instrument! To get good at this you probably need to learn from various angles. One angle would be doing some ear training exercises to help the mapping between the sound and the notion of which note of the scale; another exercise would be to practice scales and arpeggios on the instrument to reinforce the mapping between the concept of the note and the physical finger position. Practicing improvisation will also help to make your playing more instinctive. Even some quite 'passive' exercises - like noodling on the instrument while watching on TV - will help with this.
add a comment |
Voice is an 'instrument' that many people learn in almost an ideal way. We start young, and practice with it very frequently - even speaking teaches you how to control the pitch of your voice. And because it's an instrument that everyone has, almost everyone also learns to sing in various environments, from singing rhymes in nursery school, to singing along in school assemblies or as parts of a sports crowd - not to mention those who learn in a slightly more formal way.
Voice is also an instrument we have very direct control over. We don't have to worry about things like finger positions - people develop a subconscious mental map of how to control their vocal cords to hit a certain note; it almost becomes like a "thought-controlled' instrument. Due to the immediacy of control, we can also correct ourselves very quickly, so small mistakes can be corrected quickly.
Due to all these advantages that being 'built-in' to the body gives, it's true that many - perhaps most - people do have the ability to sing back a tune.
However, I think you're underestimating how good professional musicians are at reproducing tunes by ear. As per David Bowling's comment, I'd expect most professional instrumentalists to be able to play back tunes on their instrument by ear. It may be that they aren't able to do so with quite as little conscious thought as someone can when they are singing, but their experience with mapping heard notes to scales, and their scales to positions on the instrument, will make up for that.
Why do I have to experiment with pitches on an instrument to reproduce a tune by ear?
Probably simply because you haven't attained enough experience in reproducing tunes by ear on an instrument! To get good at this you probably need to learn from various angles. One angle would be doing some ear training exercises to help the mapping between the sound and the notion of which note of the scale; another exercise would be to practice scales and arpeggios on the instrument to reinforce the mapping between the concept of the note and the physical finger position. Practicing improvisation will also help to make your playing more instinctive. Even some quite 'passive' exercises - like noodling on the instrument while watching on TV - will help with this.
Voice is an 'instrument' that many people learn in almost an ideal way. We start young, and practice with it very frequently - even speaking teaches you how to control the pitch of your voice. And because it's an instrument that everyone has, almost everyone also learns to sing in various environments, from singing rhymes in nursery school, to singing along in school assemblies or as parts of a sports crowd - not to mention those who learn in a slightly more formal way.
Voice is also an instrument we have very direct control over. We don't have to worry about things like finger positions - people develop a subconscious mental map of how to control their vocal cords to hit a certain note; it almost becomes like a "thought-controlled' instrument. Due to the immediacy of control, we can also correct ourselves very quickly, so small mistakes can be corrected quickly.
Due to all these advantages that being 'built-in' to the body gives, it's true that many - perhaps most - people do have the ability to sing back a tune.
However, I think you're underestimating how good professional musicians are at reproducing tunes by ear. As per David Bowling's comment, I'd expect most professional instrumentalists to be able to play back tunes on their instrument by ear. It may be that they aren't able to do so with quite as little conscious thought as someone can when they are singing, but their experience with mapping heard notes to scales, and their scales to positions on the instrument, will make up for that.
Why do I have to experiment with pitches on an instrument to reproduce a tune by ear?
Probably simply because you haven't attained enough experience in reproducing tunes by ear on an instrument! To get good at this you probably need to learn from various angles. One angle would be doing some ear training exercises to help the mapping between the sound and the notion of which note of the scale; another exercise would be to practice scales and arpeggios on the instrument to reinforce the mapping between the concept of the note and the physical finger position. Practicing improvisation will also help to make your playing more instinctive. Even some quite 'passive' exercises - like noodling on the instrument while watching on TV - will help with this.
answered 13 hours ago
topo mortotopo morto
25.4k244102
25.4k244102
add a comment |
add a comment |
I would have thought that this is down to relative experience between the use of vocal chords and instruments. I am much more experienced in using my vocal chords to make sounds than any other instrument because I've used them for talking every day for most of my life.
As you say: even not trained people are able to reproduce a tune (singing or whistling). This must have become an unconditioned reflex by our language acquisition.
In opposition to your assumptions it can be aid that some musicians become a unison with their instrument that they can play every tune they hear without reflecting (right in the same way you are able to reproduce a tune.
To the most part of people the training of solfege and relative pitch is what they need to identify the tones of a melody.
The reflection of the names of the notes you sing or whistle will be necessary to play the right tones or keys on an instrument. It will take years of practice until this may become a conditioned reflex.
add a comment |
I would have thought that this is down to relative experience between the use of vocal chords and instruments. I am much more experienced in using my vocal chords to make sounds than any other instrument because I've used them for talking every day for most of my life.
As you say: even not trained people are able to reproduce a tune (singing or whistling). This must have become an unconditioned reflex by our language acquisition.
In opposition to your assumptions it can be aid that some musicians become a unison with their instrument that they can play every tune they hear without reflecting (right in the same way you are able to reproduce a tune.
To the most part of people the training of solfege and relative pitch is what they need to identify the tones of a melody.
The reflection of the names of the notes you sing or whistle will be necessary to play the right tones or keys on an instrument. It will take years of practice until this may become a conditioned reflex.
add a comment |
I would have thought that this is down to relative experience between the use of vocal chords and instruments. I am much more experienced in using my vocal chords to make sounds than any other instrument because I've used them for talking every day for most of my life.
As you say: even not trained people are able to reproduce a tune (singing or whistling). This must have become an unconditioned reflex by our language acquisition.
In opposition to your assumptions it can be aid that some musicians become a unison with their instrument that they can play every tune they hear without reflecting (right in the same way you are able to reproduce a tune.
To the most part of people the training of solfege and relative pitch is what they need to identify the tones of a melody.
The reflection of the names of the notes you sing or whistle will be necessary to play the right tones or keys on an instrument. It will take years of practice until this may become a conditioned reflex.
I would have thought that this is down to relative experience between the use of vocal chords and instruments. I am much more experienced in using my vocal chords to make sounds than any other instrument because I've used them for talking every day for most of my life.
As you say: even not trained people are able to reproduce a tune (singing or whistling). This must have become an unconditioned reflex by our language acquisition.
In opposition to your assumptions it can be aid that some musicians become a unison with their instrument that they can play every tune they hear without reflecting (right in the same way you are able to reproduce a tune.
To the most part of people the training of solfege and relative pitch is what they need to identify the tones of a melody.
The reflection of the names of the notes you sing or whistle will be necessary to play the right tones or keys on an instrument. It will take years of practice until this may become a conditioned reflex.
edited 13 hours ago
answered 13 hours ago
Albrecht HügliAlbrecht Hügli
2,687220
2,687220
add a comment |
add a comment |
The way we produce sound with our voice is the simplest thing on earth: if you want to sing low, you open your throat as much as possible, and then gradually close it to produce higher sounds. So all you need to sing is the ability to recognize wether you are too low or too high.
On the other hand, when you play an instrument such as the piano, you can't adjust your note as fast as you'd do when you singing. So if you are playing a note which is to low, you will have to make a guess on how much it is too low, and if you don't get it right away (which will probably happen) you'll have to do it again and again. This will take way more time than adjusting your throat takes.
I think this is also why when someone starts to whistle, he gets good really fast, even though he has not been practicing since being a kid.
If you play saxophone, clarinet, bassoon, trumpet, or anything that has an embouchure, try playing a song with only your embouchure, and you'll see it's not so hard (even though some do not have a huge range, like the saxophone's embouchure in which you can barely get an octave).
So yes, I'd say it's the way the voice works which makes it so easy to use.
add a comment |
The way we produce sound with our voice is the simplest thing on earth: if you want to sing low, you open your throat as much as possible, and then gradually close it to produce higher sounds. So all you need to sing is the ability to recognize wether you are too low or too high.
On the other hand, when you play an instrument such as the piano, you can't adjust your note as fast as you'd do when you singing. So if you are playing a note which is to low, you will have to make a guess on how much it is too low, and if you don't get it right away (which will probably happen) you'll have to do it again and again. This will take way more time than adjusting your throat takes.
I think this is also why when someone starts to whistle, he gets good really fast, even though he has not been practicing since being a kid.
If you play saxophone, clarinet, bassoon, trumpet, or anything that has an embouchure, try playing a song with only your embouchure, and you'll see it's not so hard (even though some do not have a huge range, like the saxophone's embouchure in which you can barely get an octave).
So yes, I'd say it's the way the voice works which makes it so easy to use.
add a comment |
The way we produce sound with our voice is the simplest thing on earth: if you want to sing low, you open your throat as much as possible, and then gradually close it to produce higher sounds. So all you need to sing is the ability to recognize wether you are too low or too high.
On the other hand, when you play an instrument such as the piano, you can't adjust your note as fast as you'd do when you singing. So if you are playing a note which is to low, you will have to make a guess on how much it is too low, and if you don't get it right away (which will probably happen) you'll have to do it again and again. This will take way more time than adjusting your throat takes.
I think this is also why when someone starts to whistle, he gets good really fast, even though he has not been practicing since being a kid.
If you play saxophone, clarinet, bassoon, trumpet, or anything that has an embouchure, try playing a song with only your embouchure, and you'll see it's not so hard (even though some do not have a huge range, like the saxophone's embouchure in which you can barely get an octave).
So yes, I'd say it's the way the voice works which makes it so easy to use.
The way we produce sound with our voice is the simplest thing on earth: if you want to sing low, you open your throat as much as possible, and then gradually close it to produce higher sounds. So all you need to sing is the ability to recognize wether you are too low or too high.
On the other hand, when you play an instrument such as the piano, you can't adjust your note as fast as you'd do when you singing. So if you are playing a note which is to low, you will have to make a guess on how much it is too low, and if you don't get it right away (which will probably happen) you'll have to do it again and again. This will take way more time than adjusting your throat takes.
I think this is also why when someone starts to whistle, he gets good really fast, even though he has not been practicing since being a kid.
If you play saxophone, clarinet, bassoon, trumpet, or anything that has an embouchure, try playing a song with only your embouchure, and you'll see it's not so hard (even though some do not have a huge range, like the saxophone's embouchure in which you can barely get an octave).
So yes, I'd say it's the way the voice works which makes it so easy to use.
answered 11 hours ago
Marche RemiMarche Remi
513
513
add a comment |
add a comment |
Singing is monophonic - only one note at a time. Piano and guitar and drums and so forth can play lots of notes at once. each extra note will take another human to sing it.
Also, you can feel whether the note is right or not immediately when singing and quickly glissando to the proper note if you hit it wrong. hit the wrong note on an instrument and there's usually no saving yourself - it was just wrong and there's no hiding it.
But provided your instrument is monophonic, you'll eventually get to the point where you can "sing" with it.
With instruments that can play 2+ notes at once, you will always have to "just learn and practice it"... It's just gonna be harder because you're doing multiple things at once.
Singers have it easy (ok ok sorry sheesh).
add a comment |
Singing is monophonic - only one note at a time. Piano and guitar and drums and so forth can play lots of notes at once. each extra note will take another human to sing it.
Also, you can feel whether the note is right or not immediately when singing and quickly glissando to the proper note if you hit it wrong. hit the wrong note on an instrument and there's usually no saving yourself - it was just wrong and there's no hiding it.
But provided your instrument is monophonic, you'll eventually get to the point where you can "sing" with it.
With instruments that can play 2+ notes at once, you will always have to "just learn and practice it"... It's just gonna be harder because you're doing multiple things at once.
Singers have it easy (ok ok sorry sheesh).
add a comment |
Singing is monophonic - only one note at a time. Piano and guitar and drums and so forth can play lots of notes at once. each extra note will take another human to sing it.
Also, you can feel whether the note is right or not immediately when singing and quickly glissando to the proper note if you hit it wrong. hit the wrong note on an instrument and there's usually no saving yourself - it was just wrong and there's no hiding it.
But provided your instrument is monophonic, you'll eventually get to the point where you can "sing" with it.
With instruments that can play 2+ notes at once, you will always have to "just learn and practice it"... It's just gonna be harder because you're doing multiple things at once.
Singers have it easy (ok ok sorry sheesh).
Singing is monophonic - only one note at a time. Piano and guitar and drums and so forth can play lots of notes at once. each extra note will take another human to sing it.
Also, you can feel whether the note is right or not immediately when singing and quickly glissando to the proper note if you hit it wrong. hit the wrong note on an instrument and there's usually no saving yourself - it was just wrong and there's no hiding it.
But provided your instrument is monophonic, you'll eventually get to the point where you can "sing" with it.
With instruments that can play 2+ notes at once, you will always have to "just learn and practice it"... It's just gonna be harder because you're doing multiple things at once.
Singers have it easy (ok ok sorry sheesh).
answered 7 hours ago
Stephen HazelStephen Hazel
5,40311528
5,40311528
add a comment |
add a comment |
Karl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Karl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Karl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Karl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80840%2fwhy-can-i-easily-sing-or-whistle-a-tune-ive-just-heard-but-not-as-easily-repro%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
5
It is not true that most trained musicians without perfect pitch have to experiment to find the correct notes (depending on what you mean by "trained"). Experienced and skilled musicians can immediately play what they hear. Untrained singers do the same thing that untrained players of instruments to: they slide pitches around until they seem to work. Experience talking is not remotely close to experience discriminating and executing accurate pitches. Really, all of your premises seem wrong to me.
– David Bowling
14 hours ago
What instrument do you play? From my own experience I can tell you that my relative pitch was better because ai played a brass instrument as there you always have to mind the interval ... but then playing piano I improved my knowledge of harmony that helped me to derive the chords and tones I heard.
– Albrecht Hügli
13 hours ago
1
Perfect or absolute pitch has little to do with the capability of being able to reproduce a tune once it's been heard.Absolute pitch is being able to hear a sound and identify what pitch, or note it actually is. Second sentence is also not accurate. Many competent musicians who rely heavily on sight-reading to play may not be able to re-play something heard. Others, who have a 'good ear' will be able to reproduce a tune accurately.You are basically talking about a single note tune, as sing/whistle is all that can be.So anyone who knows their instrument as well as their voice will find it easy.
– Tim
13 hours ago
1
@AlbrechtHügli - that's as maybe. Whistling or singing produces only one note at a time, so no harmony in the question, which, to my mind, is asked using flawed premises.
– Tim
13 hours ago
1
I don't think people with absolute pitch would think in terms of a series of note names when trying to pick out a tune, even on a familiar instrument. I don't think it's what many folk do anyway. Absolute pitch is useful to recogise what note is being heard, not categorise a string of notes. As others say, relative pitch is far more useful here. And although those with a.p. probably have good r.p., it's the latter they'll use more.
– Tim
12 hours ago