Potential by Assembling Charges The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are...

Limit the amount of RAM Mathematica may access?

What tool would a Roman-age civilization have to grind silver and other metals into dust?

"To split hairs" vs "To be pedantic"

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

Access elements in std::string where positon of string is greater than its size

Can't find the latex code for the ⍎ (down tack jot) symbol

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

CiviEvent: Public link for events of a specific type

How do you say "canon" as in "official for a story universe"?

Can the Protection from Evil and Good spell be used on the caster?

Dual Citizen. Exited the US on Italian passport recently

Why isn't airport relocation done gradually?

Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?

Falsification in Math vs Science

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

If the Wish spell is used to duplicate the effect of Simulacrum, are existing duplicates destroyed?

Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed

How to manage monthly salary

Is it possible to achieve a negative score?

Does duplicating a spell with Wish count as casting that spell?

Pristine Bit Checking

Are USB sockets on wall outlets live all the time, even when the switch is off?

JSON.serialize: is it possible to suppress null values of a map?



Potential by Assembling Charges



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InPotential difference between Earth's surface and 2 meters abovePotential of a uniformly charged hollow sphereElectric potential inside a conductorElectric field and electric scalar potential of two perpendicular wiresboundary condition of electrical fieldElectric Potential due to Sphere when cavity is at arbitrary positionSystem of point charges, Potential related questionIs this process to compute the electrostatic potential energy a valid one?Do charges move to the outer surface of a conductor to minimize the potential energy?Can Potential Energy be found by Energy Density?












1












$begingroup$


For finding electric potential energy of a uniformly charged sphere, we can assemble the sphere by brining charges from infinity to that point. So to make a uniformly charged sphere of radius $R$ and total charge $Q$, at some instant, charge will be assembled up to a certain radius $x$.
In order to find potential of this sphere at the surface, why is my approach giving different answers?



Approach 1:



$$rho = frac{3Q}{4 pi R^{3}}$$



$$q = frac{4}{3} pi x^{3} rho = Q frac{x^{3}}{R^3}$$
Potential at the surface would be $$V = frac{q}{4 pi epsilon_0 x} = frac{Q x^{2}}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$



Approach 2:
$$rho = frac{3Q}{4 pi R^{3}}$$
$$q = frac{4}{3} pi x^{3} rho = Q frac{x^{3}}{R^3}$$
$$E = frac{Q x}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$ (From Gauss' Law)



Potential at the surface would be $$V = -int{vec{E} cdot vec{dx}} = -frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}} int_{0}^{x}{xdx} = -frac{Q x^{2}}{8 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$



Why is the answer different in both the cases?






electrostatics potential







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    For finding electric potential energy of a uniformly charged sphere, we can assemble the sphere by brining charges from infinity to that point. So to make a uniformly charged sphere of radius $R$ and total charge $Q$, at some instant, charge will be assembled up to a certain radius $x$.
    In order to find potential of this sphere at the surface, why is my approach giving different answers?



    Approach 1:



    $$rho = frac{3Q}{4 pi R^{3}}$$



    $$q = frac{4}{3} pi x^{3} rho = Q frac{x^{3}}{R^3}$$
    Potential at the surface would be $$V = frac{q}{4 pi epsilon_0 x} = frac{Q x^{2}}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$



    Approach 2:
    $$rho = frac{3Q}{4 pi R^{3}}$$
    $$q = frac{4}{3} pi x^{3} rho = Q frac{x^{3}}{R^3}$$
    $$E = frac{Q x}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$ (From Gauss' Law)



    Potential at the surface would be $$V = -int{vec{E} cdot vec{dx}} = -frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}} int_{0}^{x}{xdx} = -frac{Q x^{2}}{8 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$



    Why is the answer different in both the cases?






    electrostatics potential







    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      For finding electric potential energy of a uniformly charged sphere, we can assemble the sphere by brining charges from infinity to that point. So to make a uniformly charged sphere of radius $R$ and total charge $Q$, at some instant, charge will be assembled up to a certain radius $x$.
      In order to find potential of this sphere at the surface, why is my approach giving different answers?



      Approach 1:



      $$rho = frac{3Q}{4 pi R^{3}}$$



      $$q = frac{4}{3} pi x^{3} rho = Q frac{x^{3}}{R^3}$$
      Potential at the surface would be $$V = frac{q}{4 pi epsilon_0 x} = frac{Q x^{2}}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$



      Approach 2:
      $$rho = frac{3Q}{4 pi R^{3}}$$
      $$q = frac{4}{3} pi x^{3} rho = Q frac{x^{3}}{R^3}$$
      $$E = frac{Q x}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$ (From Gauss' Law)



      Potential at the surface would be $$V = -int{vec{E} cdot vec{dx}} = -frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}} int_{0}^{x}{xdx} = -frac{Q x^{2}}{8 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$



      Why is the answer different in both the cases?






      electrostatics potential







      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      For finding electric potential energy of a uniformly charged sphere, we can assemble the sphere by brining charges from infinity to that point. So to make a uniformly charged sphere of radius $R$ and total charge $Q$, at some instant, charge will be assembled up to a certain radius $x$.
      In order to find potential of this sphere at the surface, why is my approach giving different answers?



      Approach 1:



      $$rho = frac{3Q}{4 pi R^{3}}$$



      $$q = frac{4}{3} pi x^{3} rho = Q frac{x^{3}}{R^3}$$
      Potential at the surface would be $$V = frac{q}{4 pi epsilon_0 x} = frac{Q x^{2}}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$



      Approach 2:
      $$rho = frac{3Q}{4 pi R^{3}}$$
      $$q = frac{4}{3} pi x^{3} rho = Q frac{x^{3}}{R^3}$$
      $$E = frac{Q x}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$ (From Gauss' Law)



      Potential at the surface would be $$V = -int{vec{E} cdot vec{dx}} = -frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}} int_{0}^{x}{xdx} = -frac{Q x^{2}}{8 pi epsilon_0 R^{3}}$$



      Why is the answer different in both the cases?






      electrostatics potential




      electrostatics potential






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 1 min ago







      K. T

















      asked 1 hour ago









      K. TK. T

      365




      365






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Approach 2 is wrong. You didn't take into account the corresponding limits for potential. Potential at centre of sphere is not zero!! The expression is V(x)-V(0) instead of V(x).... Find potential at surface by integrating for electric field outside sphere from X to infinity V(infinity)=0. So Then if you wish you can find V(x) by integrating from x=x to any general x=y(






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            You're right, thanks. We can use the fact that potential difference between centre of sphere and infinity is $frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R}$, and so the answer can be difference between my answer in approach two and the potential at the centre of the sphere, that is $$frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} - frac{Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} = frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R}$$ and so we are done.
            $endgroup$
            – K. T
            18 mins ago



















          1












          $begingroup$

          Two cases described are completely different. In first case you find the true potential of the sphere by taking the charge from infinity to the surface of the sphere. In another case you take the charge from the middle of the sphere or the centre of the sphere to the surface of the sphere which is not the potential of the sphere surface. The potential of the sphere surface can be described as the work needed to push a positive charge from infinity to a to the surface or the energy stored to push the charge from the the surface towards the infinity so you can see in your second case you are not calculating the potential of the surface of the sphere. SHORT NOTE:- You can find the potential at any point by finding the difference of potential at that point and any other point whose the potential is zero now at the centre of the the sphere you don't have the potential as 0. See this:http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/semester2/d06_potential_spheres.html






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "151"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471655%2fpotential-by-assembling-charges%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Approach 2 is wrong. You didn't take into account the corresponding limits for potential. Potential at centre of sphere is not zero!! The expression is V(x)-V(0) instead of V(x).... Find potential at surface by integrating for electric field outside sphere from X to infinity V(infinity)=0. So Then if you wish you can find V(x) by integrating from x=x to any general x=y(






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              You're right, thanks. We can use the fact that potential difference between centre of sphere and infinity is $frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R}$, and so the answer can be difference between my answer in approach two and the potential at the centre of the sphere, that is $$frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} - frac{Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} = frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R}$$ and so we are done.
              $endgroup$
              – K. T
              18 mins ago
















            2












            $begingroup$

            Approach 2 is wrong. You didn't take into account the corresponding limits for potential. Potential at centre of sphere is not zero!! The expression is V(x)-V(0) instead of V(x).... Find potential at surface by integrating for electric field outside sphere from X to infinity V(infinity)=0. So Then if you wish you can find V(x) by integrating from x=x to any general x=y(






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              You're right, thanks. We can use the fact that potential difference between centre of sphere and infinity is $frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R}$, and so the answer can be difference between my answer in approach two and the potential at the centre of the sphere, that is $$frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} - frac{Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} = frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R}$$ and so we are done.
              $endgroup$
              – K. T
              18 mins ago














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Approach 2 is wrong. You didn't take into account the corresponding limits for potential. Potential at centre of sphere is not zero!! The expression is V(x)-V(0) instead of V(x).... Find potential at surface by integrating for electric field outside sphere from X to infinity V(infinity)=0. So Then if you wish you can find V(x) by integrating from x=x to any general x=y(






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Approach 2 is wrong. You didn't take into account the corresponding limits for potential. Potential at centre of sphere is not zero!! The expression is V(x)-V(0) instead of V(x).... Find potential at surface by integrating for electric field outside sphere from X to infinity V(infinity)=0. So Then if you wish you can find V(x) by integrating from x=x to any general x=y(







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 49 mins ago









            TojrahTojrah

            2077




            2077












            • $begingroup$
              You're right, thanks. We can use the fact that potential difference between centre of sphere and infinity is $frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R}$, and so the answer can be difference between my answer in approach two and the potential at the centre of the sphere, that is $$frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} - frac{Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} = frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R}$$ and so we are done.
              $endgroup$
              – K. T
              18 mins ago


















            • $begingroup$
              You're right, thanks. We can use the fact that potential difference between centre of sphere and infinity is $frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R}$, and so the answer can be difference between my answer in approach two and the potential at the centre of the sphere, that is $$frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} - frac{Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} = frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R}$$ and so we are done.
              $endgroup$
              – K. T
              18 mins ago
















            $begingroup$
            You're right, thanks. We can use the fact that potential difference between centre of sphere and infinity is $frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R}$, and so the answer can be difference between my answer in approach two and the potential at the centre of the sphere, that is $$frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} - frac{Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} = frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R}$$ and so we are done.
            $endgroup$
            – K. T
            18 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            You're right, thanks. We can use the fact that potential difference between centre of sphere and infinity is $frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R}$, and so the answer can be difference between my answer in approach two and the potential at the centre of the sphere, that is $$frac{3Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} - frac{Q}{8 pi epsilon_0 R} = frac{Q}{4 pi epsilon_0 R}$$ and so we are done.
            $endgroup$
            – K. T
            18 mins ago











            1












            $begingroup$

            Two cases described are completely different. In first case you find the true potential of the sphere by taking the charge from infinity to the surface of the sphere. In another case you take the charge from the middle of the sphere or the centre of the sphere to the surface of the sphere which is not the potential of the sphere surface. The potential of the sphere surface can be described as the work needed to push a positive charge from infinity to a to the surface or the energy stored to push the charge from the the surface towards the infinity so you can see in your second case you are not calculating the potential of the surface of the sphere. SHORT NOTE:- You can find the potential at any point by finding the difference of potential at that point and any other point whose the potential is zero now at the centre of the the sphere you don't have the potential as 0. See this:http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/semester2/d06_potential_spheres.html






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Two cases described are completely different. In first case you find the true potential of the sphere by taking the charge from infinity to the surface of the sphere. In another case you take the charge from the middle of the sphere or the centre of the sphere to the surface of the sphere which is not the potential of the sphere surface. The potential of the sphere surface can be described as the work needed to push a positive charge from infinity to a to the surface or the energy stored to push the charge from the the surface towards the infinity so you can see in your second case you are not calculating the potential of the surface of the sphere. SHORT NOTE:- You can find the potential at any point by finding the difference of potential at that point and any other point whose the potential is zero now at the centre of the the sphere you don't have the potential as 0. See this:http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/semester2/d06_potential_spheres.html






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Two cases described are completely different. In first case you find the true potential of the sphere by taking the charge from infinity to the surface of the sphere. In another case you take the charge from the middle of the sphere or the centre of the sphere to the surface of the sphere which is not the potential of the sphere surface. The potential of the sphere surface can be described as the work needed to push a positive charge from infinity to a to the surface or the energy stored to push the charge from the the surface towards the infinity so you can see in your second case you are not calculating the potential of the surface of the sphere. SHORT NOTE:- You can find the potential at any point by finding the difference of potential at that point and any other point whose the potential is zero now at the centre of the the sphere you don't have the potential as 0. See this:http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/semester2/d06_potential_spheres.html






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Two cases described are completely different. In first case you find the true potential of the sphere by taking the charge from infinity to the surface of the sphere. In another case you take the charge from the middle of the sphere or the centre of the sphere to the surface of the sphere which is not the potential of the sphere surface. The potential of the sphere surface can be described as the work needed to push a positive charge from infinity to a to the surface or the energy stored to push the charge from the the surface towards the infinity so you can see in your second case you are not calculating the potential of the surface of the sphere. SHORT NOTE:- You can find the potential at any point by finding the difference of potential at that point and any other point whose the potential is zero now at the centre of the the sphere you don't have the potential as 0. See this:http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/semester2/d06_potential_spheres.html







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 23 mins ago

























                answered 45 mins ago









                Nobody recognizeableNobody recognizeable

                647617




                647617






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471655%2fpotential-by-assembling-charges%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    El tren de la libertad Índice Antecedentes "Porque yo decido" Desarrollo de la...

                    Image
                    Feminismo en EspañaAborto en EspañaManifestaciones y protestas en EspañaManifestaciones y protestas en 2014España en 2014Historia de las mujeres en España movimiento socialfeministaderechos sexuales y reproductivosmujeresLey del aborto en España1 de febrero2014MadridAlberto Ruíz Gallardónla ley del aborto vigente del 2010AsturiasTertulia Feminista Les ComadresCongreso de DiputadosAlicia MiyaresAna MatoAlberto Ruiz GallardónEdimburgoRomaParísLuxemburgoBuenos AiresGracia QuerejetaÁngeles González-SindeMabel LozanoIcíar BollaínIsabel CoixetGeorgina CisquellaTeresa FontVirginia Yagüe2010José Luis Rodríguez ZapateroCongreso de Diputados19 de diciembre20095 de julio2010Partido PopularTribunal Constitucional201120 de diciembre2013Partido PopularMariano RajoyGijónTertulia Feminista Les ComadresBegoña PiñeroRenfeAlicia MiyaresTertulia Feminista Les Comadres1 de febrero2014Congreso de DiputadosMariano RajoyAlberto Ruiz GallardónAna MatoAsturiasAndalucíaCanariasCataluñaComunidad ValencianaCasti
                    Read more

                    Puerta de Hutt Referencias Enlaces externos Menú de navegación15°58′00″S 5°42′00″O /...

                    Image
                    Localidades de Santa Elena inglésasentamientoisla Santa ElenaLongwoodIglesia de San MateoPico de DianaNapoleón BonaparteHenri Gratien BertrandAlarma ForestalLevelwoodSan Pablo Puerta de Hutt Hutt's Gate Asentamiento Puerta de Hutt Hutt's Gate Coordenadas 15°58′00″S 5°42′00″O  /  -15.96666667, -5.7 Coordenadas: 15°58′00″S 5°42′00″O  /  -15.96666667, -5.7 Entidad Asentamiento  • País   Reino Unido  • Territorio de ultramar   Santa Elena, Ascensión y Tristán de Acuña  • Isla Santa Elena Huso horario UTC+0 [editar datos en Wikidata] Puerta de Hutt (en inglés: Hutt's Gate ) es un pequeño asentamiento ubicado en la isla Santa Elena, que forma parte del distrito de Longwood. Se ubica en las coordenadas 15°58′00″S 5°42′00″O  /  -15.96667, -5.70000 . [ 1 ] ​ Aquí se localiza la Iglesia de San Mateo y en sus cercanías el Pico de Diana [ 2 ] ​ y la tumba de Napoleón Bonaparte. Es una amplia zona residencial y cuent
                    Read more

                    Castillo d'Acher Características Menú de navegación

                    Image
                    Montañas de los Pirineos de AragónMontañas de la provincia de Huesca msnmSelva de OzaPirineo aragonésEspañabosque Este artículo o sección necesita referencias que aparezcan en una publicación acreditada. Este aviso fue puesto el 11 de agosto de 2011. El pico desde Selva de Oza. El Castillo d' Acher es una cima de 2.384msnm en la zona de la Selva de Oza en la parte occidental del Pirineo aragonés, en España. Debe su nombre a su aspecto de fortaleza que presenta hacia todas sus vertientes. Características En orden ascendente, la cima pasa de un bosque frondoso de tonalidades verde-amarillenta a laderas rojizas. Su cima, que suele presentarse mucha nieve, es un pequeño valle rectangular rodeado en sus cuatro caras por una muralla que le da un aspecto de fortaleza. This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here
                    Read more