Kdtyjb

Understanding piped commands in GNU/Linux

Can two people see the same photon?

Found this skink in my tomato plant bucket. Is he trapped? Or could he leave if he wanted?

Does the main washing effect of soap come from foam?

Getting representations of the Lie group out of representations of its Lie algebra

My mentor says to set image to Fine instead of RAW — how is this different from JPG?

Why do the Z-fighters hide their power?

Twin's vs. Twins'

Proving that any solution to the differential equation of an oscillator can be written as a sum of sinusoids.

Why do C and C++ allow the expression (int) + 4*5?

What is a more techy Technical Writer job title that isn't cutesy or confusing?

Shimano 105 brifters (5800) and Avid BB5 compatibility

Is there a verb for listening stealthily?

Do i imagine the linear (straight line) homotopy in a correct way?

Where did Ptolemy compare the Earth to the distance of fixed stars?

Should man-made satellites feature an intelligent inverted "cow catcher"?

Fit odd number of triplets in a measure?

Does a random sequence of vectors span a Hilbert space?

calculator's angle answer for trig ratios that can work in more than 1 quadrant on the unit circle

What did Turing mean when saying that "machines cannot give rise to surprises" is due to a fallacy?

The test team as an enemy of development? And how can this be avoided?

What helicopter has the most rotor blades?

Random body shuffle every night—can we still function?

Table formatting with tabularx?

What helicopter has the most rotor blades?

2

$begingroup$

I have seen 2 rotor blades up to many and wonder when does having more rotor blades become less efficient? What helicopter has the most rotor blades?

Related: Why don't helicopters prefer shorter rotors with more blades?

aircraft-design aerodynamics helicopter propeller

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Muze

asked 4 hours ago

MuzeMuze

1135

New contributor

Muze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  If the blades are longer it has to spin slower to keep the tips from going supersonic. They are also heavier and harder to control
  $endgroup$
  – Ron Beyer
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @RonBeyer do you think redundancy of having more blades could allow the helicopter to fly with damaged blades?
  $endgroup$
  – Muze
  3 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Unlikely. Chipped/mildly damaged blades can still fly, but once they fail structurally the entire rotor is unbalanced an no amount of extra blades is going to make it stabilize. It will shake itself apart as soon as it becomes unbalanced enough.
  $endgroup$
  – Ron Beyer
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  when does having more rotor blades become less efficient? -- any number more than one. The problem is if you need more lift then you need to use longer blades but if you cannot increase blade length due to structural issues and/or storage issues then you have no choice but to sacrifice efficiency for more lifting power. A single blade is ALWAYS the most efficient number of blades.
  $endgroup$
  – slebetman
  50 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

$begingroup$

I have seen 2 rotor blades up to many and wonder when does having more rotor blades become less efficient? What helicopter has the most rotor blades?

Related: Why don't helicopters prefer shorter rotors with more blades?

aircraft-design aerodynamics helicopter propeller

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Muze

asked 4 hours ago

MuzeMuze

1135

New contributor

Muze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  If the blades are longer it has to spin slower to keep the tips from going supersonic. They are also heavier and harder to control
  $endgroup$
  – Ron Beyer
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @RonBeyer do you think redundancy of having more blades could allow the helicopter to fly with damaged blades?
  $endgroup$
  – Muze
  3 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Unlikely. Chipped/mildly damaged blades can still fly, but once they fail structurally the entire rotor is unbalanced an no amount of extra blades is going to make it stabilize. It will shake itself apart as soon as it becomes unbalanced enough.
  $endgroup$
  – Ron Beyer
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  when does having more rotor blades become less efficient? -- any number more than one. The problem is if you need more lift then you need to use longer blades but if you cannot increase blade length due to structural issues and/or storage issues then you have no choice but to sacrifice efficiency for more lifting power. A single blade is ALWAYS the most efficient number of blades.
  $endgroup$
  – slebetman
  50 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

I have seen 2 rotor blades up to many and wonder when does having more rotor blades become less efficient? What helicopter has the most rotor blades?

Related: Why don't helicopters prefer shorter rotors with more blades?

aircraft-design aerodynamics helicopter propeller

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Muze

asked 4 hours ago

MuzeMuze

1135

New contributor

Muze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Muze

asked 4 hours ago

MuzeMuze

1135

New contributor

Muze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Muze

asked 4 hours ago

MuzeMuze

1135

New contributor

Muze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 4 hours ago

MuzeMuze

1135

New contributor

Muze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 4 hours ago

MuzeMuze

1135

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

5

$begingroup$

The most I've seen are 8 Mi-26. But the highest theoretical lifting efficiency is achieved with the fewest blades and experiments have been done with single blade rotors (with a counterweight - there were vibration problems that couldn't be resolved).

So in practical terms, the most lift for the least power is achieved with a 2 blade rotor, but the need to absorb more power with a limited desirable disc diameter forces you to add more blades (or you may want a smaller rotor with lots of blades for maneuverability or other reasons, but it's sub-optimal from a horsepower efficiency standpoint).

Put another way, a helicopter like the Mi-26 could probably achieve a fair bit more lifting power for its installed horsepower with a 2 blade rotor, but each blade would seemingly extend off into the next township.

share|improve this answer

answered 2 hours ago

John KJohn K

26.1k13880

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

Muze is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62588%2fwhat-helicopter-has-the-most-rotor-blades%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

5

$begingroup$

The most I've seen are 8 Mi-26. But the highest theoretical lifting efficiency is achieved with the fewest blades and experiments have been done with single blade rotors (with a counterweight - there were vibration problems that couldn't be resolved).

So in practical terms, the most lift for the least power is achieved with a 2 blade rotor, but the need to absorb more power with a limited desirable disc diameter forces you to add more blades (or you may want a smaller rotor with lots of blades for maneuverability or other reasons, but it's sub-optimal from a horsepower efficiency standpoint).

Put another way, a helicopter like the Mi-26 could probably achieve a fair bit more lifting power for its installed horsepower with a 2 blade rotor, but each blade would seemingly extend off into the next township.

share|improve this answer

answered 2 hours ago

John KJohn K

26.1k13880

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

5

$begingroup$

The most I've seen are 8 Mi-26. But the highest theoretical lifting efficiency is achieved with the fewest blades and experiments have been done with single blade rotors (with a counterweight - there were vibration problems that couldn't be resolved).

So in practical terms, the most lift for the least power is achieved with a 2 blade rotor, but the need to absorb more power with a limited desirable disc diameter forces you to add more blades (or you may want a smaller rotor with lots of blades for maneuverability or other reasons, but it's sub-optimal from a horsepower efficiency standpoint).

Put another way, a helicopter like the Mi-26 could probably achieve a fair bit more lifting power for its installed horsepower with a 2 blade rotor, but each blade would seemingly extend off into the next township.

share|improve this answer

answered 2 hours ago

John KJohn K

26.1k13880

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

The most I've seen are 8 Mi-26. But the highest theoretical lifting efficiency is achieved with the fewest blades and experiments have been done with single blade rotors (with a counterweight - there were vibration problems that couldn't be resolved).

So in practical terms, the most lift for the least power is achieved with a 2 blade rotor, but the need to absorb more power with a limited desirable disc diameter forces you to add more blades (or you may want a smaller rotor with lots of blades for maneuverability or other reasons, but it's sub-optimal from a horsepower efficiency standpoint).

Put another way, a helicopter like the Mi-26 could probably achieve a fair bit more lifting power for its installed horsepower with a 2 blade rotor, but each blade would seemingly extend off into the next township.

share|improve this answer

answered 2 hours ago

John KJohn K

26.1k13880

$endgroup$

share|improve this answer

answered 2 hours ago

John KJohn K

26.1k13880

answered 2 hours ago

John KJohn K

26.1k13880

answered 2 hours ago

John KJohn K

26.1k13880