Better way to make this picture of sequence with arrowsHow to make “L” shaped arrows with curved...

Levi-Civita symbol: 3D matrix

Lock enemy's y-axis when using Vector3.MoveTowards to follow the player

3.5% Interest Student Loan or use all of my savings on Tuition?

PTIJ: Is all laundering forbidden during the 9 days?

How do I deal with being envious of my own players?

Are there other characters in the Star Wars universe who had damaged bodies and needed to wear an outfit like Darth Vader?

Is divide-by-zero a security vulnerability?

Why won't the strings command stop?

“I had a flat in the centre of town, but I didn’t like living there, so …”

Meaning of '4:1 (3:0)' as score in football (World Cup match)

Specific Chinese carabiner QA?

How do you say “my friend is throwing a party, do you wanna come?” in german

If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?

Why are special aircraft used for the carriers in the United States Navy?

Is there any relevance to Thor getting his hair cut other than comedic value?

Is there a frame of reference in which I was born before I was conceived?

Canadian citizen, on US no-fly list. What can I do in order to be allowed on flights which go through US airspace?

Script that counts quarters, dimes, nickels, and pennies

Can I become debt free or should I file for bankruptcy? How do I manage my debt and finances?

How to kill a localhost:8080

How do we objectively assess if a dialogue sounds unnatural or cringy?

Meaning of word ягоза

What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?

What can I do if someone tampers with my SSH public key?



Better way to make this picture of sequence with arrows


How to make “L” shaped arrows with curved edgeTikz: Error “dimension too large” when decorating arcMake TikZ figure with scenarios and arrowsDraw better identity arrows in tikzA better way to make this “Pac-Man” shape?How to improve this picture? Or have a better idea?Sequence of arrows circling aroundHelp with doing these arrows on this TikZ picturehow can draw this picturetikzset does not work in foreach loop













9















I created this picture
this picture



with very basic TikZ components and the code looks a bit messy, is there a more elegant way to do this? And secondly, is there a way to put dots at the stubs of the arrows in the beginning and end?



begin{tikzpicture}
draw[->] (-3.7, -0.4) %%% transition stub beginning
to [out=0,in=180] (-3.1, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=270] (-3, -0.2);

draw[->] (-3.1, -0.4) %%% to R_{t-1}
to [out=0,in=90] (-3,-0.5)
to [out=270, in=90] (-3,-1);

draw (-3,-1.2) node {(R_{t-1})};
draw (-2.9,0) node {(X_{t-1})};

draw[->] (-2.9,0.3) %%% X_{t-1} to A_{t-1}
to [out=90,in=180] (-2.8, 0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (-1.8,0.4)
to [out=0,in=90] (-1.7,0.2);

draw (-1.7,0) node {(A_{t-1})};

draw (-1.7, -0.3) %%% join transition
to [out=270,in=180] (-1.6,-0.4);

draw[->] (-2.8, -0.3) %%% X_{t-1} to X_t transition
to [out=270,in=180] (-2.7, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (-0.2, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=270] (-0.1, -0.2);

draw[->] (-0.2, -0.4) %%% to R_t
to [out=0,in=90] (-0.1,-0.5)
to [out=270, in=90] (-0.1,-1);

draw (-0.1,-1.2) node {(R_t)};
draw (0,0) node {(X_t)};

draw[->] (0,0.3) %%% X_t to A_t
to [out=90,in=180] (0.1, 0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (1.1,0.4)
to [out=0,in=90] (1.2,0.2);

draw (1.2,0) node {(A_t)};

draw (1.2, -0.3) %%% join transition
to [out=270,in=180] (1.3,-0.4);

draw[->] (0.1, -0.3) %%% X_t to X_{t+1} transition
to [out=270,in=180] (0.2, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (2.5, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=270] (2.6, -0.2);

draw[->] (2.5, -0.4) %%% to R_{t+1}
to [out=0,in=90] (2.6,-0.5)
to [out=270, in=90] (2.6,-1);

draw (2.6,-1.2) node {(R_{t+1})};
draw (2.7,0) node {(X_{t+1})};

draw[->] (2.7,0.3) %%% X_{t+1} to A_{t+1}
to [out=90,in=180] (2.8, 0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (3.8,0.4)
to [out=0,in=90] (3.9,0.2);

draw (3.9,0) node {(A_{t+1})};

draw (3.9, -0.3) %%% join transition stub
to [out=270,in=180] (4,-0.4);

draw (2.8, -0.3) %%% X_{t+1} transition stub end
to [out=270,in=180] (2.9, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (4.8, -0.4);

end{tikzpicture}


EDIT: Regarding the question, whether or not the arrows are supposed to overlap:



Yes, it symbolizes a transition kernel, which takes the state Xt and action At as input and returns the next state and reward Rt + 1. I also added a dotted line in the top bit, because the actions can depend on the entire history in general, although the markovian behaviors are more important.



enter image description here



Don't worry about updating your answers. I just wanted to learn about ways to improve next time. You helped me a ton.










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Do you really want to overlap the arrows? From X goes to where? Another X or to R? And from A, goes to where?

    – Sigur
    Mar 2 at 13:26













  • Oh, good. Enjoy the code so. See you.

    – Sigur
    Mar 2 at 13:55
















9















I created this picture
this picture



with very basic TikZ components and the code looks a bit messy, is there a more elegant way to do this? And secondly, is there a way to put dots at the stubs of the arrows in the beginning and end?



begin{tikzpicture}
draw[->] (-3.7, -0.4) %%% transition stub beginning
to [out=0,in=180] (-3.1, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=270] (-3, -0.2);

draw[->] (-3.1, -0.4) %%% to R_{t-1}
to [out=0,in=90] (-3,-0.5)
to [out=270, in=90] (-3,-1);

draw (-3,-1.2) node {(R_{t-1})};
draw (-2.9,0) node {(X_{t-1})};

draw[->] (-2.9,0.3) %%% X_{t-1} to A_{t-1}
to [out=90,in=180] (-2.8, 0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (-1.8,0.4)
to [out=0,in=90] (-1.7,0.2);

draw (-1.7,0) node {(A_{t-1})};

draw (-1.7, -0.3) %%% join transition
to [out=270,in=180] (-1.6,-0.4);

draw[->] (-2.8, -0.3) %%% X_{t-1} to X_t transition
to [out=270,in=180] (-2.7, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (-0.2, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=270] (-0.1, -0.2);

draw[->] (-0.2, -0.4) %%% to R_t
to [out=0,in=90] (-0.1,-0.5)
to [out=270, in=90] (-0.1,-1);

draw (-0.1,-1.2) node {(R_t)};
draw (0,0) node {(X_t)};

draw[->] (0,0.3) %%% X_t to A_t
to [out=90,in=180] (0.1, 0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (1.1,0.4)
to [out=0,in=90] (1.2,0.2);

draw (1.2,0) node {(A_t)};

draw (1.2, -0.3) %%% join transition
to [out=270,in=180] (1.3,-0.4);

draw[->] (0.1, -0.3) %%% X_t to X_{t+1} transition
to [out=270,in=180] (0.2, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (2.5, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=270] (2.6, -0.2);

draw[->] (2.5, -0.4) %%% to R_{t+1}
to [out=0,in=90] (2.6,-0.5)
to [out=270, in=90] (2.6,-1);

draw (2.6,-1.2) node {(R_{t+1})};
draw (2.7,0) node {(X_{t+1})};

draw[->] (2.7,0.3) %%% X_{t+1} to A_{t+1}
to [out=90,in=180] (2.8, 0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (3.8,0.4)
to [out=0,in=90] (3.9,0.2);

draw (3.9,0) node {(A_{t+1})};

draw (3.9, -0.3) %%% join transition stub
to [out=270,in=180] (4,-0.4);

draw (2.8, -0.3) %%% X_{t+1} transition stub end
to [out=270,in=180] (2.9, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (4.8, -0.4);

end{tikzpicture}


EDIT: Regarding the question, whether or not the arrows are supposed to overlap:



Yes, it symbolizes a transition kernel, which takes the state Xt and action At as input and returns the next state and reward Rt + 1. I also added a dotted line in the top bit, because the actions can depend on the entire history in general, although the markovian behaviors are more important.



enter image description here



Don't worry about updating your answers. I just wanted to learn about ways to improve next time. You helped me a ton.










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Do you really want to overlap the arrows? From X goes to where? Another X or to R? And from A, goes to where?

    – Sigur
    Mar 2 at 13:26













  • Oh, good. Enjoy the code so. See you.

    – Sigur
    Mar 2 at 13:55














9












9








9


3






I created this picture
this picture



with very basic TikZ components and the code looks a bit messy, is there a more elegant way to do this? And secondly, is there a way to put dots at the stubs of the arrows in the beginning and end?



begin{tikzpicture}
draw[->] (-3.7, -0.4) %%% transition stub beginning
to [out=0,in=180] (-3.1, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=270] (-3, -0.2);

draw[->] (-3.1, -0.4) %%% to R_{t-1}
to [out=0,in=90] (-3,-0.5)
to [out=270, in=90] (-3,-1);

draw (-3,-1.2) node {(R_{t-1})};
draw (-2.9,0) node {(X_{t-1})};

draw[->] (-2.9,0.3) %%% X_{t-1} to A_{t-1}
to [out=90,in=180] (-2.8, 0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (-1.8,0.4)
to [out=0,in=90] (-1.7,0.2);

draw (-1.7,0) node {(A_{t-1})};

draw (-1.7, -0.3) %%% join transition
to [out=270,in=180] (-1.6,-0.4);

draw[->] (-2.8, -0.3) %%% X_{t-1} to X_t transition
to [out=270,in=180] (-2.7, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (-0.2, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=270] (-0.1, -0.2);

draw[->] (-0.2, -0.4) %%% to R_t
to [out=0,in=90] (-0.1,-0.5)
to [out=270, in=90] (-0.1,-1);

draw (-0.1,-1.2) node {(R_t)};
draw (0,0) node {(X_t)};

draw[->] (0,0.3) %%% X_t to A_t
to [out=90,in=180] (0.1, 0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (1.1,0.4)
to [out=0,in=90] (1.2,0.2);

draw (1.2,0) node {(A_t)};

draw (1.2, -0.3) %%% join transition
to [out=270,in=180] (1.3,-0.4);

draw[->] (0.1, -0.3) %%% X_t to X_{t+1} transition
to [out=270,in=180] (0.2, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (2.5, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=270] (2.6, -0.2);

draw[->] (2.5, -0.4) %%% to R_{t+1}
to [out=0,in=90] (2.6,-0.5)
to [out=270, in=90] (2.6,-1);

draw (2.6,-1.2) node {(R_{t+1})};
draw (2.7,0) node {(X_{t+1})};

draw[->] (2.7,0.3) %%% X_{t+1} to A_{t+1}
to [out=90,in=180] (2.8, 0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (3.8,0.4)
to [out=0,in=90] (3.9,0.2);

draw (3.9,0) node {(A_{t+1})};

draw (3.9, -0.3) %%% join transition stub
to [out=270,in=180] (4,-0.4);

draw (2.8, -0.3) %%% X_{t+1} transition stub end
to [out=270,in=180] (2.9, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (4.8, -0.4);

end{tikzpicture}


EDIT: Regarding the question, whether or not the arrows are supposed to overlap:



Yes, it symbolizes a transition kernel, which takes the state Xt and action At as input and returns the next state and reward Rt + 1. I also added a dotted line in the top bit, because the actions can depend on the entire history in general, although the markovian behaviors are more important.



enter image description here



Don't worry about updating your answers. I just wanted to learn about ways to improve next time. You helped me a ton.










share|improve this question
















I created this picture
this picture



with very basic TikZ components and the code looks a bit messy, is there a more elegant way to do this? And secondly, is there a way to put dots at the stubs of the arrows in the beginning and end?



begin{tikzpicture}
draw[->] (-3.7, -0.4) %%% transition stub beginning
to [out=0,in=180] (-3.1, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=270] (-3, -0.2);

draw[->] (-3.1, -0.4) %%% to R_{t-1}
to [out=0,in=90] (-3,-0.5)
to [out=270, in=90] (-3,-1);

draw (-3,-1.2) node {(R_{t-1})};
draw (-2.9,0) node {(X_{t-1})};

draw[->] (-2.9,0.3) %%% X_{t-1} to A_{t-1}
to [out=90,in=180] (-2.8, 0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (-1.8,0.4)
to [out=0,in=90] (-1.7,0.2);

draw (-1.7,0) node {(A_{t-1})};

draw (-1.7, -0.3) %%% join transition
to [out=270,in=180] (-1.6,-0.4);

draw[->] (-2.8, -0.3) %%% X_{t-1} to X_t transition
to [out=270,in=180] (-2.7, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (-0.2, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=270] (-0.1, -0.2);

draw[->] (-0.2, -0.4) %%% to R_t
to [out=0,in=90] (-0.1,-0.5)
to [out=270, in=90] (-0.1,-1);

draw (-0.1,-1.2) node {(R_t)};
draw (0,0) node {(X_t)};

draw[->] (0,0.3) %%% X_t to A_t
to [out=90,in=180] (0.1, 0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (1.1,0.4)
to [out=0,in=90] (1.2,0.2);

draw (1.2,0) node {(A_t)};

draw (1.2, -0.3) %%% join transition
to [out=270,in=180] (1.3,-0.4);

draw[->] (0.1, -0.3) %%% X_t to X_{t+1} transition
to [out=270,in=180] (0.2, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (2.5, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=270] (2.6, -0.2);

draw[->] (2.5, -0.4) %%% to R_{t+1}
to [out=0,in=90] (2.6,-0.5)
to [out=270, in=90] (2.6,-1);

draw (2.6,-1.2) node {(R_{t+1})};
draw (2.7,0) node {(X_{t+1})};

draw[->] (2.7,0.3) %%% X_{t+1} to A_{t+1}
to [out=90,in=180] (2.8, 0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (3.8,0.4)
to [out=0,in=90] (3.9,0.2);

draw (3.9,0) node {(A_{t+1})};

draw (3.9, -0.3) %%% join transition stub
to [out=270,in=180] (4,-0.4);

draw (2.8, -0.3) %%% X_{t+1} transition stub end
to [out=270,in=180] (2.9, -0.4)
to [out=0,in=180] (4.8, -0.4);

end{tikzpicture}


EDIT: Regarding the question, whether or not the arrows are supposed to overlap:



Yes, it symbolizes a transition kernel, which takes the state Xt and action At as input and returns the next state and reward Rt + 1. I also added a dotted line in the top bit, because the actions can depend on the entire history in general, although the markovian behaviors are more important.



enter image description here



Don't worry about updating your answers. I just wanted to learn about ways to improve next time. You helped me a ton.







tikz-pgf tikz-arrows best-practices






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Andrew Swann

77.4k9130330




77.4k9130330










asked Mar 2 at 12:31









Felix B.Felix B.

1929




1929








  • 1





    Do you really want to overlap the arrows? From X goes to where? Another X or to R? And from A, goes to where?

    – Sigur
    Mar 2 at 13:26













  • Oh, good. Enjoy the code so. See you.

    – Sigur
    Mar 2 at 13:55














  • 1





    Do you really want to overlap the arrows? From X goes to where? Another X or to R? And from A, goes to where?

    – Sigur
    Mar 2 at 13:26













  • Oh, good. Enjoy the code so. See you.

    – Sigur
    Mar 2 at 13:55








1




1





Do you really want to overlap the arrows? From X goes to where? Another X or to R? And from A, goes to where?

– Sigur
Mar 2 at 13:26







Do you really want to overlap the arrows? From X goes to where? Another X or to R? And from A, goes to where?

– Sigur
Mar 2 at 13:26















Oh, good. Enjoy the code so. See you.

– Sigur
Mar 2 at 13:55





Oh, good. Enjoy the code so. See you.

– Sigur
Mar 2 at 13:55










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















12














Since you asked is there a more elegant way to do this, here is a starting point to define the nodes using foreach.



enter image description here



documentclass[margin=2mm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[%
node distance=1.5cm,
inner sep=2pt,
]

foreach [count=i] l in {-1,,+1}{
node (Xi) at (4*i,0) {$X_{tl}$};
node[right of=Xi] (Ai) {$A_{tl}$};
node[below of=Xi] (Ri) {$R_{tl}$};
}
node[left of=X1] (left) {phantom{$X_t$}};
node[right of=A3] (right) {phantom{$X_t$}};

%% dashed line
draw[dashed] ([yshift=7.5pt]left.north) -- ([yshift=7.5pt]right.north);

begin{scope}[%
->,
rounded corners=5pt,
thick,
]

%% X to A
foreach i in {1,2,3}{%
draw (Xi.north)
-- ([yshift=7pt]Xi.north)
-| (Ai.north);
}

%% X to X
draw ([xshift=4pt]X1.south) -- ([xshift=4pt,yshift=-7pt]X1.south)
-| ([xshift=-4pt]X2.south);
draw ([xshift=4pt]X2.south) -- ([xshift=4pt,yshift=-7pt]X2.south)
-| ([xshift=-4pt]X3.south);

%% X to dots
draw ([xshift=4pt]X3.south) -- ([xshift=4pt,yshift=-7pt]X3.south)
-- ([yshift=-7pt]right.south)node[right]{$dots$};

%% A to dots
draw (A3.south) -- ([yshift=-7pt]A3.south)
-- ([yshift=-7pt]right.south);

%% A to R
draw (A1)
-- ([yshift=-7pt]A1.south)
-| (R2.north);
draw (A2)
-- ([yshift=-7pt]A2.south)
-| (R3.north);

%% dots to X
draw ([yshift=-7pt]left.south)node[left]{$dots$}
-| ([xshift=-4pt]X1.south);

%% dots to R
draw ([yshift=-7pt]left.south)
-| (R1.north);
end{scope}

end{tikzpicture}
end{document}





share|improve this answer


























  • tikz has loops? that's nice

    – Felix B.
    Mar 2 at 13:17













  • @FelixB., oh, yes. Not only TikZ, but there is pgffor.

    – Sigur
    Mar 2 at 13:20











  • @FelixB. Read more in Section 2.20 of the TikZ - PGF manual: Repeating Things: For-Loops.

    – JouleV
    Mar 2 at 13:26











  • I'll be out for some time now.

    – Sigur
    Mar 2 at 13:50











  • @Sigur I guess -| means it does not go diagonally but rather makes a corner?

    – Felix B.
    Mar 2 at 14:12



















6














I improved it by using node and taking advantage of these nodes' .south and .north – this would make the texts have a better spacing with the arrows. Also, a variant of the format of the arrows is used.



documentclass[tikz,margin=3mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1.5]
% Nodes
node (rt-1) at (0,0) {$R_{t-1}$};
node (xt-1) at (0,1) {$X_{t-1}$};
node (at-1) at (1,1) {$A_{t-1}$};
node (rt) at (2.5,0) {$R_t$};
node (xt) at (2.5,1) {$X_t$};
node (at) at (3.5,1) {$A_t$};
node (rt+1) at (5,0) {$R_{t+1}$};
node (xt+1) at (5,1) {$X_{t+1}$};
node (at+1) at (6,1) {$A_{t+1}$};
% Beginning
draw[<-] ($(xt-1.south)+(-.1,0)$) arc (0:-90:.25cm) coordinate (bt-1);
draw[->] ($(bt-1)+(-.5,0)$) -- (bt-1) to[out=0,in=90] (rt-1.north);
% At position t - 1
draw[->] (xt-1.north) to[out=90,in=90] (at-1.north);
draw[->] ($(xt-1.south)+(.1,0)$) arc (180:270:.25cm) coordinate (et-1) -- ($(et-1)+(1.5,0)$) to[out=0,in=90] (rt.north);
draw[<-] ($(xt.south)+(-.1,0)$) arc (0:-90:.25cm) coordinate (bt);
draw ($(et-1)+(1.5,0)$)--(bt);
draw (at-1.south) arc (180:270:.25cm);
% At position t
draw[->] (xt.north) to[out=90,in=90] (at.north);
draw[->] ($(xt.south)+(.1,0)$) arc (180:270:.25cm) coordinate (et) -- ($(et)+(1.5,0)$) to[out=0,in=90] (rt+1.north);
draw[<-] ($(xt+1.south)+(-.1,0)$) arc (0:-90:.25cm) coordinate (bt+1);
draw ($(et)+(1.5,0)$)--(bt+1);
draw (at.south) arc (180:270:.25cm);
% At position t + 1
draw[->] (xt+1.north) to[out=90,in=90] (at+1.north);
draw ($(xt+1.south)+(.1,0)$) arc (180:270:.25cm) coordinate (et+1) -- ($(et+1)+(1.5,0)$);
draw (at+1.south) arc (180:270:.25cm);
% The dots as you requested
draw ($(bt-1)+(-.5,0)$) node[left] {$cdots$};
draw ($(et+1)+(1.5,0)$) node[right]{$cdots$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477407%2fbetter-way-to-make-this-picture-of-sequence-with-arrows%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    12














    Since you asked is there a more elegant way to do this, here is a starting point to define the nodes using foreach.



    enter image description here



    documentclass[margin=2mm]{standalone}
    usepackage{tikz}
    begin{document}
    begin{tikzpicture}[%
    node distance=1.5cm,
    inner sep=2pt,
    ]

    foreach [count=i] l in {-1,,+1}{
    node (Xi) at (4*i,0) {$X_{tl}$};
    node[right of=Xi] (Ai) {$A_{tl}$};
    node[below of=Xi] (Ri) {$R_{tl}$};
    }
    node[left of=X1] (left) {phantom{$X_t$}};
    node[right of=A3] (right) {phantom{$X_t$}};

    %% dashed line
    draw[dashed] ([yshift=7.5pt]left.north) -- ([yshift=7.5pt]right.north);

    begin{scope}[%
    ->,
    rounded corners=5pt,
    thick,
    ]

    %% X to A
    foreach i in {1,2,3}{%
    draw (Xi.north)
    -- ([yshift=7pt]Xi.north)
    -| (Ai.north);
    }

    %% X to X
    draw ([xshift=4pt]X1.south) -- ([xshift=4pt,yshift=-7pt]X1.south)
    -| ([xshift=-4pt]X2.south);
    draw ([xshift=4pt]X2.south) -- ([xshift=4pt,yshift=-7pt]X2.south)
    -| ([xshift=-4pt]X3.south);

    %% X to dots
    draw ([xshift=4pt]X3.south) -- ([xshift=4pt,yshift=-7pt]X3.south)
    -- ([yshift=-7pt]right.south)node[right]{$dots$};

    %% A to dots
    draw (A3.south) -- ([yshift=-7pt]A3.south)
    -- ([yshift=-7pt]right.south);

    %% A to R
    draw (A1)
    -- ([yshift=-7pt]A1.south)
    -| (R2.north);
    draw (A2)
    -- ([yshift=-7pt]A2.south)
    -| (R3.north);

    %% dots to X
    draw ([yshift=-7pt]left.south)node[left]{$dots$}
    -| ([xshift=-4pt]X1.south);

    %% dots to R
    draw ([yshift=-7pt]left.south)
    -| (R1.north);
    end{scope}

    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}





    share|improve this answer


























    • tikz has loops? that's nice

      – Felix B.
      Mar 2 at 13:17













    • @FelixB., oh, yes. Not only TikZ, but there is pgffor.

      – Sigur
      Mar 2 at 13:20











    • @FelixB. Read more in Section 2.20 of the TikZ - PGF manual: Repeating Things: For-Loops.

      – JouleV
      Mar 2 at 13:26











    • I'll be out for some time now.

      – Sigur
      Mar 2 at 13:50











    • @Sigur I guess -| means it does not go diagonally but rather makes a corner?

      – Felix B.
      Mar 2 at 14:12
















    12














    Since you asked is there a more elegant way to do this, here is a starting point to define the nodes using foreach.



    enter image description here



    documentclass[margin=2mm]{standalone}
    usepackage{tikz}
    begin{document}
    begin{tikzpicture}[%
    node distance=1.5cm,
    inner sep=2pt,
    ]

    foreach [count=i] l in {-1,,+1}{
    node (Xi) at (4*i,0) {$X_{tl}$};
    node[right of=Xi] (Ai) {$A_{tl}$};
    node[below of=Xi] (Ri) {$R_{tl}$};
    }
    node[left of=X1] (left) {phantom{$X_t$}};
    node[right of=A3] (right) {phantom{$X_t$}};

    %% dashed line
    draw[dashed] ([yshift=7.5pt]left.north) -- ([yshift=7.5pt]right.north);

    begin{scope}[%
    ->,
    rounded corners=5pt,
    thick,
    ]

    %% X to A
    foreach i in {1,2,3}{%
    draw (Xi.north)
    -- ([yshift=7pt]Xi.north)
    -| (Ai.north);
    }

    %% X to X
    draw ([xshift=4pt]X1.south) -- ([xshift=4pt,yshift=-7pt]X1.south)
    -| ([xshift=-4pt]X2.south);
    draw ([xshift=4pt]X2.south) -- ([xshift=4pt,yshift=-7pt]X2.south)
    -| ([xshift=-4pt]X3.south);

    %% X to dots
    draw ([xshift=4pt]X3.south) -- ([xshift=4pt,yshift=-7pt]X3.south)
    -- ([yshift=-7pt]right.south)node[right]{$dots$};

    %% A to dots
    draw (A3.south) -- ([yshift=-7pt]A3.south)
    -- ([yshift=-7pt]right.south);

    %% A to R
    draw (A1)
    -- ([yshift=-7pt]A1.south)
    -| (R2.north);
    draw (A2)
    -- ([yshift=-7pt]A2.south)
    -| (R3.north);

    %% dots to X
    draw ([yshift=-7pt]left.south)node[left]{$dots$}
    -| ([xshift=-4pt]X1.south);

    %% dots to R
    draw ([yshift=-7pt]left.south)
    -| (R1.north);
    end{scope}

    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}





    share|improve this answer


























    • tikz has loops? that's nice

      – Felix B.
      Mar 2 at 13:17













    • @FelixB., oh, yes. Not only TikZ, but there is pgffor.

      – Sigur
      Mar 2 at 13:20











    • @FelixB. Read more in Section 2.20 of the TikZ - PGF manual: Repeating Things: For-Loops.

      – JouleV
      Mar 2 at 13:26











    • I'll be out for some time now.

      – Sigur
      Mar 2 at 13:50











    • @Sigur I guess -| means it does not go diagonally but rather makes a corner?

      – Felix B.
      Mar 2 at 14:12














    12












    12








    12







    Since you asked is there a more elegant way to do this, here is a starting point to define the nodes using foreach.



    enter image description here



    documentclass[margin=2mm]{standalone}
    usepackage{tikz}
    begin{document}
    begin{tikzpicture}[%
    node distance=1.5cm,
    inner sep=2pt,
    ]

    foreach [count=i] l in {-1,,+1}{
    node (Xi) at (4*i,0) {$X_{tl}$};
    node[right of=Xi] (Ai) {$A_{tl}$};
    node[below of=Xi] (Ri) {$R_{tl}$};
    }
    node[left of=X1] (left) {phantom{$X_t$}};
    node[right of=A3] (right) {phantom{$X_t$}};

    %% dashed line
    draw[dashed] ([yshift=7.5pt]left.north) -- ([yshift=7.5pt]right.north);

    begin{scope}[%
    ->,
    rounded corners=5pt,
    thick,
    ]

    %% X to A
    foreach i in {1,2,3}{%
    draw (Xi.north)
    -- ([yshift=7pt]Xi.north)
    -| (Ai.north);
    }

    %% X to X
    draw ([xshift=4pt]X1.south) -- ([xshift=4pt,yshift=-7pt]X1.south)
    -| ([xshift=-4pt]X2.south);
    draw ([xshift=4pt]X2.south) -- ([xshift=4pt,yshift=-7pt]X2.south)
    -| ([xshift=-4pt]X3.south);

    %% X to dots
    draw ([xshift=4pt]X3.south) -- ([xshift=4pt,yshift=-7pt]X3.south)
    -- ([yshift=-7pt]right.south)node[right]{$dots$};

    %% A to dots
    draw (A3.south) -- ([yshift=-7pt]A3.south)
    -- ([yshift=-7pt]right.south);

    %% A to R
    draw (A1)
    -- ([yshift=-7pt]A1.south)
    -| (R2.north);
    draw (A2)
    -- ([yshift=-7pt]A2.south)
    -| (R3.north);

    %% dots to X
    draw ([yshift=-7pt]left.south)node[left]{$dots$}
    -| ([xshift=-4pt]X1.south);

    %% dots to R
    draw ([yshift=-7pt]left.south)
    -| (R1.north);
    end{scope}

    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}





    share|improve this answer















    Since you asked is there a more elegant way to do this, here is a starting point to define the nodes using foreach.



    enter image description here



    documentclass[margin=2mm]{standalone}
    usepackage{tikz}
    begin{document}
    begin{tikzpicture}[%
    node distance=1.5cm,
    inner sep=2pt,
    ]

    foreach [count=i] l in {-1,,+1}{
    node (Xi) at (4*i,0) {$X_{tl}$};
    node[right of=Xi] (Ai) {$A_{tl}$};
    node[below of=Xi] (Ri) {$R_{tl}$};
    }
    node[left of=X1] (left) {phantom{$X_t$}};
    node[right of=A3] (right) {phantom{$X_t$}};

    %% dashed line
    draw[dashed] ([yshift=7.5pt]left.north) -- ([yshift=7.5pt]right.north);

    begin{scope}[%
    ->,
    rounded corners=5pt,
    thick,
    ]

    %% X to A
    foreach i in {1,2,3}{%
    draw (Xi.north)
    -- ([yshift=7pt]Xi.north)
    -| (Ai.north);
    }

    %% X to X
    draw ([xshift=4pt]X1.south) -- ([xshift=4pt,yshift=-7pt]X1.south)
    -| ([xshift=-4pt]X2.south);
    draw ([xshift=4pt]X2.south) -- ([xshift=4pt,yshift=-7pt]X2.south)
    -| ([xshift=-4pt]X3.south);

    %% X to dots
    draw ([xshift=4pt]X3.south) -- ([xshift=4pt,yshift=-7pt]X3.south)
    -- ([yshift=-7pt]right.south)node[right]{$dots$};

    %% A to dots
    draw (A3.south) -- ([yshift=-7pt]A3.south)
    -- ([yshift=-7pt]right.south);

    %% A to R
    draw (A1)
    -- ([yshift=-7pt]A1.south)
    -| (R2.north);
    draw (A2)
    -- ([yshift=-7pt]A2.south)
    -| (R3.north);

    %% dots to X
    draw ([yshift=-7pt]left.south)node[left]{$dots$}
    -| ([xshift=-4pt]X1.south);

    %% dots to R
    draw ([yshift=-7pt]left.south)
    -| (R1.north);
    end{scope}

    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 2 at 15:55

























    answered Mar 2 at 12:57









    SigurSigur

    25.8k457140




    25.8k457140













    • tikz has loops? that's nice

      – Felix B.
      Mar 2 at 13:17













    • @FelixB., oh, yes. Not only TikZ, but there is pgffor.

      – Sigur
      Mar 2 at 13:20











    • @FelixB. Read more in Section 2.20 of the TikZ - PGF manual: Repeating Things: For-Loops.

      – JouleV
      Mar 2 at 13:26











    • I'll be out for some time now.

      – Sigur
      Mar 2 at 13:50











    • @Sigur I guess -| means it does not go diagonally but rather makes a corner?

      – Felix B.
      Mar 2 at 14:12



















    • tikz has loops? that's nice

      – Felix B.
      Mar 2 at 13:17













    • @FelixB., oh, yes. Not only TikZ, but there is pgffor.

      – Sigur
      Mar 2 at 13:20











    • @FelixB. Read more in Section 2.20 of the TikZ - PGF manual: Repeating Things: For-Loops.

      – JouleV
      Mar 2 at 13:26











    • I'll be out for some time now.

      – Sigur
      Mar 2 at 13:50











    • @Sigur I guess -| means it does not go diagonally but rather makes a corner?

      – Felix B.
      Mar 2 at 14:12

















    tikz has loops? that's nice

    – Felix B.
    Mar 2 at 13:17







    tikz has loops? that's nice

    – Felix B.
    Mar 2 at 13:17















    @FelixB., oh, yes. Not only TikZ, but there is pgffor.

    – Sigur
    Mar 2 at 13:20





    @FelixB., oh, yes. Not only TikZ, but there is pgffor.

    – Sigur
    Mar 2 at 13:20













    @FelixB. Read more in Section 2.20 of the TikZ - PGF manual: Repeating Things: For-Loops.

    – JouleV
    Mar 2 at 13:26





    @FelixB. Read more in Section 2.20 of the TikZ - PGF manual: Repeating Things: For-Loops.

    – JouleV
    Mar 2 at 13:26













    I'll be out for some time now.

    – Sigur
    Mar 2 at 13:50





    I'll be out for some time now.

    – Sigur
    Mar 2 at 13:50













    @Sigur I guess -| means it does not go diagonally but rather makes a corner?

    – Felix B.
    Mar 2 at 14:12





    @Sigur I guess -| means it does not go diagonally but rather makes a corner?

    – Felix B.
    Mar 2 at 14:12











    6














    I improved it by using node and taking advantage of these nodes' .south and .north – this would make the texts have a better spacing with the arrows. Also, a variant of the format of the arrows is used.



    documentclass[tikz,margin=3mm]{standalone}
    usetikzlibrary{calc}
    begin{document}
    begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1.5]
    % Nodes
    node (rt-1) at (0,0) {$R_{t-1}$};
    node (xt-1) at (0,1) {$X_{t-1}$};
    node (at-1) at (1,1) {$A_{t-1}$};
    node (rt) at (2.5,0) {$R_t$};
    node (xt) at (2.5,1) {$X_t$};
    node (at) at (3.5,1) {$A_t$};
    node (rt+1) at (5,0) {$R_{t+1}$};
    node (xt+1) at (5,1) {$X_{t+1}$};
    node (at+1) at (6,1) {$A_{t+1}$};
    % Beginning
    draw[<-] ($(xt-1.south)+(-.1,0)$) arc (0:-90:.25cm) coordinate (bt-1);
    draw[->] ($(bt-1)+(-.5,0)$) -- (bt-1) to[out=0,in=90] (rt-1.north);
    % At position t - 1
    draw[->] (xt-1.north) to[out=90,in=90] (at-1.north);
    draw[->] ($(xt-1.south)+(.1,0)$) arc (180:270:.25cm) coordinate (et-1) -- ($(et-1)+(1.5,0)$) to[out=0,in=90] (rt.north);
    draw[<-] ($(xt.south)+(-.1,0)$) arc (0:-90:.25cm) coordinate (bt);
    draw ($(et-1)+(1.5,0)$)--(bt);
    draw (at-1.south) arc (180:270:.25cm);
    % At position t
    draw[->] (xt.north) to[out=90,in=90] (at.north);
    draw[->] ($(xt.south)+(.1,0)$) arc (180:270:.25cm) coordinate (et) -- ($(et)+(1.5,0)$) to[out=0,in=90] (rt+1.north);
    draw[<-] ($(xt+1.south)+(-.1,0)$) arc (0:-90:.25cm) coordinate (bt+1);
    draw ($(et)+(1.5,0)$)--(bt+1);
    draw (at.south) arc (180:270:.25cm);
    % At position t + 1
    draw[->] (xt+1.north) to[out=90,in=90] (at+1.north);
    draw ($(xt+1.south)+(.1,0)$) arc (180:270:.25cm) coordinate (et+1) -- ($(et+1)+(1.5,0)$);
    draw (at+1.south) arc (180:270:.25cm);
    % The dots as you requested
    draw ($(bt-1)+(-.5,0)$) node[left] {$cdots$};
    draw ($(et+1)+(1.5,0)$) node[right]{$cdots$};
    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer




























      6














      I improved it by using node and taking advantage of these nodes' .south and .north – this would make the texts have a better spacing with the arrows. Also, a variant of the format of the arrows is used.



      documentclass[tikz,margin=3mm]{standalone}
      usetikzlibrary{calc}
      begin{document}
      begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1.5]
      % Nodes
      node (rt-1) at (0,0) {$R_{t-1}$};
      node (xt-1) at (0,1) {$X_{t-1}$};
      node (at-1) at (1,1) {$A_{t-1}$};
      node (rt) at (2.5,0) {$R_t$};
      node (xt) at (2.5,1) {$X_t$};
      node (at) at (3.5,1) {$A_t$};
      node (rt+1) at (5,0) {$R_{t+1}$};
      node (xt+1) at (5,1) {$X_{t+1}$};
      node (at+1) at (6,1) {$A_{t+1}$};
      % Beginning
      draw[<-] ($(xt-1.south)+(-.1,0)$) arc (0:-90:.25cm) coordinate (bt-1);
      draw[->] ($(bt-1)+(-.5,0)$) -- (bt-1) to[out=0,in=90] (rt-1.north);
      % At position t - 1
      draw[->] (xt-1.north) to[out=90,in=90] (at-1.north);
      draw[->] ($(xt-1.south)+(.1,0)$) arc (180:270:.25cm) coordinate (et-1) -- ($(et-1)+(1.5,0)$) to[out=0,in=90] (rt.north);
      draw[<-] ($(xt.south)+(-.1,0)$) arc (0:-90:.25cm) coordinate (bt);
      draw ($(et-1)+(1.5,0)$)--(bt);
      draw (at-1.south) arc (180:270:.25cm);
      % At position t
      draw[->] (xt.north) to[out=90,in=90] (at.north);
      draw[->] ($(xt.south)+(.1,0)$) arc (180:270:.25cm) coordinate (et) -- ($(et)+(1.5,0)$) to[out=0,in=90] (rt+1.north);
      draw[<-] ($(xt+1.south)+(-.1,0)$) arc (0:-90:.25cm) coordinate (bt+1);
      draw ($(et)+(1.5,0)$)--(bt+1);
      draw (at.south) arc (180:270:.25cm);
      % At position t + 1
      draw[->] (xt+1.north) to[out=90,in=90] (at+1.north);
      draw ($(xt+1.south)+(.1,0)$) arc (180:270:.25cm) coordinate (et+1) -- ($(et+1)+(1.5,0)$);
      draw (at+1.south) arc (180:270:.25cm);
      % The dots as you requested
      draw ($(bt-1)+(-.5,0)$) node[left] {$cdots$};
      draw ($(et+1)+(1.5,0)$) node[right]{$cdots$};
      end{tikzpicture}
      end{document}


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer


























        6












        6








        6







        I improved it by using node and taking advantage of these nodes' .south and .north – this would make the texts have a better spacing with the arrows. Also, a variant of the format of the arrows is used.



        documentclass[tikz,margin=3mm]{standalone}
        usetikzlibrary{calc}
        begin{document}
        begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1.5]
        % Nodes
        node (rt-1) at (0,0) {$R_{t-1}$};
        node (xt-1) at (0,1) {$X_{t-1}$};
        node (at-1) at (1,1) {$A_{t-1}$};
        node (rt) at (2.5,0) {$R_t$};
        node (xt) at (2.5,1) {$X_t$};
        node (at) at (3.5,1) {$A_t$};
        node (rt+1) at (5,0) {$R_{t+1}$};
        node (xt+1) at (5,1) {$X_{t+1}$};
        node (at+1) at (6,1) {$A_{t+1}$};
        % Beginning
        draw[<-] ($(xt-1.south)+(-.1,0)$) arc (0:-90:.25cm) coordinate (bt-1);
        draw[->] ($(bt-1)+(-.5,0)$) -- (bt-1) to[out=0,in=90] (rt-1.north);
        % At position t - 1
        draw[->] (xt-1.north) to[out=90,in=90] (at-1.north);
        draw[->] ($(xt-1.south)+(.1,0)$) arc (180:270:.25cm) coordinate (et-1) -- ($(et-1)+(1.5,0)$) to[out=0,in=90] (rt.north);
        draw[<-] ($(xt.south)+(-.1,0)$) arc (0:-90:.25cm) coordinate (bt);
        draw ($(et-1)+(1.5,0)$)--(bt);
        draw (at-1.south) arc (180:270:.25cm);
        % At position t
        draw[->] (xt.north) to[out=90,in=90] (at.north);
        draw[->] ($(xt.south)+(.1,0)$) arc (180:270:.25cm) coordinate (et) -- ($(et)+(1.5,0)$) to[out=0,in=90] (rt+1.north);
        draw[<-] ($(xt+1.south)+(-.1,0)$) arc (0:-90:.25cm) coordinate (bt+1);
        draw ($(et)+(1.5,0)$)--(bt+1);
        draw (at.south) arc (180:270:.25cm);
        % At position t + 1
        draw[->] (xt+1.north) to[out=90,in=90] (at+1.north);
        draw ($(xt+1.south)+(.1,0)$) arc (180:270:.25cm) coordinate (et+1) -- ($(et+1)+(1.5,0)$);
        draw (at+1.south) arc (180:270:.25cm);
        % The dots as you requested
        draw ($(bt-1)+(-.5,0)$) node[left] {$cdots$};
        draw ($(et+1)+(1.5,0)$) node[right]{$cdots$};
        end{tikzpicture}
        end{document}


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer













        I improved it by using node and taking advantage of these nodes' .south and .north – this would make the texts have a better spacing with the arrows. Also, a variant of the format of the arrows is used.



        documentclass[tikz,margin=3mm]{standalone}
        usetikzlibrary{calc}
        begin{document}
        begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1.5]
        % Nodes
        node (rt-1) at (0,0) {$R_{t-1}$};
        node (xt-1) at (0,1) {$X_{t-1}$};
        node (at-1) at (1,1) {$A_{t-1}$};
        node (rt) at (2.5,0) {$R_t$};
        node (xt) at (2.5,1) {$X_t$};
        node (at) at (3.5,1) {$A_t$};
        node (rt+1) at (5,0) {$R_{t+1}$};
        node (xt+1) at (5,1) {$X_{t+1}$};
        node (at+1) at (6,1) {$A_{t+1}$};
        % Beginning
        draw[<-] ($(xt-1.south)+(-.1,0)$) arc (0:-90:.25cm) coordinate (bt-1);
        draw[->] ($(bt-1)+(-.5,0)$) -- (bt-1) to[out=0,in=90] (rt-1.north);
        % At position t - 1
        draw[->] (xt-1.north) to[out=90,in=90] (at-1.north);
        draw[->] ($(xt-1.south)+(.1,0)$) arc (180:270:.25cm) coordinate (et-1) -- ($(et-1)+(1.5,0)$) to[out=0,in=90] (rt.north);
        draw[<-] ($(xt.south)+(-.1,0)$) arc (0:-90:.25cm) coordinate (bt);
        draw ($(et-1)+(1.5,0)$)--(bt);
        draw (at-1.south) arc (180:270:.25cm);
        % At position t
        draw[->] (xt.north) to[out=90,in=90] (at.north);
        draw[->] ($(xt.south)+(.1,0)$) arc (180:270:.25cm) coordinate (et) -- ($(et)+(1.5,0)$) to[out=0,in=90] (rt+1.north);
        draw[<-] ($(xt+1.south)+(-.1,0)$) arc (0:-90:.25cm) coordinate (bt+1);
        draw ($(et)+(1.5,0)$)--(bt+1);
        draw (at.south) arc (180:270:.25cm);
        % At position t + 1
        draw[->] (xt+1.north) to[out=90,in=90] (at+1.north);
        draw ($(xt+1.south)+(.1,0)$) arc (180:270:.25cm) coordinate (et+1) -- ($(et+1)+(1.5,0)$);
        draw (at+1.south) arc (180:270:.25cm);
        % The dots as you requested
        draw ($(bt-1)+(-.5,0)$) node[left] {$cdots$};
        draw ($(et+1)+(1.5,0)$) node[right]{$cdots$};
        end{tikzpicture}
        end{document}


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 2 at 13:02









        JouleVJouleV

        4,91111139




        4,91111139






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477407%2fbetter-way-to-make-this-picture-of-sequence-with-arrows%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            El tren de la libertad Índice Antecedentes "Porque yo decido" Desarrollo de la...

            Puerta de Hutt Referencias Enlaces externos Menú de navegación15°58′00″S 5°42′00″O /...

            Castillo d'Acher Características Menú de navegación