The meaning of the “at the of”my ticket out of fashion — meaning?this side of something - meaning?What...

Who is our nearest neighbor

Life insurance that covers only simultaneous/dual deaths

Is having access to past exams cheating and, if yes, could it be proven just by a good grade?

How to make readers know that my work has used a hidden constraint?

How does Dispel Magic work against Stoneskin?

What is the definition of "Natural Selection"?

Single word request: Harming the benefactor

It's a yearly task, alright

Deleting missing values from a dataset

Unreachable code, but reachable with exception

Why would a jet engine that runs at temps excess of 2000°C burn when it crashes?

Excess Zinc in garden soil

When is a batch class instantiated when you schedule it?

What wound would be of little consequence to a biped but terrible for a quadruped?

Force user to remove USB token

If Invisibility ends because the original caster casts a non-concentration spell, does Invisibility also end on other targets of the original casting?

Is it ok to include an epilogue dedicated to colleagues who passed away in the end of the manuscript?

Latest web browser compatible with Windows 98

Provisioning profile doesn't include the application-identifier and keychain-access-groups entitlements

Running a subshell from the middle of the current command

Can the druid cantrip Thorn Whip really defeat a water weird this easily?

Potentiometer like component

US to Europe trip with Canada layover- is 52 minutes enough?

Sword in the Stone story where the sword was held in place by electromagnets



The meaning of the “at the of”


my ticket out of fashion — meaning?this side of something - meaning?What does “against the use of something” exactly mean in phraseMeaning of “Bloody Beautiful”What does leaves in three hours mean?Is Teaching-a-one-to-fish a phrase?Quest for the king meaningWhat does “book-wise” mean in this context?What does “go-round” mean in this sentence?What is the meaning of this joke? “Judgement day is upon us. The minions of Lucifer walk upon the earth.. Oh, no.. It's merely the Danish”













2















In the following article by The Telegraph:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/2387900/New-man-at-the-of-IMG.html

I stumbled upon the following phrase (in the title of the article):



"New man at the of IMG"



What does this phrase mean?

Is this even correct English? (Doesn't look like one to me :q )

Am I missing something?










share|improve this question







New contributor




SasQ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 3





    I think it is a mistake too. Maybe they left out a word & meant to say, "at the helm of...", or something like that.

    – Lorel C.
    3 hours ago








  • 1





    And they didn't correct it since 2004? That would be weird. I lean towards a mistake as well, but it doesn't hurt to ask, just in case this were actually correct English with some obscure syntax rule in use :q

    – SasQ
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Newspapers and their online analogues can't even afford enough copyeditors to review articles before they're published, much less afterwards, when the articles are mostly of no further commercial value to the publisher.

    – StoneyB
    2 hours ago
















2















In the following article by The Telegraph:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/2387900/New-man-at-the-of-IMG.html

I stumbled upon the following phrase (in the title of the article):



"New man at the of IMG"



What does this phrase mean?

Is this even correct English? (Doesn't look like one to me :q )

Am I missing something?










share|improve this question







New contributor




SasQ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 3





    I think it is a mistake too. Maybe they left out a word & meant to say, "at the helm of...", or something like that.

    – Lorel C.
    3 hours ago








  • 1





    And they didn't correct it since 2004? That would be weird. I lean towards a mistake as well, but it doesn't hurt to ask, just in case this were actually correct English with some obscure syntax rule in use :q

    – SasQ
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Newspapers and their online analogues can't even afford enough copyeditors to review articles before they're published, much less afterwards, when the articles are mostly of no further commercial value to the publisher.

    – StoneyB
    2 hours ago














2












2








2








In the following article by The Telegraph:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/2387900/New-man-at-the-of-IMG.html

I stumbled upon the following phrase (in the title of the article):



"New man at the of IMG"



What does this phrase mean?

Is this even correct English? (Doesn't look like one to me :q )

Am I missing something?










share|improve this question







New contributor




SasQ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












In the following article by The Telegraph:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/2387900/New-man-at-the-of-IMG.html

I stumbled upon the following phrase (in the title of the article):



"New man at the of IMG"



What does this phrase mean?

Is this even correct English? (Doesn't look like one to me :q )

Am I missing something?







meaning phrases syntax






share|improve this question







New contributor




SasQ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




SasQ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




SasQ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 3 hours ago









SasQSasQ

1133




1133




New contributor




SasQ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





SasQ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






SasQ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 3





    I think it is a mistake too. Maybe they left out a word & meant to say, "at the helm of...", or something like that.

    – Lorel C.
    3 hours ago








  • 1





    And they didn't correct it since 2004? That would be weird. I lean towards a mistake as well, but it doesn't hurt to ask, just in case this were actually correct English with some obscure syntax rule in use :q

    – SasQ
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Newspapers and their online analogues can't even afford enough copyeditors to review articles before they're published, much less afterwards, when the articles are mostly of no further commercial value to the publisher.

    – StoneyB
    2 hours ago














  • 3





    I think it is a mistake too. Maybe they left out a word & meant to say, "at the helm of...", or something like that.

    – Lorel C.
    3 hours ago








  • 1





    And they didn't correct it since 2004? That would be weird. I lean towards a mistake as well, but it doesn't hurt to ask, just in case this were actually correct English with some obscure syntax rule in use :q

    – SasQ
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Newspapers and their online analogues can't even afford enough copyeditors to review articles before they're published, much less afterwards, when the articles are mostly of no further commercial value to the publisher.

    – StoneyB
    2 hours ago








3




3





I think it is a mistake too. Maybe they left out a word & meant to say, "at the helm of...", or something like that.

– Lorel C.
3 hours ago







I think it is a mistake too. Maybe they left out a word & meant to say, "at the helm of...", or something like that.

– Lorel C.
3 hours ago






1




1





And they didn't correct it since 2004? That would be weird. I lean towards a mistake as well, but it doesn't hurt to ask, just in case this were actually correct English with some obscure syntax rule in use :q

– SasQ
3 hours ago





And they didn't correct it since 2004? That would be weird. I lean towards a mistake as well, but it doesn't hurt to ask, just in case this were actually correct English with some obscure syntax rule in use :q

– SasQ
3 hours ago




1




1





Newspapers and their online analogues can't even afford enough copyeditors to review articles before they're published, much less afterwards, when the articles are mostly of no further commercial value to the publisher.

– StoneyB
2 hours ago





Newspapers and their online analogues can't even afford enough copyeditors to review articles before they're published, much less afterwards, when the articles are mostly of no further commercial value to the publisher.

– StoneyB
2 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4














It is definitely a mistake that was missed by a sub editor.



As Lorel C says, the author or editors probably made a mistake in the course of changing the title. Authors of newspaper articles generally provide a 'suggestion' for the title of the piece when they submit it, but this is nearly always changed by the sub editor before publication. In this case, a mistake was introduced.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "481"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    SasQ is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200474%2fthe-meaning-of-the-at-the-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    It is definitely a mistake that was missed by a sub editor.



    As Lorel C says, the author or editors probably made a mistake in the course of changing the title. Authors of newspaper articles generally provide a 'suggestion' for the title of the piece when they submit it, but this is nearly always changed by the sub editor before publication. In this case, a mistake was introduced.






    share|improve this answer




























      4














      It is definitely a mistake that was missed by a sub editor.



      As Lorel C says, the author or editors probably made a mistake in the course of changing the title. Authors of newspaper articles generally provide a 'suggestion' for the title of the piece when they submit it, but this is nearly always changed by the sub editor before publication. In this case, a mistake was introduced.






      share|improve this answer


























        4












        4








        4







        It is definitely a mistake that was missed by a sub editor.



        As Lorel C says, the author or editors probably made a mistake in the course of changing the title. Authors of newspaper articles generally provide a 'suggestion' for the title of the piece when they submit it, but this is nearly always changed by the sub editor before publication. In this case, a mistake was introduced.






        share|improve this answer













        It is definitely a mistake that was missed by a sub editor.



        As Lorel C says, the author or editors probably made a mistake in the course of changing the title. Authors of newspaper articles generally provide a 'suggestion' for the title of the piece when they submit it, but this is nearly always changed by the sub editor before publication. In this case, a mistake was introduced.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        fred2fred2

        2,807718




        2,807718






















            SasQ is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            SasQ is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            SasQ is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            SasQ is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200474%2fthe-meaning-of-the-at-the-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            El tren de la libertad Índice Antecedentes "Porque yo decido" Desarrollo de la...

            Castillo d'Acher Características Menú de navegación

            Connecting two nodes from the same mother node horizontallyTikZ: What EXACTLY does the the |- notation for...