Does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?2019 Community...
When two POV characters meet
Coworker uses her breast-pump everywhere in the office
Can you reject a postdoc offer after the PI has paid a large sum for flights/accommodation for your visit?
Is King K. Rool's down throw to up-special a true combo?
What is the dot in “1.2.4."
US to Europe trip with Canada layover- is 52 minutes enough?
Do I need to leave some extra space available on the disk which my database log files reside, for log backup operations to successfully occur?
What is the definition of "Natural Selection"?
Why don't MCU characters ever seem to have language issues?
Rejected in 4th interview round citing insufficient years of experience
This equation is outside the page, how to modify it
what does the apostrophe mean in this notation?
How to discourage/prevent PCs from using door choke-points?
What is the difference between "shut" and "close"?
Am I not good enough for you?
The three point beverage
Counter-example to the existence of left Bousfield localization of combinatorial model category
If the Captain's screens are out, does he switch seats with the co-pilot?
Replacing Windows 7 security updates with anti-virus?
Running a subshell from the middle of the current command
How to make readers know that my work has used a hidden constraint?
Have researches managed to "reverse time" and if so, what does that mean for physics?
A curious inequality concerning binomial coefficients
What wound would be of little consequence to a biped but terrible for a quadruped?
Does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?
2019 Community Moderator ElectionBirth is empty on ext4Can I set the “Archive” bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?Can I configure my Linux system for more aggressive file system caching?Which Linux file systems for USB sticks?what is inode for, in FreeBSD or SolarisHow to interact with the concrete file system?file system, archive bitDoes Linux uses the device files for the HDD partitions to access the HDD?Is the Virtual File System (VFS) a program or is it just an interface?How do I format an internal hard drive so that FreeBSD, Linux and Windows can all access it?How does memory mapping a file have significant performance increases over the standard I/O system calls?What is responsible for file permissions in a linux system?
Linux supports many file systems (for example: ext3, NTFS, FAT32, etc.).
The following diagram shows how Linux allows a process to access files:
So assume that a process called the read()
system call to read a file, what will happen is that the VFS layer will be accessed, and the VFS layer will decide which file system driver to access based on the file system of the partition that the file to be read resides on.
Linux provides many system calls to access files (for example: read()
, write()
, rename()
, etc.).
Now read()
and write()
and rename()
work on all the file systems that Linux supports.
But there are specific features that exist only on some file systems while not existing on others. For example: on a NTFS file system, you can set the Archive bit for a file, while this can't be done on an ext3 file system.
Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports? for example: does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?
linux filesystems
New contributor
add a comment |
Linux supports many file systems (for example: ext3, NTFS, FAT32, etc.).
The following diagram shows how Linux allows a process to access files:
So assume that a process called the read()
system call to read a file, what will happen is that the VFS layer will be accessed, and the VFS layer will decide which file system driver to access based on the file system of the partition that the file to be read resides on.
Linux provides many system calls to access files (for example: read()
, write()
, rename()
, etc.).
Now read()
and write()
and rename()
work on all the file systems that Linux supports.
But there are specific features that exist only on some file systems while not existing on others. For example: on a NTFS file system, you can set the Archive bit for a file, while this can't be done on an ext3 file system.
Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports? for example: does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?
linux filesystems
New contributor
add a comment |
Linux supports many file systems (for example: ext3, NTFS, FAT32, etc.).
The following diagram shows how Linux allows a process to access files:
So assume that a process called the read()
system call to read a file, what will happen is that the VFS layer will be accessed, and the VFS layer will decide which file system driver to access based on the file system of the partition that the file to be read resides on.
Linux provides many system calls to access files (for example: read()
, write()
, rename()
, etc.).
Now read()
and write()
and rename()
work on all the file systems that Linux supports.
But there are specific features that exist only on some file systems while not existing on others. For example: on a NTFS file system, you can set the Archive bit for a file, while this can't be done on an ext3 file system.
Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports? for example: does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?
linux filesystems
New contributor
Linux supports many file systems (for example: ext3, NTFS, FAT32, etc.).
The following diagram shows how Linux allows a process to access files:
So assume that a process called the read()
system call to read a file, what will happen is that the VFS layer will be accessed, and the VFS layer will decide which file system driver to access based on the file system of the partition that the file to be read resides on.
Linux provides many system calls to access files (for example: read()
, write()
, rename()
, etc.).
Now read()
and write()
and rename()
work on all the file systems that Linux supports.
But there are specific features that exist only on some file systems while not existing on others. For example: on a NTFS file system, you can set the Archive bit for a file, while this can't be done on an ext3 file system.
Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports? for example: does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?
linux filesystems
linux filesystems
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 3 hours ago
user341642user341642
161
161
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?
For this particular case, the ntfs-3g
driver exports the file attributes via extended attributes, see Can I set the "Archive" bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?
The (V)FAT file system has the similar file attributes, but it uses an ioctl()
function to access them, see ioctl_fat(2)
. (ioctl()
is a sort of a multipurpose system call, used for all kinds of device specific stuff that don't warrant a real system call.)
Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?
It's hard to answer for sure, but there has been at least one example of the opposite. ext4 internally supports a "birth time" timestamp for files (like, a real creation time, unlike ctime
that changes on inode modification). But even though ext4 is the "standard" filesystem, for a long time, there was no system call to access the birth time.
It should be supported now, with the statx()
system call added in Linux 4.11, in April 2017.
Related:
- Birth is empty on ext4
- A number of articles on lwn.net about statx, including e.g. statx() v3
2
ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).
– Uncle Billy
2 hours ago
This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention ofstatx
, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.
– Stephen Kitt
2 hours ago
@UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.
– ilkkachu
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
user341642 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f506160%2fdoes-linux-have-system-calls-to-access-all-the-features-of-the-file-systems-it-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?
For this particular case, the ntfs-3g
driver exports the file attributes via extended attributes, see Can I set the "Archive" bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?
The (V)FAT file system has the similar file attributes, but it uses an ioctl()
function to access them, see ioctl_fat(2)
. (ioctl()
is a sort of a multipurpose system call, used for all kinds of device specific stuff that don't warrant a real system call.)
Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?
It's hard to answer for sure, but there has been at least one example of the opposite. ext4 internally supports a "birth time" timestamp for files (like, a real creation time, unlike ctime
that changes on inode modification). But even though ext4 is the "standard" filesystem, for a long time, there was no system call to access the birth time.
It should be supported now, with the statx()
system call added in Linux 4.11, in April 2017.
Related:
- Birth is empty on ext4
- A number of articles on lwn.net about statx, including e.g. statx() v3
2
ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).
– Uncle Billy
2 hours ago
This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention ofstatx
, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.
– Stephen Kitt
2 hours ago
@UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.
– ilkkachu
2 hours ago
add a comment |
does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?
For this particular case, the ntfs-3g
driver exports the file attributes via extended attributes, see Can I set the "Archive" bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?
The (V)FAT file system has the similar file attributes, but it uses an ioctl()
function to access them, see ioctl_fat(2)
. (ioctl()
is a sort of a multipurpose system call, used for all kinds of device specific stuff that don't warrant a real system call.)
Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?
It's hard to answer for sure, but there has been at least one example of the opposite. ext4 internally supports a "birth time" timestamp for files (like, a real creation time, unlike ctime
that changes on inode modification). But even though ext4 is the "standard" filesystem, for a long time, there was no system call to access the birth time.
It should be supported now, with the statx()
system call added in Linux 4.11, in April 2017.
Related:
- Birth is empty on ext4
- A number of articles on lwn.net about statx, including e.g. statx() v3
2
ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).
– Uncle Billy
2 hours ago
This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention ofstatx
, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.
– Stephen Kitt
2 hours ago
@UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.
– ilkkachu
2 hours ago
add a comment |
does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?
For this particular case, the ntfs-3g
driver exports the file attributes via extended attributes, see Can I set the "Archive" bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?
The (V)FAT file system has the similar file attributes, but it uses an ioctl()
function to access them, see ioctl_fat(2)
. (ioctl()
is a sort of a multipurpose system call, used for all kinds of device specific stuff that don't warrant a real system call.)
Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?
It's hard to answer for sure, but there has been at least one example of the opposite. ext4 internally supports a "birth time" timestamp for files (like, a real creation time, unlike ctime
that changes on inode modification). But even though ext4 is the "standard" filesystem, for a long time, there was no system call to access the birth time.
It should be supported now, with the statx()
system call added in Linux 4.11, in April 2017.
Related:
- Birth is empty on ext4
- A number of articles on lwn.net about statx, including e.g. statx() v3
does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?
For this particular case, the ntfs-3g
driver exports the file attributes via extended attributes, see Can I set the "Archive" bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?
The (V)FAT file system has the similar file attributes, but it uses an ioctl()
function to access them, see ioctl_fat(2)
. (ioctl()
is a sort of a multipurpose system call, used for all kinds of device specific stuff that don't warrant a real system call.)
Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?
It's hard to answer for sure, but there has been at least one example of the opposite. ext4 internally supports a "birth time" timestamp for files (like, a real creation time, unlike ctime
that changes on inode modification). But even though ext4 is the "standard" filesystem, for a long time, there was no system call to access the birth time.
It should be supported now, with the statx()
system call added in Linux 4.11, in April 2017.
Related:
- Birth is empty on ext4
- A number of articles on lwn.net about statx, including e.g. statx() v3
edited 2 hours ago
answered 2 hours ago
ilkkachuilkkachu
61.1k1099175
61.1k1099175
2
ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).
– Uncle Billy
2 hours ago
This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention ofstatx
, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.
– Stephen Kitt
2 hours ago
@UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.
– ilkkachu
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2
ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).
– Uncle Billy
2 hours ago
This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention ofstatx
, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.
– Stephen Kitt
2 hours ago
@UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.
– ilkkachu
2 hours ago
2
2
ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).
– Uncle Billy
2 hours ago
ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).
– Uncle Billy
2 hours ago
This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention of
statx
, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.– Stephen Kitt
2 hours ago
This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention of
statx
, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.– Stephen Kitt
2 hours ago
@UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.
– ilkkachu
2 hours ago
@UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.
– ilkkachu
2 hours ago
add a comment |
user341642 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user341642 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user341642 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user341642 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f506160%2fdoes-linux-have-system-calls-to-access-all-the-features-of-the-file-systems-it-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown