Is drag coefficient lowest at zero angle of attack? Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18,...
What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?
Strange behaviour of Check
What would be Julian Assange's expected punishment, on the current English criminal law?
Choo-choo! Word trains
Unexpected result with right shift after bitwise negation
Area of a 2D convex hull
Autumning in love
Complexity of many constant time steps with occasional logarithmic steps
I'm having difficulty getting my players to do stuff in a sandbox campaign
How to market an anarchic city as a tourism spot to people living in civilized areas?
Determine whether f is a function, an injection, a surjection
How to say that you spent the night with someone, you were only sleeping and nothing else?
Why is "Captain Marvel" translated as male in Portugal?
Can I throw a longsword at someone?
Passing functions in C++
Working around an AWS network ACL rule limit
Is 1 ppb equal to 1 μg/kg?
Why is there no army of Iron-Mans in the MCU?
What computer would be fastest for Mathematica Home Edition?
Unable to start mainnet node docker container
How to set letter above or below the symbol?
Do working physicists consider Newtonian mechanics to be "falsified"?
The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551
What are the performance impacts of 'functional' Rust?
Is drag coefficient lowest at zero angle of attack?
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do insects decrease aircraft performance?How to draw NACA 6-Series Airfoils?How can the zero-lift drag coefficient (parasitic drag) be calculated?What is the relation between the Lift Coefficient and the Angle of Attack?Is it possible to fly horizontally with zero angle of attack?How to find trim condition of a sectional airfoil without knowing the angle of attack?What is the effect of flow separation on lift, pressure distribution and drag?How can the zero-lift drag coefficient (parasitic drag) be calculated?Do negative angles-of-attack create lift?How do you calculate the lift coefficient of an airfoil at zero angle of attack?Calculating induced drag approximation using XFoil generated parasitic dragDoes speed or angle of attack generally have the greatest impact on total induced drag?What's the theoretical background of the critical angle of attack?
$begingroup$
The drag coefficient of a symmetric airfoil is lowest when its angle of attack is zero. I'm not sure if this is true in general.
aerodynamics airfoil drag angle-of-attack
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The drag coefficient of a symmetric airfoil is lowest when its angle of attack is zero. I'm not sure if this is true in general.
aerodynamics airfoil drag angle-of-attack
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Welcome to Av.SE!
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The drag coefficient of a symmetric airfoil is lowest when its angle of attack is zero. I'm not sure if this is true in general.
aerodynamics airfoil drag angle-of-attack
New contributor
$endgroup$
The drag coefficient of a symmetric airfoil is lowest when its angle of attack is zero. I'm not sure if this is true in general.
aerodynamics airfoil drag angle-of-attack
aerodynamics airfoil drag angle-of-attack
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 6 hours ago
simple jacksimple jack
103
103
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
Welcome to Av.SE!
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Welcome to Av.SE!
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to Av.SE!
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to Av.SE!
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
6 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Obviously, drag should be smallest for symmetrical airfoils at zero angle of attack.
However, most airfoils have camber, and then the lowest drag is at positive lift coefficients in case of positive camber. Where that point is exactly depends on many parameters; in case of laminar airfoils even local imperfections can have a noticeable effect. Generally, the lowest drag can be found at the angle of attack where the stagnation point is exactly at the center of the leading edge, where the local curvature is highest. A deviation from this point will force the flow on one side to negotiate this point of highest curvature all by itself, resulting in a suction peak which will increase the losses in the boundary layer.
This is a theoretical drag polar (calculated with XFOIL) of an airfoil with a 20% camber flap at different settings and a Reynolds number of 1.5 million. The laminar bucket is clearly visible and produces a range of lift coefficients with nearly identical drag. The small waviness at the lower end of the laminar bucket is an artificial result of smoothing the plot.
What is obvious is how camber shifts the area of minimum drag up and down. If you use the right side of the plot to find the angle of attack of minimum drag, you will find that this is not constant but goes down as flap angles go up. For the 0° flap polar it is at about -2° AoA. This is caused by the induced angle of attack which increases with the lift coefficient.
The 6-series NACA airfoils were the first to be systematically designed with the pressure distribution in mind, and the design lift coefficient is where the condition of the ideal stagnation point location is met. This is indicated by the digit right after the hyphen in the airfoil name: Divide this digit by 10 and you have the lift coefficient of minimum drag.
Example: The $63_1-412$ airfoil has its lowest drag at a lift coefficient of 0.4.
If you want to know the angle of attack with the lowest drag of a whole airplane, this is a very different matter and needs to include the drag due to lift, which is of course smallest at the zero lift polar point.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, for a symmetrical lift generating airfoil this is true.
The drag coefficient is computed by dividing the wetted area $A_w$ of the airfoil by its frontal area $A_f$ :
$$ c_d = frac{A_w}{A_f} $$
For non-symmetrical airfoils, the lowest drag coefficient is found at the angle of attack were the frontal area is at its smallest. For almost all the airfoils this is at 0 degrees AoA.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It is not true for the Clark-Y airfoil.
$endgroup$
– simple jack
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Frontal area is smallest? April 1st was two weeks ago!
$endgroup$
– Peter Kämpf
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
simple jack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62357%2fis-drag-coefficient-lowest-at-zero-angle-of-attack%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Obviously, drag should be smallest for symmetrical airfoils at zero angle of attack.
However, most airfoils have camber, and then the lowest drag is at positive lift coefficients in case of positive camber. Where that point is exactly depends on many parameters; in case of laminar airfoils even local imperfections can have a noticeable effect. Generally, the lowest drag can be found at the angle of attack where the stagnation point is exactly at the center of the leading edge, where the local curvature is highest. A deviation from this point will force the flow on one side to negotiate this point of highest curvature all by itself, resulting in a suction peak which will increase the losses in the boundary layer.
This is a theoretical drag polar (calculated with XFOIL) of an airfoil with a 20% camber flap at different settings and a Reynolds number of 1.5 million. The laminar bucket is clearly visible and produces a range of lift coefficients with nearly identical drag. The small waviness at the lower end of the laminar bucket is an artificial result of smoothing the plot.
What is obvious is how camber shifts the area of minimum drag up and down. If you use the right side of the plot to find the angle of attack of minimum drag, you will find that this is not constant but goes down as flap angles go up. For the 0° flap polar it is at about -2° AoA. This is caused by the induced angle of attack which increases with the lift coefficient.
The 6-series NACA airfoils were the first to be systematically designed with the pressure distribution in mind, and the design lift coefficient is where the condition of the ideal stagnation point location is met. This is indicated by the digit right after the hyphen in the airfoil name: Divide this digit by 10 and you have the lift coefficient of minimum drag.
Example: The $63_1-412$ airfoil has its lowest drag at a lift coefficient of 0.4.
If you want to know the angle of attack with the lowest drag of a whole airplane, this is a very different matter and needs to include the drag due to lift, which is of course smallest at the zero lift polar point.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Obviously, drag should be smallest for symmetrical airfoils at zero angle of attack.
However, most airfoils have camber, and then the lowest drag is at positive lift coefficients in case of positive camber. Where that point is exactly depends on many parameters; in case of laminar airfoils even local imperfections can have a noticeable effect. Generally, the lowest drag can be found at the angle of attack where the stagnation point is exactly at the center of the leading edge, where the local curvature is highest. A deviation from this point will force the flow on one side to negotiate this point of highest curvature all by itself, resulting in a suction peak which will increase the losses in the boundary layer.
This is a theoretical drag polar (calculated with XFOIL) of an airfoil with a 20% camber flap at different settings and a Reynolds number of 1.5 million. The laminar bucket is clearly visible and produces a range of lift coefficients with nearly identical drag. The small waviness at the lower end of the laminar bucket is an artificial result of smoothing the plot.
What is obvious is how camber shifts the area of minimum drag up and down. If you use the right side of the plot to find the angle of attack of minimum drag, you will find that this is not constant but goes down as flap angles go up. For the 0° flap polar it is at about -2° AoA. This is caused by the induced angle of attack which increases with the lift coefficient.
The 6-series NACA airfoils were the first to be systematically designed with the pressure distribution in mind, and the design lift coefficient is where the condition of the ideal stagnation point location is met. This is indicated by the digit right after the hyphen in the airfoil name: Divide this digit by 10 and you have the lift coefficient of minimum drag.
Example: The $63_1-412$ airfoil has its lowest drag at a lift coefficient of 0.4.
If you want to know the angle of attack with the lowest drag of a whole airplane, this is a very different matter and needs to include the drag due to lift, which is of course smallest at the zero lift polar point.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Obviously, drag should be smallest for symmetrical airfoils at zero angle of attack.
However, most airfoils have camber, and then the lowest drag is at positive lift coefficients in case of positive camber. Where that point is exactly depends on many parameters; in case of laminar airfoils even local imperfections can have a noticeable effect. Generally, the lowest drag can be found at the angle of attack where the stagnation point is exactly at the center of the leading edge, where the local curvature is highest. A deviation from this point will force the flow on one side to negotiate this point of highest curvature all by itself, resulting in a suction peak which will increase the losses in the boundary layer.
This is a theoretical drag polar (calculated with XFOIL) of an airfoil with a 20% camber flap at different settings and a Reynolds number of 1.5 million. The laminar bucket is clearly visible and produces a range of lift coefficients with nearly identical drag. The small waviness at the lower end of the laminar bucket is an artificial result of smoothing the plot.
What is obvious is how camber shifts the area of minimum drag up and down. If you use the right side of the plot to find the angle of attack of minimum drag, you will find that this is not constant but goes down as flap angles go up. For the 0° flap polar it is at about -2° AoA. This is caused by the induced angle of attack which increases with the lift coefficient.
The 6-series NACA airfoils were the first to be systematically designed with the pressure distribution in mind, and the design lift coefficient is where the condition of the ideal stagnation point location is met. This is indicated by the digit right after the hyphen in the airfoil name: Divide this digit by 10 and you have the lift coefficient of minimum drag.
Example: The $63_1-412$ airfoil has its lowest drag at a lift coefficient of 0.4.
If you want to know the angle of attack with the lowest drag of a whole airplane, this is a very different matter and needs to include the drag due to lift, which is of course smallest at the zero lift polar point.
$endgroup$
Obviously, drag should be smallest for symmetrical airfoils at zero angle of attack.
However, most airfoils have camber, and then the lowest drag is at positive lift coefficients in case of positive camber. Where that point is exactly depends on many parameters; in case of laminar airfoils even local imperfections can have a noticeable effect. Generally, the lowest drag can be found at the angle of attack where the stagnation point is exactly at the center of the leading edge, where the local curvature is highest. A deviation from this point will force the flow on one side to negotiate this point of highest curvature all by itself, resulting in a suction peak which will increase the losses in the boundary layer.
This is a theoretical drag polar (calculated with XFOIL) of an airfoil with a 20% camber flap at different settings and a Reynolds number of 1.5 million. The laminar bucket is clearly visible and produces a range of lift coefficients with nearly identical drag. The small waviness at the lower end of the laminar bucket is an artificial result of smoothing the plot.
What is obvious is how camber shifts the area of minimum drag up and down. If you use the right side of the plot to find the angle of attack of minimum drag, you will find that this is not constant but goes down as flap angles go up. For the 0° flap polar it is at about -2° AoA. This is caused by the induced angle of attack which increases with the lift coefficient.
The 6-series NACA airfoils were the first to be systematically designed with the pressure distribution in mind, and the design lift coefficient is where the condition of the ideal stagnation point location is met. This is indicated by the digit right after the hyphen in the airfoil name: Divide this digit by 10 and you have the lift coefficient of minimum drag.
Example: The $63_1-412$ airfoil has its lowest drag at a lift coefficient of 0.4.
If you want to know the angle of attack with the lowest drag of a whole airplane, this is a very different matter and needs to include the drag due to lift, which is of course smallest at the zero lift polar point.
answered 1 hour ago
Peter KämpfPeter Kämpf
162k12411656
162k12411656
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, for a symmetrical lift generating airfoil this is true.
The drag coefficient is computed by dividing the wetted area $A_w$ of the airfoil by its frontal area $A_f$ :
$$ c_d = frac{A_w}{A_f} $$
For non-symmetrical airfoils, the lowest drag coefficient is found at the angle of attack were the frontal area is at its smallest. For almost all the airfoils this is at 0 degrees AoA.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It is not true for the Clark-Y airfoil.
$endgroup$
– simple jack
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Frontal area is smallest? April 1st was two weeks ago!
$endgroup$
– Peter Kämpf
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, for a symmetrical lift generating airfoil this is true.
The drag coefficient is computed by dividing the wetted area $A_w$ of the airfoil by its frontal area $A_f$ :
$$ c_d = frac{A_w}{A_f} $$
For non-symmetrical airfoils, the lowest drag coefficient is found at the angle of attack were the frontal area is at its smallest. For almost all the airfoils this is at 0 degrees AoA.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It is not true for the Clark-Y airfoil.
$endgroup$
– simple jack
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Frontal area is smallest? April 1st was two weeks ago!
$endgroup$
– Peter Kämpf
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, for a symmetrical lift generating airfoil this is true.
The drag coefficient is computed by dividing the wetted area $A_w$ of the airfoil by its frontal area $A_f$ :
$$ c_d = frac{A_w}{A_f} $$
For non-symmetrical airfoils, the lowest drag coefficient is found at the angle of attack were the frontal area is at its smallest. For almost all the airfoils this is at 0 degrees AoA.
$endgroup$
Yes, for a symmetrical lift generating airfoil this is true.
The drag coefficient is computed by dividing the wetted area $A_w$ of the airfoil by its frontal area $A_f$ :
$$ c_d = frac{A_w}{A_f} $$
For non-symmetrical airfoils, the lowest drag coefficient is found at the angle of attack were the frontal area is at its smallest. For almost all the airfoils this is at 0 degrees AoA.
edited 5 hours ago
simple jack
103
103
answered 6 hours ago
BrilsmurfffjeBrilsmurfffje
3,41621536
3,41621536
$begingroup$
It is not true for the Clark-Y airfoil.
$endgroup$
– simple jack
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Frontal area is smallest? April 1st was two weeks ago!
$endgroup$
– Peter Kämpf
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is not true for the Clark-Y airfoil.
$endgroup$
– simple jack
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Frontal area is smallest? April 1st was two weeks ago!
$endgroup$
– Peter Kämpf
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
It is not true for the Clark-Y airfoil.
$endgroup$
– simple jack
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
It is not true for the Clark-Y airfoil.
$endgroup$
– simple jack
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Frontal area is smallest? April 1st was two weeks ago!
$endgroup$
– Peter Kämpf
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Frontal area is smallest? April 1st was two weeks ago!
$endgroup$
– Peter Kämpf
2 hours ago
add a comment |
simple jack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
simple jack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
simple jack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
simple jack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62357%2fis-drag-coefficient-lowest-at-zero-angle-of-attack%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Welcome to Av.SE!
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
6 hours ago