Would a completely good Muggle be able to use a wand? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCan a...
Can I equip Skullclamp on a creature I am sacrificing?
If Nick Fury and Coulson already knew about aliens (Kree and Skrull) why did they wait until Thor's appearance to start making weapons?
Sending manuscript to multiple publishers
What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?
Complex fractions
multiple labels for a single equation
Different harmonic changes implied by a simple descending scale
Bold, vivid family
Do I need to enable Dev Hub in my PROD Org?
MessageLevel in QGIS3
Are there any unintended negative consequences to allowing PCs to gain multiple levels at once in a short milestone-XP game?
What was the first Unix version to run on a microcomputer?
sp_blitzCache results Memory grants
Why don't programming languages automatically manage the synchronous/asynchronous problem?
What is the purpose of the Evocation wizard's Potent Cantrip feature?
Why do professional authors make "consistency" mistakes? And how to avoid them?
What is ( CFMCC ) on ILS approach chart?
Preparing Indesign booklet with .psd graphics for print
Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?
What exact does MIB represent in SNMP? How is it different from OID?
WOW air has ceased operation, can I get my tickets refunded?
Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis
Limits on contract work without pre-agreed price/contract (UK)
Is it my responsibility to learn a new technology in my own time my employer wants to implement?
Would a completely good Muggle be able to use a wand?
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCan a Muggle do anything with a wand?What were Dumbledore's actual intentions for the Elder Wand?Could Harry have died a natural death while he was a kind-of-Horcrux, and what would become of the part that Voldemort had to kill him?How do Muggle Wars affect the magical world?Spell Propagation Speed?Elder Wand ownershipWhy didn't Harry draw gold from Gringotts?Why did Harry and Ron take Gilderoy Lockhart with them into the Chamber of Secrets?Was Harry good at Muggle sports?What was the original version of this FAQ answer on JK Rowling's website?Did Arthur Weasley take Muggle Studies?
I was reading through this question Can a Muggle do anything with a wand? and Valorum’s answer said this:
JKR addressed this point in an interview in 2006;
"I been asked what would happen if a Muggle picked up a magic wand in my world. And the answer would probably be something accidental... possibly quite violent. Because a wand, in my world, is merely a vehicle — a vessel for what lies inside the person."
So then what if you’re someone who is completely good and has no "violence" inside of you, would you then be able to use a wand?
harry-potter
edited 1 hour ago
TheLethalCarrot
49.2k19267311
asked 1 hour ago
it makes u thinkit makes u think
191
New contributor
it makes u think is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I was reading through this question Can a Muggle do anything with a wand? and Valorum’s answer said this:
JKR addressed this point in an interview in 2006;
"I been asked what would happen if a Muggle picked up a magic wand in my world. And the answer would probably be something accidental... possibly quite violent. Because a wand, in my world, is merely a vehicle — a vessel for what lies inside the person."
So then what if you’re someone who is completely good and has no "violence" inside of you, would you then be able to use a wand?
harry-potter
edited 1 hour ago
TheLethalCarrot
49.2k19267311
asked 1 hour ago
it makes u thinkit makes u think
191
New contributor
it makes u think is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
If I'm reading the quote correctly, no. Being pure of heart would eliminate the "possibly quite violent" part, but not the "probably something accidental" part.
– F1Krazy
1 hour ago
I think a tablet with a fancy, expensive drawing app might be a good analogy. Anyone can scribble on the screen, but it takes talent and practice to paint something people (beyond the immediate family) would consider art.
– Gaultheria
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I was reading through this question Can a Muggle do anything with a wand? and Valorum’s answer said this:
JKR addressed this point in an interview in 2006;
"I been asked what would happen if a Muggle picked up a magic wand in my world. And the answer would probably be something accidental... possibly quite violent. Because a wand, in my world, is merely a vehicle — a vessel for what lies inside the person."
So then what if you’re someone who is completely good and has no "violence" inside of you, would you then be able to use a wand?
harry-potter
edited 1 hour ago
TheLethalCarrot
49.2k19267311
asked 1 hour ago
it makes u thinkit makes u think
191
New contributor
it makes u think is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I was reading through this question Can a Muggle do anything with a wand? and Valorum’s answer said this:
JKR addressed this point in an interview in 2006;
"I been asked what would happen if a Muggle picked up a magic wand in my world. And the answer would probably be something accidental... possibly quite violent. Because a wand, in my world, is merely a vehicle — a vessel for what lies inside the person."
So then what if you’re someone who is completely good and has no "violence" inside of you, would you then be able to use a wand?
harry-potter
harry-potter
edited 1 hour ago
TheLethalCarrot
49.2k19267311
asked 1 hour ago
it makes u thinkit makes u think
191
New contributor
it makes u think is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 1 hour ago
TheLethalCarrot
49.2k19267311
asked 1 hour ago
it makes u thinkit makes u think
191
New contributor
it makes u think is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 1 hour ago
TheLethalCarrot
49.2k19267311
edited 1 hour ago
TheLethalCarrot
49.2k19267311
edited 1 hour ago
TheLethalCarrot
49.2k19267311
49.2k19267311
asked 1 hour ago
it makes u thinkit makes u think
191
New contributor
it makes u think is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 1 hour ago
it makes u thinkit makes u think
191
asked 1 hour ago
it makes u thinkit makes u think
191
191
New contributor
it makes u think is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
it makes u think is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
it makes u think is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
If I'm reading the quote correctly, no. Being pure of heart would eliminate the "possibly quite violent" part, but not the "probably something accidental" part.
– F1Krazy
1 hour ago
I think a tablet with a fancy, expensive drawing app might be a good analogy. Anyone can scribble on the screen, but it takes talent and practice to paint something people (beyond the immediate family) would consider art.
– Gaultheria
1 hour ago
add a comment |
If I'm reading the quote correctly, no. Being pure of heart would eliminate the "possibly quite violent" part, but not the "probably something accidental" part.
– F1Krazy
1 hour ago
I think a tablet with a fancy, expensive drawing app might be a good analogy. Anyone can scribble on the screen, but it takes talent and practice to paint something people (beyond the immediate family) would consider art.
– Gaultheria
1 hour ago
If I'm reading the quote correctly, no. Being pure of heart would eliminate the "possibly quite violent" part, but not the "probably something accidental" part.
– F1Krazy
1 hour ago
If I'm reading the quote correctly, no. Being pure of heart would eliminate the "possibly quite violent" part, but not the "probably something accidental" part.
– F1Krazy
1 hour ago
I think a tablet with a fancy, expensive drawing app might be a good analogy. Anyone can scribble on the screen, but it takes talent and practice to paint something people (beyond the immediate family) would consider art.
– Gaultheria
1 hour ago
I think a tablet with a fancy, expensive drawing app might be a good analogy. Anyone can scribble on the screen, but it takes talent and practice to paint something people (beyond the immediate family) would consider art.
– Gaultheria
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
No, you've misunderstood the quote.
JKR isn't saying that the result would be violent because violence is what lies inside a Muggle (though it does sound like something the Malfoys might come up with) but that the result of a Muggle using a wand would be uncontrolled because the Muggle lacks the ability to control magic - that's the power that lies inside a wizard, and which the wand is a vessel for.
By way of analogy, imagine a three-year-old driving a car. The outcome would probably be unintentional, and possibly quite violent, but that's not because it is in the nature of children to be violent but because they lack the ability to control the vehicle. Their character doesn't matter, only their ability.
answered 42 mins ago
Harry JohnstonHarry Johnston
13.6k23267
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
it makes u think is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208175%2fwould-a-completely-good-muggle-be-able-to-use-a-wand%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No, you've misunderstood the quote.
JKR isn't saying that the result would be violent because violence is what lies inside a Muggle (though it does sound like something the Malfoys might come up with) but that the result of a Muggle using a wand would be uncontrolled because the Muggle lacks the ability to control magic - that's the power that lies inside a wizard, and which the wand is a vessel for.
By way of analogy, imagine a three-year-old driving a car. The outcome would probably be unintentional, and possibly quite violent, but that's not because it is in the nature of children to be violent but because they lack the ability to control the vehicle. Their character doesn't matter, only their ability.
answered 42 mins ago
Harry JohnstonHarry Johnston
13.6k23267
add a comment |
No, you've misunderstood the quote.
JKR isn't saying that the result would be violent because violence is what lies inside a Muggle (though it does sound like something the Malfoys might come up with) but that the result of a Muggle using a wand would be uncontrolled because the Muggle lacks the ability to control magic - that's the power that lies inside a wizard, and which the wand is a vessel for.
By way of analogy, imagine a three-year-old driving a car. The outcome would probably be unintentional, and possibly quite violent, but that's not because it is in the nature of children to be violent but because they lack the ability to control the vehicle. Their character doesn't matter, only their ability.
answered 42 mins ago
Harry JohnstonHarry Johnston
13.6k23267
add a comment |
No, you've misunderstood the quote.
JKR isn't saying that the result would be violent because violence is what lies inside a Muggle (though it does sound like something the Malfoys might come up with) but that the result of a Muggle using a wand would be uncontrolled because the Muggle lacks the ability to control magic - that's the power that lies inside a wizard, and which the wand is a vessel for.
By way of analogy, imagine a three-year-old driving a car. The outcome would probably be unintentional, and possibly quite violent, but that's not because it is in the nature of children to be violent but because they lack the ability to control the vehicle. Their character doesn't matter, only their ability.
answered 42 mins ago
Harry JohnstonHarry Johnston
13.6k23267
No, you've misunderstood the quote.
JKR isn't saying that the result would be violent because violence is what lies inside a Muggle (though it does sound like something the Malfoys might come up with) but that the result of a Muggle using a wand would be uncontrolled because the Muggle lacks the ability to control magic - that's the power that lies inside a wizard, and which the wand is a vessel for.
By way of analogy, imagine a three-year-old driving a car. The outcome would probably be unintentional, and possibly quite violent, but that's not because it is in the nature of children to be violent but because they lack the ability to control the vehicle. Their character doesn't matter, only their ability.
answered 42 mins ago
Harry JohnstonHarry Johnston
13.6k23267
answered 42 mins ago
Harry JohnstonHarry Johnston
13.6k23267
answered 42 mins ago
Harry JohnstonHarry Johnston
13.6k23267
answered 42 mins ago
Harry JohnstonHarry Johnston
13.6k23267
13.6k23267
add a comment |
add a comment |
it makes u think is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
it makes u think is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
it makes u think is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
it makes u think is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208175%2fwould-a-completely-good-muggle-be-able-to-use-a-wand%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
If I'm reading the quote correctly, no. Being pure of heart would eliminate the "possibly quite violent" part, but not the "probably something accidental" part.
– F1Krazy
1 hour ago
I think a tablet with a fancy, expensive drawing app might be a good analogy. Anyone can scribble on the screen, but it takes talent and practice to paint something people (beyond the immediate family) would consider art.
– Gaultheria
1 hour ago