Does the sign matter for proportionality?What does this formula do?what is the constant of proportionality?I...
Mac Pro install disk keeps ejecting itself
Packing rectangles: Does rotation ever help?
Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?
Why does nature favour the Laplacian?
how to find the equation of a circle given points of the circle
What does KSP mean?
Does a semiconductor follow Ohm's law?
Please, smoke with good manners
What route did the Hindenburg take when traveling from Germany to the U.S.?
How can I place the product on a social media post better?
Unexpected email from Yorkshire Bank
The Defining Moment
How come there are so many candidates for the 2020 Democratic party presidential nomination?
Realistic Necromancy?
What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?
Apply MapThread to all but one variable
How to type a section sign (§) into the Minecraft client
Is there any limitation with Arduino Nano serial communication distance?
Combinable filters
How do I reattach a shelf to the wall when it ripped out of the wall?
French for 'It must be my imagination'?
Will a top journal at least read my introduction?
Sci fi novel series with instant travel between planets through gates. A river runs through the gates
What was the first Intel x86 processor with "Base + Index * Scale + Displacement" addressing mode?
Does the sign matter for proportionality?
What does this formula do?what is the constant of proportionality?I did not understand the approach needed to solve this problem on inverse proportionalityCalculating Volume for the Perfect CompostWhy does proportionality yield multiplicitiveness and not addition?Why does 1:2 = 1/2?Why does 100% represent the whole of somethingSimple Ratios Shortcut - Why does it work?How do I figure out the proportionality between two aspect ratiosHow is the joint proportionality (joint variation) equation (i.e. $y = kxz$) logically correct?
$begingroup$
This question arose from Physics, where the force on an object attached on a spring is proportional to the displacement to the equilibrium (that is, the rest position). Also, if the displacement to the equilibrium is positive, the force will be negative, as it tries to pull the object back (i.e. if you pull a string, the force is opposite to your direction of pull).
Therefore, it can be said that:
$$F propto -x$$
Where $F$ is the force and $x$ is the displacement from equilibrium
Is this the same as:
$$F propto x$$
According to the relation of proportionality, it should be, but my friend says that putting the second one is not correct.
Both are equivalent right?
ratio
edited 20 mins ago
Brian
1,529516
asked 3 hours ago
Sebi SSebi S
182
New contributor
Sebi S is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question arose from Physics, where the force on an object attached on a spring is proportional to the displacement to the equilibrium (that is, the rest position). Also, if the displacement to the equilibrium is positive, the force will be negative, as it tries to pull the object back (i.e. if you pull a string, the force is opposite to your direction of pull).
Therefore, it can be said that:
$$F propto -x$$
Where $F$ is the force and $x$ is the displacement from equilibrium
Is this the same as:
$$F propto x$$
According to the relation of proportionality, it should be, but my friend says that putting the second one is not correct.
Both are equivalent right?
ratio
edited 20 mins ago
Brian
1,529516
asked 3 hours ago
Sebi SSebi S
182
New contributor
Sebi S is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It depends on definitions/context. Using the definition on wikipedia, yes they are equivalent.
$endgroup$
– David Peterson
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question arose from Physics, where the force on an object attached on a spring is proportional to the displacement to the equilibrium (that is, the rest position). Also, if the displacement to the equilibrium is positive, the force will be negative, as it tries to pull the object back (i.e. if you pull a string, the force is opposite to your direction of pull).
Therefore, it can be said that:
$$F propto -x$$
Where $F$ is the force and $x$ is the displacement from equilibrium
Is this the same as:
$$F propto x$$
According to the relation of proportionality, it should be, but my friend says that putting the second one is not correct.
Both are equivalent right?
ratio
edited 20 mins ago
Brian
1,529516
asked 3 hours ago
Sebi SSebi S
182
New contributor
Sebi S is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
This question arose from Physics, where the force on an object attached on a spring is proportional to the displacement to the equilibrium (that is, the rest position). Also, if the displacement to the equilibrium is positive, the force will be negative, as it tries to pull the object back (i.e. if you pull a string, the force is opposite to your direction of pull).
Therefore, it can be said that:
$$F propto -x$$
Where $F$ is the force and $x$ is the displacement from equilibrium
Is this the same as:
$$F propto x$$
According to the relation of proportionality, it should be, but my friend says that putting the second one is not correct.
Both are equivalent right?
ratio
ratio
edited 20 mins ago
Brian
1,529516
asked 3 hours ago
Sebi SSebi S
182
New contributor
Sebi S is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 20 mins ago
Brian
1,529516
asked 3 hours ago
Sebi SSebi S
182
New contributor
Sebi S is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 20 mins ago
Brian
1,529516
edited 20 mins ago
Brian
1,529516
edited 20 mins ago
Brian
1,529516
1,529516
asked 3 hours ago
Sebi SSebi S
182
New contributor
Sebi S is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
Sebi SSebi S
182
asked 3 hours ago
Sebi SSebi S
182
182
New contributor
Sebi S is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Sebi S is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Sebi S is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
It depends on definitions/context. Using the definition on wikipedia, yes they are equivalent.
$endgroup$
– David Peterson
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It depends on definitions/context. Using the definition on wikipedia, yes they are equivalent.
$endgroup$
– David Peterson
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
It depends on definitions/context. Using the definition on wikipedia, yes they are equivalent.
$endgroup$
– David Peterson
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
It depends on definitions/context. Using the definition on wikipedia, yes they are equivalent.
$endgroup$
– David Peterson
3 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, proportionality does not tell anything about the sign of the proportionality constant. This is probably done in physics so that the proportionality constant $k$ can be considered to be always positive. This has a physical interpretation , so it is convenient for it to be positive.
answered 3 hours ago
John DoeJohn Doe
12.3k11341
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mathematically they are equivalent, but physycist may want to differentiate between a force in the same direction as the displacement, and a force opposite to the displacement, as they lead to physically different behavior of the system. Thus the minus sign matters.
answered 3 hours ago
Adam LatosińskiAdam Latosiński
9709
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sebi S is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3204950%2fdoes-the-sign-matter-for-proportionality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, proportionality does not tell anything about the sign of the proportionality constant. This is probably done in physics so that the proportionality constant $k$ can be considered to be always positive. This has a physical interpretation , so it is convenient for it to be positive.
answered 3 hours ago
John DoeJohn Doe
12.3k11341
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, proportionality does not tell anything about the sign of the proportionality constant. This is probably done in physics so that the proportionality constant $k$ can be considered to be always positive. This has a physical interpretation , so it is convenient for it to be positive.
answered 3 hours ago
John DoeJohn Doe
12.3k11341
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, proportionality does not tell anything about the sign of the proportionality constant. This is probably done in physics so that the proportionality constant $k$ can be considered to be always positive. This has a physical interpretation , so it is convenient for it to be positive.
answered 3 hours ago
John DoeJohn Doe
12.3k11341
$endgroup$
Yes, proportionality does not tell anything about the sign of the proportionality constant. This is probably done in physics so that the proportionality constant $k$ can be considered to be always positive. This has a physical interpretation , so it is convenient for it to be positive.
answered 3 hours ago
John DoeJohn Doe
12.3k11341
answered 3 hours ago
John DoeJohn Doe
12.3k11341
answered 3 hours ago
John DoeJohn Doe
12.3k11341
answered 3 hours ago
John DoeJohn Doe
12.3k11341
12.3k11341
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mathematically they are equivalent, but physycist may want to differentiate between a force in the same direction as the displacement, and a force opposite to the displacement, as they lead to physically different behavior of the system. Thus the minus sign matters.
answered 3 hours ago
Adam LatosińskiAdam Latosiński
9709
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mathematically they are equivalent, but physycist may want to differentiate between a force in the same direction as the displacement, and a force opposite to the displacement, as they lead to physically different behavior of the system. Thus the minus sign matters.
answered 3 hours ago
Adam LatosińskiAdam Latosiński
9709
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mathematically they are equivalent, but physycist may want to differentiate between a force in the same direction as the displacement, and a force opposite to the displacement, as they lead to physically different behavior of the system. Thus the minus sign matters.
answered 3 hours ago
Adam LatosińskiAdam Latosiński
9709
$endgroup$
Mathematically they are equivalent, but physycist may want to differentiate between a force in the same direction as the displacement, and a force opposite to the displacement, as they lead to physically different behavior of the system. Thus the minus sign matters.
answered 3 hours ago
Adam LatosińskiAdam Latosiński
9709
answered 3 hours ago
Adam LatosińskiAdam Latosiński
9709
answered 3 hours ago
Adam LatosińskiAdam Latosiński
9709
answered 3 hours ago
Adam LatosińskiAdam Latosiński
9709
9709
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sebi S is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sebi S is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sebi S is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sebi S is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3204950%2fdoes-the-sign-matter-for-proportionality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
It depends on definitions/context. Using the definition on wikipedia, yes they are equivalent.
$endgroup$
– David Peterson
3 hours ago