Naming the result of a source block Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at...
Naming the result of a source block
2001: A Space Odyssey's use of the song "Daisy Bell" (Bicycle Built for Two); life imitates art or vice-versa?
When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?
Dating a Former Employee
Error "illegal generic type for instanceof" when using local classes
Why are Kinder Surprise Eggs illegal in the USA?
What is Wonderstone and are there any references to it pre-1982?
Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?
Why am I getting the error "non-boolean type specified in a context where a condition is expected" for this request?
What is the logic behind the Maharil's explanation of why we don't say שעשה ניסים on Pesach?
Short Story with Cinderella as a Voo-doo Witch
How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?
What does this icon in iOS Stardew Valley mean?
Is the Standard Deduction better than Itemized when both are the same amount?
What would be the ideal power source for a cybernetic eye?
List *all* the tuples!
Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems
ListPlot join points by nearest neighbor rather than order
How widely used is the term Treppenwitz? Is it something that most Germans know?
What is the meaning of the new sigil in Game of Thrones Season 8 intro?
How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?
Fundamental Solution of the Pell Equation
Apollo command module space walk?
Single word antonym of "flightless"
Naming the result of a source block
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Can I use elisp code make a table and insert a variable into cell?Indentation of source block resultFontify result of source block in org-modeHow to have org-babel treat the first line of a table result as a header?Org-mode: pipe source block output as stdin to next source blockHow to append header arguments to result code src block?How to insert a result of an org-mode source block as part of the document's syntax?Org-mode: Get src block result inside block definition for clocktableget contents of source blockCatching warnings from sh source blockHow to generate the result file for dot source block and include it with another path in org-mode?
The following question has been asked (in slightly different form) in a comment of another answer:
Is it possible to name the results of a source block with #+NAME: foobar
(or equivalently but old-style: #+TBLNAME: foobar
) rather than #+RESULTS: foobar
?
Example:
#+NAME: foo
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :var alpha=2 :results value
(let* ((tol 0.1)
(alpha_1 (- 90 alpha)))
`(("angle" "symbol" "value" "max" "min") hline
("toe" "\alpha" ,alpha ,(+ alpha tol) ,(- alpha tol))
("c" "\alpha_1" ,alpha_1 ,(+ alpha_1 tol) ,(- alpha_1 tol))
))
#+END_SRC
#+RESULTS: foo
| angle | symbol | value | max | min |
|-------+----------+-------+------+------|
| toe | alpha | 1 | 1.1 | 0.9 |
| c | alpha_1 | 89 | 89.1 | 88.9 |
org-babel org-table
add a comment |
The following question has been asked (in slightly different form) in a comment of another answer:
Is it possible to name the results of a source block with #+NAME: foobar
(or equivalently but old-style: #+TBLNAME: foobar
) rather than #+RESULTS: foobar
?
Example:
#+NAME: foo
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :var alpha=2 :results value
(let* ((tol 0.1)
(alpha_1 (- 90 alpha)))
`(("angle" "symbol" "value" "max" "min") hline
("toe" "\alpha" ,alpha ,(+ alpha tol) ,(- alpha tol))
("c" "\alpha_1" ,alpha_1 ,(+ alpha_1 tol) ,(- alpha_1 tol))
))
#+END_SRC
#+RESULTS: foo
| angle | symbol | value | max | min |
|-------+----------+-------+------+------|
| toe | alpha | 1 | 1.1 | 0.9 |
| c | alpha_1 | 89 | 89.1 | 88.9 |
org-babel org-table
add a comment |
The following question has been asked (in slightly different form) in a comment of another answer:
Is it possible to name the results of a source block with #+NAME: foobar
(or equivalently but old-style: #+TBLNAME: foobar
) rather than #+RESULTS: foobar
?
Example:
#+NAME: foo
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :var alpha=2 :results value
(let* ((tol 0.1)
(alpha_1 (- 90 alpha)))
`(("angle" "symbol" "value" "max" "min") hline
("toe" "\alpha" ,alpha ,(+ alpha tol) ,(- alpha tol))
("c" "\alpha_1" ,alpha_1 ,(+ alpha_1 tol) ,(- alpha_1 tol))
))
#+END_SRC
#+RESULTS: foo
| angle | symbol | value | max | min |
|-------+----------+-------+------+------|
| toe | alpha | 1 | 1.1 | 0.9 |
| c | alpha_1 | 89 | 89.1 | 88.9 |
org-babel org-table
The following question has been asked (in slightly different form) in a comment of another answer:
Is it possible to name the results of a source block with #+NAME: foobar
(or equivalently but old-style: #+TBLNAME: foobar
) rather than #+RESULTS: foobar
?
Example:
#+NAME: foo
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :var alpha=2 :results value
(let* ((tol 0.1)
(alpha_1 (- 90 alpha)))
`(("angle" "symbol" "value" "max" "min") hline
("toe" "\alpha" ,alpha ,(+ alpha tol) ,(- alpha tol))
("c" "\alpha_1" ,alpha_1 ,(+ alpha_1 tol) ,(- alpha_1 tol))
))
#+END_SRC
#+RESULTS: foo
| angle | symbol | value | max | min |
|-------+----------+-------+------+------|
| toe | alpha | 1 | 1.1 | 0.9 |
| c | alpha_1 | 89 | 89.1 | 88.9 |
org-babel org-table
org-babel org-table
asked 4 hours ago
TobiasTobias
15.2k11035
15.2k11035
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
One can add the following lines below unnamed source blocks (with bar
replaced by the intended table name):
#+NAME: bar
#+RESULTS:
||
The line with #+name: bar
is preserved after the evaluation of the source block and ||
is replaced with the resulting table.
Note, that the name bar
really names the table and not the source block.
That has the following consequences (probably among others I am not aware of at the moment):
If you refer to the table name in the header arguments of another source block, say
buh
, then thebar
source block is not reevaluated whenbuh
is evaluated. The table is not updated but taken as argument forbuh
as it is.
That is usually more an disadvantage than an advantage.
One can callorg-babel-execute-buffer
to get correctly updated results.If the source block returns a string containing the formatted org-table rather than table data referring to the source block name in header variables gets you the string and not the table data. That is most often unwanted.
In that case it is a big advantage that you can alternatively refer to the resulting table by its name.
If the source block is named, e.g., foo
replace #+RESULTS:
with #+RESULTS: foo
.
Example:
#+NAME: foo
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :var alpha=2 :results value
(let* ((tol 0.1)
(alpha_1 (- 90 alpha)))
`(("angle" "symbol" "value" "max" "min") hline
("toe" "\alpha" ,alpha ,(+ alpha tol) ,(- alpha tol))
("c" "\alpha_1" ,alpha_1 ,(+ alpha_1 tol) ,(- alpha_1 tol))
))
#+END_SRC
#+TBLNAME: bar
#+RESULTS: foo
| angle | symbol | value | max | min |
|-------+----------+-------+------+------|
| toe | alpha | 1 | 1.1 | 0.9 |
| c | alpha_1 | 89 | 89.1 | 88.9 |
#+CALL: foo(alpha=bar[2,3])
#+NAME: buh
#+RESULTS:
| angle | symbol | value | max | min |
|-------+----------+-------+--------------------+-------------------|
| toe | alpha | 1.1 | 1.2000000000000002 | 1.0 |
| c | alpha_1 | 88.9 | 89.0 | 88.80000000000001 |
The example demonstrates the update problem. The header variable alpha
had the value 1 at the first evaluation of foo
. Afterwards the value was changed to 2 but the source block foo
was not evaluated again.
The evaluation of the #+CALL
statement does use the table value 1.1 at cell 2,3
directly without reevaluation of foo
.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "583"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2femacs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48972%2fnaming-the-result-of-a-source-block%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
One can add the following lines below unnamed source blocks (with bar
replaced by the intended table name):
#+NAME: bar
#+RESULTS:
||
The line with #+name: bar
is preserved after the evaluation of the source block and ||
is replaced with the resulting table.
Note, that the name bar
really names the table and not the source block.
That has the following consequences (probably among others I am not aware of at the moment):
If you refer to the table name in the header arguments of another source block, say
buh
, then thebar
source block is not reevaluated whenbuh
is evaluated. The table is not updated but taken as argument forbuh
as it is.
That is usually more an disadvantage than an advantage.
One can callorg-babel-execute-buffer
to get correctly updated results.If the source block returns a string containing the formatted org-table rather than table data referring to the source block name in header variables gets you the string and not the table data. That is most often unwanted.
In that case it is a big advantage that you can alternatively refer to the resulting table by its name.
If the source block is named, e.g., foo
replace #+RESULTS:
with #+RESULTS: foo
.
Example:
#+NAME: foo
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :var alpha=2 :results value
(let* ((tol 0.1)
(alpha_1 (- 90 alpha)))
`(("angle" "symbol" "value" "max" "min") hline
("toe" "\alpha" ,alpha ,(+ alpha tol) ,(- alpha tol))
("c" "\alpha_1" ,alpha_1 ,(+ alpha_1 tol) ,(- alpha_1 tol))
))
#+END_SRC
#+TBLNAME: bar
#+RESULTS: foo
| angle | symbol | value | max | min |
|-------+----------+-------+------+------|
| toe | alpha | 1 | 1.1 | 0.9 |
| c | alpha_1 | 89 | 89.1 | 88.9 |
#+CALL: foo(alpha=bar[2,3])
#+NAME: buh
#+RESULTS:
| angle | symbol | value | max | min |
|-------+----------+-------+--------------------+-------------------|
| toe | alpha | 1.1 | 1.2000000000000002 | 1.0 |
| c | alpha_1 | 88.9 | 89.0 | 88.80000000000001 |
The example demonstrates the update problem. The header variable alpha
had the value 1 at the first evaluation of foo
. Afterwards the value was changed to 2 but the source block foo
was not evaluated again.
The evaluation of the #+CALL
statement does use the table value 1.1 at cell 2,3
directly without reevaluation of foo
.
add a comment |
One can add the following lines below unnamed source blocks (with bar
replaced by the intended table name):
#+NAME: bar
#+RESULTS:
||
The line with #+name: bar
is preserved after the evaluation of the source block and ||
is replaced with the resulting table.
Note, that the name bar
really names the table and not the source block.
That has the following consequences (probably among others I am not aware of at the moment):
If you refer to the table name in the header arguments of another source block, say
buh
, then thebar
source block is not reevaluated whenbuh
is evaluated. The table is not updated but taken as argument forbuh
as it is.
That is usually more an disadvantage than an advantage.
One can callorg-babel-execute-buffer
to get correctly updated results.If the source block returns a string containing the formatted org-table rather than table data referring to the source block name in header variables gets you the string and not the table data. That is most often unwanted.
In that case it is a big advantage that you can alternatively refer to the resulting table by its name.
If the source block is named, e.g., foo
replace #+RESULTS:
with #+RESULTS: foo
.
Example:
#+NAME: foo
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :var alpha=2 :results value
(let* ((tol 0.1)
(alpha_1 (- 90 alpha)))
`(("angle" "symbol" "value" "max" "min") hline
("toe" "\alpha" ,alpha ,(+ alpha tol) ,(- alpha tol))
("c" "\alpha_1" ,alpha_1 ,(+ alpha_1 tol) ,(- alpha_1 tol))
))
#+END_SRC
#+TBLNAME: bar
#+RESULTS: foo
| angle | symbol | value | max | min |
|-------+----------+-------+------+------|
| toe | alpha | 1 | 1.1 | 0.9 |
| c | alpha_1 | 89 | 89.1 | 88.9 |
#+CALL: foo(alpha=bar[2,3])
#+NAME: buh
#+RESULTS:
| angle | symbol | value | max | min |
|-------+----------+-------+--------------------+-------------------|
| toe | alpha | 1.1 | 1.2000000000000002 | 1.0 |
| c | alpha_1 | 88.9 | 89.0 | 88.80000000000001 |
The example demonstrates the update problem. The header variable alpha
had the value 1 at the first evaluation of foo
. Afterwards the value was changed to 2 but the source block foo
was not evaluated again.
The evaluation of the #+CALL
statement does use the table value 1.1 at cell 2,3
directly without reevaluation of foo
.
add a comment |
One can add the following lines below unnamed source blocks (with bar
replaced by the intended table name):
#+NAME: bar
#+RESULTS:
||
The line with #+name: bar
is preserved after the evaluation of the source block and ||
is replaced with the resulting table.
Note, that the name bar
really names the table and not the source block.
That has the following consequences (probably among others I am not aware of at the moment):
If you refer to the table name in the header arguments of another source block, say
buh
, then thebar
source block is not reevaluated whenbuh
is evaluated. The table is not updated but taken as argument forbuh
as it is.
That is usually more an disadvantage than an advantage.
One can callorg-babel-execute-buffer
to get correctly updated results.If the source block returns a string containing the formatted org-table rather than table data referring to the source block name in header variables gets you the string and not the table data. That is most often unwanted.
In that case it is a big advantage that you can alternatively refer to the resulting table by its name.
If the source block is named, e.g., foo
replace #+RESULTS:
with #+RESULTS: foo
.
Example:
#+NAME: foo
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :var alpha=2 :results value
(let* ((tol 0.1)
(alpha_1 (- 90 alpha)))
`(("angle" "symbol" "value" "max" "min") hline
("toe" "\alpha" ,alpha ,(+ alpha tol) ,(- alpha tol))
("c" "\alpha_1" ,alpha_1 ,(+ alpha_1 tol) ,(- alpha_1 tol))
))
#+END_SRC
#+TBLNAME: bar
#+RESULTS: foo
| angle | symbol | value | max | min |
|-------+----------+-------+------+------|
| toe | alpha | 1 | 1.1 | 0.9 |
| c | alpha_1 | 89 | 89.1 | 88.9 |
#+CALL: foo(alpha=bar[2,3])
#+NAME: buh
#+RESULTS:
| angle | symbol | value | max | min |
|-------+----------+-------+--------------------+-------------------|
| toe | alpha | 1.1 | 1.2000000000000002 | 1.0 |
| c | alpha_1 | 88.9 | 89.0 | 88.80000000000001 |
The example demonstrates the update problem. The header variable alpha
had the value 1 at the first evaluation of foo
. Afterwards the value was changed to 2 but the source block foo
was not evaluated again.
The evaluation of the #+CALL
statement does use the table value 1.1 at cell 2,3
directly without reevaluation of foo
.
One can add the following lines below unnamed source blocks (with bar
replaced by the intended table name):
#+NAME: bar
#+RESULTS:
||
The line with #+name: bar
is preserved after the evaluation of the source block and ||
is replaced with the resulting table.
Note, that the name bar
really names the table and not the source block.
That has the following consequences (probably among others I am not aware of at the moment):
If you refer to the table name in the header arguments of another source block, say
buh
, then thebar
source block is not reevaluated whenbuh
is evaluated. The table is not updated but taken as argument forbuh
as it is.
That is usually more an disadvantage than an advantage.
One can callorg-babel-execute-buffer
to get correctly updated results.If the source block returns a string containing the formatted org-table rather than table data referring to the source block name in header variables gets you the string and not the table data. That is most often unwanted.
In that case it is a big advantage that you can alternatively refer to the resulting table by its name.
If the source block is named, e.g., foo
replace #+RESULTS:
with #+RESULTS: foo
.
Example:
#+NAME: foo
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :var alpha=2 :results value
(let* ((tol 0.1)
(alpha_1 (- 90 alpha)))
`(("angle" "symbol" "value" "max" "min") hline
("toe" "\alpha" ,alpha ,(+ alpha tol) ,(- alpha tol))
("c" "\alpha_1" ,alpha_1 ,(+ alpha_1 tol) ,(- alpha_1 tol))
))
#+END_SRC
#+TBLNAME: bar
#+RESULTS: foo
| angle | symbol | value | max | min |
|-------+----------+-------+------+------|
| toe | alpha | 1 | 1.1 | 0.9 |
| c | alpha_1 | 89 | 89.1 | 88.9 |
#+CALL: foo(alpha=bar[2,3])
#+NAME: buh
#+RESULTS:
| angle | symbol | value | max | min |
|-------+----------+-------+--------------------+-------------------|
| toe | alpha | 1.1 | 1.2000000000000002 | 1.0 |
| c | alpha_1 | 88.9 | 89.0 | 88.80000000000001 |
The example demonstrates the update problem. The header variable alpha
had the value 1 at the first evaluation of foo
. Afterwards the value was changed to 2 but the source block foo
was not evaluated again.
The evaluation of the #+CALL
statement does use the table value 1.1 at cell 2,3
directly without reevaluation of foo
.
edited 4 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
TobiasTobias
15.2k11035
15.2k11035
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Emacs Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2femacs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48972%2fnaming-the-result-of-a-source-block%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown