Confusion about non-derivable continuous functions The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey...

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

Patience, young "Padovan"

Where to refill my bottle in India?

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

How to manage monthly salary

Can't find the latex code for the ⍎ (down tack jot) symbol

Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?

Pristine Bit Checking

Does duplicating a spell with wish count as casting that spell?

Families of ordered set partitions with disjoint blocks

How are circuits which use complex ICs normally simulated?

How to create dashed lines/arrows in Illustrator

Is it possible for the two major parties in the UK to form a coalition with each other instead of a much smaller party?

Is bread bad for ducks?

"To split hairs" vs "To be pedantic"

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

Manuscript was "unsubmitted" because the manuscript was deposited in Arxiv Preprints

Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium

How to reverse every other sublist of a list?

Does light intensity oscillate really fast since it is a wave?

Geography at the pixel level

Is this food a bread or a loaf?

What do the Banks children have against barley water?



Confusion about non-derivable continuous functions



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAre there any implicit, continuous, non-differentiable functions?Logical Relations Between Three Statements about Continuous FunctionsCombination of continuous and discontinuous functionsIs there only one continuous-everywhere non-differentiable function?Intuition behind uniformly continuous functionsWhy weren't continuous functions defined as Darboux functions?Examples of functions that do not belong to any Baire classFind all continuous functions that satisfy the Jensen inequality(?) $f(frac{x+y}{2})=frac{f(x)+f(y)}{2}$Confused About Limit Points and Closed SetsConfusion About Differentiability of Function












2












$begingroup$


I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.



And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.



I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Where did you read that erroneous definition?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
    $endgroup$
    – fazan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @avs That is false.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    58 mins ago
















2












$begingroup$


I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.



And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.



I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Where did you read that erroneous definition?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
    $endgroup$
    – fazan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @avs That is false.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    58 mins ago














2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.



And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.



I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.



And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.



I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.







real-analysis functions derivatives continuity






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









fazanfazan

537




537












  • $begingroup$
    For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Where did you read that erroneous definition?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
    $endgroup$
    – fazan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @avs That is false.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    58 mins ago


















  • $begingroup$
    For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Where did you read that erroneous definition?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
    $endgroup$
    – fazan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @avs That is false.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    58 mins ago
















$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
$endgroup$
– avs
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
$endgroup$
– avs
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
@avs That is false.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
58 mins ago




$begingroup$
@avs That is false.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
58 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



    If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
    $$f(x,y)=begin{cases}(x^2+y^2)sin(frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+y^2}}) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)end{cases}$$
    at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
      $endgroup$
      – Haris Gusic
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
      $endgroup$
      – K.Power
      1 hour ago












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181529%2fconfusion-about-non-derivable-continuous-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



    The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      3












      $begingroup$

      That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



      The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



        The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



        The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 2 hours ago

























        answered 2 hours ago









        Haris GusicHaris Gusic

        3,506627




        3,506627























            1












            $begingroup$

            As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



            If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
            $$f(x,y)=begin{cases}(x^2+y^2)sin(frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+y^2}}) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)end{cases}$$
            at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
              $endgroup$
              – Haris Gusic
              1 hour ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
              $endgroup$
              – K.Power
              1 hour ago
















            1












            $begingroup$

            As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



            If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
            $$f(x,y)=begin{cases}(x^2+y^2)sin(frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+y^2}}) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)end{cases}$$
            at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
              $endgroup$
              – Haris Gusic
              1 hour ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
              $endgroup$
              – K.Power
              1 hour ago














            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



            If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
            $$f(x,y)=begin{cases}(x^2+y^2)sin(frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+y^2}}) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)end{cases}$$
            at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



            If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
            $$f(x,y)=begin{cases}(x^2+y^2)sin(frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+y^2}}) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)end{cases}$$
            at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 1 hour ago

























            answered 1 hour ago









            K.PowerK.Power

            3,710926




            3,710926












            • $begingroup$
              The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
              $endgroup$
              – Haris Gusic
              1 hour ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
              $endgroup$
              – K.Power
              1 hour ago


















            • $begingroup$
              The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
              $endgroup$
              – Haris Gusic
              1 hour ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
              $endgroup$
              – K.Power
              1 hour ago
















            $begingroup$
            The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
            $endgroup$
            – Haris Gusic
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
            $endgroup$
            – Haris Gusic
            1 hour ago




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
            $endgroup$
            – K.Power
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
            $endgroup$
            – K.Power
            1 hour ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181529%2fconfusion-about-non-derivable-continuous-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Installing LyX: “No textclass is found.”LyX installation error- text class not found- 'Reconfigure' or...

            (1602) Indiana Índice Designación y nombre Características orbitales Véase...

            Universidad Autónoma de Occidente Índice Historia Campus Facultades Programas Académicos Medios de...