Kdtyjb

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation

Dual Citizen. Exited the US on Italian passport recently

Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?

What does "sndry explns" mean in one of the Hitchhiker's guide books?

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?

Families of ordered set partitions with disjoint blocks

How can I create a character who can assume the widest possible range of creature sizes?

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

What is this 4-propeller plane?

Monty Hall variation

What function has this graph?

Why is the maximum length of openwrt’s root password 8 characters?

Does light intensity oscillate really fast since it is a wave?

Is this food a bread or a loaf?

Manuscript was "unsubmitted" because the manuscript was deposited in Arxiv Preprints

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

How to deal with fear of taking dependencies

Inversion Puzzle

Why is it "Tumoren" and not "Tumore"?

Extreme, unacceptable situation and I can't attend work tomorrow morning

Falsification in Math vs Science

Package linegoal: each second use of them works differently

0

This following-up question to interesting @Bernard answer. For some reason I test his solution, how it works if i repeat the same equation four times:

documentclass[twocolumn]{article}

usepackage{amsmath}

usepackage{linegoal}



%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!

usepackage{showframe}

renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness{0.15pt}

renewcommand*ShowFrameColor{color{red}}

%---------------------------------------------------------------%

usepackage{lipsum}



begin{document}

lipsum[1]

begin{equation}

begin{aligned}

NUP_S

    & =1- rlap{parbox[t]{linegoal}{probability of successfully finishing an SU service}}\[1ex]

    & = 1 - frac{lambda_S(1-P^{BL}_S)(1-P^{FT}_S)}{lambda_S}\

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S + P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S\

NUP_S

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S - P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S

end{aligned}

end{equation}

lipsum[2-3]

begin{equation}

begin{aligned}

NUP_S

    & =1- rlap{parbox[t]{linegoal}{probability of successfully finishing an SU service}}\[1ex]

    & = 1 - frac{lambda_S(1-P^{BL}_S)(1-P^{FT}_S)}{lambda_S}\

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S + P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S\

NUP_S

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S - P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S

end{aligned}

end{equation}

lipsum[4-5]

end{document}

begin{equation}

begin{aligned}

NUP_S

    & =1- rlap{parbox[t]{linegoal}{probability of successfully finishing an SU service}}\[1ex]

    & = 1 - frac{lambda_S(1-P^{BL}_S)(1-P^{FT}_S)}{lambda_S}\

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S + P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S\

NUP_S

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S - P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S

end{aligned}

end{equation}

lipsum[6-7]

begin{equation}

begin{aligned}

NUP_S

    & =1- rlap{parbox[t]{linegoal}{probability of successfully finishing an SU service}}\[1ex]

    & = 1 - frac{lambda_S(1-P^{BL}_S)(1-P^{FT}_S)}{lambda_S}\

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S + P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S\

NUP_S

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S - P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S

end{aligned}

end{equation}

lipsum[1-3]

end{document}

To my surprise, the results of equation code (after two compilation) are not the same as expected. each second has different formatted text:

I wonder, do I overlooked something in my test or the reasons is in some difference in used LaTeX installation. I use 64-bit MikTeX, upgraded yesterday.

equations linegoal

share

asked 5 mins ago

ZarkoZarko

129k868169

add a comment | 

0

This following-up question to interesting @Bernard answer. For some reason I test his solution, how it works if i repeat the same equation four times:

documentclass[twocolumn]{article}

usepackage{amsmath}

usepackage{linegoal}



%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!

usepackage{showframe}

renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness{0.15pt}

renewcommand*ShowFrameColor{color{red}}

%---------------------------------------------------------------%

usepackage{lipsum}



begin{document}

lipsum[1]

begin{equation}

begin{aligned}

NUP_S

    & =1- rlap{parbox[t]{linegoal}{probability of successfully finishing an SU service}}\[1ex]

    & = 1 - frac{lambda_S(1-P^{BL}_S)(1-P^{FT}_S)}{lambda_S}\

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S + P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S\

NUP_S

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S - P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S

end{aligned}

end{equation}

lipsum[2-3]

begin{equation}

begin{aligned}

NUP_S

    & =1- rlap{parbox[t]{linegoal}{probability of successfully finishing an SU service}}\[1ex]

    & = 1 - frac{lambda_S(1-P^{BL}_S)(1-P^{FT}_S)}{lambda_S}\

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S + P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S\

NUP_S

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S - P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S

end{aligned}

end{equation}

lipsum[4-5]

end{document}

begin{equation}

begin{aligned}

NUP_S

    & =1- rlap{parbox[t]{linegoal}{probability of successfully finishing an SU service}}\[1ex]

    & = 1 - frac{lambda_S(1-P^{BL}_S)(1-P^{FT}_S)}{lambda_S}\

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S + P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S\

NUP_S

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S - P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S

end{aligned}

end{equation}

lipsum[6-7]

begin{equation}

begin{aligned}

NUP_S

    & =1- rlap{parbox[t]{linegoal}{probability of successfully finishing an SU service}}\[1ex]

    & = 1 - frac{lambda_S(1-P^{BL}_S)(1-P^{FT}_S)}{lambda_S}\

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S + P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S\

NUP_S

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S - P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S

end{aligned}

end{equation}

lipsum[1-3]

end{document}

To my surprise, the results of equation code (after two compilation) are not the same as expected. each second has different formatted text:

I wonder, do I overlooked something in my test or the reasons is in some difference in used LaTeX installation. I use 64-bit MikTeX, upgraded yesterday.

equations linegoal

share

asked 5 mins ago

ZarkoZarko

129k868169

add a comment | 

This following-up question to interesting @Bernard answer. For some reason I test his solution, how it works if i repeat the same equation four times:

documentclass[twocolumn]{article}

usepackage{amsmath}

usepackage{linegoal}



%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!

usepackage{showframe}

renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness{0.15pt}

renewcommand*ShowFrameColor{color{red}}

%---------------------------------------------------------------%

usepackage{lipsum}



begin{document}

lipsum[1]

begin{equation}

begin{aligned}

NUP_S

    & =1- rlap{parbox[t]{linegoal}{probability of successfully finishing an SU service}}\[1ex]

    & = 1 - frac{lambda_S(1-P^{BL}_S)(1-P^{FT}_S)}{lambda_S}\

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S + P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S\

NUP_S

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S - P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S

end{aligned}

end{equation}

lipsum[2-3]

begin{equation}

begin{aligned}

NUP_S

    & =1- rlap{parbox[t]{linegoal}{probability of successfully finishing an SU service}}\[1ex]

    & = 1 - frac{lambda_S(1-P^{BL}_S)(1-P^{FT}_S)}{lambda_S}\

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S + P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S\

NUP_S

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S - P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S

end{aligned}

end{equation}

lipsum[4-5]

end{document}

begin{equation}

begin{aligned}

NUP_S

    & =1- rlap{parbox[t]{linegoal}{probability of successfully finishing an SU service}}\[1ex]

    & = 1 - frac{lambda_S(1-P^{BL}_S)(1-P^{FT}_S)}{lambda_S}\

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S + P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S\

NUP_S

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S - P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S

end{aligned}

end{equation}

lipsum[6-7]

begin{equation}

begin{aligned}

NUP_S

    & =1- rlap{parbox[t]{linegoal}{probability of successfully finishing an SU service}}\[1ex]

    & = 1 - frac{lambda_S(1-P^{BL}_S)(1-P^{FT}_S)}{lambda_S}\

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S + P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S\

NUP_S

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S - P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S

end{aligned}

end{equation}

lipsum[1-3]

end{document}

To my surprise, the results of equation code (after two compilation) are not the same as expected. each second has different formatted text:

I wonder, do I overlooked something in my test or the reasons is in some difference in used LaTeX installation. I use 64-bit MikTeX, upgraded yesterday.

equations linegoal

share

asked 5 mins ago

ZarkoZarko

129k868169

documentclass[twocolumn]{article}

usepackage{amsmath}

usepackage{linegoal}



%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!

usepackage{showframe}

renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness{0.15pt}

renewcommand*ShowFrameColor{color{red}}

%---------------------------------------------------------------%

usepackage{lipsum}



begin{document}

lipsum[1]

begin{equation}

begin{aligned}

NUP_S

    & =1- rlap{parbox[t]{linegoal}{probability of successfully finishing an SU service}}\[1ex]

    & = 1 - frac{lambda_S(1-P^{BL}_S)(1-P^{FT}_S)}{lambda_S}\

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S + P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S\

NUP_S

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S - P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S

end{aligned}

end{equation}

lipsum[2-3]

begin{equation}

begin{aligned}

NUP_S

    & =1- rlap{parbox[t]{linegoal}{probability of successfully finishing an SU service}}\[1ex]

    & = 1 - frac{lambda_S(1-P^{BL}_S)(1-P^{FT}_S)}{lambda_S}\

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S + P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S\

NUP_S

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S - P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S

end{aligned}

end{equation}

lipsum[4-5]

end{document}

begin{equation}

begin{aligned}

NUP_S

    & =1- rlap{parbox[t]{linegoal}{probability of successfully finishing an SU service}}\[1ex]

    & = 1 - frac{lambda_S(1-P^{BL}_S)(1-P^{FT}_S)}{lambda_S}\

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S + P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S\

NUP_S

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S - P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S

end{aligned}

end{equation}

lipsum[6-7]

begin{equation}

begin{aligned}

NUP_S

    & =1- rlap{parbox[t]{linegoal}{probability of successfully finishing an SU service}}\[1ex]

    & = 1 - frac{lambda_S(1-P^{BL}_S)(1-P^{FT}_S)}{lambda_S}\

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S + P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S\

NUP_S

    & = P^{BL}_S + P^{FT}_S - P^{BL}_S  P^{FT}_S

end{aligned}

end{equation}

lipsum[1-3]

end{document}

share

asked 5 mins ago

ZarkoZarko

129k868169

share

asked 5 mins ago

ZarkoZarko

129k868169

asked 5 mins ago

ZarkoZarko

129k868169

asked 5 mins ago

ZarkoZarko

129k868169