Is it possible to make sharp wind that can cut stuff from afar?Fencing style for blades that can attack from...

Why is this code 6.5x slower with optimizations enabled?

Why is "Reports" in sentence down without "The"

least quadratic residue under GRH: an EXPLICIT bound

Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?

Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?

What do you call something that goes against the spirit of the law, but is legal when interpreting the law to the letter?

How can the DM most effectively choose 1 out of an odd number of players to be targeted by an attack or effect?

Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?

How to calculate implied correlation via observed market price (Margrabe option)

How do you conduct xenoanthropology after first contact?

How to type dʒ symbol (IPA) on Mac?

XeLaTeX and pdfLaTeX ignore hyphenation

DOS, create pipe for stdin/stdout of command.com(or 4dos.com) in C or Batch?

declaring a variable twice in IIFE

Prevent a directory in /tmp from being deleted

Can a German sentence have two subjects?

A Journey Through Space and Time

Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)

Extreme, but not acceptable situation and I can't start the work tomorrow morning

Can I interfere when another PC is about to be attacked?

Do airline pilots ever risk not hearing communication directed to them specifically, from traffic controllers?

How do I create uniquely male characters?

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

A function which translates a sentence to title-case



Is it possible to make sharp wind that can cut stuff from afar?


Fencing style for blades that can attack from a distanceIs it possible to make a logically consistent set of laws that produces physics similar to that in superhero comics?The Palm Buckler (Blocking With Anterior Arm)What would be the ideal melee weapon for someone with superhuman strength?Can I make a ruler that works at any temperature?Best ranged weapon for superhuman strength?How practical and possible is a monomolecular string weapon that can be controlled?Does it make sense to have a type of energy generated from stars that humans could absorb for magic?How can one convince someone from the past that one really can transmute elements at-will?How would a tree that can create its own wind work and look like?Fencing style for blades that can attack from a distance













6












$begingroup$


You know the typical wind slash in anime or games where the swordsman slashes from afar either vertically or horizontally and the wind pressure or projectile cut the opponent, like in this image for example.



Now I wonder if this is scientifically possible, or is there a solution for it? and What mechanism for the sword or the weapon shape to achieve such a state? How much strength or speed would the person need to swing his arm to manage so(I know a normal human won't reach it or his hand or body will rip apart just by common sense alone), what are the side effects, and what would the wind cut/slash look like?



I know there are some recent similar questions like Fencing style for blades that can attack from a distance but he/she mostly asking for the martial art, not how to achieve such projections.



enter image description here










share|improve this question









New contributor




Li Jun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I don't know about slashing, but a burst of air that causes impact damage seems possible if you could make a more powerful version of the air bazooka toy. It seems all you need is a tube and a plunger. Even the toy version that just uses a little band can deliver quite a bit of force from a few 10s of feet. If the plunger was powerful enough you could probably get a lot of force.
    $endgroup$
    – user4574
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm going to have to think about this one. Offhand, an "air blade" wont be able to cut anything. However, I am going to have to think about whether an air vortex can drill into something. Vortexes have the advantage of keeping power localized. I'm just not sure what happens when a vortex tries to go supersonic.
    $endgroup$
    – Cort Ammon
    12 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You really need something moving at supersonic speeds, really close. E.g. Thrust SSC or jet fighter making low pass.
    $endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Probably the closest real thing but still not really close: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_XF-84H_Thunderscreech
    $endgroup$
    – Ville Niemi
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As in the above is what would happen if you attached your katana to a gas turbine so that it rotates at supersonic speed. Note the reported side effects.
    $endgroup$
    – Ville Niemi
    8 hours ago
















6












$begingroup$


You know the typical wind slash in anime or games where the swordsman slashes from afar either vertically or horizontally and the wind pressure or projectile cut the opponent, like in this image for example.



Now I wonder if this is scientifically possible, or is there a solution for it? and What mechanism for the sword or the weapon shape to achieve such a state? How much strength or speed would the person need to swing his arm to manage so(I know a normal human won't reach it or his hand or body will rip apart just by common sense alone), what are the side effects, and what would the wind cut/slash look like?



I know there are some recent similar questions like Fencing style for blades that can attack from a distance but he/she mostly asking for the martial art, not how to achieve such projections.



enter image description here










share|improve this question









New contributor




Li Jun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I don't know about slashing, but a burst of air that causes impact damage seems possible if you could make a more powerful version of the air bazooka toy. It seems all you need is a tube and a plunger. Even the toy version that just uses a little band can deliver quite a bit of force from a few 10s of feet. If the plunger was powerful enough you could probably get a lot of force.
    $endgroup$
    – user4574
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm going to have to think about this one. Offhand, an "air blade" wont be able to cut anything. However, I am going to have to think about whether an air vortex can drill into something. Vortexes have the advantage of keeping power localized. I'm just not sure what happens when a vortex tries to go supersonic.
    $endgroup$
    – Cort Ammon
    12 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You really need something moving at supersonic speeds, really close. E.g. Thrust SSC or jet fighter making low pass.
    $endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Probably the closest real thing but still not really close: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_XF-84H_Thunderscreech
    $endgroup$
    – Ville Niemi
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As in the above is what would happen if you attached your katana to a gas turbine so that it rotates at supersonic speed. Note the reported side effects.
    $endgroup$
    – Ville Niemi
    8 hours ago














6












6








6


1



$begingroup$


You know the typical wind slash in anime or games where the swordsman slashes from afar either vertically or horizontally and the wind pressure or projectile cut the opponent, like in this image for example.



Now I wonder if this is scientifically possible, or is there a solution for it? and What mechanism for the sword or the weapon shape to achieve such a state? How much strength or speed would the person need to swing his arm to manage so(I know a normal human won't reach it or his hand or body will rip apart just by common sense alone), what are the side effects, and what would the wind cut/slash look like?



I know there are some recent similar questions like Fencing style for blades that can attack from a distance but he/she mostly asking for the martial art, not how to achieve such projections.



enter image description here










share|improve this question









New contributor




Li Jun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




You know the typical wind slash in anime or games where the swordsman slashes from afar either vertically or horizontally and the wind pressure or projectile cut the opponent, like in this image for example.



Now I wonder if this is scientifically possible, or is there a solution for it? and What mechanism for the sword or the weapon shape to achieve such a state? How much strength or speed would the person need to swing his arm to manage so(I know a normal human won't reach it or his hand or body will rip apart just by common sense alone), what are the side effects, and what would the wind cut/slash look like?



I know there are some recent similar questions like Fencing style for blades that can attack from a distance but he/she mostly asking for the martial art, not how to achieve such projections.



enter image description here







physics weapons science






share|improve this question









New contributor




Li Jun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Li Jun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 11 hours ago







Li Jun













New contributor




Li Jun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 19 hours ago









Li JunLi Jun

1659




1659




New contributor




Li Jun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Li Jun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Li Jun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I don't know about slashing, but a burst of air that causes impact damage seems possible if you could make a more powerful version of the air bazooka toy. It seems all you need is a tube and a plunger. Even the toy version that just uses a little band can deliver quite a bit of force from a few 10s of feet. If the plunger was powerful enough you could probably get a lot of force.
    $endgroup$
    – user4574
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm going to have to think about this one. Offhand, an "air blade" wont be able to cut anything. However, I am going to have to think about whether an air vortex can drill into something. Vortexes have the advantage of keeping power localized. I'm just not sure what happens when a vortex tries to go supersonic.
    $endgroup$
    – Cort Ammon
    12 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You really need something moving at supersonic speeds, really close. E.g. Thrust SSC or jet fighter making low pass.
    $endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Probably the closest real thing but still not really close: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_XF-84H_Thunderscreech
    $endgroup$
    – Ville Niemi
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As in the above is what would happen if you attached your katana to a gas turbine so that it rotates at supersonic speed. Note the reported side effects.
    $endgroup$
    – Ville Niemi
    8 hours ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I don't know about slashing, but a burst of air that causes impact damage seems possible if you could make a more powerful version of the air bazooka toy. It seems all you need is a tube and a plunger. Even the toy version that just uses a little band can deliver quite a bit of force from a few 10s of feet. If the plunger was powerful enough you could probably get a lot of force.
    $endgroup$
    – user4574
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm going to have to think about this one. Offhand, an "air blade" wont be able to cut anything. However, I am going to have to think about whether an air vortex can drill into something. Vortexes have the advantage of keeping power localized. I'm just not sure what happens when a vortex tries to go supersonic.
    $endgroup$
    – Cort Ammon
    12 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You really need something moving at supersonic speeds, really close. E.g. Thrust SSC or jet fighter making low pass.
    $endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Probably the closest real thing but still not really close: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_XF-84H_Thunderscreech
    $endgroup$
    – Ville Niemi
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As in the above is what would happen if you attached your katana to a gas turbine so that it rotates at supersonic speed. Note the reported side effects.
    $endgroup$
    – Ville Niemi
    8 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
I don't know about slashing, but a burst of air that causes impact damage seems possible if you could make a more powerful version of the air bazooka toy. It seems all you need is a tube and a plunger. Even the toy version that just uses a little band can deliver quite a bit of force from a few 10s of feet. If the plunger was powerful enough you could probably get a lot of force.
$endgroup$
– user4574
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
I don't know about slashing, but a burst of air that causes impact damage seems possible if you could make a more powerful version of the air bazooka toy. It seems all you need is a tube and a plunger. Even the toy version that just uses a little band can deliver quite a bit of force from a few 10s of feet. If the plunger was powerful enough you could probably get a lot of force.
$endgroup$
– user4574
13 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I'm going to have to think about this one. Offhand, an "air blade" wont be able to cut anything. However, I am going to have to think about whether an air vortex can drill into something. Vortexes have the advantage of keeping power localized. I'm just not sure what happens when a vortex tries to go supersonic.
$endgroup$
– Cort Ammon
12 hours ago




$begingroup$
I'm going to have to think about this one. Offhand, an "air blade" wont be able to cut anything. However, I am going to have to think about whether an air vortex can drill into something. Vortexes have the advantage of keeping power localized. I'm just not sure what happens when a vortex tries to go supersonic.
$endgroup$
– Cort Ammon
12 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
You really need something moving at supersonic speeds, really close. E.g. Thrust SSC or jet fighter making low pass.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
You really need something moving at supersonic speeds, really close. E.g. Thrust SSC or jet fighter making low pass.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
9 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Probably the closest real thing but still not really close: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_XF-84H_Thunderscreech
$endgroup$
– Ville Niemi
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Probably the closest real thing but still not really close: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_XF-84H_Thunderscreech
$endgroup$
– Ville Niemi
8 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
As in the above is what would happen if you attached your katana to a gas turbine so that it rotates at supersonic speed. Note the reported side effects.
$endgroup$
– Ville Niemi
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
As in the above is what would happen if you attached your katana to a gas turbine so that it rotates at supersonic speed. Note the reported side effects.
$endgroup$
– Ville Niemi
8 hours ago










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















10












$begingroup$

Not possible without also ejecting particulate matter. If it could be done then people would be cut into pieces by standing near a helicopter or aircraft propeller.



The only solution would be to use sand or shot blasting. Even then, if your opponent was wearing armour, the worst you are likely to do is clean it for them.



enter image description here



You would also require quite a lot of equipment.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Just to add to your answer, a sand blaster type weapon could easily harm someone in armour if pointed at their helmet. It would go in between the gaps in the eye slits if they were wearing a closed face helmet. I know that i, for one, would not want highly pressurised sand fired into my eyes. If they were in an open face helmet... yeah, i dont think they are going to have a good time at all. If you used metal fillings instead, it might cause lacerations or if you used a powder it could cause someone to choke as they inhaled it.
    $endgroup$
    – Liam Morris
    17 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @LiamMorris heck, with enough pressure, you can use water and the guy won't see again.
    $endgroup$
    – John Dvorak
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JohnDvorak You could yes, you could even put gravel or sand in with it and then you’ve got yourself a water cutter, at close range they can cut through steel.
    $endgroup$
    – Liam Morris
    13 hours ago



















2












$begingroup$

A metal cutting water jet shoots at 760 m/s you could attach one to your sword.



Speed of sound 343 m/s if your character arm
can move that fast? Then there is compressed air in a air gun. (why not just use throwing weapon or a gun)






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Luke Patton is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    well this is just quriousity how to make wind cut/slash posible not the practicality or alternative although the wind contain sand or other substance that can make it happen is aceptable to me, but unfortunately i consider water jet is an alternative not really wind base except maybe if the water vapour or the subtance can do such reaction, and at least i think for melee weapon it can be a surprise attack against opponent that stay out of range of the melee weapon. besides i can just make the world dont have gun or long range weapon because of tradition.
    $endgroup$
    – Li Jun
    16 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    since i cant edit it anymore just to be more clear: i mean the wind contain small sand or dust or other small particle substance that can make it happen is aceptable to me, but unfortunately i consider water jet is an alternative not really wind base to me except maybe if the water vapour or the small subtance can still do such reaction.
    $endgroup$
    – Li Jun
    16 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Waterjust are dangerous at point-blank range, but I think their effectiveness drops off very quickly so they're not much good as ranged weapons. Waterjets were at one time considered for antitank "melee" weapons varried by infantry, but were (and I think still are) too big and heavy for practical use. Might not always be that way, of course...
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    14 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I don't see how a water jet qualifies as wind.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    14 hours ago



















2












$begingroup$

As pointed out in the adjoining replies, a blast/slash of air cannot occur on its own, from a physical viewpoint. You can either compress that air and direct it at the target and this would require insanely high precision to focus it and cause significant damage. Also, as the other reply states, "air slashes" are basically shock waves travelling in air. Now, from my knowledge of undergraduate fluid mechanics, a shock wave occurs when a fluid is made to undergo a careful transition from subsonic state to supersonic state by making it flow through a convergent-divergent nozzle. In order to create the shock wave at the exit plane of the nozzle (which literally is your weapon), you need to operate it very precisely under the "third design pressure ratio point" which, in practice, is too difficult to achieve. Also, once the shock wave exits the nozzle, it can no longer be treated as a one-dimensional wavefront, rather it becomes three-dimensional, expanding and dissipating exponentially. So, that would require your opponent to be present within a few meters of your reach.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Subhas Nandy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hi, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! Please take the time to vist out Tour page if you havent already.
    $endgroup$
    – Liam Morris
    9 hours ago



















2












$begingroup$

It is possible to kill with air pressure, you just have to be REALLY CLOSE to do it



The only documented death I found from "air pressure" is Jon-Erik Hexum, who was bored on the set of his tv series. He had a gun loaded with blanks, and decided to play a fake game of Russian Roulette with his gun and the blank cartridges (i.e. put the gun on your temple and pull the trigger).



This is still not safe because of both the explosion created by the blank and the bits of paper and plastic moving at high speeds out of the muzzle. He died from a fractured skull and pieces of paper and plastic that were embedded in his brain.



Blanks cause injuries if put next to the skin.



Of course, millions of actors have been "shot" by blanks with no ill effects. Most on-set fatalities involved a malfunctioning or poorly maintained gun, such as Brandon Lee.



To sum up - It is completely possible to cause injury or death with air pressure, but the death zone is basically touching the other person. Anyone with a sword could simply cut off the hand holding the "air sword", so this weapon would be completely impractical.



One other thing to consider. Blanks are meant to be a safe way to fire a gun on-screen. Real bullets came first. If you have the tech to get air moving at the speed required to injure or kill, you already have the technology to make a real gun that fires lead projectiles.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    A wind with maximum sharpness is a discontinuity - where the velocity suddenly changes between different regions of aim, rather than continuously (gradually) changing from one velocity to another.



    I don't know how dangerous air shock waves are, but water shock waves can klll you underwater. Probably, a sufficiently strong air shock wave (i.e. large enough change in velocity) will be as deadly as you want.



    Shockwaves are commonly spherical, heading out in all directions from a point, but I think some directionality must be possible, just as sound wave and light waves can have some directionality. Perhaps, originating from within a pipe?



    However, a shock wave generated by a sword slashing (extremely quickly) would travel laterally to the sword - like the bow wave of a ship. A force-push (extremely quickly) might work better.



    disclaimer all off the top of my head, not an expert






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      No, its not really possible.



      Sound is just a pressure wave. If you have a powerful enough sound wave, it can do some damage.



      Loudest possible sound wave is 194 decibels. This is a result of the wave trough being a vacuum (and the wave crest being 2 atm.)



      This sound level is considered approximately the level required to be fatal. Human studies are necessarily restricted. It is thought that this sound level could induce fatal embolisms in the lungs.



      Since flesh has considerable flexibility, it is resilient against sonic assault. Something rigid like glass or concrete would be more easily damaged, and can in fact be destroyed when a frequency closely match to a natural vibration mode is used. This is not a sonic cutting attack though.



      194 Db is not powerful enough to cut flesh. So, you cannot use a cutting sound strike no matter how you wave your weapon. In theory, if your weapon was large enough, and moving fast enough, it could be sufficient to cause damage due to hearing hearing loss, or even a stunning effect, but never cut flesh.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$














        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "579"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });






        Li Jun is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143425%2fis-it-possible-to-make-sharp-wind-that-can-cut-stuff-from-afar%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes








        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        10












        $begingroup$

        Not possible without also ejecting particulate matter. If it could be done then people would be cut into pieces by standing near a helicopter or aircraft propeller.



        The only solution would be to use sand or shot blasting. Even then, if your opponent was wearing armour, the worst you are likely to do is clean it for them.



        enter image description here



        You would also require quite a lot of equipment.



        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$









        • 7




          $begingroup$
          Just to add to your answer, a sand blaster type weapon could easily harm someone in armour if pointed at their helmet. It would go in between the gaps in the eye slits if they were wearing a closed face helmet. I know that i, for one, would not want highly pressurised sand fired into my eyes. If they were in an open face helmet... yeah, i dont think they are going to have a good time at all. If you used metal fillings instead, it might cause lacerations or if you used a powder it could cause someone to choke as they inhaled it.
          $endgroup$
          – Liam Morris
          17 hours ago






        • 2




          $begingroup$
          @LiamMorris heck, with enough pressure, you can use water and the guy won't see again.
          $endgroup$
          – John Dvorak
          13 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          @JohnDvorak You could yes, you could even put gravel or sand in with it and then you’ve got yourself a water cutter, at close range they can cut through steel.
          $endgroup$
          – Liam Morris
          13 hours ago
















        10












        $begingroup$

        Not possible without also ejecting particulate matter. If it could be done then people would be cut into pieces by standing near a helicopter or aircraft propeller.



        The only solution would be to use sand or shot blasting. Even then, if your opponent was wearing armour, the worst you are likely to do is clean it for them.



        enter image description here



        You would also require quite a lot of equipment.



        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$









        • 7




          $begingroup$
          Just to add to your answer, a sand blaster type weapon could easily harm someone in armour if pointed at their helmet. It would go in between the gaps in the eye slits if they were wearing a closed face helmet. I know that i, for one, would not want highly pressurised sand fired into my eyes. If they were in an open face helmet... yeah, i dont think they are going to have a good time at all. If you used metal fillings instead, it might cause lacerations or if you used a powder it could cause someone to choke as they inhaled it.
          $endgroup$
          – Liam Morris
          17 hours ago






        • 2




          $begingroup$
          @LiamMorris heck, with enough pressure, you can use water and the guy won't see again.
          $endgroup$
          – John Dvorak
          13 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          @JohnDvorak You could yes, you could even put gravel or sand in with it and then you’ve got yourself a water cutter, at close range they can cut through steel.
          $endgroup$
          – Liam Morris
          13 hours ago














        10












        10








        10





        $begingroup$

        Not possible without also ejecting particulate matter. If it could be done then people would be cut into pieces by standing near a helicopter or aircraft propeller.



        The only solution would be to use sand or shot blasting. Even then, if your opponent was wearing armour, the worst you are likely to do is clean it for them.



        enter image description here



        You would also require quite a lot of equipment.



        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Not possible without also ejecting particulate matter. If it could be done then people would be cut into pieces by standing near a helicopter or aircraft propeller.



        The only solution would be to use sand or shot blasting. Even then, if your opponent was wearing armour, the worst you are likely to do is clean it for them.



        enter image description here



        You would also require quite a lot of equipment.



        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 18 hours ago

























        answered 18 hours ago









        chasly from UKchasly from UK

        19.8k983174




        19.8k983174








        • 7




          $begingroup$
          Just to add to your answer, a sand blaster type weapon could easily harm someone in armour if pointed at their helmet. It would go in between the gaps in the eye slits if they were wearing a closed face helmet. I know that i, for one, would not want highly pressurised sand fired into my eyes. If they were in an open face helmet... yeah, i dont think they are going to have a good time at all. If you used metal fillings instead, it might cause lacerations or if you used a powder it could cause someone to choke as they inhaled it.
          $endgroup$
          – Liam Morris
          17 hours ago






        • 2




          $begingroup$
          @LiamMorris heck, with enough pressure, you can use water and the guy won't see again.
          $endgroup$
          – John Dvorak
          13 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          @JohnDvorak You could yes, you could even put gravel or sand in with it and then you’ve got yourself a water cutter, at close range they can cut through steel.
          $endgroup$
          – Liam Morris
          13 hours ago














        • 7




          $begingroup$
          Just to add to your answer, a sand blaster type weapon could easily harm someone in armour if pointed at their helmet. It would go in between the gaps in the eye slits if they were wearing a closed face helmet. I know that i, for one, would not want highly pressurised sand fired into my eyes. If they were in an open face helmet... yeah, i dont think they are going to have a good time at all. If you used metal fillings instead, it might cause lacerations or if you used a powder it could cause someone to choke as they inhaled it.
          $endgroup$
          – Liam Morris
          17 hours ago






        • 2




          $begingroup$
          @LiamMorris heck, with enough pressure, you can use water and the guy won't see again.
          $endgroup$
          – John Dvorak
          13 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          @JohnDvorak You could yes, you could even put gravel or sand in with it and then you’ve got yourself a water cutter, at close range they can cut through steel.
          $endgroup$
          – Liam Morris
          13 hours ago








        7




        7




        $begingroup$
        Just to add to your answer, a sand blaster type weapon could easily harm someone in armour if pointed at their helmet. It would go in between the gaps in the eye slits if they were wearing a closed face helmet. I know that i, for one, would not want highly pressurised sand fired into my eyes. If they were in an open face helmet... yeah, i dont think they are going to have a good time at all. If you used metal fillings instead, it might cause lacerations or if you used a powder it could cause someone to choke as they inhaled it.
        $endgroup$
        – Liam Morris
        17 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        Just to add to your answer, a sand blaster type weapon could easily harm someone in armour if pointed at their helmet. It would go in between the gaps in the eye slits if they were wearing a closed face helmet. I know that i, for one, would not want highly pressurised sand fired into my eyes. If they were in an open face helmet... yeah, i dont think they are going to have a good time at all. If you used metal fillings instead, it might cause lacerations or if you used a powder it could cause someone to choke as they inhaled it.
        $endgroup$
        – Liam Morris
        17 hours ago




        2




        2




        $begingroup$
        @LiamMorris heck, with enough pressure, you can use water and the guy won't see again.
        $endgroup$
        – John Dvorak
        13 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        @LiamMorris heck, with enough pressure, you can use water and the guy won't see again.
        $endgroup$
        – John Dvorak
        13 hours ago




        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        @JohnDvorak You could yes, you could even put gravel or sand in with it and then you’ve got yourself a water cutter, at close range they can cut through steel.
        $endgroup$
        – Liam Morris
        13 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        @JohnDvorak You could yes, you could even put gravel or sand in with it and then you’ve got yourself a water cutter, at close range they can cut through steel.
        $endgroup$
        – Liam Morris
        13 hours ago











        2












        $begingroup$

        A metal cutting water jet shoots at 760 m/s you could attach one to your sword.



        Speed of sound 343 m/s if your character arm
        can move that fast? Then there is compressed air in a air gun. (why not just use throwing weapon or a gun)






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Luke Patton is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$









        • 1




          $begingroup$
          well this is just quriousity how to make wind cut/slash posible not the practicality or alternative although the wind contain sand or other substance that can make it happen is aceptable to me, but unfortunately i consider water jet is an alternative not really wind base except maybe if the water vapour or the subtance can do such reaction, and at least i think for melee weapon it can be a surprise attack against opponent that stay out of range of the melee weapon. besides i can just make the world dont have gun or long range weapon because of tradition.
          $endgroup$
          – Li Jun
          16 hours ago










        • $begingroup$
          since i cant edit it anymore just to be more clear: i mean the wind contain small sand or dust or other small particle substance that can make it happen is aceptable to me, but unfortunately i consider water jet is an alternative not really wind base to me except maybe if the water vapour or the small subtance can still do such reaction.
          $endgroup$
          – Li Jun
          16 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Waterjust are dangerous at point-blank range, but I think their effectiveness drops off very quickly so they're not much good as ranged weapons. Waterjets were at one time considered for antitank "melee" weapons varried by infantry, but were (and I think still are) too big and heavy for practical use. Might not always be that way, of course...
          $endgroup$
          – Starfish Prime
          14 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          I don't see how a water jet qualifies as wind.
          $endgroup$
          – L.Dutch
          14 hours ago
















        2












        $begingroup$

        A metal cutting water jet shoots at 760 m/s you could attach one to your sword.



        Speed of sound 343 m/s if your character arm
        can move that fast? Then there is compressed air in a air gun. (why not just use throwing weapon or a gun)






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Luke Patton is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$









        • 1




          $begingroup$
          well this is just quriousity how to make wind cut/slash posible not the practicality or alternative although the wind contain sand or other substance that can make it happen is aceptable to me, but unfortunately i consider water jet is an alternative not really wind base except maybe if the water vapour or the subtance can do such reaction, and at least i think for melee weapon it can be a surprise attack against opponent that stay out of range of the melee weapon. besides i can just make the world dont have gun or long range weapon because of tradition.
          $endgroup$
          – Li Jun
          16 hours ago










        • $begingroup$
          since i cant edit it anymore just to be more clear: i mean the wind contain small sand or dust or other small particle substance that can make it happen is aceptable to me, but unfortunately i consider water jet is an alternative not really wind base to me except maybe if the water vapour or the small subtance can still do such reaction.
          $endgroup$
          – Li Jun
          16 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Waterjust are dangerous at point-blank range, but I think their effectiveness drops off very quickly so they're not much good as ranged weapons. Waterjets were at one time considered for antitank "melee" weapons varried by infantry, but were (and I think still are) too big and heavy for practical use. Might not always be that way, of course...
          $endgroup$
          – Starfish Prime
          14 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          I don't see how a water jet qualifies as wind.
          $endgroup$
          – L.Dutch
          14 hours ago














        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        A metal cutting water jet shoots at 760 m/s you could attach one to your sword.



        Speed of sound 343 m/s if your character arm
        can move that fast? Then there is compressed air in a air gun. (why not just use throwing weapon or a gun)






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Luke Patton is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$



        A metal cutting water jet shoots at 760 m/s you could attach one to your sword.



        Speed of sound 343 m/s if your character arm
        can move that fast? Then there is compressed air in a air gun. (why not just use throwing weapon or a gun)







        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Luke Patton is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer






        New contributor




        Luke Patton is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 17 hours ago









        Luke PattonLuke Patton

        291




        291




        New contributor




        Luke Patton is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Luke Patton is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Luke Patton is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.








        • 1




          $begingroup$
          well this is just quriousity how to make wind cut/slash posible not the practicality or alternative although the wind contain sand or other substance that can make it happen is aceptable to me, but unfortunately i consider water jet is an alternative not really wind base except maybe if the water vapour or the subtance can do such reaction, and at least i think for melee weapon it can be a surprise attack against opponent that stay out of range of the melee weapon. besides i can just make the world dont have gun or long range weapon because of tradition.
          $endgroup$
          – Li Jun
          16 hours ago










        • $begingroup$
          since i cant edit it anymore just to be more clear: i mean the wind contain small sand or dust or other small particle substance that can make it happen is aceptable to me, but unfortunately i consider water jet is an alternative not really wind base to me except maybe if the water vapour or the small subtance can still do such reaction.
          $endgroup$
          – Li Jun
          16 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Waterjust are dangerous at point-blank range, but I think their effectiveness drops off very quickly so they're not much good as ranged weapons. Waterjets were at one time considered for antitank "melee" weapons varried by infantry, but were (and I think still are) too big and heavy for practical use. Might not always be that way, of course...
          $endgroup$
          – Starfish Prime
          14 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          I don't see how a water jet qualifies as wind.
          $endgroup$
          – L.Dutch
          14 hours ago














        • 1




          $begingroup$
          well this is just quriousity how to make wind cut/slash posible not the practicality or alternative although the wind contain sand or other substance that can make it happen is aceptable to me, but unfortunately i consider water jet is an alternative not really wind base except maybe if the water vapour or the subtance can do such reaction, and at least i think for melee weapon it can be a surprise attack against opponent that stay out of range of the melee weapon. besides i can just make the world dont have gun or long range weapon because of tradition.
          $endgroup$
          – Li Jun
          16 hours ago










        • $begingroup$
          since i cant edit it anymore just to be more clear: i mean the wind contain small sand or dust or other small particle substance that can make it happen is aceptable to me, but unfortunately i consider water jet is an alternative not really wind base to me except maybe if the water vapour or the small subtance can still do such reaction.
          $endgroup$
          – Li Jun
          16 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Waterjust are dangerous at point-blank range, but I think their effectiveness drops off very quickly so they're not much good as ranged weapons. Waterjets were at one time considered for antitank "melee" weapons varried by infantry, but were (and I think still are) too big and heavy for practical use. Might not always be that way, of course...
          $endgroup$
          – Starfish Prime
          14 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          I don't see how a water jet qualifies as wind.
          $endgroup$
          – L.Dutch
          14 hours ago








        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        well this is just quriousity how to make wind cut/slash posible not the practicality or alternative although the wind contain sand or other substance that can make it happen is aceptable to me, but unfortunately i consider water jet is an alternative not really wind base except maybe if the water vapour or the subtance can do such reaction, and at least i think for melee weapon it can be a surprise attack against opponent that stay out of range of the melee weapon. besides i can just make the world dont have gun or long range weapon because of tradition.
        $endgroup$
        – Li Jun
        16 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        well this is just quriousity how to make wind cut/slash posible not the practicality or alternative although the wind contain sand or other substance that can make it happen is aceptable to me, but unfortunately i consider water jet is an alternative not really wind base except maybe if the water vapour or the subtance can do such reaction, and at least i think for melee weapon it can be a surprise attack against opponent that stay out of range of the melee weapon. besides i can just make the world dont have gun or long range weapon because of tradition.
        $endgroup$
        – Li Jun
        16 hours ago












        $begingroup$
        since i cant edit it anymore just to be more clear: i mean the wind contain small sand or dust or other small particle substance that can make it happen is aceptable to me, but unfortunately i consider water jet is an alternative not really wind base to me except maybe if the water vapour or the small subtance can still do such reaction.
        $endgroup$
        – Li Jun
        16 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        since i cant edit it anymore just to be more clear: i mean the wind contain small sand or dust or other small particle substance that can make it happen is aceptable to me, but unfortunately i consider water jet is an alternative not really wind base to me except maybe if the water vapour or the small subtance can still do such reaction.
        $endgroup$
        – Li Jun
        16 hours ago




        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        Waterjust are dangerous at point-blank range, but I think their effectiveness drops off very quickly so they're not much good as ranged weapons. Waterjets were at one time considered for antitank "melee" weapons varried by infantry, but were (and I think still are) too big and heavy for practical use. Might not always be that way, of course...
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        14 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        Waterjust are dangerous at point-blank range, but I think their effectiveness drops off very quickly so they're not much good as ranged weapons. Waterjets were at one time considered for antitank "melee" weapons varried by infantry, but were (and I think still are) too big and heavy for practical use. Might not always be that way, of course...
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        14 hours ago




        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        I don't see how a water jet qualifies as wind.
        $endgroup$
        – L.Dutch
        14 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        I don't see how a water jet qualifies as wind.
        $endgroup$
        – L.Dutch
        14 hours ago











        2












        $begingroup$

        As pointed out in the adjoining replies, a blast/slash of air cannot occur on its own, from a physical viewpoint. You can either compress that air and direct it at the target and this would require insanely high precision to focus it and cause significant damage. Also, as the other reply states, "air slashes" are basically shock waves travelling in air. Now, from my knowledge of undergraduate fluid mechanics, a shock wave occurs when a fluid is made to undergo a careful transition from subsonic state to supersonic state by making it flow through a convergent-divergent nozzle. In order to create the shock wave at the exit plane of the nozzle (which literally is your weapon), you need to operate it very precisely under the "third design pressure ratio point" which, in practice, is too difficult to achieve. Also, once the shock wave exits the nozzle, it can no longer be treated as a one-dimensional wavefront, rather it becomes three-dimensional, expanding and dissipating exponentially. So, that would require your opponent to be present within a few meters of your reach.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Subhas Nandy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$









        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Hi, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! Please take the time to vist out Tour page if you havent already.
          $endgroup$
          – Liam Morris
          9 hours ago
















        2












        $begingroup$

        As pointed out in the adjoining replies, a blast/slash of air cannot occur on its own, from a physical viewpoint. You can either compress that air and direct it at the target and this would require insanely high precision to focus it and cause significant damage. Also, as the other reply states, "air slashes" are basically shock waves travelling in air. Now, from my knowledge of undergraduate fluid mechanics, a shock wave occurs when a fluid is made to undergo a careful transition from subsonic state to supersonic state by making it flow through a convergent-divergent nozzle. In order to create the shock wave at the exit plane of the nozzle (which literally is your weapon), you need to operate it very precisely under the "third design pressure ratio point" which, in practice, is too difficult to achieve. Also, once the shock wave exits the nozzle, it can no longer be treated as a one-dimensional wavefront, rather it becomes three-dimensional, expanding and dissipating exponentially. So, that would require your opponent to be present within a few meters of your reach.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Subhas Nandy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$









        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Hi, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! Please take the time to vist out Tour page if you havent already.
          $endgroup$
          – Liam Morris
          9 hours ago














        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        As pointed out in the adjoining replies, a blast/slash of air cannot occur on its own, from a physical viewpoint. You can either compress that air and direct it at the target and this would require insanely high precision to focus it and cause significant damage. Also, as the other reply states, "air slashes" are basically shock waves travelling in air. Now, from my knowledge of undergraduate fluid mechanics, a shock wave occurs when a fluid is made to undergo a careful transition from subsonic state to supersonic state by making it flow through a convergent-divergent nozzle. In order to create the shock wave at the exit plane of the nozzle (which literally is your weapon), you need to operate it very precisely under the "third design pressure ratio point" which, in practice, is too difficult to achieve. Also, once the shock wave exits the nozzle, it can no longer be treated as a one-dimensional wavefront, rather it becomes three-dimensional, expanding and dissipating exponentially. So, that would require your opponent to be present within a few meters of your reach.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Subhas Nandy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$



        As pointed out in the adjoining replies, a blast/slash of air cannot occur on its own, from a physical viewpoint. You can either compress that air and direct it at the target and this would require insanely high precision to focus it and cause significant damage. Also, as the other reply states, "air slashes" are basically shock waves travelling in air. Now, from my knowledge of undergraduate fluid mechanics, a shock wave occurs when a fluid is made to undergo a careful transition from subsonic state to supersonic state by making it flow through a convergent-divergent nozzle. In order to create the shock wave at the exit plane of the nozzle (which literally is your weapon), you need to operate it very precisely under the "third design pressure ratio point" which, in practice, is too difficult to achieve. Also, once the shock wave exits the nozzle, it can no longer be treated as a one-dimensional wavefront, rather it becomes three-dimensional, expanding and dissipating exponentially. So, that would require your opponent to be present within a few meters of your reach.







        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Subhas Nandy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer






        New contributor




        Subhas Nandy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 9 hours ago









        Subhas NandySubhas Nandy

        212




        212




        New contributor




        Subhas Nandy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Subhas Nandy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Subhas Nandy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.








        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Hi, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! Please take the time to vist out Tour page if you havent already.
          $endgroup$
          – Liam Morris
          9 hours ago














        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Hi, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! Please take the time to vist out Tour page if you havent already.
          $endgroup$
          – Liam Morris
          9 hours ago








        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        Hi, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! Please take the time to vist out Tour page if you havent already.
        $endgroup$
        – Liam Morris
        9 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        Hi, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! Please take the time to vist out Tour page if you havent already.
        $endgroup$
        – Liam Morris
        9 hours ago











        2












        $begingroup$

        It is possible to kill with air pressure, you just have to be REALLY CLOSE to do it



        The only documented death I found from "air pressure" is Jon-Erik Hexum, who was bored on the set of his tv series. He had a gun loaded with blanks, and decided to play a fake game of Russian Roulette with his gun and the blank cartridges (i.e. put the gun on your temple and pull the trigger).



        This is still not safe because of both the explosion created by the blank and the bits of paper and plastic moving at high speeds out of the muzzle. He died from a fractured skull and pieces of paper and plastic that were embedded in his brain.



        Blanks cause injuries if put next to the skin.



        Of course, millions of actors have been "shot" by blanks with no ill effects. Most on-set fatalities involved a malfunctioning or poorly maintained gun, such as Brandon Lee.



        To sum up - It is completely possible to cause injury or death with air pressure, but the death zone is basically touching the other person. Anyone with a sword could simply cut off the hand holding the "air sword", so this weapon would be completely impractical.



        One other thing to consider. Blanks are meant to be a safe way to fire a gun on-screen. Real bullets came first. If you have the tech to get air moving at the speed required to injure or kill, you already have the technology to make a real gun that fires lead projectiles.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$


















          2












          $begingroup$

          It is possible to kill with air pressure, you just have to be REALLY CLOSE to do it



          The only documented death I found from "air pressure" is Jon-Erik Hexum, who was bored on the set of his tv series. He had a gun loaded with blanks, and decided to play a fake game of Russian Roulette with his gun and the blank cartridges (i.e. put the gun on your temple and pull the trigger).



          This is still not safe because of both the explosion created by the blank and the bits of paper and plastic moving at high speeds out of the muzzle. He died from a fractured skull and pieces of paper and plastic that were embedded in his brain.



          Blanks cause injuries if put next to the skin.



          Of course, millions of actors have been "shot" by blanks with no ill effects. Most on-set fatalities involved a malfunctioning or poorly maintained gun, such as Brandon Lee.



          To sum up - It is completely possible to cause injury or death with air pressure, but the death zone is basically touching the other person. Anyone with a sword could simply cut off the hand holding the "air sword", so this weapon would be completely impractical.



          One other thing to consider. Blanks are meant to be a safe way to fire a gun on-screen. Real bullets came first. If you have the tech to get air moving at the speed required to injure or kill, you already have the technology to make a real gun that fires lead projectiles.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$
















            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            It is possible to kill with air pressure, you just have to be REALLY CLOSE to do it



            The only documented death I found from "air pressure" is Jon-Erik Hexum, who was bored on the set of his tv series. He had a gun loaded with blanks, and decided to play a fake game of Russian Roulette with his gun and the blank cartridges (i.e. put the gun on your temple and pull the trigger).



            This is still not safe because of both the explosion created by the blank and the bits of paper and plastic moving at high speeds out of the muzzle. He died from a fractured skull and pieces of paper and plastic that were embedded in his brain.



            Blanks cause injuries if put next to the skin.



            Of course, millions of actors have been "shot" by blanks with no ill effects. Most on-set fatalities involved a malfunctioning or poorly maintained gun, such as Brandon Lee.



            To sum up - It is completely possible to cause injury or death with air pressure, but the death zone is basically touching the other person. Anyone with a sword could simply cut off the hand holding the "air sword", so this weapon would be completely impractical.



            One other thing to consider. Blanks are meant to be a safe way to fire a gun on-screen. Real bullets came first. If you have the tech to get air moving at the speed required to injure or kill, you already have the technology to make a real gun that fires lead projectiles.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            It is possible to kill with air pressure, you just have to be REALLY CLOSE to do it



            The only documented death I found from "air pressure" is Jon-Erik Hexum, who was bored on the set of his tv series. He had a gun loaded with blanks, and decided to play a fake game of Russian Roulette with his gun and the blank cartridges (i.e. put the gun on your temple and pull the trigger).



            This is still not safe because of both the explosion created by the blank and the bits of paper and plastic moving at high speeds out of the muzzle. He died from a fractured skull and pieces of paper and plastic that were embedded in his brain.



            Blanks cause injuries if put next to the skin.



            Of course, millions of actors have been "shot" by blanks with no ill effects. Most on-set fatalities involved a malfunctioning or poorly maintained gun, such as Brandon Lee.



            To sum up - It is completely possible to cause injury or death with air pressure, but the death zone is basically touching the other person. Anyone with a sword could simply cut off the hand holding the "air sword", so this weapon would be completely impractical.



            One other thing to consider. Blanks are meant to be a safe way to fire a gun on-screen. Real bullets came first. If you have the tech to get air moving at the speed required to injure or kill, you already have the technology to make a real gun that fires lead projectiles.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 2 hours ago

























            answered 10 hours ago









            sevensevenssevensevens

            4985




            4985























                1












                $begingroup$

                A wind with maximum sharpness is a discontinuity - where the velocity suddenly changes between different regions of aim, rather than continuously (gradually) changing from one velocity to another.



                I don't know how dangerous air shock waves are, but water shock waves can klll you underwater. Probably, a sufficiently strong air shock wave (i.e. large enough change in velocity) will be as deadly as you want.



                Shockwaves are commonly spherical, heading out in all directions from a point, but I think some directionality must be possible, just as sound wave and light waves can have some directionality. Perhaps, originating from within a pipe?



                However, a shock wave generated by a sword slashing (extremely quickly) would travel laterally to the sword - like the bow wave of a ship. A force-push (extremely quickly) might work better.



                disclaimer all off the top of my head, not an expert






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  A wind with maximum sharpness is a discontinuity - where the velocity suddenly changes between different regions of aim, rather than continuously (gradually) changing from one velocity to another.



                  I don't know how dangerous air shock waves are, but water shock waves can klll you underwater. Probably, a sufficiently strong air shock wave (i.e. large enough change in velocity) will be as deadly as you want.



                  Shockwaves are commonly spherical, heading out in all directions from a point, but I think some directionality must be possible, just as sound wave and light waves can have some directionality. Perhaps, originating from within a pipe?



                  However, a shock wave generated by a sword slashing (extremely quickly) would travel laterally to the sword - like the bow wave of a ship. A force-push (extremely quickly) might work better.



                  disclaimer all off the top of my head, not an expert






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    A wind with maximum sharpness is a discontinuity - where the velocity suddenly changes between different regions of aim, rather than continuously (gradually) changing from one velocity to another.



                    I don't know how dangerous air shock waves are, but water shock waves can klll you underwater. Probably, a sufficiently strong air shock wave (i.e. large enough change in velocity) will be as deadly as you want.



                    Shockwaves are commonly spherical, heading out in all directions from a point, but I think some directionality must be possible, just as sound wave and light waves can have some directionality. Perhaps, originating from within a pipe?



                    However, a shock wave generated by a sword slashing (extremely quickly) would travel laterally to the sword - like the bow wave of a ship. A force-push (extremely quickly) might work better.



                    disclaimer all off the top of my head, not an expert






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    A wind with maximum sharpness is a discontinuity - where the velocity suddenly changes between different regions of aim, rather than continuously (gradually) changing from one velocity to another.



                    I don't know how dangerous air shock waves are, but water shock waves can klll you underwater. Probably, a sufficiently strong air shock wave (i.e. large enough change in velocity) will be as deadly as you want.



                    Shockwaves are commonly spherical, heading out in all directions from a point, but I think some directionality must be possible, just as sound wave and light waves can have some directionality. Perhaps, originating from within a pipe?



                    However, a shock wave generated by a sword slashing (extremely quickly) would travel laterally to the sword - like the bow wave of a ship. A force-push (extremely quickly) might work better.



                    disclaimer all off the top of my head, not an expert







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 12 hours ago









                    hyperpalliumhyperpallium

                    1513




                    1513























                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        No, its not really possible.



                        Sound is just a pressure wave. If you have a powerful enough sound wave, it can do some damage.



                        Loudest possible sound wave is 194 decibels. This is a result of the wave trough being a vacuum (and the wave crest being 2 atm.)



                        This sound level is considered approximately the level required to be fatal. Human studies are necessarily restricted. It is thought that this sound level could induce fatal embolisms in the lungs.



                        Since flesh has considerable flexibility, it is resilient against sonic assault. Something rigid like glass or concrete would be more easily damaged, and can in fact be destroyed when a frequency closely match to a natural vibration mode is used. This is not a sonic cutting attack though.



                        194 Db is not powerful enough to cut flesh. So, you cannot use a cutting sound strike no matter how you wave your weapon. In theory, if your weapon was large enough, and moving fast enough, it could be sufficient to cause damage due to hearing hearing loss, or even a stunning effect, but never cut flesh.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          No, its not really possible.



                          Sound is just a pressure wave. If you have a powerful enough sound wave, it can do some damage.



                          Loudest possible sound wave is 194 decibels. This is a result of the wave trough being a vacuum (and the wave crest being 2 atm.)



                          This sound level is considered approximately the level required to be fatal. Human studies are necessarily restricted. It is thought that this sound level could induce fatal embolisms in the lungs.



                          Since flesh has considerable flexibility, it is resilient against sonic assault. Something rigid like glass or concrete would be more easily damaged, and can in fact be destroyed when a frequency closely match to a natural vibration mode is used. This is not a sonic cutting attack though.



                          194 Db is not powerful enough to cut flesh. So, you cannot use a cutting sound strike no matter how you wave your weapon. In theory, if your weapon was large enough, and moving fast enough, it could be sufficient to cause damage due to hearing hearing loss, or even a stunning effect, but never cut flesh.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            No, its not really possible.



                            Sound is just a pressure wave. If you have a powerful enough sound wave, it can do some damage.



                            Loudest possible sound wave is 194 decibels. This is a result of the wave trough being a vacuum (and the wave crest being 2 atm.)



                            This sound level is considered approximately the level required to be fatal. Human studies are necessarily restricted. It is thought that this sound level could induce fatal embolisms in the lungs.



                            Since flesh has considerable flexibility, it is resilient against sonic assault. Something rigid like glass or concrete would be more easily damaged, and can in fact be destroyed when a frequency closely match to a natural vibration mode is used. This is not a sonic cutting attack though.



                            194 Db is not powerful enough to cut flesh. So, you cannot use a cutting sound strike no matter how you wave your weapon. In theory, if your weapon was large enough, and moving fast enough, it could be sufficient to cause damage due to hearing hearing loss, or even a stunning effect, but never cut flesh.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            No, its not really possible.



                            Sound is just a pressure wave. If you have a powerful enough sound wave, it can do some damage.



                            Loudest possible sound wave is 194 decibels. This is a result of the wave trough being a vacuum (and the wave crest being 2 atm.)



                            This sound level is considered approximately the level required to be fatal. Human studies are necessarily restricted. It is thought that this sound level could induce fatal embolisms in the lungs.



                            Since flesh has considerable flexibility, it is resilient against sonic assault. Something rigid like glass or concrete would be more easily damaged, and can in fact be destroyed when a frequency closely match to a natural vibration mode is used. This is not a sonic cutting attack though.



                            194 Db is not powerful enough to cut flesh. So, you cannot use a cutting sound strike no matter how you wave your weapon. In theory, if your weapon was large enough, and moving fast enough, it could be sufficient to cause damage due to hearing hearing loss, or even a stunning effect, but never cut flesh.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 2 hours ago









                            Gary WalkerGary Walker

                            15.7k23059




                            15.7k23059






















                                Li Jun is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                Li Jun is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                Li Jun is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Li Jun is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143425%2fis-it-possible-to-make-sharp-wind-that-can-cut-stuff-from-afar%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                El tren de la libertad Índice Antecedentes "Porque yo decido" Desarrollo de la...

                                Puerta de Hutt Referencias Enlaces externos Menú de navegación15°58′00″S 5°42′00″O /...

                                Castillo d'Acher Características Menú de navegación