En passant for beginnersRules: en passant and draw by triple repetitionWhat advice would you give a novice in...
Can we use the stored gravitational potential energy of a building to produce power?
Dilemma of explaining to interviewer that he is the reason for declining second interview
How should I handle players who ignore the session zero agreement?
When does coming up with an idea constitute sufficient contribution for authorship?
SQL Create Script DDL Table from View
How to implement expandbefore, similarly to expandafter?
If I delete my router's history can my ISP still provide it to my parents?
Slicing User Stories
How to replace the content to multiple files?
Do authors have to be politically correct in article-writing?
How experienced do I need to be to go on a photography workshop?
Which preposition to use with beauty? Of or with?
A starship is travelling at 0.9c and collides with a small rock. Will it leave a clean hole through, or will more happen?
Why do members of Congress in committee hearings ask witnesses the same question multiple times?
Does Windows 10's telemetry include sending *.doc files if Word crashed?
How do you funnel food off a cutting board?
Overfitting and Underfitting
How to approximate rolls for potions of healing using only d6's?
ArcとVecのmutableエラー'cannot borrow as mutable'について
Strange Sign on Lab Door
Called into a meeting and told we are being made redundant (laid off) and "not to share outside". Can I tell my partner?
On what did Lego base the appearance of the new Hogwarts minifigs?
Can a person refuse a presidential pardon?
Why is c4 a better move in this position?
En passant for beginners
Rules: en passant and draw by triple repetitionWhat advice would you give a novice in Chess?Draws, en passant, and the FIDE's 2014 rulebook revisionCommented games for beginnersWhy I can not make passant captureWhy is En Passant only possible on the first opportunity?Simple Openings for Beginners?Rules: How does right to castle and en-passant get considered for the purpose of calculating a threefold repetitionWhat's next after first 5 months and 700 points?Any suggested check list for beginners?
When I started playing chess, I learned many of the rules of chess on my own.
I was playing chess online, and then I realised that pawns can capture in such a fashion. At first, it was weird to me. Like, wow! How can a pawn capture like this?!
Then I read the theory of en passant. I have come to know that such kinds of rules exist in chess. By the way, it's an interesting rule.
Now here comes the main question: How can we teach this rule to a beginner (in a plain language or simplified way or associating any story to it)?
beginner en-passant captures
New contributor
add a comment |
When I started playing chess, I learned many of the rules of chess on my own.
I was playing chess online, and then I realised that pawns can capture in such a fashion. At first, it was weird to me. Like, wow! How can a pawn capture like this?!
Then I read the theory of en passant. I have come to know that such kinds of rules exist in chess. By the way, it's an interesting rule.
Now here comes the main question: How can we teach this rule to a beginner (in a plain language or simplified way or associating any story to it)?
beginner en-passant captures
New contributor
add a comment |
When I started playing chess, I learned many of the rules of chess on my own.
I was playing chess online, and then I realised that pawns can capture in such a fashion. At first, it was weird to me. Like, wow! How can a pawn capture like this?!
Then I read the theory of en passant. I have come to know that such kinds of rules exist in chess. By the way, it's an interesting rule.
Now here comes the main question: How can we teach this rule to a beginner (in a plain language or simplified way or associating any story to it)?
beginner en-passant captures
New contributor
When I started playing chess, I learned many of the rules of chess on my own.
I was playing chess online, and then I realised that pawns can capture in such a fashion. At first, it was weird to me. Like, wow! How can a pawn capture like this?!
Then I read the theory of en passant. I have come to know that such kinds of rules exist in chess. By the way, it's an interesting rule.
Now here comes the main question: How can we teach this rule to a beginner (in a plain language or simplified way or associating any story to it)?
beginner en-passant captures
beginner en-passant captures
New contributor
New contributor
edited 5 hours ago
Peter Mortensen
1477
1477
New contributor
asked yesterday
Creepy CreatureCreepy Creature
1715
1715
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
How can we teach this rule to a Beginner? (in a plain language or
simplified way or associating any story to it)
The history gives the story.
At one time pawns could only move one square at a time even on the first move. But this made the game a bit slow. To speed it up the rule was changed to allow a pawn to move either one square, as before, or two squares on the first move.
But this changed the way one pawn could stop another pawn from moving because of the risk of capture. So, for instance, a black pawn on g4 stops a white pawn on h2 from moving. Before the rule change the only move the white pawn could make was from h2 to h3. Then the black pawn on g4 could capture it. After the rule change the black pawn could move straight from h2 to h4 thereby dodging the attack from the black pawn. This was unfair to the black pawn on g4 and changed the game in an unintended way. So, to even things up again the en passant rule was introduced which said that in that situation the g4 black pawn could take the h4 white pawn as if it had only moved one square.
The rule only applies on the move immediately after the double pawn move because with the old rule (only allowed to move one square on move one) if black didn't take immediately then white could move the pawn on his next move and the chance was gone.
1
The second para also answered the question of "why en-passant is a necessity?"
– Creepy Creature
21 hours ago
1
@CreepyCreature Yes. If the h2 white pawn could escape the black g4 pawn by moving h2-h4 on the first move it would completely change the game. When the double first move for the pawn was introduced the new en passant rule was needed to retain the balance.
– Brian Towers
21 hours ago
1
Of course, the two rules taken together still have a significant effect on the game's strategy (beyond "just speeding up the game"). One wonders if the original rationale is still applicable.
– Kevin
20 hours ago
1
Mostly a great answer! In the last sentence, though, I recommend not assigning a gender to a hypothetical chess-player ("on their next move" is better, in my opinion). There is a lot of implicit bias against women playing chess in many cultures, and a pronoun that assumes that a hypothetical chess-player must be male perpetuates that bias.
– Greg Martin
5 hours ago
@GregMartin It's not an assumption of gender. English traditionally uses the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular, as it has no non-gendered singular personal pronouns for referring to humans. Use of the plural ones as an alternative has gained wide acceptance, but use of the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular is still completely correct and widely taught.
– reirab
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
In simple words: if a pawn jumps two squares and lands right next to an opponent's pawn, then the opponent can capture that pawn in the following turn as if it had moved only 1 square. That is, only right after you made your jump, your opponent has the option to take by en-passant, past that turn it is no longer allowed.
So keywords to remember: two square move, right next to, and following turn.
Visually:
[title "Visualised example"]
[fen "r1bqkbnr/pppppppp/2n5/4P3/8/8/PPPP1PPP/RNBQKBNR b KQkq - 0 2"]
1...d5 2.exd6 (1...d6 2.exd6)
Notice the end scenarios are the same after either d6
and d5
, as in after the capture one cannot tell if it had been by en-passant or a normal capture.
Intuitively, you can imagine the rule is there so that one cannot jump past another pawn and completely evade the option of a trade. Exactly similar to when you move your pawn only one square, and your opponent still has the option to capture your pawn if they so desire.
add a comment |
As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia, they have a decent article regarding en-passant:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/En_passant
It is a special pawn capture that can only occur immediately after a pawn makes a double-step move from its starting square, and it could have been captured by an enemy pawn had it advanced only one square. The opponent captures the just-moved pawn "as it passes" through the first square. The result is the same as if the pawn had advanced only one square and the enemy pawn had captured it normally.
I hope that helps a little.
New contributor
"As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia" Well, dare I say, you shouldn't.
– Marc.2377
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "435"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Creepy Creature is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f23871%2fen-passant-for-beginners%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
How can we teach this rule to a Beginner? (in a plain language or
simplified way or associating any story to it)
The history gives the story.
At one time pawns could only move one square at a time even on the first move. But this made the game a bit slow. To speed it up the rule was changed to allow a pawn to move either one square, as before, or two squares on the first move.
But this changed the way one pawn could stop another pawn from moving because of the risk of capture. So, for instance, a black pawn on g4 stops a white pawn on h2 from moving. Before the rule change the only move the white pawn could make was from h2 to h3. Then the black pawn on g4 could capture it. After the rule change the black pawn could move straight from h2 to h4 thereby dodging the attack from the black pawn. This was unfair to the black pawn on g4 and changed the game in an unintended way. So, to even things up again the en passant rule was introduced which said that in that situation the g4 black pawn could take the h4 white pawn as if it had only moved one square.
The rule only applies on the move immediately after the double pawn move because with the old rule (only allowed to move one square on move one) if black didn't take immediately then white could move the pawn on his next move and the chance was gone.
1
The second para also answered the question of "why en-passant is a necessity?"
– Creepy Creature
21 hours ago
1
@CreepyCreature Yes. If the h2 white pawn could escape the black g4 pawn by moving h2-h4 on the first move it would completely change the game. When the double first move for the pawn was introduced the new en passant rule was needed to retain the balance.
– Brian Towers
21 hours ago
1
Of course, the two rules taken together still have a significant effect on the game's strategy (beyond "just speeding up the game"). One wonders if the original rationale is still applicable.
– Kevin
20 hours ago
1
Mostly a great answer! In the last sentence, though, I recommend not assigning a gender to a hypothetical chess-player ("on their next move" is better, in my opinion). There is a lot of implicit bias against women playing chess in many cultures, and a pronoun that assumes that a hypothetical chess-player must be male perpetuates that bias.
– Greg Martin
5 hours ago
@GregMartin It's not an assumption of gender. English traditionally uses the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular, as it has no non-gendered singular personal pronouns for referring to humans. Use of the plural ones as an alternative has gained wide acceptance, but use of the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular is still completely correct and widely taught.
– reirab
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
How can we teach this rule to a Beginner? (in a plain language or
simplified way or associating any story to it)
The history gives the story.
At one time pawns could only move one square at a time even on the first move. But this made the game a bit slow. To speed it up the rule was changed to allow a pawn to move either one square, as before, or two squares on the first move.
But this changed the way one pawn could stop another pawn from moving because of the risk of capture. So, for instance, a black pawn on g4 stops a white pawn on h2 from moving. Before the rule change the only move the white pawn could make was from h2 to h3. Then the black pawn on g4 could capture it. After the rule change the black pawn could move straight from h2 to h4 thereby dodging the attack from the black pawn. This was unfair to the black pawn on g4 and changed the game in an unintended way. So, to even things up again the en passant rule was introduced which said that in that situation the g4 black pawn could take the h4 white pawn as if it had only moved one square.
The rule only applies on the move immediately after the double pawn move because with the old rule (only allowed to move one square on move one) if black didn't take immediately then white could move the pawn on his next move and the chance was gone.
1
The second para also answered the question of "why en-passant is a necessity?"
– Creepy Creature
21 hours ago
1
@CreepyCreature Yes. If the h2 white pawn could escape the black g4 pawn by moving h2-h4 on the first move it would completely change the game. When the double first move for the pawn was introduced the new en passant rule was needed to retain the balance.
– Brian Towers
21 hours ago
1
Of course, the two rules taken together still have a significant effect on the game's strategy (beyond "just speeding up the game"). One wonders if the original rationale is still applicable.
– Kevin
20 hours ago
1
Mostly a great answer! In the last sentence, though, I recommend not assigning a gender to a hypothetical chess-player ("on their next move" is better, in my opinion). There is a lot of implicit bias against women playing chess in many cultures, and a pronoun that assumes that a hypothetical chess-player must be male perpetuates that bias.
– Greg Martin
5 hours ago
@GregMartin It's not an assumption of gender. English traditionally uses the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular, as it has no non-gendered singular personal pronouns for referring to humans. Use of the plural ones as an alternative has gained wide acceptance, but use of the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular is still completely correct and widely taught.
– reirab
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
How can we teach this rule to a Beginner? (in a plain language or
simplified way or associating any story to it)
The history gives the story.
At one time pawns could only move one square at a time even on the first move. But this made the game a bit slow. To speed it up the rule was changed to allow a pawn to move either one square, as before, or two squares on the first move.
But this changed the way one pawn could stop another pawn from moving because of the risk of capture. So, for instance, a black pawn on g4 stops a white pawn on h2 from moving. Before the rule change the only move the white pawn could make was from h2 to h3. Then the black pawn on g4 could capture it. After the rule change the black pawn could move straight from h2 to h4 thereby dodging the attack from the black pawn. This was unfair to the black pawn on g4 and changed the game in an unintended way. So, to even things up again the en passant rule was introduced which said that in that situation the g4 black pawn could take the h4 white pawn as if it had only moved one square.
The rule only applies on the move immediately after the double pawn move because with the old rule (only allowed to move one square on move one) if black didn't take immediately then white could move the pawn on his next move and the chance was gone.
How can we teach this rule to a Beginner? (in a plain language or
simplified way or associating any story to it)
The history gives the story.
At one time pawns could only move one square at a time even on the first move. But this made the game a bit slow. To speed it up the rule was changed to allow a pawn to move either one square, as before, or two squares on the first move.
But this changed the way one pawn could stop another pawn from moving because of the risk of capture. So, for instance, a black pawn on g4 stops a white pawn on h2 from moving. Before the rule change the only move the white pawn could make was from h2 to h3. Then the black pawn on g4 could capture it. After the rule change the black pawn could move straight from h2 to h4 thereby dodging the attack from the black pawn. This was unfair to the black pawn on g4 and changed the game in an unintended way. So, to even things up again the en passant rule was introduced which said that in that situation the g4 black pawn could take the h4 white pawn as if it had only moved one square.
The rule only applies on the move immediately after the double pawn move because with the old rule (only allowed to move one square on move one) if black didn't take immediately then white could move the pawn on his next move and the chance was gone.
answered yesterday
Brian TowersBrian Towers
15.8k32969
15.8k32969
1
The second para also answered the question of "why en-passant is a necessity?"
– Creepy Creature
21 hours ago
1
@CreepyCreature Yes. If the h2 white pawn could escape the black g4 pawn by moving h2-h4 on the first move it would completely change the game. When the double first move for the pawn was introduced the new en passant rule was needed to retain the balance.
– Brian Towers
21 hours ago
1
Of course, the two rules taken together still have a significant effect on the game's strategy (beyond "just speeding up the game"). One wonders if the original rationale is still applicable.
– Kevin
20 hours ago
1
Mostly a great answer! In the last sentence, though, I recommend not assigning a gender to a hypothetical chess-player ("on their next move" is better, in my opinion). There is a lot of implicit bias against women playing chess in many cultures, and a pronoun that assumes that a hypothetical chess-player must be male perpetuates that bias.
– Greg Martin
5 hours ago
@GregMartin It's not an assumption of gender. English traditionally uses the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular, as it has no non-gendered singular personal pronouns for referring to humans. Use of the plural ones as an alternative has gained wide acceptance, but use of the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular is still completely correct and widely taught.
– reirab
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
1
The second para also answered the question of "why en-passant is a necessity?"
– Creepy Creature
21 hours ago
1
@CreepyCreature Yes. If the h2 white pawn could escape the black g4 pawn by moving h2-h4 on the first move it would completely change the game. When the double first move for the pawn was introduced the new en passant rule was needed to retain the balance.
– Brian Towers
21 hours ago
1
Of course, the two rules taken together still have a significant effect on the game's strategy (beyond "just speeding up the game"). One wonders if the original rationale is still applicable.
– Kevin
20 hours ago
1
Mostly a great answer! In the last sentence, though, I recommend not assigning a gender to a hypothetical chess-player ("on their next move" is better, in my opinion). There is a lot of implicit bias against women playing chess in many cultures, and a pronoun that assumes that a hypothetical chess-player must be male perpetuates that bias.
– Greg Martin
5 hours ago
@GregMartin It's not an assumption of gender. English traditionally uses the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular, as it has no non-gendered singular personal pronouns for referring to humans. Use of the plural ones as an alternative has gained wide acceptance, but use of the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular is still completely correct and widely taught.
– reirab
3 hours ago
1
1
The second para also answered the question of "why en-passant is a necessity?"
– Creepy Creature
21 hours ago
The second para also answered the question of "why en-passant is a necessity?"
– Creepy Creature
21 hours ago
1
1
@CreepyCreature Yes. If the h2 white pawn could escape the black g4 pawn by moving h2-h4 on the first move it would completely change the game. When the double first move for the pawn was introduced the new en passant rule was needed to retain the balance.
– Brian Towers
21 hours ago
@CreepyCreature Yes. If the h2 white pawn could escape the black g4 pawn by moving h2-h4 on the first move it would completely change the game. When the double first move for the pawn was introduced the new en passant rule was needed to retain the balance.
– Brian Towers
21 hours ago
1
1
Of course, the two rules taken together still have a significant effect on the game's strategy (beyond "just speeding up the game"). One wonders if the original rationale is still applicable.
– Kevin
20 hours ago
Of course, the two rules taken together still have a significant effect on the game's strategy (beyond "just speeding up the game"). One wonders if the original rationale is still applicable.
– Kevin
20 hours ago
1
1
Mostly a great answer! In the last sentence, though, I recommend not assigning a gender to a hypothetical chess-player ("on their next move" is better, in my opinion). There is a lot of implicit bias against women playing chess in many cultures, and a pronoun that assumes that a hypothetical chess-player must be male perpetuates that bias.
– Greg Martin
5 hours ago
Mostly a great answer! In the last sentence, though, I recommend not assigning a gender to a hypothetical chess-player ("on their next move" is better, in my opinion). There is a lot of implicit bias against women playing chess in many cultures, and a pronoun that assumes that a hypothetical chess-player must be male perpetuates that bias.
– Greg Martin
5 hours ago
@GregMartin It's not an assumption of gender. English traditionally uses the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular, as it has no non-gendered singular personal pronouns for referring to humans. Use of the plural ones as an alternative has gained wide acceptance, but use of the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular is still completely correct and widely taught.
– reirab
3 hours ago
@GregMartin It's not an assumption of gender. English traditionally uses the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular, as it has no non-gendered singular personal pronouns for referring to humans. Use of the plural ones as an alternative has gained wide acceptance, but use of the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular is still completely correct and widely taught.
– reirab
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
In simple words: if a pawn jumps two squares and lands right next to an opponent's pawn, then the opponent can capture that pawn in the following turn as if it had moved only 1 square. That is, only right after you made your jump, your opponent has the option to take by en-passant, past that turn it is no longer allowed.
So keywords to remember: two square move, right next to, and following turn.
Visually:
[title "Visualised example"]
[fen "r1bqkbnr/pppppppp/2n5/4P3/8/8/PPPP1PPP/RNBQKBNR b KQkq - 0 2"]
1...d5 2.exd6 (1...d6 2.exd6)
Notice the end scenarios are the same after either d6
and d5
, as in after the capture one cannot tell if it had been by en-passant or a normal capture.
Intuitively, you can imagine the rule is there so that one cannot jump past another pawn and completely evade the option of a trade. Exactly similar to when you move your pawn only one square, and your opponent still has the option to capture your pawn if they so desire.
add a comment |
In simple words: if a pawn jumps two squares and lands right next to an opponent's pawn, then the opponent can capture that pawn in the following turn as if it had moved only 1 square. That is, only right after you made your jump, your opponent has the option to take by en-passant, past that turn it is no longer allowed.
So keywords to remember: two square move, right next to, and following turn.
Visually:
[title "Visualised example"]
[fen "r1bqkbnr/pppppppp/2n5/4P3/8/8/PPPP1PPP/RNBQKBNR b KQkq - 0 2"]
1...d5 2.exd6 (1...d6 2.exd6)
Notice the end scenarios are the same after either d6
and d5
, as in after the capture one cannot tell if it had been by en-passant or a normal capture.
Intuitively, you can imagine the rule is there so that one cannot jump past another pawn and completely evade the option of a trade. Exactly similar to when you move your pawn only one square, and your opponent still has the option to capture your pawn if they so desire.
add a comment |
In simple words: if a pawn jumps two squares and lands right next to an opponent's pawn, then the opponent can capture that pawn in the following turn as if it had moved only 1 square. That is, only right after you made your jump, your opponent has the option to take by en-passant, past that turn it is no longer allowed.
So keywords to remember: two square move, right next to, and following turn.
Visually:
[title "Visualised example"]
[fen "r1bqkbnr/pppppppp/2n5/4P3/8/8/PPPP1PPP/RNBQKBNR b KQkq - 0 2"]
1...d5 2.exd6 (1...d6 2.exd6)
Notice the end scenarios are the same after either d6
and d5
, as in after the capture one cannot tell if it had been by en-passant or a normal capture.
Intuitively, you can imagine the rule is there so that one cannot jump past another pawn and completely evade the option of a trade. Exactly similar to when you move your pawn only one square, and your opponent still has the option to capture your pawn if they so desire.
In simple words: if a pawn jumps two squares and lands right next to an opponent's pawn, then the opponent can capture that pawn in the following turn as if it had moved only 1 square. That is, only right after you made your jump, your opponent has the option to take by en-passant, past that turn it is no longer allowed.
So keywords to remember: two square move, right next to, and following turn.
Visually:
[title "Visualised example"]
[fen "r1bqkbnr/pppppppp/2n5/4P3/8/8/PPPP1PPP/RNBQKBNR b KQkq - 0 2"]
1...d5 2.exd6 (1...d6 2.exd6)
Notice the end scenarios are the same after either d6
and d5
, as in after the capture one cannot tell if it had been by en-passant or a normal capture.
Intuitively, you can imagine the rule is there so that one cannot jump past another pawn and completely evade the option of a trade. Exactly similar to when you move your pawn only one square, and your opponent still has the option to capture your pawn if they so desire.
answered yesterday
user929304user929304
514418
514418
add a comment |
add a comment |
As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia, they have a decent article regarding en-passant:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/En_passant
It is a special pawn capture that can only occur immediately after a pawn makes a double-step move from its starting square, and it could have been captured by an enemy pawn had it advanced only one square. The opponent captures the just-moved pawn "as it passes" through the first square. The result is the same as if the pawn had advanced only one square and the enemy pawn had captured it normally.
I hope that helps a little.
New contributor
"As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia" Well, dare I say, you shouldn't.
– Marc.2377
9 hours ago
add a comment |
As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia, they have a decent article regarding en-passant:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/En_passant
It is a special pawn capture that can only occur immediately after a pawn makes a double-step move from its starting square, and it could have been captured by an enemy pawn had it advanced only one square. The opponent captures the just-moved pawn "as it passes" through the first square. The result is the same as if the pawn had advanced only one square and the enemy pawn had captured it normally.
I hope that helps a little.
New contributor
"As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia" Well, dare I say, you shouldn't.
– Marc.2377
9 hours ago
add a comment |
As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia, they have a decent article regarding en-passant:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/En_passant
It is a special pawn capture that can only occur immediately after a pawn makes a double-step move from its starting square, and it could have been captured by an enemy pawn had it advanced only one square. The opponent captures the just-moved pawn "as it passes" through the first square. The result is the same as if the pawn had advanced only one square and the enemy pawn had captured it normally.
I hope that helps a little.
New contributor
As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia, they have a decent article regarding en-passant:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/En_passant
It is a special pawn capture that can only occur immediately after a pawn makes a double-step move from its starting square, and it could have been captured by an enemy pawn had it advanced only one square. The opponent captures the just-moved pawn "as it passes" through the first square. The result is the same as if the pawn had advanced only one square and the enemy pawn had captured it normally.
I hope that helps a little.
New contributor
New contributor
answered yesterday
Owen ReesOwen Rees
286
286
New contributor
New contributor
"As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia" Well, dare I say, you shouldn't.
– Marc.2377
9 hours ago
add a comment |
"As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia" Well, dare I say, you shouldn't.
– Marc.2377
9 hours ago
"As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia" Well, dare I say, you shouldn't.
– Marc.2377
9 hours ago
"As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia" Well, dare I say, you shouldn't.
– Marc.2377
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Creepy Creature is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Creepy Creature is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Creepy Creature is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Creepy Creature is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chess Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f23871%2fen-passant-for-beginners%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown