En passant for beginnersRules: en passant and draw by triple repetitionWhat advice would you give a novice in...

Can we use the stored gravitational potential energy of a building to produce power?

Dilemma of explaining to interviewer that he is the reason for declining second interview

How should I handle players who ignore the session zero agreement?

When does coming up with an idea constitute sufficient contribution for authorship?

SQL Create Script DDL Table from View

How to implement expandbefore, similarly to expandafter?

If I delete my router's history can my ISP still provide it to my parents?

Slicing User Stories

How to replace the content to multiple files?

Do authors have to be politically correct in article-writing?

How experienced do I need to be to go on a photography workshop?

Which preposition to use with beauty? Of or with?

A starship is travelling at 0.9c and collides with a small rock. Will it leave a clean hole through, or will more happen?

Why do members of Congress in committee hearings ask witnesses the same question multiple times?

Does Windows 10's telemetry include sending *.doc files if Word crashed?

How do you funnel food off a cutting board?

Overfitting and Underfitting

How to approximate rolls for potions of healing using only d6's?

ArcとVecのmutableエラー'cannot borrow as mutable'について

Strange Sign on Lab Door

Called into a meeting and told we are being made redundant (laid off) and "not to share outside". Can I tell my partner?

On what did Lego base the appearance of the new Hogwarts minifigs?

Can a person refuse a presidential pardon?

Why is c4 a better move in this position?



En passant for beginners


Rules: en passant and draw by triple repetitionWhat advice would you give a novice in Chess?Draws, en passant, and the FIDE's 2014 rulebook revisionCommented games for beginnersWhy I can not make passant captureWhy is En Passant only possible on the first opportunity?Simple Openings for Beginners?Rules: How does right to castle and en-passant get considered for the purpose of calculating a threefold repetitionWhat's next after first 5 months and 700 points?Any suggested check list for beginners?













13















When I started playing chess, I learned many of the rules of chess on my own.
I was playing chess online, and then I realised that pawns can capture in such a fashion. At first, it was weird to me. Like, wow! How can a pawn capture like this?!



Then I read the theory of en passant. I have come to know that such kinds of rules exist in chess. By the way, it's an interesting rule.



Now here comes the main question: How can we teach this rule to a beginner (in a plain language or simplified way or associating any story to it)?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Creepy Creature is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    13















    When I started playing chess, I learned many of the rules of chess on my own.
    I was playing chess online, and then I realised that pawns can capture in such a fashion. At first, it was weird to me. Like, wow! How can a pawn capture like this?!



    Then I read the theory of en passant. I have come to know that such kinds of rules exist in chess. By the way, it's an interesting rule.



    Now here comes the main question: How can we teach this rule to a beginner (in a plain language or simplified way or associating any story to it)?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    Creepy Creature is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      13












      13








      13


      1






      When I started playing chess, I learned many of the rules of chess on my own.
      I was playing chess online, and then I realised that pawns can capture in such a fashion. At first, it was weird to me. Like, wow! How can a pawn capture like this?!



      Then I read the theory of en passant. I have come to know that such kinds of rules exist in chess. By the way, it's an interesting rule.



      Now here comes the main question: How can we teach this rule to a beginner (in a plain language or simplified way or associating any story to it)?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Creepy Creature is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      When I started playing chess, I learned many of the rules of chess on my own.
      I was playing chess online, and then I realised that pawns can capture in such a fashion. At first, it was weird to me. Like, wow! How can a pawn capture like this?!



      Then I read the theory of en passant. I have come to know that such kinds of rules exist in chess. By the way, it's an interesting rule.



      Now here comes the main question: How can we teach this rule to a beginner (in a plain language or simplified way or associating any story to it)?







      beginner en-passant captures






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Creepy Creature is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Creepy Creature is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 5 hours ago









      Peter Mortensen

      1477




      1477






      New contributor




      Creepy Creature is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked yesterday









      Creepy CreatureCreepy Creature

      1715




      1715




      New contributor




      Creepy Creature is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Creepy Creature is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Creepy Creature is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          12















          How can we teach this rule to a Beginner? (in a plain language or
          simplified way or associating any story to it)




          The history gives the story.



          At one time pawns could only move one square at a time even on the first move. But this made the game a bit slow. To speed it up the rule was changed to allow a pawn to move either one square, as before, or two squares on the first move.



          But this changed the way one pawn could stop another pawn from moving because of the risk of capture. So, for instance, a black pawn on g4 stops a white pawn on h2 from moving. Before the rule change the only move the white pawn could make was from h2 to h3. Then the black pawn on g4 could capture it. After the rule change the black pawn could move straight from h2 to h4 thereby dodging the attack from the black pawn. This was unfair to the black pawn on g4 and changed the game in an unintended way. So, to even things up again the en passant rule was introduced which said that in that situation the g4 black pawn could take the h4 white pawn as if it had only moved one square.



          The rule only applies on the move immediately after the double pawn move because with the old rule (only allowed to move one square on move one) if black didn't take immediately then white could move the pawn on his next move and the chance was gone.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            The second para also answered the question of "why en-passant is a necessity?"

            – Creepy Creature
            21 hours ago






          • 1





            @CreepyCreature Yes. If the h2 white pawn could escape the black g4 pawn by moving h2-h4 on the first move it would completely change the game. When the double first move for the pawn was introduced the new en passant rule was needed to retain the balance.

            – Brian Towers
            21 hours ago






          • 1





            Of course, the two rules taken together still have a significant effect on the game's strategy (beyond "just speeding up the game"). One wonders if the original rationale is still applicable.

            – Kevin
            20 hours ago






          • 1





            Mostly a great answer! In the last sentence, though, I recommend not assigning a gender to a hypothetical chess-player ("on their next move" is better, in my opinion). There is a lot of implicit bias against women playing chess in many cultures, and a pronoun that assumes that a hypothetical chess-player must be male perpetuates that bias.

            – Greg Martin
            5 hours ago











          • @GregMartin It's not an assumption of gender. English traditionally uses the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular, as it has no non-gendered singular personal pronouns for referring to humans. Use of the plural ones as an alternative has gained wide acceptance, but use of the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular is still completely correct and widely taught.

            – reirab
            3 hours ago



















          8














          In simple words: if a pawn jumps two squares and lands right next to an opponent's pawn, then the opponent can capture that pawn in the following turn as if it had moved only 1 square. That is, only right after you made your jump, your opponent has the option to take by en-passant, past that turn it is no longer allowed.



          So keywords to remember: two square move, right next to, and following turn.



          Visually:



           [title "Visualised example"]
          [fen "r1bqkbnr/pppppppp/2n5/4P3/8/8/PPPP1PPP/RNBQKBNR b KQkq - 0 2"]

          1...d5 2.exd6 (1...d6 2.exd6)


          Notice the end scenarios are the same after either d6 and d5, as in after the capture one cannot tell if it had been by en-passant or a normal capture.



          Intuitively, you can imagine the rule is there so that one cannot jump past another pawn and completely evade the option of a trade. Exactly similar to when you move your pawn only one square, and your opponent still has the option to capture your pawn if they so desire.






          share|improve this answer































            0














            As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia, they have a decent article regarding en-passant:



            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/En_passant



            It is a special pawn capture that can only occur immediately after a pawn makes a double-step move from its starting square, and it could have been captured by an enemy pawn had it advanced only one square. The opponent captures the just-moved pawn "as it passes" through the first square. The result is the same as if the pawn had advanced only one square and the enemy pawn had captured it normally.



            I hope that helps a little.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Owen Rees is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





















            • "As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia" Well, dare I say, you shouldn't.

              – Marc.2377
              9 hours ago











            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "435"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            Creepy Creature is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f23871%2fen-passant-for-beginners%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            12















            How can we teach this rule to a Beginner? (in a plain language or
            simplified way or associating any story to it)




            The history gives the story.



            At one time pawns could only move one square at a time even on the first move. But this made the game a bit slow. To speed it up the rule was changed to allow a pawn to move either one square, as before, or two squares on the first move.



            But this changed the way one pawn could stop another pawn from moving because of the risk of capture. So, for instance, a black pawn on g4 stops a white pawn on h2 from moving. Before the rule change the only move the white pawn could make was from h2 to h3. Then the black pawn on g4 could capture it. After the rule change the black pawn could move straight from h2 to h4 thereby dodging the attack from the black pawn. This was unfair to the black pawn on g4 and changed the game in an unintended way. So, to even things up again the en passant rule was introduced which said that in that situation the g4 black pawn could take the h4 white pawn as if it had only moved one square.



            The rule only applies on the move immediately after the double pawn move because with the old rule (only allowed to move one square on move one) if black didn't take immediately then white could move the pawn on his next move and the chance was gone.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 1





              The second para also answered the question of "why en-passant is a necessity?"

              – Creepy Creature
              21 hours ago






            • 1





              @CreepyCreature Yes. If the h2 white pawn could escape the black g4 pawn by moving h2-h4 on the first move it would completely change the game. When the double first move for the pawn was introduced the new en passant rule was needed to retain the balance.

              – Brian Towers
              21 hours ago






            • 1





              Of course, the two rules taken together still have a significant effect on the game's strategy (beyond "just speeding up the game"). One wonders if the original rationale is still applicable.

              – Kevin
              20 hours ago






            • 1





              Mostly a great answer! In the last sentence, though, I recommend not assigning a gender to a hypothetical chess-player ("on their next move" is better, in my opinion). There is a lot of implicit bias against women playing chess in many cultures, and a pronoun that assumes that a hypothetical chess-player must be male perpetuates that bias.

              – Greg Martin
              5 hours ago











            • @GregMartin It's not an assumption of gender. English traditionally uses the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular, as it has no non-gendered singular personal pronouns for referring to humans. Use of the plural ones as an alternative has gained wide acceptance, but use of the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular is still completely correct and widely taught.

              – reirab
              3 hours ago
















            12















            How can we teach this rule to a Beginner? (in a plain language or
            simplified way or associating any story to it)




            The history gives the story.



            At one time pawns could only move one square at a time even on the first move. But this made the game a bit slow. To speed it up the rule was changed to allow a pawn to move either one square, as before, or two squares on the first move.



            But this changed the way one pawn could stop another pawn from moving because of the risk of capture. So, for instance, a black pawn on g4 stops a white pawn on h2 from moving. Before the rule change the only move the white pawn could make was from h2 to h3. Then the black pawn on g4 could capture it. After the rule change the black pawn could move straight from h2 to h4 thereby dodging the attack from the black pawn. This was unfair to the black pawn on g4 and changed the game in an unintended way. So, to even things up again the en passant rule was introduced which said that in that situation the g4 black pawn could take the h4 white pawn as if it had only moved one square.



            The rule only applies on the move immediately after the double pawn move because with the old rule (only allowed to move one square on move one) if black didn't take immediately then white could move the pawn on his next move and the chance was gone.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 1





              The second para also answered the question of "why en-passant is a necessity?"

              – Creepy Creature
              21 hours ago






            • 1





              @CreepyCreature Yes. If the h2 white pawn could escape the black g4 pawn by moving h2-h4 on the first move it would completely change the game. When the double first move for the pawn was introduced the new en passant rule was needed to retain the balance.

              – Brian Towers
              21 hours ago






            • 1





              Of course, the two rules taken together still have a significant effect on the game's strategy (beyond "just speeding up the game"). One wonders if the original rationale is still applicable.

              – Kevin
              20 hours ago






            • 1





              Mostly a great answer! In the last sentence, though, I recommend not assigning a gender to a hypothetical chess-player ("on their next move" is better, in my opinion). There is a lot of implicit bias against women playing chess in many cultures, and a pronoun that assumes that a hypothetical chess-player must be male perpetuates that bias.

              – Greg Martin
              5 hours ago











            • @GregMartin It's not an assumption of gender. English traditionally uses the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular, as it has no non-gendered singular personal pronouns for referring to humans. Use of the plural ones as an alternative has gained wide acceptance, but use of the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular is still completely correct and widely taught.

              – reirab
              3 hours ago














            12












            12








            12








            How can we teach this rule to a Beginner? (in a plain language or
            simplified way or associating any story to it)




            The history gives the story.



            At one time pawns could only move one square at a time even on the first move. But this made the game a bit slow. To speed it up the rule was changed to allow a pawn to move either one square, as before, or two squares on the first move.



            But this changed the way one pawn could stop another pawn from moving because of the risk of capture. So, for instance, a black pawn on g4 stops a white pawn on h2 from moving. Before the rule change the only move the white pawn could make was from h2 to h3. Then the black pawn on g4 could capture it. After the rule change the black pawn could move straight from h2 to h4 thereby dodging the attack from the black pawn. This was unfair to the black pawn on g4 and changed the game in an unintended way. So, to even things up again the en passant rule was introduced which said that in that situation the g4 black pawn could take the h4 white pawn as if it had only moved one square.



            The rule only applies on the move immediately after the double pawn move because with the old rule (only allowed to move one square on move one) if black didn't take immediately then white could move the pawn on his next move and the chance was gone.






            share|improve this answer














            How can we teach this rule to a Beginner? (in a plain language or
            simplified way or associating any story to it)




            The history gives the story.



            At one time pawns could only move one square at a time even on the first move. But this made the game a bit slow. To speed it up the rule was changed to allow a pawn to move either one square, as before, or two squares on the first move.



            But this changed the way one pawn could stop another pawn from moving because of the risk of capture. So, for instance, a black pawn on g4 stops a white pawn on h2 from moving. Before the rule change the only move the white pawn could make was from h2 to h3. Then the black pawn on g4 could capture it. After the rule change the black pawn could move straight from h2 to h4 thereby dodging the attack from the black pawn. This was unfair to the black pawn on g4 and changed the game in an unintended way. So, to even things up again the en passant rule was introduced which said that in that situation the g4 black pawn could take the h4 white pawn as if it had only moved one square.



            The rule only applies on the move immediately after the double pawn move because with the old rule (only allowed to move one square on move one) if black didn't take immediately then white could move the pawn on his next move and the chance was gone.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            Brian TowersBrian Towers

            15.8k32969




            15.8k32969








            • 1





              The second para also answered the question of "why en-passant is a necessity?"

              – Creepy Creature
              21 hours ago






            • 1





              @CreepyCreature Yes. If the h2 white pawn could escape the black g4 pawn by moving h2-h4 on the first move it would completely change the game. When the double first move for the pawn was introduced the new en passant rule was needed to retain the balance.

              – Brian Towers
              21 hours ago






            • 1





              Of course, the two rules taken together still have a significant effect on the game's strategy (beyond "just speeding up the game"). One wonders if the original rationale is still applicable.

              – Kevin
              20 hours ago






            • 1





              Mostly a great answer! In the last sentence, though, I recommend not assigning a gender to a hypothetical chess-player ("on their next move" is better, in my opinion). There is a lot of implicit bias against women playing chess in many cultures, and a pronoun that assumes that a hypothetical chess-player must be male perpetuates that bias.

              – Greg Martin
              5 hours ago











            • @GregMartin It's not an assumption of gender. English traditionally uses the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular, as it has no non-gendered singular personal pronouns for referring to humans. Use of the plural ones as an alternative has gained wide acceptance, but use of the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular is still completely correct and widely taught.

              – reirab
              3 hours ago














            • 1





              The second para also answered the question of "why en-passant is a necessity?"

              – Creepy Creature
              21 hours ago






            • 1





              @CreepyCreature Yes. If the h2 white pawn could escape the black g4 pawn by moving h2-h4 on the first move it would completely change the game. When the double first move for the pawn was introduced the new en passant rule was needed to retain the balance.

              – Brian Towers
              21 hours ago






            • 1





              Of course, the two rules taken together still have a significant effect on the game's strategy (beyond "just speeding up the game"). One wonders if the original rationale is still applicable.

              – Kevin
              20 hours ago






            • 1





              Mostly a great answer! In the last sentence, though, I recommend not assigning a gender to a hypothetical chess-player ("on their next move" is better, in my opinion). There is a lot of implicit bias against women playing chess in many cultures, and a pronoun that assumes that a hypothetical chess-player must be male perpetuates that bias.

              – Greg Martin
              5 hours ago











            • @GregMartin It's not an assumption of gender. English traditionally uses the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular, as it has no non-gendered singular personal pronouns for referring to humans. Use of the plural ones as an alternative has gained wide acceptance, but use of the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular is still completely correct and widely taught.

              – reirab
              3 hours ago








            1




            1





            The second para also answered the question of "why en-passant is a necessity?"

            – Creepy Creature
            21 hours ago





            The second para also answered the question of "why en-passant is a necessity?"

            – Creepy Creature
            21 hours ago




            1




            1





            @CreepyCreature Yes. If the h2 white pawn could escape the black g4 pawn by moving h2-h4 on the first move it would completely change the game. When the double first move for the pawn was introduced the new en passant rule was needed to retain the balance.

            – Brian Towers
            21 hours ago





            @CreepyCreature Yes. If the h2 white pawn could escape the black g4 pawn by moving h2-h4 on the first move it would completely change the game. When the double first move for the pawn was introduced the new en passant rule was needed to retain the balance.

            – Brian Towers
            21 hours ago




            1




            1





            Of course, the two rules taken together still have a significant effect on the game's strategy (beyond "just speeding up the game"). One wonders if the original rationale is still applicable.

            – Kevin
            20 hours ago





            Of course, the two rules taken together still have a significant effect on the game's strategy (beyond "just speeding up the game"). One wonders if the original rationale is still applicable.

            – Kevin
            20 hours ago




            1




            1





            Mostly a great answer! In the last sentence, though, I recommend not assigning a gender to a hypothetical chess-player ("on their next move" is better, in my opinion). There is a lot of implicit bias against women playing chess in many cultures, and a pronoun that assumes that a hypothetical chess-player must be male perpetuates that bias.

            – Greg Martin
            5 hours ago





            Mostly a great answer! In the last sentence, though, I recommend not assigning a gender to a hypothetical chess-player ("on their next move" is better, in my opinion). There is a lot of implicit bias against women playing chess in many cultures, and a pronoun that assumes that a hypothetical chess-player must be male perpetuates that bias.

            – Greg Martin
            5 hours ago













            @GregMartin It's not an assumption of gender. English traditionally uses the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular, as it has no non-gendered singular personal pronouns for referring to humans. Use of the plural ones as an alternative has gained wide acceptance, but use of the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular is still completely correct and widely taught.

            – reirab
            3 hours ago





            @GregMartin It's not an assumption of gender. English traditionally uses the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular, as it has no non-gendered singular personal pronouns for referring to humans. Use of the plural ones as an alternative has gained wide acceptance, but use of the masculine pronouns for gender-neutral singular is still completely correct and widely taught.

            – reirab
            3 hours ago











            8














            In simple words: if a pawn jumps two squares and lands right next to an opponent's pawn, then the opponent can capture that pawn in the following turn as if it had moved only 1 square. That is, only right after you made your jump, your opponent has the option to take by en-passant, past that turn it is no longer allowed.



            So keywords to remember: two square move, right next to, and following turn.



            Visually:



             [title "Visualised example"]
            [fen "r1bqkbnr/pppppppp/2n5/4P3/8/8/PPPP1PPP/RNBQKBNR b KQkq - 0 2"]

            1...d5 2.exd6 (1...d6 2.exd6)


            Notice the end scenarios are the same after either d6 and d5, as in after the capture one cannot tell if it had been by en-passant or a normal capture.



            Intuitively, you can imagine the rule is there so that one cannot jump past another pawn and completely evade the option of a trade. Exactly similar to when you move your pawn only one square, and your opponent still has the option to capture your pawn if they so desire.






            share|improve this answer




























              8














              In simple words: if a pawn jumps two squares and lands right next to an opponent's pawn, then the opponent can capture that pawn in the following turn as if it had moved only 1 square. That is, only right after you made your jump, your opponent has the option to take by en-passant, past that turn it is no longer allowed.



              So keywords to remember: two square move, right next to, and following turn.



              Visually:



               [title "Visualised example"]
              [fen "r1bqkbnr/pppppppp/2n5/4P3/8/8/PPPP1PPP/RNBQKBNR b KQkq - 0 2"]

              1...d5 2.exd6 (1...d6 2.exd6)


              Notice the end scenarios are the same after either d6 and d5, as in after the capture one cannot tell if it had been by en-passant or a normal capture.



              Intuitively, you can imagine the rule is there so that one cannot jump past another pawn and completely evade the option of a trade. Exactly similar to when you move your pawn only one square, and your opponent still has the option to capture your pawn if they so desire.






              share|improve this answer


























                8












                8








                8







                In simple words: if a pawn jumps two squares and lands right next to an opponent's pawn, then the opponent can capture that pawn in the following turn as if it had moved only 1 square. That is, only right after you made your jump, your opponent has the option to take by en-passant, past that turn it is no longer allowed.



                So keywords to remember: two square move, right next to, and following turn.



                Visually:



                 [title "Visualised example"]
                [fen "r1bqkbnr/pppppppp/2n5/4P3/8/8/PPPP1PPP/RNBQKBNR b KQkq - 0 2"]

                1...d5 2.exd6 (1...d6 2.exd6)


                Notice the end scenarios are the same after either d6 and d5, as in after the capture one cannot tell if it had been by en-passant or a normal capture.



                Intuitively, you can imagine the rule is there so that one cannot jump past another pawn and completely evade the option of a trade. Exactly similar to when you move your pawn only one square, and your opponent still has the option to capture your pawn if they so desire.






                share|improve this answer













                In simple words: if a pawn jumps two squares and lands right next to an opponent's pawn, then the opponent can capture that pawn in the following turn as if it had moved only 1 square. That is, only right after you made your jump, your opponent has the option to take by en-passant, past that turn it is no longer allowed.



                So keywords to remember: two square move, right next to, and following turn.



                Visually:



                 [title "Visualised example"]
                [fen "r1bqkbnr/pppppppp/2n5/4P3/8/8/PPPP1PPP/RNBQKBNR b KQkq - 0 2"]

                1...d5 2.exd6 (1...d6 2.exd6)


                Notice the end scenarios are the same after either d6 and d5, as in after the capture one cannot tell if it had been by en-passant or a normal capture.



                Intuitively, you can imagine the rule is there so that one cannot jump past another pawn and completely evade the option of a trade. Exactly similar to when you move your pawn only one square, and your opponent still has the option to capture your pawn if they so desire.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered yesterday









                user929304user929304

                514418




                514418























                    0














                    As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia, they have a decent article regarding en-passant:



                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/En_passant



                    It is a special pawn capture that can only occur immediately after a pawn makes a double-step move from its starting square, and it could have been captured by an enemy pawn had it advanced only one square. The opponent captures the just-moved pawn "as it passes" through the first square. The result is the same as if the pawn had advanced only one square and the enemy pawn had captured it normally.



                    I hope that helps a little.






                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    Owen Rees is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                    • "As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia" Well, dare I say, you shouldn't.

                      – Marc.2377
                      9 hours ago
















                    0














                    As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia, they have a decent article regarding en-passant:



                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/En_passant



                    It is a special pawn capture that can only occur immediately after a pawn makes a double-step move from its starting square, and it could have been captured by an enemy pawn had it advanced only one square. The opponent captures the just-moved pawn "as it passes" through the first square. The result is the same as if the pawn had advanced only one square and the enemy pawn had captured it normally.



                    I hope that helps a little.






                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    Owen Rees is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                    • "As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia" Well, dare I say, you shouldn't.

                      – Marc.2377
                      9 hours ago














                    0












                    0








                    0







                    As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia, they have a decent article regarding en-passant:



                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/En_passant



                    It is a special pawn capture that can only occur immediately after a pawn makes a double-step move from its starting square, and it could have been captured by an enemy pawn had it advanced only one square. The opponent captures the just-moved pawn "as it passes" through the first square. The result is the same as if the pawn had advanced only one square and the enemy pawn had captured it normally.



                    I hope that helps a little.






                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    Owen Rees is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.










                    As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia, they have a decent article regarding en-passant:



                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/En_passant



                    It is a special pawn capture that can only occur immediately after a pawn makes a double-step move from its starting square, and it could have been captured by an enemy pawn had it advanced only one square. The opponent captures the just-moved pawn "as it passes" through the first square. The result is the same as if the pawn had advanced only one square and the enemy pawn had captured it normally.



                    I hope that helps a little.







                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    Owen Rees is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer






                    New contributor




                    Owen Rees is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    answered yesterday









                    Owen ReesOwen Rees

                    286




                    286




                    New contributor




                    Owen Rees is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    New contributor





                    Owen Rees is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    Owen Rees is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.













                    • "As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia" Well, dare I say, you shouldn't.

                      – Marc.2377
                      9 hours ago



















                    • "As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia" Well, dare I say, you shouldn't.

                      – Marc.2377
                      9 hours ago

















                    "As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia" Well, dare I say, you shouldn't.

                    – Marc.2377
                    9 hours ago





                    "As much as I hate to cite Wikipedia" Well, dare I say, you shouldn't.

                    – Marc.2377
                    9 hours ago










                    Creepy Creature is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    Creepy Creature is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    Creepy Creature is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Creepy Creature is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Chess Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f23871%2fen-passant-for-beginners%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    El tren de la libertad Índice Antecedentes "Porque yo decido" Desarrollo de la...

                    Castillo d'Acher Características Menú de navegación

                    Connecting two nodes from the same mother node horizontallyTikZ: What EXACTLY does the the |- notation for...