A question regarding using the definite articleWhat is the difference between “an answer” and “the...

What's the metal clinking sound at the end of credits in Avengers: Endgame?

How to creep the reader out with what seems like a normal person?

Why the difference in metal between 銀行 and お金?

How to replace the "space symbol" (squat-u) in listings?

Can fracking help reduce CO2?

What does "rf" mean in "rfkill"?

Reverse the word in a string with the same order in javascript

How to determine the actual or "true" resolution of a digital photograph?

What is the difference between `a[bc]d` (brackets) and `a{b,c}d` (braces)?

How can I get precisely a certain cubic cm by changing the following factors?

Cannot populate data in lightning data table

Transfer over $10k

Packing rectangles: Does rotation ever help?

In Proverbs 14:34, is sin a disgrace to a people, or is mercy a sin-offering?

Counterexample: a pair of linearly ordered sets that are isomorphic to subsets of the other, but not isomorphic between them

Can solid acids and bases have pH values? If not, how are they classified as acids or bases?

When and why did journal article titles become descriptive, rather than creatively allusive?

Reversing the direction of the arrow in gb4e

How to back up a running remote server?

Find the coordinate of two line segments that are perpendicular

What is a Recurrent Neural Network?

Pulling the rope with one hand is as heavy as with two hands?

Options leqno, reqno for documentclass or exist another option?

How to set the font color of quantity objects (Version 11.3 vs version 12)?



A question regarding using the definite article


What is the difference between “an answer” and “the answer”?Using definite article before abbreviationsDefinite article before place nameUsing the definite articleIf “noun clause” has no articles, how does it sound for native speaker?Company name with the definite articleUsing the definite article in “I love the people who make me laugh.”Italians/The Italians - using the definite articleDefinite article before “office”Using definite article“the”?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1















Supposed that I already stated earlier that it was raining for while and I gave a good description of how it looked like. Now, I am wondering if I can use Rain without any articles so that only the general idea of raining is conveyed?




Once rain was down to drizzle, I decided to move on.




I also, searched the internet and it seems for the new status of the weather, an indefinite article is usually used. So, if my sentence is wrong without any article preceding drizzle?










share|improve this question

























  • The basic problem here is that English articles aren't optional. Omitting the article doesn't just omit the meaning of the article, it has its own meaning.

    – Anonymous
    59 mins ago


















1















Supposed that I already stated earlier that it was raining for while and I gave a good description of how it looked like. Now, I am wondering if I can use Rain without any articles so that only the general idea of raining is conveyed?




Once rain was down to drizzle, I decided to move on.




I also, searched the internet and it seems for the new status of the weather, an indefinite article is usually used. So, if my sentence is wrong without any article preceding drizzle?










share|improve this question

























  • The basic problem here is that English articles aren't optional. Omitting the article doesn't just omit the meaning of the article, it has its own meaning.

    – Anonymous
    59 mins ago














1












1








1








Supposed that I already stated earlier that it was raining for while and I gave a good description of how it looked like. Now, I am wondering if I can use Rain without any articles so that only the general idea of raining is conveyed?




Once rain was down to drizzle, I decided to move on.




I also, searched the internet and it seems for the new status of the weather, an indefinite article is usually used. So, if my sentence is wrong without any article preceding drizzle?










share|improve this question
















Supposed that I already stated earlier that it was raining for while and I gave a good description of how it looked like. Now, I am wondering if I can use Rain without any articles so that only the general idea of raining is conveyed?




Once rain was down to drizzle, I decided to move on.




I also, searched the internet and it seems for the new status of the weather, an indefinite article is usually used. So, if my sentence is wrong without any article preceding drizzle?







articles definite-article indefinite-article zero-article






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago







Cardinal

















asked 3 hours ago









CardinalCardinal

3,56842359




3,56842359













  • The basic problem here is that English articles aren't optional. Omitting the article doesn't just omit the meaning of the article, it has its own meaning.

    – Anonymous
    59 mins ago



















  • The basic problem here is that English articles aren't optional. Omitting the article doesn't just omit the meaning of the article, it has its own meaning.

    – Anonymous
    59 mins ago

















The basic problem here is that English articles aren't optional. Omitting the article doesn't just omit the meaning of the article, it has its own meaning.

– Anonymous
59 mins ago





The basic problem here is that English articles aren't optional. Omitting the article doesn't just omit the meaning of the article, it has its own meaning.

– Anonymous
59 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














You shouldn't eliminate them. Typically the articles before rain and drizzle are necessary, because it's a specific instance of rain/drizzle that is causing your decision in the rest of the sentence.




Once the rain was down to a drizzle, I decided to move on.




The fact that you've described the rain doesn't necessarily allow you to eliminate the article. If you walked into a kitchen and described the table in great detail, it still wouldn't be grammatical to say "I sat at table." Just as the table you're sitting at is a specific table, the rain you're experiencing is a specific instance of rain.



You can eliminate the article when you're talking generally, as in




  • "Rain is necessary for healthy plants."

  • "I hate rain."

  • "Rain turns into snow below a certain temperature."


Drizzle also needs an article in your sentence, and it should be "a" like the following example:




Once the kitten had turned into a cat, he was no longer cute.





  • Using "the cat" would cause confusion, because it would imply that the specific kitten had turned into a different specific cat.


I'm adding a caveat here to say that with some particular words, and in some more poetic writing, it is sometimes alright to drop the articles.




  • "Spring turned into summer" is acceptable and fairly common, as is "Night became day"


  • If you were attempting to be poetic, you could possibly invoke those common phrases and say "Rain turned to drizzle, and I decided to move on." But with the verbs you use in your original sentence, it doesn't sound poetic--it sounds incorrect.







share|improve this answer


























  • Hello, I specifically said that I already gave a description for the rain; and based on my education, I must use the definite article in such cases. I myslef am aware of this general rule of thumb, but I meant even though I already talked about the rain, I want to convey the general or abstract connotation of rain. Is that wrong?

    – Cardinal
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    @Cardinal Yes. If you're experiencing the rain and it's having an effect on your behavior, it's not an abstract connotation. It's a physical thing, and it's a particular instance of that physical thing.

    – Katy
    1 hour ago













  • Nitpicking: instead of "You probably shouldn't eliminate them.", "You can't eliminate them.". And instead of "The fact that you've described the rain doesn't necessarily allow you to eliminate the article.", how about "Since you've mentioned the rain already, it requires a definite article."?

    – Anonymous
    59 mins ago











  • @Anonymous Because of the caveat about poetic language that I mentioned at the end, I don't believe a blanket statement is accurate.

    – Katy
    57 mins ago












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208559%2fa-question-regarding-using-the-definite-article%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














You shouldn't eliminate them. Typically the articles before rain and drizzle are necessary, because it's a specific instance of rain/drizzle that is causing your decision in the rest of the sentence.




Once the rain was down to a drizzle, I decided to move on.




The fact that you've described the rain doesn't necessarily allow you to eliminate the article. If you walked into a kitchen and described the table in great detail, it still wouldn't be grammatical to say "I sat at table." Just as the table you're sitting at is a specific table, the rain you're experiencing is a specific instance of rain.



You can eliminate the article when you're talking generally, as in




  • "Rain is necessary for healthy plants."

  • "I hate rain."

  • "Rain turns into snow below a certain temperature."


Drizzle also needs an article in your sentence, and it should be "a" like the following example:




Once the kitten had turned into a cat, he was no longer cute.





  • Using "the cat" would cause confusion, because it would imply that the specific kitten had turned into a different specific cat.


I'm adding a caveat here to say that with some particular words, and in some more poetic writing, it is sometimes alright to drop the articles.




  • "Spring turned into summer" is acceptable and fairly common, as is "Night became day"


  • If you were attempting to be poetic, you could possibly invoke those common phrases and say "Rain turned to drizzle, and I decided to move on." But with the verbs you use in your original sentence, it doesn't sound poetic--it sounds incorrect.







share|improve this answer


























  • Hello, I specifically said that I already gave a description for the rain; and based on my education, I must use the definite article in such cases. I myslef am aware of this general rule of thumb, but I meant even though I already talked about the rain, I want to convey the general or abstract connotation of rain. Is that wrong?

    – Cardinal
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    @Cardinal Yes. If you're experiencing the rain and it's having an effect on your behavior, it's not an abstract connotation. It's a physical thing, and it's a particular instance of that physical thing.

    – Katy
    1 hour ago













  • Nitpicking: instead of "You probably shouldn't eliminate them.", "You can't eliminate them.". And instead of "The fact that you've described the rain doesn't necessarily allow you to eliminate the article.", how about "Since you've mentioned the rain already, it requires a definite article."?

    – Anonymous
    59 mins ago











  • @Anonymous Because of the caveat about poetic language that I mentioned at the end, I don't believe a blanket statement is accurate.

    – Katy
    57 mins ago
















3














You shouldn't eliminate them. Typically the articles before rain and drizzle are necessary, because it's a specific instance of rain/drizzle that is causing your decision in the rest of the sentence.




Once the rain was down to a drizzle, I decided to move on.




The fact that you've described the rain doesn't necessarily allow you to eliminate the article. If you walked into a kitchen and described the table in great detail, it still wouldn't be grammatical to say "I sat at table." Just as the table you're sitting at is a specific table, the rain you're experiencing is a specific instance of rain.



You can eliminate the article when you're talking generally, as in




  • "Rain is necessary for healthy plants."

  • "I hate rain."

  • "Rain turns into snow below a certain temperature."


Drizzle also needs an article in your sentence, and it should be "a" like the following example:




Once the kitten had turned into a cat, he was no longer cute.





  • Using "the cat" would cause confusion, because it would imply that the specific kitten had turned into a different specific cat.


I'm adding a caveat here to say that with some particular words, and in some more poetic writing, it is sometimes alright to drop the articles.




  • "Spring turned into summer" is acceptable and fairly common, as is "Night became day"


  • If you were attempting to be poetic, you could possibly invoke those common phrases and say "Rain turned to drizzle, and I decided to move on." But with the verbs you use in your original sentence, it doesn't sound poetic--it sounds incorrect.







share|improve this answer


























  • Hello, I specifically said that I already gave a description for the rain; and based on my education, I must use the definite article in such cases. I myslef am aware of this general rule of thumb, but I meant even though I already talked about the rain, I want to convey the general or abstract connotation of rain. Is that wrong?

    – Cardinal
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    @Cardinal Yes. If you're experiencing the rain and it's having an effect on your behavior, it's not an abstract connotation. It's a physical thing, and it's a particular instance of that physical thing.

    – Katy
    1 hour ago













  • Nitpicking: instead of "You probably shouldn't eliminate them.", "You can't eliminate them.". And instead of "The fact that you've described the rain doesn't necessarily allow you to eliminate the article.", how about "Since you've mentioned the rain already, it requires a definite article."?

    – Anonymous
    59 mins ago











  • @Anonymous Because of the caveat about poetic language that I mentioned at the end, I don't believe a blanket statement is accurate.

    – Katy
    57 mins ago














3












3








3







You shouldn't eliminate them. Typically the articles before rain and drizzle are necessary, because it's a specific instance of rain/drizzle that is causing your decision in the rest of the sentence.




Once the rain was down to a drizzle, I decided to move on.




The fact that you've described the rain doesn't necessarily allow you to eliminate the article. If you walked into a kitchen and described the table in great detail, it still wouldn't be grammatical to say "I sat at table." Just as the table you're sitting at is a specific table, the rain you're experiencing is a specific instance of rain.



You can eliminate the article when you're talking generally, as in




  • "Rain is necessary for healthy plants."

  • "I hate rain."

  • "Rain turns into snow below a certain temperature."


Drizzle also needs an article in your sentence, and it should be "a" like the following example:




Once the kitten had turned into a cat, he was no longer cute.





  • Using "the cat" would cause confusion, because it would imply that the specific kitten had turned into a different specific cat.


I'm adding a caveat here to say that with some particular words, and in some more poetic writing, it is sometimes alright to drop the articles.




  • "Spring turned into summer" is acceptable and fairly common, as is "Night became day"


  • If you were attempting to be poetic, you could possibly invoke those common phrases and say "Rain turned to drizzle, and I decided to move on." But with the verbs you use in your original sentence, it doesn't sound poetic--it sounds incorrect.







share|improve this answer















You shouldn't eliminate them. Typically the articles before rain and drizzle are necessary, because it's a specific instance of rain/drizzle that is causing your decision in the rest of the sentence.




Once the rain was down to a drizzle, I decided to move on.




The fact that you've described the rain doesn't necessarily allow you to eliminate the article. If you walked into a kitchen and described the table in great detail, it still wouldn't be grammatical to say "I sat at table." Just as the table you're sitting at is a specific table, the rain you're experiencing is a specific instance of rain.



You can eliminate the article when you're talking generally, as in




  • "Rain is necessary for healthy plants."

  • "I hate rain."

  • "Rain turns into snow below a certain temperature."


Drizzle also needs an article in your sentence, and it should be "a" like the following example:




Once the kitten had turned into a cat, he was no longer cute.





  • Using "the cat" would cause confusion, because it would imply that the specific kitten had turned into a different specific cat.


I'm adding a caveat here to say that with some particular words, and in some more poetic writing, it is sometimes alright to drop the articles.




  • "Spring turned into summer" is acceptable and fairly common, as is "Night became day"


  • If you were attempting to be poetic, you could possibly invoke those common phrases and say "Rain turned to drizzle, and I decided to move on." But with the verbs you use in your original sentence, it doesn't sound poetic--it sounds incorrect.








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 55 mins ago

























answered 2 hours ago









KatyKaty

2,979619




2,979619













  • Hello, I specifically said that I already gave a description for the rain; and based on my education, I must use the definite article in such cases. I myslef am aware of this general rule of thumb, but I meant even though I already talked about the rain, I want to convey the general or abstract connotation of rain. Is that wrong?

    – Cardinal
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    @Cardinal Yes. If you're experiencing the rain and it's having an effect on your behavior, it's not an abstract connotation. It's a physical thing, and it's a particular instance of that physical thing.

    – Katy
    1 hour ago













  • Nitpicking: instead of "You probably shouldn't eliminate them.", "You can't eliminate them.". And instead of "The fact that you've described the rain doesn't necessarily allow you to eliminate the article.", how about "Since you've mentioned the rain already, it requires a definite article."?

    – Anonymous
    59 mins ago











  • @Anonymous Because of the caveat about poetic language that I mentioned at the end, I don't believe a blanket statement is accurate.

    – Katy
    57 mins ago



















  • Hello, I specifically said that I already gave a description for the rain; and based on my education, I must use the definite article in such cases. I myslef am aware of this general rule of thumb, but I meant even though I already talked about the rain, I want to convey the general or abstract connotation of rain. Is that wrong?

    – Cardinal
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    @Cardinal Yes. If you're experiencing the rain and it's having an effect on your behavior, it's not an abstract connotation. It's a physical thing, and it's a particular instance of that physical thing.

    – Katy
    1 hour ago













  • Nitpicking: instead of "You probably shouldn't eliminate them.", "You can't eliminate them.". And instead of "The fact that you've described the rain doesn't necessarily allow you to eliminate the article.", how about "Since you've mentioned the rain already, it requires a definite article."?

    – Anonymous
    59 mins ago











  • @Anonymous Because of the caveat about poetic language that I mentioned at the end, I don't believe a blanket statement is accurate.

    – Katy
    57 mins ago

















Hello, I specifically said that I already gave a description for the rain; and based on my education, I must use the definite article in such cases. I myslef am aware of this general rule of thumb, but I meant even though I already talked about the rain, I want to convey the general or abstract connotation of rain. Is that wrong?

– Cardinal
2 hours ago





Hello, I specifically said that I already gave a description for the rain; and based on my education, I must use the definite article in such cases. I myslef am aware of this general rule of thumb, but I meant even though I already talked about the rain, I want to convey the general or abstract connotation of rain. Is that wrong?

– Cardinal
2 hours ago




1




1





@Cardinal Yes. If you're experiencing the rain and it's having an effect on your behavior, it's not an abstract connotation. It's a physical thing, and it's a particular instance of that physical thing.

– Katy
1 hour ago







@Cardinal Yes. If you're experiencing the rain and it's having an effect on your behavior, it's not an abstract connotation. It's a physical thing, and it's a particular instance of that physical thing.

– Katy
1 hour ago















Nitpicking: instead of "You probably shouldn't eliminate them.", "You can't eliminate them.". And instead of "The fact that you've described the rain doesn't necessarily allow you to eliminate the article.", how about "Since you've mentioned the rain already, it requires a definite article."?

– Anonymous
59 mins ago





Nitpicking: instead of "You probably shouldn't eliminate them.", "You can't eliminate them.". And instead of "The fact that you've described the rain doesn't necessarily allow you to eliminate the article.", how about "Since you've mentioned the rain already, it requires a definite article."?

– Anonymous
59 mins ago













@Anonymous Because of the caveat about poetic language that I mentioned at the end, I don't believe a blanket statement is accurate.

– Katy
57 mins ago





@Anonymous Because of the caveat about poetic language that I mentioned at the end, I don't believe a blanket statement is accurate.

– Katy
57 mins ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208559%2fa-question-regarding-using-the-definite-article%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Why does my Macbook overheat and use so much CPU and energy when on YouTube?Why do so many insist on using...

How to prevent page numbers from appearing on glossaries?How to remove a dot and a page number in the...

Puerta de Hutt Referencias Enlaces externos Menú de navegación15°58′00″S 5°42′00″O /...