Bayesian Nash Equilibria in Battle of SexesIs this equivalent to the game of chicken?Perfect Bayesian...
Why was Germany not as successful as other Europeans in establishing overseas colonies?
Phrase for the opposite of "foolproof"
What is a Recurrent Neural Network?
gnu parallel how to use with ffmpeg
What is the difference between `a[bc]d` (brackets) and `a{b,c}d` (braces)?
Why are the 2nd/3rd singular forms of present of « potere » irregular?
Subtleties of choosing the sequence of tenses in Russian
TikZ how to make supply and demand arrows for nodes?
If Earth is tilted, why is Polaris always above the same spot?
How to determine the actual or "true" resolution of a digital photograph?
Can fracking help reduce CO2?
Examples of non trivial equivalence relations , I mean equivalence relations without the expression " same ... as" in their definition?
When and why did journal article titles become descriptive, rather than creatively allusive?
Please, smoke with good manners
Where did the extra Pym particles come from in Endgame?
Do generators produce a fixed load?
Illegal assignment from SObject to Contact
Stark VS Thanos
Is creating your own "experiment" considered cheating during a physics exam?
Why does processed meat contain preservatives, while canned fish needs not?
How can Republicans who favour free markets, consistently express anger when they don't like the outcome of that choice?
Confusion about capacitors
A question regarding using the definite article
Sci-fi novel series with instant travel between planets through gates. A river runs through the gates
Bayesian Nash Equilibria in Battle of Sexes
Is this equivalent to the game of chicken?Perfect Bayesian EquilibriumBayesian Nash Equilibrium - Mixed StrategiesMonotone transformation of a gameBayesian-Nash equilibrium in a first-price auctionPerfect Bayesian EquilibriaMixed Strategies in Bayesian GamesComputing pure strategy Nash equilibria in finite gamesBayesian Nash Equilibria: Strong and Weak TypesDefinition of Bayesian Nash equilibrium
$begingroup$
Consider the static Bayesian game as described above. $ t_1$ and $ 𝑡_2$
are the types of the row and column player respectively, which are both uniformly distributed on the interval [0,1]. The first part of the question is asking us to find a Bayesian Nash Equilibrium. Trivially, don't the the top left and bottom right corners correspond to equilibrium outcomes? Unless I've misunderstood the definition of a BNE.
game-theory bayesian-game
asked 8 hours ago
StudentStudent
486
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the static Bayesian game as described above. $ t_1$ and $ 𝑡_2$ are the types of the row and column player respectively, which are both uniformly distributed on the interval [0,1]. The first part of the question is asking us to find a Bayesian Nash Equilibrium. Trivially, don't the the top left and bottom right corners correspond to equilibrium outcomes? Unless I've misunderstood the definition of a BNE.
game-theory bayesian-game
asked 8 hours ago
StudentStudent
486
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the static Bayesian game as described above. $ t_1$ and $ 𝑡_2$ are the types of the row and column player respectively, which are both uniformly distributed on the interval [0,1]. The first part of the question is asking us to find a Bayesian Nash Equilibrium. Trivially, don't the the top left and bottom right corners correspond to equilibrium outcomes? Unless I've misunderstood the definition of a BNE.
game-theory bayesian-game
asked 8 hours ago
StudentStudent
486
$endgroup$
Consider the static Bayesian game as described above. $ t_1$ and $ 𝑡_2$ are the types of the row and column player respectively, which are both uniformly distributed on the interval [0,1]. The first part of the question is asking us to find a Bayesian Nash Equilibrium. Trivially, don't the the top left and bottom right corners correspond to equilibrium outcomes? Unless I've misunderstood the definition of a BNE.
game-theory bayesian-game
game-theory bayesian-game
asked 8 hours ago
StudentStudent
486
asked 8 hours ago
StudentStudent
486
edited 48 mins ago
Student
asked 8 hours ago
StudentStudent
486
asked 8 hours ago
StudentStudent
486
asked 8 hours ago
StudentStudent
486
486
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, you are correct. All types $t_{1}$ choose O (B) and all types $t_{2}$
choose O (B) are both Bayesian equilibria.
Note that there are other Bayesian equilibrium in this game, if you are interested this is explained in detail here (p. 10, see reference below) for this particular battle of the sexes with two-sided incomplete information. The basic idea is to note that in this game, each player has a continuum of types, and so the set of types is infinite. You can look for a Bayesian equilibrium in which player 1 goes to the $Opera$ if $t_{1}$ exceeds some critical value $x_{1}$ and chooses $Fight$ otherwise, and player 2 chooses to $Fight$ if $t_{2}$ exceeds some critical value $x_{2}$ and goes to the $Opera$ otherwise. To find the values $x_{1}$, $x_{2}$ that make these strategies a Bayesian equilibrium you can calculate each player's expected payoffs given the other player's strategy and find the optimal values based on this.
Game Theory: Static and Dynamic Games of Incomplete Information
Branislav L. Slantchev Department of Political Science, University of California – San Diego
edited 5 hours ago
Giskard
13.7k32348
answered 7 hours ago
user20105user20105
36010
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Ideally you would post a short description of the linked content, because links break over time. You can give a name that people can google, quote, etc.
$endgroup$
– Giskard
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Fantastic. I must point out that the question had a hint about threshold values which is what confused me. Perhaps that is covered in your link.
$endgroup$
– Student
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have modified it to include the idea and reference @Giskard, thanks for the tip
$endgroup$
– user20105
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Student yes, there is a Bayesian equilibrium with threshold values. I included a quick hint here but it is very well explained in the link.
$endgroup$
– user20105
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Well I am not sure what you mean by assuming some form of the strategies, as the set is fixed by the very game setup. The essential idea that you want to ask yourself, as with any Nash equilibrium, is in what situation will neither of the players (in this case 2) have a profitable deviation? So obviously the most straight forward answer is, as you pointed out, the situation in which {Opera, Opera} and {Fight, Fight}. However, rational choice implies that you take into account the strategy of the other player given a priori knowledge of the probability of his type [...]
$endgroup$
– user20105
44 mins ago
|
show 4 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "591"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2feconomics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29016%2fbayesian-nash-equilibria-in-battle-of-sexes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, you are correct. All types $t_{1}$ choose O (B) and all types $t_{2}$
choose O (B) are both Bayesian equilibria.
Note that there are other Bayesian equilibrium in this game, if you are interested this is explained in detail here (p. 10, see reference below) for this particular battle of the sexes with two-sided incomplete information. The basic idea is to note that in this game, each player has a continuum of types, and so the set of types is infinite. You can look for a Bayesian equilibrium in which player 1 goes to the $Opera$ if $t_{1}$ exceeds some critical value $x_{1}$ and chooses $Fight$ otherwise, and player 2 chooses to $Fight$ if $t_{2}$ exceeds some critical value $x_{2}$ and goes to the $Opera$ otherwise. To find the values $x_{1}$, $x_{2}$ that make these strategies a Bayesian equilibrium you can calculate each player's expected payoffs given the other player's strategy and find the optimal values based on this.
Game Theory: Static and Dynamic Games of Incomplete Information
Branislav L. Slantchev Department of Political Science, University of California – San Diego
edited 5 hours ago
Giskard
13.7k32348
answered 7 hours ago
user20105user20105
36010
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Ideally you would post a short description of the linked content, because links break over time. You can give a name that people can google, quote, etc.
$endgroup$
– Giskard
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Fantastic. I must point out that the question had a hint about threshold values which is what confused me. Perhaps that is covered in your link.
$endgroup$
– Student
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have modified it to include the idea and reference @Giskard, thanks for the tip
$endgroup$
– user20105
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Student yes, there is a Bayesian equilibrium with threshold values. I included a quick hint here but it is very well explained in the link.
$endgroup$
– user20105
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Well I am not sure what you mean by assuming some form of the strategies, as the set is fixed by the very game setup. The essential idea that you want to ask yourself, as with any Nash equilibrium, is in what situation will neither of the players (in this case 2) have a profitable deviation? So obviously the most straight forward answer is, as you pointed out, the situation in which {Opera, Opera} and {Fight, Fight}. However, rational choice implies that you take into account the strategy of the other player given a priori knowledge of the probability of his type [...]
$endgroup$
– user20105
44 mins ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Yes, you are correct. All types $t_{1}$ choose O (B) and all types $t_{2}$
choose O (B) are both Bayesian equilibria.
Note that there are other Bayesian equilibrium in this game, if you are interested this is explained in detail here (p. 10, see reference below) for this particular battle of the sexes with two-sided incomplete information. The basic idea is to note that in this game, each player has a continuum of types, and so the set of types is infinite. You can look for a Bayesian equilibrium in which player 1 goes to the $Opera$ if $t_{1}$ exceeds some critical value $x_{1}$ and chooses $Fight$ otherwise, and player 2 chooses to $Fight$ if $t_{2}$ exceeds some critical value $x_{2}$ and goes to the $Opera$ otherwise. To find the values $x_{1}$, $x_{2}$ that make these strategies a Bayesian equilibrium you can calculate each player's expected payoffs given the other player's strategy and find the optimal values based on this.
Game Theory: Static and Dynamic Games of Incomplete Information
Branislav L. Slantchev Department of Political Science, University of California – San Diego
edited 5 hours ago
Giskard
13.7k32348
answered 7 hours ago
user20105user20105
36010
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Ideally you would post a short description of the linked content, because links break over time. You can give a name that people can google, quote, etc.
$endgroup$
– Giskard
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Fantastic. I must point out that the question had a hint about threshold values which is what confused me. Perhaps that is covered in your link.
$endgroup$
– Student
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have modified it to include the idea and reference @Giskard, thanks for the tip
$endgroup$
– user20105
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Student yes, there is a Bayesian equilibrium with threshold values. I included a quick hint here but it is very well explained in the link.
$endgroup$
– user20105
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Well I am not sure what you mean by assuming some form of the strategies, as the set is fixed by the very game setup. The essential idea that you want to ask yourself, as with any Nash equilibrium, is in what situation will neither of the players (in this case 2) have a profitable deviation? So obviously the most straight forward answer is, as you pointed out, the situation in which {Opera, Opera} and {Fight, Fight}. However, rational choice implies that you take into account the strategy of the other player given a priori knowledge of the probability of his type [...]
$endgroup$
– user20105
44 mins ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Yes, you are correct. All types $t_{1}$ choose O (B) and all types $t_{2}$
choose O (B) are both Bayesian equilibria.
Note that there are other Bayesian equilibrium in this game, if you are interested this is explained in detail here (p. 10, see reference below) for this particular battle of the sexes with two-sided incomplete information. The basic idea is to note that in this game, each player has a continuum of types, and so the set of types is infinite. You can look for a Bayesian equilibrium in which player 1 goes to the $Opera$ if $t_{1}$ exceeds some critical value $x_{1}$ and chooses $Fight$ otherwise, and player 2 chooses to $Fight$ if $t_{2}$ exceeds some critical value $x_{2}$ and goes to the $Opera$ otherwise. To find the values $x_{1}$, $x_{2}$ that make these strategies a Bayesian equilibrium you can calculate each player's expected payoffs given the other player's strategy and find the optimal values based on this.
Game Theory: Static and Dynamic Games of Incomplete Information
Branislav L. Slantchev Department of Political Science, University of California – San Diego
edited 5 hours ago
Giskard
13.7k32348
answered 7 hours ago
user20105user20105
36010
$endgroup$
Yes, you are correct. All types $t_{1}$ choose O (B) and all types $t_{2}$
choose O (B) are both Bayesian equilibria.
Note that there are other Bayesian equilibrium in this game, if you are interested this is explained in detail here (p. 10, see reference below) for this particular battle of the sexes with two-sided incomplete information. The basic idea is to note that in this game, each player has a continuum of types, and so the set of types is infinite. You can look for a Bayesian equilibrium in which player 1 goes to the $Opera$ if $t_{1}$ exceeds some critical value $x_{1}$ and chooses $Fight$ otherwise, and player 2 chooses to $Fight$ if $t_{2}$ exceeds some critical value $x_{2}$ and goes to the $Opera$ otherwise. To find the values $x_{1}$, $x_{2}$ that make these strategies a Bayesian equilibrium you can calculate each player's expected payoffs given the other player's strategy and find the optimal values based on this.
Game Theory: Static and Dynamic Games of Incomplete Information
Branislav L. Slantchev Department of Political Science, University of California – San Diego
edited 5 hours ago
Giskard
13.7k32348
answered 7 hours ago
user20105user20105
36010
edited 5 hours ago
Giskard
13.7k32348
edited 5 hours ago
Giskard
13.7k32348
edited 5 hours ago
Giskard
13.7k32348
13.7k32348
answered 7 hours ago
user20105user20105
36010
answered 7 hours ago
user20105user20105
36010
answered 7 hours ago
user20105user20105
36010
36010
2
$begingroup$
Ideally you would post a short description of the linked content, because links break over time. You can give a name that people can google, quote, etc.
$endgroup$
– Giskard
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Fantastic. I must point out that the question had a hint about threshold values which is what confused me. Perhaps that is covered in your link.
$endgroup$
– Student
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have modified it to include the idea and reference @Giskard, thanks for the tip
$endgroup$
– user20105
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Student yes, there is a Bayesian equilibrium with threshold values. I included a quick hint here but it is very well explained in the link.
$endgroup$
– user20105
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Well I am not sure what you mean by assuming some form of the strategies, as the set is fixed by the very game setup. The essential idea that you want to ask yourself, as with any Nash equilibrium, is in what situation will neither of the players (in this case 2) have a profitable deviation? So obviously the most straight forward answer is, as you pointed out, the situation in which {Opera, Opera} and {Fight, Fight}. However, rational choice implies that you take into account the strategy of the other player given a priori knowledge of the probability of his type [...]
$endgroup$
– user20105
44 mins ago
|
show 4 more comments
2
$begingroup$
Ideally you would post a short description of the linked content, because links break over time. You can give a name that people can google, quote, etc.
$endgroup$
– Giskard
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Fantastic. I must point out that the question had a hint about threshold values which is what confused me. Perhaps that is covered in your link.
$endgroup$
– Student
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have modified it to include the idea and reference @Giskard, thanks for the tip
$endgroup$
– user20105
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Student yes, there is a Bayesian equilibrium with threshold values. I included a quick hint here but it is very well explained in the link.
$endgroup$
– user20105
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Well I am not sure what you mean by assuming some form of the strategies, as the set is fixed by the very game setup. The essential idea that you want to ask yourself, as with any Nash equilibrium, is in what situation will neither of the players (in this case 2) have a profitable deviation? So obviously the most straight forward answer is, as you pointed out, the situation in which {Opera, Opera} and {Fight, Fight}. However, rational choice implies that you take into account the strategy of the other player given a priori knowledge of the probability of his type [...]
$endgroup$
– user20105
44 mins ago
2
2
$begingroup$
Ideally you would post a short description of the linked content, because links break over time. You can give a name that people can google, quote, etc.
$endgroup$
– Giskard
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ideally you would post a short description of the linked content, because links break over time. You can give a name that people can google, quote, etc.
$endgroup$
– Giskard
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Fantastic. I must point out that the question had a hint about threshold values which is what confused me. Perhaps that is covered in your link.
$endgroup$
– Student
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Fantastic. I must point out that the question had a hint about threshold values which is what confused me. Perhaps that is covered in your link.
$endgroup$
– Student
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have modified it to include the idea and reference @Giskard, thanks for the tip
$endgroup$
– user20105
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have modified it to include the idea and reference @Giskard, thanks for the tip
$endgroup$
– user20105
7 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Student yes, there is a Bayesian equilibrium with threshold values. I included a quick hint here but it is very well explained in the link.
$endgroup$
– user20105
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Student yes, there is a Bayesian equilibrium with threshold values. I included a quick hint here but it is very well explained in the link.
$endgroup$
– user20105
7 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Well I am not sure what you mean by assuming some form of the strategies, as the set is fixed by the very game setup. The essential idea that you want to ask yourself, as with any Nash equilibrium, is in what situation will neither of the players (in this case 2) have a profitable deviation? So obviously the most straight forward answer is, as you pointed out, the situation in which {Opera, Opera} and {Fight, Fight}. However, rational choice implies that you take into account the strategy of the other player given a priori knowledge of the probability of his type [...]
$endgroup$
– user20105
44 mins ago
$begingroup$
Well I am not sure what you mean by assuming some form of the strategies, as the set is fixed by the very game setup. The essential idea that you want to ask yourself, as with any Nash equilibrium, is in what situation will neither of the players (in this case 2) have a profitable deviation? So obviously the most straight forward answer is, as you pointed out, the situation in which {Opera, Opera} and {Fight, Fight}. However, rational choice implies that you take into account the strategy of the other player given a priori knowledge of the probability of his type [...]
$endgroup$
– user20105
44 mins ago
|
show 4 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Economics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2feconomics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29016%2fbayesian-nash-equilibria-in-battle-of-sexes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
