Find functions f & g such that f(x+y)=g (x.y) for all x & y?How do you define functions for...
Confusion about capacitors
Weird result in complex limit
Where did the extra Pym particles come from in Endgame?
Transfer over $10k
Reverse the word in a string with the same order in javascript
Help, my Death Star suffers from Kessler syndrome!
What word means to make something obsolete?
Why does Bran Stark feel that Jon Snow "needs to know" about his lineage?
Is it cheaper to drop cargo drop than to land it?
Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?
How to determine the actual or "true" resolution of a digital photograph?
Airbnb - host wants to reduce rooms, can we get refund?
How can Republicans who favour free markets, consistently express anger when they don't like the outcome of that choice?
Why do Ichisongas hate elephants and hippos?
Illegal assignment from SObject to Contact
Confused by notation of atomic number Z and mass number A on periodic table of elements
Why does nature favour the Laplacian?
Single Colour Mastermind Problem
What is the strongest case that can be made in favour of the UK regaining some control over fishing policy after Brexit?
Why is the origin of “threshold” uncertain?
Why do computer-science majors learn calculus?
Pressure to defend the relevance of one's area of mathematics
Can a creature tell when it has been affected by a Divination wizard's Portent?
What is the difference between `a[bc]d` (brackets) and `a{b,c}d` (braces)?
Find functions f & g such that f(x+y)=g (x.y) for all x & y?
How do you define functions for non-mathematicians?Automated generation of a parametric plot?For each $y in mathbb{R}$ either no $x$ with $f(x) = y$ or two such values of $x$. Show that $f$ is discontinuous.Show that if $C(K)$ is separable, then $K$ is metrisable, for $K$ compact and HausdorffFinding Conjugate harmonic of $u = frac{1}{2} ln(x^2 + y^2)$Asymptotic functions with derivatives that are $1/2^x$Nowhere Differentiable function over a non-compact spaceMethod for deconstructing an integral involving two functionsFinding derivative given $f(x)$ and limitfix point solution or approximation available? logistic regression?
$begingroup$
My approach towards this question was that first I putted x=0 and then y=0 which yields f(x)=f(y)and f(x)=g(0), and again for x=1 & y=1 it gives g (x)=f(1+x), and so on. My query is that what should the compact & rigorous form of proof or solution looks like because I found myself stuck between results and not comprehending results very well. Thanks.
real-analysis calculus functional-analysis functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My approach towards this question was that first I putted x=0 and then y=0 which yields f(x)=f(y)and f(x)=g(0), and again for x=1 & y=1 it gives g (x)=f(1+x), and so on. My query is that what should the compact & rigorous form of proof or solution looks like because I found myself stuck between results and not comprehending results very well. Thanks.
real-analysis calculus functional-analysis functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My approach towards this question was that first I putted x=0 and then y=0 which yields f(x)=f(y)and f(x)=g(0), and again for x=1 & y=1 it gives g (x)=f(1+x), and so on. My query is that what should the compact & rigorous form of proof or solution looks like because I found myself stuck between results and not comprehending results very well. Thanks.
real-analysis calculus functional-analysis functions
$endgroup$
My approach towards this question was that first I putted x=0 and then y=0 which yields f(x)=f(y)and f(x)=g(0), and again for x=1 & y=1 it gives g (x)=f(1+x), and so on. My query is that what should the compact & rigorous form of proof or solution looks like because I found myself stuck between results and not comprehending results very well. Thanks.
real-analysis calculus functional-analysis functions
real-analysis calculus functional-analysis functions
edited 1 hour ago
BORN TO LEARN
asked 2 hours ago
BORN TO LEARNBORN TO LEARN
377
377
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$$f(x) = f(x + 0) = g(x cdot 0) = g(0)$$ for all $x$. Thus $f(x)$ is constant and always equal to $g(0)$. Moreover, $$g(0) = f(1 + y) = g(1 cdot y) = g(y)$$ for all $y$. Thus $g$ is also constant and equal to $g(0)$. Thus $f, g$ are the same constant function. All constant functions $f = g = c$ will satisfy the relation. This is all you need.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Yeah thanks man m looking for this kind of preciseness.
$endgroup$
– BORN TO LEARN
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sorry I edited it because I made a mistake in description that g(x)=f(1+y) instead of g(x)=f(1+x).
$endgroup$
– BORN TO LEARN
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Now I think your proof also needs editing?
$endgroup$
– BORN TO LEARN
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@BORNTOLEARN where does it need edited? I only used the relation f(x + y) = g(x y).
$endgroup$
– BenB
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@BORNTOLEARN because f is identically equal to g(0) as I show in the previous part.
$endgroup$
– BenB
1 hour ago
|
show 5 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3206426%2ffind-functions-f-g-such-that-fxy-g-x-y-for-all-x-y%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$$f(x) = f(x + 0) = g(x cdot 0) = g(0)$$ for all $x$. Thus $f(x)$ is constant and always equal to $g(0)$. Moreover, $$g(0) = f(1 + y) = g(1 cdot y) = g(y)$$ for all $y$. Thus $g$ is also constant and equal to $g(0)$. Thus $f, g$ are the same constant function. All constant functions $f = g = c$ will satisfy the relation. This is all you need.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Yeah thanks man m looking for this kind of preciseness.
$endgroup$
– BORN TO LEARN
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sorry I edited it because I made a mistake in description that g(x)=f(1+y) instead of g(x)=f(1+x).
$endgroup$
– BORN TO LEARN
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Now I think your proof also needs editing?
$endgroup$
– BORN TO LEARN
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@BORNTOLEARN where does it need edited? I only used the relation f(x + y) = g(x y).
$endgroup$
– BenB
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@BORNTOLEARN because f is identically equal to g(0) as I show in the previous part.
$endgroup$
– BenB
1 hour ago
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
$$f(x) = f(x + 0) = g(x cdot 0) = g(0)$$ for all $x$. Thus $f(x)$ is constant and always equal to $g(0)$. Moreover, $$g(0) = f(1 + y) = g(1 cdot y) = g(y)$$ for all $y$. Thus $g$ is also constant and equal to $g(0)$. Thus $f, g$ are the same constant function. All constant functions $f = g = c$ will satisfy the relation. This is all you need.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Yeah thanks man m looking for this kind of preciseness.
$endgroup$
– BORN TO LEARN
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sorry I edited it because I made a mistake in description that g(x)=f(1+y) instead of g(x)=f(1+x).
$endgroup$
– BORN TO LEARN
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Now I think your proof also needs editing?
$endgroup$
– BORN TO LEARN
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@BORNTOLEARN where does it need edited? I only used the relation f(x + y) = g(x y).
$endgroup$
– BenB
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@BORNTOLEARN because f is identically equal to g(0) as I show in the previous part.
$endgroup$
– BenB
1 hour ago
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
$$f(x) = f(x + 0) = g(x cdot 0) = g(0)$$ for all $x$. Thus $f(x)$ is constant and always equal to $g(0)$. Moreover, $$g(0) = f(1 + y) = g(1 cdot y) = g(y)$$ for all $y$. Thus $g$ is also constant and equal to $g(0)$. Thus $f, g$ are the same constant function. All constant functions $f = g = c$ will satisfy the relation. This is all you need.
$endgroup$
$$f(x) = f(x + 0) = g(x cdot 0) = g(0)$$ for all $x$. Thus $f(x)$ is constant and always equal to $g(0)$. Moreover, $$g(0) = f(1 + y) = g(1 cdot y) = g(y)$$ for all $y$. Thus $g$ is also constant and equal to $g(0)$. Thus $f, g$ are the same constant function. All constant functions $f = g = c$ will satisfy the relation. This is all you need.
answered 2 hours ago
BenBBenB
46039
46039
1
$begingroup$
Yeah thanks man m looking for this kind of preciseness.
$endgroup$
– BORN TO LEARN
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sorry I edited it because I made a mistake in description that g(x)=f(1+y) instead of g(x)=f(1+x).
$endgroup$
– BORN TO LEARN
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Now I think your proof also needs editing?
$endgroup$
– BORN TO LEARN
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@BORNTOLEARN where does it need edited? I only used the relation f(x + y) = g(x y).
$endgroup$
– BenB
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@BORNTOLEARN because f is identically equal to g(0) as I show in the previous part.
$endgroup$
– BenB
1 hour ago
|
show 5 more comments
1
$begingroup$
Yeah thanks man m looking for this kind of preciseness.
$endgroup$
– BORN TO LEARN
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sorry I edited it because I made a mistake in description that g(x)=f(1+y) instead of g(x)=f(1+x).
$endgroup$
– BORN TO LEARN
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Now I think your proof also needs editing?
$endgroup$
– BORN TO LEARN
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@BORNTOLEARN where does it need edited? I only used the relation f(x + y) = g(x y).
$endgroup$
– BenB
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@BORNTOLEARN because f is identically equal to g(0) as I show in the previous part.
$endgroup$
– BenB
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Yeah thanks man m looking for this kind of preciseness.
$endgroup$
– BORN TO LEARN
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yeah thanks man m looking for this kind of preciseness.
$endgroup$
– BORN TO LEARN
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sorry I edited it because I made a mistake in description that g(x)=f(1+y) instead of g(x)=f(1+x).
$endgroup$
– BORN TO LEARN
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Sorry I edited it because I made a mistake in description that g(x)=f(1+y) instead of g(x)=f(1+x).
$endgroup$
– BORN TO LEARN
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Now I think your proof also needs editing?
$endgroup$
– BORN TO LEARN
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Now I think your proof also needs editing?
$endgroup$
– BORN TO LEARN
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@BORNTOLEARN where does it need edited? I only used the relation f(x + y) = g(x y).
$endgroup$
– BenB
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@BORNTOLEARN where does it need edited? I only used the relation f(x + y) = g(x y).
$endgroup$
– BenB
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@BORNTOLEARN because f is identically equal to g(0) as I show in the previous part.
$endgroup$
– BenB
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@BORNTOLEARN because f is identically equal to g(0) as I show in the previous part.
$endgroup$
– BenB
1 hour ago
|
show 5 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3206426%2ffind-functions-f-g-such-that-fxy-g-x-y-for-all-x-y%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown