Comparing exact expressions vs real numbersFixed-Point Numbers in MathematicaMatching pair of numbers {a,-a},...

What happens when you cast a spell on yourself with spell turning on?

What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?

If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?

Overcome Queueable maximum depth limit in dev orgs

Precision notation for voltmeters

An Undercover Army

What do I miss if I buy Monster Hunter: World late?

What does "rhumatis" mean?

Is "cogitate" an appropriate word for this?

Why aren't there more Gauls like Obelix?

Why is there an extra space when I type "ls" on the Desktop?

First time traveler, what plane ticket?

Is it a Cyclops number? "Nobody" knows!

The (Easy) Road to Code

Travis/Jest: TypeError: Cannot assign to read only property 'Symbol(Symbol.toStringTag)' of object '#<process>'

Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?

Is being socially reclusive okay for a graduate student?

Generating a list with duplicate entries

is cessation of perception and felling the Nibbana?

I can't find CRS EPSG 27700 in version 3.6.0

I've given my players a lot of magic items. Is it reasonable for me to give them harder encounters?

A running toilet that stops itself

Deal the cards to the players

Paper published similar to PhD thesis



Comparing exact expressions vs real numbers


Fixed-Point Numbers in MathematicaMatching pair of numbers {a,-a}, where a is numericSignificantly different results between Mathematica and Wolfram Alpha with large radicals and small numbersHow to solve this two algebraic equation simultaneously for u and H ?(all real number)Getting non-real answers when assuming variable is real when trying to numerically find maximum entropy distributionError and uncertainty propagation: Is using Precision/Accuracy a sound strategy?Partial Derivatives of numbers not evaluating?How to make Mathematica substitute exact numerical values of (derivatives) 2F1equal expressions give different numerical resultHow to solve equation in integer numbers













1












$begingroup$


Often I need to generate some data using some symmetry operations and I usually keep them as exact expressions (for example, consider the points on a triangular grid {{-(1/2), Sqrt[3]/2}, {-(1/2), -(Sqrt[3]/2)}, {1, 0}, ...}) and I need to compare different points, something like if a1+b==a2. I am trying to find an efficient way to do that.



Consider this



a=-2/Sqrt[3] + Sqrt[3]
b=Sqrt[1/4 + (2/Sqrt[3] - Sqrt[3]/2)^2]

{N[a],N[b]}



{0.57735,0.57735}




Now, a==b does not do anything.



N[a] == N[b]
N[a]-N[b] == 0
N[a - b] == 0



True



False



False




Because N[a-b]=-3.33067*10^-16. So the way out is



Chop@N[a - b] == 0



True




However,



RepeatedTiming[N[a] == N[b]]
RepeatedTiming[Chop@N[a - b] == 0]



{5.4*10^-6, True}



{9.07*10^-6, True}




On the other hand,



a1 = N[a]; b1 = N[b];
RepeatedTiming[a1 == b1]



{2.7*10^-7, True}




So my questions are




  1. Is it better to use real numbers if I have to do such comparisons?


  2. What would be the best (least time consuming when dealing with a large number of inputs) way to compare exact expressions if I have to use exact expressions?











share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You'll want to be careful if you find cases like this. N[Sin[2017 2^(1/5)]] - N[-1]
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is computer-less
    5 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    PossibleZeroQ could help.
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    5 hours ago
















1












$begingroup$


Often I need to generate some data using some symmetry operations and I usually keep them as exact expressions (for example, consider the points on a triangular grid {{-(1/2), Sqrt[3]/2}, {-(1/2), -(Sqrt[3]/2)}, {1, 0}, ...}) and I need to compare different points, something like if a1+b==a2. I am trying to find an efficient way to do that.



Consider this



a=-2/Sqrt[3] + Sqrt[3]
b=Sqrt[1/4 + (2/Sqrt[3] - Sqrt[3]/2)^2]

{N[a],N[b]}



{0.57735,0.57735}




Now, a==b does not do anything.



N[a] == N[b]
N[a]-N[b] == 0
N[a - b] == 0



True



False



False




Because N[a-b]=-3.33067*10^-16. So the way out is



Chop@N[a - b] == 0



True




However,



RepeatedTiming[N[a] == N[b]]
RepeatedTiming[Chop@N[a - b] == 0]



{5.4*10^-6, True}



{9.07*10^-6, True}




On the other hand,



a1 = N[a]; b1 = N[b];
RepeatedTiming[a1 == b1]



{2.7*10^-7, True}




So my questions are




  1. Is it better to use real numbers if I have to do such comparisons?


  2. What would be the best (least time consuming when dealing with a large number of inputs) way to compare exact expressions if I have to use exact expressions?











share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You'll want to be careful if you find cases like this. N[Sin[2017 2^(1/5)]] - N[-1]
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is computer-less
    5 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    PossibleZeroQ could help.
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    5 hours ago














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Often I need to generate some data using some symmetry operations and I usually keep them as exact expressions (for example, consider the points on a triangular grid {{-(1/2), Sqrt[3]/2}, {-(1/2), -(Sqrt[3]/2)}, {1, 0}, ...}) and I need to compare different points, something like if a1+b==a2. I am trying to find an efficient way to do that.



Consider this



a=-2/Sqrt[3] + Sqrt[3]
b=Sqrt[1/4 + (2/Sqrt[3] - Sqrt[3]/2)^2]

{N[a],N[b]}



{0.57735,0.57735}




Now, a==b does not do anything.



N[a] == N[b]
N[a]-N[b] == 0
N[a - b] == 0



True



False



False




Because N[a-b]=-3.33067*10^-16. So the way out is



Chop@N[a - b] == 0



True




However,



RepeatedTiming[N[a] == N[b]]
RepeatedTiming[Chop@N[a - b] == 0]



{5.4*10^-6, True}



{9.07*10^-6, True}




On the other hand,



a1 = N[a]; b1 = N[b];
RepeatedTiming[a1 == b1]



{2.7*10^-7, True}




So my questions are




  1. Is it better to use real numbers if I have to do such comparisons?


  2. What would be the best (least time consuming when dealing with a large number of inputs) way to compare exact expressions if I have to use exact expressions?











share|improve this question









$endgroup$




Often I need to generate some data using some symmetry operations and I usually keep them as exact expressions (for example, consider the points on a triangular grid {{-(1/2), Sqrt[3]/2}, {-(1/2), -(Sqrt[3]/2)}, {1, 0}, ...}) and I need to compare different points, something like if a1+b==a2. I am trying to find an efficient way to do that.



Consider this



a=-2/Sqrt[3] + Sqrt[3]
b=Sqrt[1/4 + (2/Sqrt[3] - Sqrt[3]/2)^2]

{N[a],N[b]}



{0.57735,0.57735}




Now, a==b does not do anything.



N[a] == N[b]
N[a]-N[b] == 0
N[a - b] == 0



True



False



False




Because N[a-b]=-3.33067*10^-16. So the way out is



Chop@N[a - b] == 0



True




However,



RepeatedTiming[N[a] == N[b]]
RepeatedTiming[Chop@N[a - b] == 0]



{5.4*10^-6, True}



{9.07*10^-6, True}




On the other hand,



a1 = N[a]; b1 = N[b];
RepeatedTiming[a1 == b1]



{2.7*10^-7, True}




So my questions are




  1. Is it better to use real numbers if I have to do such comparisons?


  2. What would be the best (least time consuming when dealing with a large number of inputs) way to compare exact expressions if I have to use exact expressions?








numerical-value






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 5 hours ago









SumitSumit

11.7k21955




11.7k21955












  • $begingroup$
    You'll want to be careful if you find cases like this. N[Sin[2017 2^(1/5)]] - N[-1]
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is computer-less
    5 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    PossibleZeroQ could help.
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    5 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    You'll want to be careful if you find cases like this. N[Sin[2017 2^(1/5)]] - N[-1]
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is computer-less
    5 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    PossibleZeroQ could help.
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    5 hours ago
















$begingroup$
You'll want to be careful if you find cases like this. N[Sin[2017 2^(1/5)]] - N[-1]
$endgroup$
– J. M. is computer-less
5 hours ago






$begingroup$
You'll want to be careful if you find cases like this. N[Sin[2017 2^(1/5)]] - N[-1]
$endgroup$
– J. M. is computer-less
5 hours ago














$begingroup$
PossibleZeroQ could help.
$endgroup$
– Roman
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
PossibleZeroQ could help.
$endgroup$
– Roman
5 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

PossibleZeroQ is rather fast and does precisely what you're looking for:



RepeatedTiming[PossibleZeroQ[a - b]]



{3.2*10^-6, True}




@JM's difficult case is handled correctly:



PossibleZeroQ[Sin[2017 2^(1/5)] - (-1)]



False







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "387"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192869%2fcomparing-exact-expressions-vs-real-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    PossibleZeroQ is rather fast and does precisely what you're looking for:



    RepeatedTiming[PossibleZeroQ[a - b]]



    {3.2*10^-6, True}




    @JM's difficult case is handled correctly:



    PossibleZeroQ[Sin[2017 2^(1/5)] - (-1)]



    False







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      PossibleZeroQ is rather fast and does precisely what you're looking for:



      RepeatedTiming[PossibleZeroQ[a - b]]



      {3.2*10^-6, True}




      @JM's difficult case is handled correctly:



      PossibleZeroQ[Sin[2017 2^(1/5)] - (-1)]



      False







      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        PossibleZeroQ is rather fast and does precisely what you're looking for:



        RepeatedTiming[PossibleZeroQ[a - b]]



        {3.2*10^-6, True}




        @JM's difficult case is handled correctly:



        PossibleZeroQ[Sin[2017 2^(1/5)] - (-1)]



        False







        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        PossibleZeroQ is rather fast and does precisely what you're looking for:



        RepeatedTiming[PossibleZeroQ[a - b]]



        {3.2*10^-6, True}




        @JM's difficult case is handled correctly:



        PossibleZeroQ[Sin[2017 2^(1/5)] - (-1)]



        False








        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 1 hour ago

























        answered 2 hours ago









        RomanRoman

        2,714717




        2,714717






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192869%2fcomparing-exact-expressions-vs-real-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            El tren de la libertad Índice Antecedentes "Porque yo decido" Desarrollo de la...

            Puerta de Hutt Referencias Enlaces externos Menú de navegación15°58′00″S 5°42′00″O /...

            Castillo d'Acher Características Menú de navegación