How to annotate PDF files generated by pdflatex? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey...
60's-70's movie: home appliances revolting against the owners
Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?
Can I visit the Trinity College (Cambridge) library and see some of their rare books
Does Parliament hold absolute power in the UK?
Can a flute soloist sit?
How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time
What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?
Can the DM override racial traits?
Is there a way to generate uniformly distributed points on a sphere from a fixed amount of random real numbers per point?
Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive
Can each chord in a progression create its own key?
Is 'stolen' appropriate word?
Match Roman Numerals
How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?
Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?
Do warforged have souls?
Loose spokes after only a few rides
Homework question about an engine pulling a train
What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?
How to read αἱμύλιος or when to aspirate
The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551
What's the point in a preamp?
Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?
Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?
How to annotate PDF files generated by pdflatex?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraIs there are way to annotate pdfs with LaTeX?How to add todo notes?Tooltip that works with all pdf readersMake Notes from Lyx into Annotations on the PDFHow to comment on a PDF in LaTeXIs there a better package to add comment / annotations into your LaTeX pdf than pdfcomment today?What program can display PDF tooltips on a Linux system?Embed text in pgfplots or tikz generated pdf filesAdobe Acrobat's markup and annotate trough LaTeX?Retrieving coordinates of every character in a formulaPDF Preview not workingWhich hyperref variable can I set to make a pdf open with the “Comment” tool displayed in the right panel of the window?Attaching file into a pdf with pdfLaTeX will crash Adobe ReaderCan we have viewer specific text in a pdf generated by pdfLaTex?Adobe Acrobat's markup and annotate trough LaTeX?Is there a viewer command that will close only the current PDF document in TeXnicCenter?How do I open PDF in Adobe Reader DC without locking the file from being updated by pdflatex?WinEdt has stopped being able to close pdf filesIncompatible generated pdf file with Adobe Acrobat 11 XIShow document title instead of file name in PDF-Reader
I want to annotate some PDF files (created with pdflatex), e.g.
- word x is missing here
- this part of a sentence should be moved to the front
- replace word x by y
- highlight this sentence
- insert a note
etc.
The current Acrobat Reader has some annotation capabilities, but the PDF has to contain some magic bits that 'allow' annotations in the Adobe Reader. And by default PDFs created with pdflatex
do not contain these bits. Is there is a workaround available?
Adobe Acrobat does not need this permissions - but it do not have a license and the current version probably does not work on all systems I use.
Okular has some annotation features, but the annotations are not saved in the PDF - pretty useless for me, because I want to exchange these annotations.
Thus, what are the alternatives for annotating PDF files generated by pdflatex?
Basic requirements:
- open source
- run at least on Linux
- Annotations should be saved in the PDF file
- Annotations should be viewable with standard PDF viewers (e.g. Acrobat Reader)
- It would be nice if a PDF viewer could skip from annotation to annotation and display them with color marks at the scrollbar (like compile errors/warnings in an IDE)
Edit: After some answers - it seems that there are 3 feasible routes to solve the annotation problem:
- An open source PDF-tool that implements the PDF annotation specification (looks like there is some WIP)
- A tool that patches the PDF file (i.e. adds some kind of signature), such that the reviewer can just use some Acrobat Reader Version > 5.0 (not available AFAIK, not open source)
- If the .tex-source is available and the reviewer knows LaTeX she can just use the
pdfcomment
package
pdf pdftex viewers pdfcomment
|
show 4 more comments
I want to annotate some PDF files (created with pdflatex), e.g.
- word x is missing here
- this part of a sentence should be moved to the front
- replace word x by y
- highlight this sentence
- insert a note
etc.
The current Acrobat Reader has some annotation capabilities, but the PDF has to contain some magic bits that 'allow' annotations in the Adobe Reader. And by default PDFs created with pdflatex
do not contain these bits. Is there is a workaround available?
Adobe Acrobat does not need this permissions - but it do not have a license and the current version probably does not work on all systems I use.
Okular has some annotation features, but the annotations are not saved in the PDF - pretty useless for me, because I want to exchange these annotations.
Thus, what are the alternatives for annotating PDF files generated by pdflatex?
Basic requirements:
- open source
- run at least on Linux
- Annotations should be saved in the PDF file
- Annotations should be viewable with standard PDF viewers (e.g. Acrobat Reader)
- It would be nice if a PDF viewer could skip from annotation to annotation and display them with color marks at the scrollbar (like compile errors/warnings in an IDE)
Edit: After some answers - it seems that there are 3 feasible routes to solve the annotation problem:
- An open source PDF-tool that implements the PDF annotation specification (looks like there is some WIP)
- A tool that patches the PDF file (i.e. adds some kind of signature), such that the reviewer can just use some Acrobat Reader Version > 5.0 (not available AFAIK, not open source)
- If the .tex-source is available and the reviewer knows LaTeX she can just use the
pdfcomment
package
pdf pdftex viewers pdfcomment
1
What are the magic bits? It seems the simplest solution would be to pdflatex (perhaps with thehyperref
package?) to write those bits to the pdf file.
– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 12:58
Well, I don't really know - I guess it is some DRM-like signature. Googled some time ago for it - but could not find exact informations about it ...
– maxschlepzig
Dec 1 '10 at 13:08
2
Old (but not necessarily out of date) information here.
– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 13:46
1
There's always the pencil-and-paper approach...
– SamB
Dec 17 '10 at 0:15
Sure, but the point of using PDF annotations really is to be able to conveniently exchange them, e.g. send the result to people via email - or email the PDF to a reviewer and get the annotated document back via email. Very convenient - if it works.
– maxschlepzig
Feb 13 '11 at 9:57
|
show 4 more comments
I want to annotate some PDF files (created with pdflatex), e.g.
- word x is missing here
- this part of a sentence should be moved to the front
- replace word x by y
- highlight this sentence
- insert a note
etc.
The current Acrobat Reader has some annotation capabilities, but the PDF has to contain some magic bits that 'allow' annotations in the Adobe Reader. And by default PDFs created with pdflatex
do not contain these bits. Is there is a workaround available?
Adobe Acrobat does not need this permissions - but it do not have a license and the current version probably does not work on all systems I use.
Okular has some annotation features, but the annotations are not saved in the PDF - pretty useless for me, because I want to exchange these annotations.
Thus, what are the alternatives for annotating PDF files generated by pdflatex?
Basic requirements:
- open source
- run at least on Linux
- Annotations should be saved in the PDF file
- Annotations should be viewable with standard PDF viewers (e.g. Acrobat Reader)
- It would be nice if a PDF viewer could skip from annotation to annotation and display them with color marks at the scrollbar (like compile errors/warnings in an IDE)
Edit: After some answers - it seems that there are 3 feasible routes to solve the annotation problem:
- An open source PDF-tool that implements the PDF annotation specification (looks like there is some WIP)
- A tool that patches the PDF file (i.e. adds some kind of signature), such that the reviewer can just use some Acrobat Reader Version > 5.0 (not available AFAIK, not open source)
- If the .tex-source is available and the reviewer knows LaTeX she can just use the
pdfcomment
package
pdf pdftex viewers pdfcomment
I want to annotate some PDF files (created with pdflatex), e.g.
- word x is missing here
- this part of a sentence should be moved to the front
- replace word x by y
- highlight this sentence
- insert a note
etc.
The current Acrobat Reader has some annotation capabilities, but the PDF has to contain some magic bits that 'allow' annotations in the Adobe Reader. And by default PDFs created with pdflatex
do not contain these bits. Is there is a workaround available?
Adobe Acrobat does not need this permissions - but it do not have a license and the current version probably does not work on all systems I use.
Okular has some annotation features, but the annotations are not saved in the PDF - pretty useless for me, because I want to exchange these annotations.
Thus, what are the alternatives for annotating PDF files generated by pdflatex?
Basic requirements:
- open source
- run at least on Linux
- Annotations should be saved in the PDF file
- Annotations should be viewable with standard PDF viewers (e.g. Acrobat Reader)
- It would be nice if a PDF viewer could skip from annotation to annotation and display them with color marks at the scrollbar (like compile errors/warnings in an IDE)
Edit: After some answers - it seems that there are 3 feasible routes to solve the annotation problem:
- An open source PDF-tool that implements the PDF annotation specification (looks like there is some WIP)
- A tool that patches the PDF file (i.e. adds some kind of signature), such that the reviewer can just use some Acrobat Reader Version > 5.0 (not available AFAIK, not open source)
- If the .tex-source is available and the reviewer knows LaTeX she can just use the
pdfcomment
package
pdf pdftex viewers pdfcomment
pdf pdftex viewers pdfcomment
edited Dec 30 '11 at 11:52
Josef
5,72222039
5,72222039
asked Dec 1 '10 at 11:20
maxschlepzigmaxschlepzig
5,987114253
5,987114253
1
What are the magic bits? It seems the simplest solution would be to pdflatex (perhaps with thehyperref
package?) to write those bits to the pdf file.
– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 12:58
Well, I don't really know - I guess it is some DRM-like signature. Googled some time ago for it - but could not find exact informations about it ...
– maxschlepzig
Dec 1 '10 at 13:08
2
Old (but not necessarily out of date) information here.
– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 13:46
1
There's always the pencil-and-paper approach...
– SamB
Dec 17 '10 at 0:15
Sure, but the point of using PDF annotations really is to be able to conveniently exchange them, e.g. send the result to people via email - or email the PDF to a reviewer and get the annotated document back via email. Very convenient - if it works.
– maxschlepzig
Feb 13 '11 at 9:57
|
show 4 more comments
1
What are the magic bits? It seems the simplest solution would be to pdflatex (perhaps with thehyperref
package?) to write those bits to the pdf file.
– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 12:58
Well, I don't really know - I guess it is some DRM-like signature. Googled some time ago for it - but could not find exact informations about it ...
– maxschlepzig
Dec 1 '10 at 13:08
2
Old (but not necessarily out of date) information here.
– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 13:46
1
There's always the pencil-and-paper approach...
– SamB
Dec 17 '10 at 0:15
Sure, but the point of using PDF annotations really is to be able to conveniently exchange them, e.g. send the result to people via email - or email the PDF to a reviewer and get the annotated document back via email. Very convenient - if it works.
– maxschlepzig
Feb 13 '11 at 9:57
1
1
What are the magic bits? It seems the simplest solution would be to pdflatex (perhaps with the
hyperref
package?) to write those bits to the pdf file.– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 12:58
What are the magic bits? It seems the simplest solution would be to pdflatex (perhaps with the
hyperref
package?) to write those bits to the pdf file.– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 12:58
Well, I don't really know - I guess it is some DRM-like signature. Googled some time ago for it - but could not find exact informations about it ...
– maxschlepzig
Dec 1 '10 at 13:08
Well, I don't really know - I guess it is some DRM-like signature. Googled some time ago for it - but could not find exact informations about it ...
– maxschlepzig
Dec 1 '10 at 13:08
2
2
Old (but not necessarily out of date) information here.
– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 13:46
Old (but not necessarily out of date) information here.
– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 13:46
1
1
There's always the pencil-and-paper approach...
– SamB
Dec 17 '10 at 0:15
There's always the pencil-and-paper approach...
– SamB
Dec 17 '10 at 0:15
Sure, but the point of using PDF annotations really is to be able to conveniently exchange them, e.g. send the result to people via email - or email the PDF to a reviewer and get the annotated document back via email. Very convenient - if it works.
– maxschlepzig
Feb 13 '11 at 9:57
Sure, but the point of using PDF annotations really is to be able to conveniently exchange them, e.g. send the result to people via email - or email the PDF to a reviewer and get the annotated document back via email. Very convenient - if it works.
– maxschlepzig
Feb 13 '11 at 9:57
|
show 4 more comments
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
Okay jumping on the old horse! ;-)
Meanwhile Acrobat Reader X offers some simple possibilities for PDF annotations. If you want to do more you can use the pdfcomment
package, e.g. for your examples:
documentclass[a4paper]{article}
usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage[rgb]{xcolor}
usepackage[author={Max Schlepzig}]{pdfcomment}
begin{document}
Here wepdfcomment[color=red,icon=Insert]{insert: miss} a word!
You can do much more pdfmarkupcomment[markup=Squiggly,color=green]{with pdfcomment}{move to the front}.
This is a pdfmarkupcomment[markup=StrikeOut,color=red]{stupid}{replace stupid with funny} game!
pdfmarkupcomment[markup=Highlight,color=yellow]{Of course, you can highlight complete sentences.}{Highlight}
This is verypdfcomment[icon=Note,color=blue]{insert graphic!} interesting!
end{document}
1
great to discover thepdfcomment
package! looks nice.
– user4686
Apr 30 '11 at 21:42
good hint about pdfcomment - if you have the source available and the editor knows LaTeX, then this is a good option.
– maxschlepzig
May 6 '11 at 20:24
1
I have been working with the author of pdfcomment (because I have been working on a similar tool, which is now in the more-or-less deprecated pdfmarginpar package). My most recent knowledge about the state-of-the-art is that TeX will successfully generate annotations, and you can see them and move the popups. But you CANNOT EDIT them. They are purely read-only. I believe there is no way around this limitation because it would involve some sort of key encryption (I do not know the details).
– Christian Feuersänger
May 7 '11 at 10:44
@Christian Feuersänger I think maxschlepzig is talking about journal editors. You can edit PDF annotations if your reader does support it. Adobe Raeder X now has support for PDF text annotations and Highlight markup annotations and can edit them. Other viewers don't have to edit the PDF file itself they simply can write a new PDF file, like Foxit or X-Change viewer are doing. So editing is no problem if supported by the viewer the one way or the other. In the context of LaTeX it makes more sense to edit the LaTeX source anyway. Put it into a SVN repository and all work with the same document.
– Josef
May 7 '11 at 12:32
Maybe a silly question: is there by any chance an easy way to generate PDF withpdfcomments
comments, send it to someone, receive a version with replies to the comments, and importing these replies back to the latex source (and possibly replying to them again)? If not, this feature is only half that useful it could be!
– Martin Pecka
Feb 19 '18 at 18:51
add a comment |
Using wine
you can install and run pdf-xchange. As far as I recall it is free and worked fine for me under linux. Should do the things you want.
1
+1 for pdf-xchange viewer. After trying every tool available on Linux, at the end I came to this app. Works fine through wine, at least versions prior to the last one.
– Meho R.
Dec 1 '10 at 22:55
Foxit Phantom also works through wine and, at least on my machine, works smoother than pdf-xchange viewer and faster. Only trouble is that I could only get version 2.2.4.0225 to work, but not newer.
– Roey Angel
Oct 30 '12 at 11:24
add a comment |
As it doesn't seem to have been mentioned, what about the pdfcomment Latex package?
It will write pdf annotations (note that here you would write the annotations as Latex code - however, under Linux the pdf annotations would be only viewable in Adobe Reader - although evince
seems to start at least showing icons in the 11.04 Ubuntu...)
EDIT: Imagine, I didn't know this by now :) Check evince annotiations - Ubuntu Forums and Re: [evince] Annotation and evince - actually, evince
does support both adding and reading PDF annotations; and I'm having evince
version "GNOME Document Viewer 2.32.0" and "libpoppler13/natty uptodate 0.16.4-0ubuntu1" (i.e. I'm not even sure I'm having the recommended poppler 0.15 on Natty?).... Though, note you need to use the dropdown menu in sidebar to get a list of annotations and adding - and for some reason, annotations added through evince
itself are clickable (and their contents can be read) - those from pdfcomment aren't (and their contents are not shown in the list).
And in this post: [[pdftex] pdf objects with references to each other?](tug.org/pipermail/pdftex/2002-March/002440.html) there is directpdftex
code that can make the annotation clickable inevince
...
– sdaau
Apr 30 '11 at 13:08
... and here is a small hack topdfcomment.sty
which will make the annotations clickable inevince
: A slight change: pdfcomment annot. for Evince
– sdaau
Apr 30 '11 at 13:48
In the case you don't monitor the forum: i wrote a reply ;-)
– Josef
Apr 30 '11 at 20:16
@Josef - sorry, just wanted to document the pdfcomment/evince trick :) Cheers!
– sdaau
May 1 '11 at 16:28
1
The link above seems to be dead (november 2012). My Evince doesn't properly detect the pdfannotations ; however, okular does anyway.
– rcabane
Nov 14 '12 at 8:15
|
show 1 more comment
There seem to be several pdf readers for Windows that allow you to add annotation to pdf documents, however, there does not seem to be anything like that for Linux, apart from PDFedit, which, in my experience, is rather hard to use and at the moment very unstable.
One Linux tool that couild be at least partially helpful is flpsed. it is a tool for adding annotation to Postscript files, and it can (to some extent) handle pdf files through external programs. I used it before to fill in pdf forms that were not "fillable".
I tried pdfedit yesterday, and indeed, I found it hard to use ;)
– maxschlepzig
Dec 2 '10 at 10:11
add a comment |
I use xournal and jarnal for this sort of thing. I've no idea how they compare to Adobe and I almost never use Adobe, and I don't know if "annotations" has a special meaning in the context of this question so these might not be what you're looking for.
- Both are open source (xournal is a C++ program, jarnal is java)
- Both run on Linux (jarnal runs on any platform with java)
- Both can export to PDF
- Given that both can export to PDF, if "annotations" has no special connotations, this is certainly true
- Don't know about this one
1
I think the OP is talking about "annotations" as in the comments or highlights one can make on a document in Word or Acrobat Pro. These are (cool) apps for handwriting notes from scratch.
– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 13:57
@Matthew: I wondered about that, but since "annotation" is an ordinary word which makes sense in this setting, I couldn't be sure. As I don't use Acrobat (Pro or otherwise) or Word, I have little conception of what extra features are involved with these "super annotations".
– Loop Space
Dec 1 '10 at 19:16
add a comment |
Okular since some time in 2014 can save annotations inside files by saving it to a new file with:
"File > Save as .."
The annotations will then be saved inside that new file, and not just in the configuration/system files of okular.
Opposite to that, you can use "File > Save Copy as ..", that removes any annotations for the newly saved file.
Unfortunately there is no way to check where the annotations are saved that you see in any opened pdf file. But if you generally save the pdf as a new file with "Save as .." before sending to anyone, you are on the safe side.
What helped for Acrobat Reader for me, was adding:
pdfminorversion=4
before documentclass[pdftex]{...
Welcome to TeX.SX! You can highlight code in your post using back-ticks. For code-blocks indent them by four spaces or use the{}
on the gui.
– Andrew
Jul 6 '16 at 12:01
add a comment |
I think PDF edit is able to do what you want, it's open source, free etc. it can be found at http://pdfedit.petricek.net/en/download.html
add a comment |
If you want not just a marginpar box, but an object you can move in your viewer, another possible approach is to use attachfile
package, with something like: textattachfile[color=0 0 1,print=false]{empty}{parbox{linewidth}{$ partial S leq 0 $ is wrong!}}
, maybe folded inside a marginpar
or other thing to place it properly. It allows to use formulas, includegraphics
', etc. though it is a very ugly method (you are attaching an empty file
).
You can also use attachfile
's {subject
,description
} options to make a meta-comment, or make it from the pdf viewer.
It would be nice not to have to attach that ghost file. I've looked for something to tailor a comment icon with pdfcomment
but I haven't been able. attachfile
provides a way to embed some extra icons in the pdf, making them not viewer-dependent, maybe that way. Also there is an option to avoid the ghost file (notextattachfile
, with print=true), but then the object is locked.
add a comment |
Five years later:
Under Windows, still pdf-xchange, but under Linux there is »Master PDF Editor«. With both you can add words, annotations, whatever to a PDF.
Old answer from 2012
I've been using flpsed (http://www.ecademix.com/JohannesHofmann/flpsed.html) to comment text in PDFs for years, easy, fast, slim.
add a comment |
Google Drive's PDF viewer supports adding "comments" on PDF files. Drive isn't open-source, but it's usable from Linux and the comments are saved to the file and, if the file is downloaded from Drive and opened in Adobe Acrobat, seem to show up as the same kind of annotations that Acrobat itself creates.
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f6306%2fhow-to-annotate-pdf-files-generated-by-pdflatex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Okay jumping on the old horse! ;-)
Meanwhile Acrobat Reader X offers some simple possibilities for PDF annotations. If you want to do more you can use the pdfcomment
package, e.g. for your examples:
documentclass[a4paper]{article}
usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage[rgb]{xcolor}
usepackage[author={Max Schlepzig}]{pdfcomment}
begin{document}
Here wepdfcomment[color=red,icon=Insert]{insert: miss} a word!
You can do much more pdfmarkupcomment[markup=Squiggly,color=green]{with pdfcomment}{move to the front}.
This is a pdfmarkupcomment[markup=StrikeOut,color=red]{stupid}{replace stupid with funny} game!
pdfmarkupcomment[markup=Highlight,color=yellow]{Of course, you can highlight complete sentences.}{Highlight}
This is verypdfcomment[icon=Note,color=blue]{insert graphic!} interesting!
end{document}
1
great to discover thepdfcomment
package! looks nice.
– user4686
Apr 30 '11 at 21:42
good hint about pdfcomment - if you have the source available and the editor knows LaTeX, then this is a good option.
– maxschlepzig
May 6 '11 at 20:24
1
I have been working with the author of pdfcomment (because I have been working on a similar tool, which is now in the more-or-less deprecated pdfmarginpar package). My most recent knowledge about the state-of-the-art is that TeX will successfully generate annotations, and you can see them and move the popups. But you CANNOT EDIT them. They are purely read-only. I believe there is no way around this limitation because it would involve some sort of key encryption (I do not know the details).
– Christian Feuersänger
May 7 '11 at 10:44
@Christian Feuersänger I think maxschlepzig is talking about journal editors. You can edit PDF annotations if your reader does support it. Adobe Raeder X now has support for PDF text annotations and Highlight markup annotations and can edit them. Other viewers don't have to edit the PDF file itself they simply can write a new PDF file, like Foxit or X-Change viewer are doing. So editing is no problem if supported by the viewer the one way or the other. In the context of LaTeX it makes more sense to edit the LaTeX source anyway. Put it into a SVN repository and all work with the same document.
– Josef
May 7 '11 at 12:32
Maybe a silly question: is there by any chance an easy way to generate PDF withpdfcomments
comments, send it to someone, receive a version with replies to the comments, and importing these replies back to the latex source (and possibly replying to them again)? If not, this feature is only half that useful it could be!
– Martin Pecka
Feb 19 '18 at 18:51
add a comment |
Okay jumping on the old horse! ;-)
Meanwhile Acrobat Reader X offers some simple possibilities for PDF annotations. If you want to do more you can use the pdfcomment
package, e.g. for your examples:
documentclass[a4paper]{article}
usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage[rgb]{xcolor}
usepackage[author={Max Schlepzig}]{pdfcomment}
begin{document}
Here wepdfcomment[color=red,icon=Insert]{insert: miss} a word!
You can do much more pdfmarkupcomment[markup=Squiggly,color=green]{with pdfcomment}{move to the front}.
This is a pdfmarkupcomment[markup=StrikeOut,color=red]{stupid}{replace stupid with funny} game!
pdfmarkupcomment[markup=Highlight,color=yellow]{Of course, you can highlight complete sentences.}{Highlight}
This is verypdfcomment[icon=Note,color=blue]{insert graphic!} interesting!
end{document}
1
great to discover thepdfcomment
package! looks nice.
– user4686
Apr 30 '11 at 21:42
good hint about pdfcomment - if you have the source available and the editor knows LaTeX, then this is a good option.
– maxschlepzig
May 6 '11 at 20:24
1
I have been working with the author of pdfcomment (because I have been working on a similar tool, which is now in the more-or-less deprecated pdfmarginpar package). My most recent knowledge about the state-of-the-art is that TeX will successfully generate annotations, and you can see them and move the popups. But you CANNOT EDIT them. They are purely read-only. I believe there is no way around this limitation because it would involve some sort of key encryption (I do not know the details).
– Christian Feuersänger
May 7 '11 at 10:44
@Christian Feuersänger I think maxschlepzig is talking about journal editors. You can edit PDF annotations if your reader does support it. Adobe Raeder X now has support for PDF text annotations and Highlight markup annotations and can edit them. Other viewers don't have to edit the PDF file itself they simply can write a new PDF file, like Foxit or X-Change viewer are doing. So editing is no problem if supported by the viewer the one way or the other. In the context of LaTeX it makes more sense to edit the LaTeX source anyway. Put it into a SVN repository and all work with the same document.
– Josef
May 7 '11 at 12:32
Maybe a silly question: is there by any chance an easy way to generate PDF withpdfcomments
comments, send it to someone, receive a version with replies to the comments, and importing these replies back to the latex source (and possibly replying to them again)? If not, this feature is only half that useful it could be!
– Martin Pecka
Feb 19 '18 at 18:51
add a comment |
Okay jumping on the old horse! ;-)
Meanwhile Acrobat Reader X offers some simple possibilities for PDF annotations. If you want to do more you can use the pdfcomment
package, e.g. for your examples:
documentclass[a4paper]{article}
usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage[rgb]{xcolor}
usepackage[author={Max Schlepzig}]{pdfcomment}
begin{document}
Here wepdfcomment[color=red,icon=Insert]{insert: miss} a word!
You can do much more pdfmarkupcomment[markup=Squiggly,color=green]{with pdfcomment}{move to the front}.
This is a pdfmarkupcomment[markup=StrikeOut,color=red]{stupid}{replace stupid with funny} game!
pdfmarkupcomment[markup=Highlight,color=yellow]{Of course, you can highlight complete sentences.}{Highlight}
This is verypdfcomment[icon=Note,color=blue]{insert graphic!} interesting!
end{document}
Okay jumping on the old horse! ;-)
Meanwhile Acrobat Reader X offers some simple possibilities for PDF annotations. If you want to do more you can use the pdfcomment
package, e.g. for your examples:
documentclass[a4paper]{article}
usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage[rgb]{xcolor}
usepackage[author={Max Schlepzig}]{pdfcomment}
begin{document}
Here wepdfcomment[color=red,icon=Insert]{insert: miss} a word!
You can do much more pdfmarkupcomment[markup=Squiggly,color=green]{with pdfcomment}{move to the front}.
This is a pdfmarkupcomment[markup=StrikeOut,color=red]{stupid}{replace stupid with funny} game!
pdfmarkupcomment[markup=Highlight,color=yellow]{Of course, you can highlight complete sentences.}{Highlight}
This is verypdfcomment[icon=Note,color=blue]{insert graphic!} interesting!
end{document}
edited May 3 '11 at 10:17
answered Apr 30 '11 at 10:18
JosefJosef
5,72222039
5,72222039
1
great to discover thepdfcomment
package! looks nice.
– user4686
Apr 30 '11 at 21:42
good hint about pdfcomment - if you have the source available and the editor knows LaTeX, then this is a good option.
– maxschlepzig
May 6 '11 at 20:24
1
I have been working with the author of pdfcomment (because I have been working on a similar tool, which is now in the more-or-less deprecated pdfmarginpar package). My most recent knowledge about the state-of-the-art is that TeX will successfully generate annotations, and you can see them and move the popups. But you CANNOT EDIT them. They are purely read-only. I believe there is no way around this limitation because it would involve some sort of key encryption (I do not know the details).
– Christian Feuersänger
May 7 '11 at 10:44
@Christian Feuersänger I think maxschlepzig is talking about journal editors. You can edit PDF annotations if your reader does support it. Adobe Raeder X now has support for PDF text annotations and Highlight markup annotations and can edit them. Other viewers don't have to edit the PDF file itself they simply can write a new PDF file, like Foxit or X-Change viewer are doing. So editing is no problem if supported by the viewer the one way or the other. In the context of LaTeX it makes more sense to edit the LaTeX source anyway. Put it into a SVN repository and all work with the same document.
– Josef
May 7 '11 at 12:32
Maybe a silly question: is there by any chance an easy way to generate PDF withpdfcomments
comments, send it to someone, receive a version with replies to the comments, and importing these replies back to the latex source (and possibly replying to them again)? If not, this feature is only half that useful it could be!
– Martin Pecka
Feb 19 '18 at 18:51
add a comment |
1
great to discover thepdfcomment
package! looks nice.
– user4686
Apr 30 '11 at 21:42
good hint about pdfcomment - if you have the source available and the editor knows LaTeX, then this is a good option.
– maxschlepzig
May 6 '11 at 20:24
1
I have been working with the author of pdfcomment (because I have been working on a similar tool, which is now in the more-or-less deprecated pdfmarginpar package). My most recent knowledge about the state-of-the-art is that TeX will successfully generate annotations, and you can see them and move the popups. But you CANNOT EDIT them. They are purely read-only. I believe there is no way around this limitation because it would involve some sort of key encryption (I do not know the details).
– Christian Feuersänger
May 7 '11 at 10:44
@Christian Feuersänger I think maxschlepzig is talking about journal editors. You can edit PDF annotations if your reader does support it. Adobe Raeder X now has support for PDF text annotations and Highlight markup annotations and can edit them. Other viewers don't have to edit the PDF file itself they simply can write a new PDF file, like Foxit or X-Change viewer are doing. So editing is no problem if supported by the viewer the one way or the other. In the context of LaTeX it makes more sense to edit the LaTeX source anyway. Put it into a SVN repository and all work with the same document.
– Josef
May 7 '11 at 12:32
Maybe a silly question: is there by any chance an easy way to generate PDF withpdfcomments
comments, send it to someone, receive a version with replies to the comments, and importing these replies back to the latex source (and possibly replying to them again)? If not, this feature is only half that useful it could be!
– Martin Pecka
Feb 19 '18 at 18:51
1
1
great to discover the
pdfcomment
package! looks nice.– user4686
Apr 30 '11 at 21:42
great to discover the
pdfcomment
package! looks nice.– user4686
Apr 30 '11 at 21:42
good hint about pdfcomment - if you have the source available and the editor knows LaTeX, then this is a good option.
– maxschlepzig
May 6 '11 at 20:24
good hint about pdfcomment - if you have the source available and the editor knows LaTeX, then this is a good option.
– maxschlepzig
May 6 '11 at 20:24
1
1
I have been working with the author of pdfcomment (because I have been working on a similar tool, which is now in the more-or-less deprecated pdfmarginpar package). My most recent knowledge about the state-of-the-art is that TeX will successfully generate annotations, and you can see them and move the popups. But you CANNOT EDIT them. They are purely read-only. I believe there is no way around this limitation because it would involve some sort of key encryption (I do not know the details).
– Christian Feuersänger
May 7 '11 at 10:44
I have been working with the author of pdfcomment (because I have been working on a similar tool, which is now in the more-or-less deprecated pdfmarginpar package). My most recent knowledge about the state-of-the-art is that TeX will successfully generate annotations, and you can see them and move the popups. But you CANNOT EDIT them. They are purely read-only. I believe there is no way around this limitation because it would involve some sort of key encryption (I do not know the details).
– Christian Feuersänger
May 7 '11 at 10:44
@Christian Feuersänger I think maxschlepzig is talking about journal editors. You can edit PDF annotations if your reader does support it. Adobe Raeder X now has support for PDF text annotations and Highlight markup annotations and can edit them. Other viewers don't have to edit the PDF file itself they simply can write a new PDF file, like Foxit or X-Change viewer are doing. So editing is no problem if supported by the viewer the one way or the other. In the context of LaTeX it makes more sense to edit the LaTeX source anyway. Put it into a SVN repository and all work with the same document.
– Josef
May 7 '11 at 12:32
@Christian Feuersänger I think maxschlepzig is talking about journal editors. You can edit PDF annotations if your reader does support it. Adobe Raeder X now has support for PDF text annotations and Highlight markup annotations and can edit them. Other viewers don't have to edit the PDF file itself they simply can write a new PDF file, like Foxit or X-Change viewer are doing. So editing is no problem if supported by the viewer the one way or the other. In the context of LaTeX it makes more sense to edit the LaTeX source anyway. Put it into a SVN repository and all work with the same document.
– Josef
May 7 '11 at 12:32
Maybe a silly question: is there by any chance an easy way to generate PDF with
pdfcomments
comments, send it to someone, receive a version with replies to the comments, and importing these replies back to the latex source (and possibly replying to them again)? If not, this feature is only half that useful it could be!– Martin Pecka
Feb 19 '18 at 18:51
Maybe a silly question: is there by any chance an easy way to generate PDF with
pdfcomments
comments, send it to someone, receive a version with replies to the comments, and importing these replies back to the latex source (and possibly replying to them again)? If not, this feature is only half that useful it could be!– Martin Pecka
Feb 19 '18 at 18:51
add a comment |
Using wine
you can install and run pdf-xchange. As far as I recall it is free and worked fine for me under linux. Should do the things you want.
1
+1 for pdf-xchange viewer. After trying every tool available on Linux, at the end I came to this app. Works fine through wine, at least versions prior to the last one.
– Meho R.
Dec 1 '10 at 22:55
Foxit Phantom also works through wine and, at least on my machine, works smoother than pdf-xchange viewer and faster. Only trouble is that I could only get version 2.2.4.0225 to work, but not newer.
– Roey Angel
Oct 30 '12 at 11:24
add a comment |
Using wine
you can install and run pdf-xchange. As far as I recall it is free and worked fine for me under linux. Should do the things you want.
1
+1 for pdf-xchange viewer. After trying every tool available on Linux, at the end I came to this app. Works fine through wine, at least versions prior to the last one.
– Meho R.
Dec 1 '10 at 22:55
Foxit Phantom also works through wine and, at least on my machine, works smoother than pdf-xchange viewer and faster. Only trouble is that I could only get version 2.2.4.0225 to work, but not newer.
– Roey Angel
Oct 30 '12 at 11:24
add a comment |
Using wine
you can install and run pdf-xchange. As far as I recall it is free and worked fine for me under linux. Should do the things you want.
Using wine
you can install and run pdf-xchange. As far as I recall it is free and worked fine for me under linux. Should do the things you want.
answered Dec 1 '10 at 12:16
DrorDror
11.2k1973150
11.2k1973150
1
+1 for pdf-xchange viewer. After trying every tool available on Linux, at the end I came to this app. Works fine through wine, at least versions prior to the last one.
– Meho R.
Dec 1 '10 at 22:55
Foxit Phantom also works through wine and, at least on my machine, works smoother than pdf-xchange viewer and faster. Only trouble is that I could only get version 2.2.4.0225 to work, but not newer.
– Roey Angel
Oct 30 '12 at 11:24
add a comment |
1
+1 for pdf-xchange viewer. After trying every tool available on Linux, at the end I came to this app. Works fine through wine, at least versions prior to the last one.
– Meho R.
Dec 1 '10 at 22:55
Foxit Phantom also works through wine and, at least on my machine, works smoother than pdf-xchange viewer and faster. Only trouble is that I could only get version 2.2.4.0225 to work, but not newer.
– Roey Angel
Oct 30 '12 at 11:24
1
1
+1 for pdf-xchange viewer. After trying every tool available on Linux, at the end I came to this app. Works fine through wine, at least versions prior to the last one.
– Meho R.
Dec 1 '10 at 22:55
+1 for pdf-xchange viewer. After trying every tool available on Linux, at the end I came to this app. Works fine through wine, at least versions prior to the last one.
– Meho R.
Dec 1 '10 at 22:55
Foxit Phantom also works through wine and, at least on my machine, works smoother than pdf-xchange viewer and faster. Only trouble is that I could only get version 2.2.4.0225 to work, but not newer.
– Roey Angel
Oct 30 '12 at 11:24
Foxit Phantom also works through wine and, at least on my machine, works smoother than pdf-xchange viewer and faster. Only trouble is that I could only get version 2.2.4.0225 to work, but not newer.
– Roey Angel
Oct 30 '12 at 11:24
add a comment |
As it doesn't seem to have been mentioned, what about the pdfcomment Latex package?
It will write pdf annotations (note that here you would write the annotations as Latex code - however, under Linux the pdf annotations would be only viewable in Adobe Reader - although evince
seems to start at least showing icons in the 11.04 Ubuntu...)
EDIT: Imagine, I didn't know this by now :) Check evince annotiations - Ubuntu Forums and Re: [evince] Annotation and evince - actually, evince
does support both adding and reading PDF annotations; and I'm having evince
version "GNOME Document Viewer 2.32.0" and "libpoppler13/natty uptodate 0.16.4-0ubuntu1" (i.e. I'm not even sure I'm having the recommended poppler 0.15 on Natty?).... Though, note you need to use the dropdown menu in sidebar to get a list of annotations and adding - and for some reason, annotations added through evince
itself are clickable (and their contents can be read) - those from pdfcomment aren't (and their contents are not shown in the list).
And in this post: [[pdftex] pdf objects with references to each other?](tug.org/pipermail/pdftex/2002-March/002440.html) there is directpdftex
code that can make the annotation clickable inevince
...
– sdaau
Apr 30 '11 at 13:08
... and here is a small hack topdfcomment.sty
which will make the annotations clickable inevince
: A slight change: pdfcomment annot. for Evince
– sdaau
Apr 30 '11 at 13:48
In the case you don't monitor the forum: i wrote a reply ;-)
– Josef
Apr 30 '11 at 20:16
@Josef - sorry, just wanted to document the pdfcomment/evince trick :) Cheers!
– sdaau
May 1 '11 at 16:28
1
The link above seems to be dead (november 2012). My Evince doesn't properly detect the pdfannotations ; however, okular does anyway.
– rcabane
Nov 14 '12 at 8:15
|
show 1 more comment
As it doesn't seem to have been mentioned, what about the pdfcomment Latex package?
It will write pdf annotations (note that here you would write the annotations as Latex code - however, under Linux the pdf annotations would be only viewable in Adobe Reader - although evince
seems to start at least showing icons in the 11.04 Ubuntu...)
EDIT: Imagine, I didn't know this by now :) Check evince annotiations - Ubuntu Forums and Re: [evince] Annotation and evince - actually, evince
does support both adding and reading PDF annotations; and I'm having evince
version "GNOME Document Viewer 2.32.0" and "libpoppler13/natty uptodate 0.16.4-0ubuntu1" (i.e. I'm not even sure I'm having the recommended poppler 0.15 on Natty?).... Though, note you need to use the dropdown menu in sidebar to get a list of annotations and adding - and for some reason, annotations added through evince
itself are clickable (and their contents can be read) - those from pdfcomment aren't (and their contents are not shown in the list).
And in this post: [[pdftex] pdf objects with references to each other?](tug.org/pipermail/pdftex/2002-March/002440.html) there is directpdftex
code that can make the annotation clickable inevince
...
– sdaau
Apr 30 '11 at 13:08
... and here is a small hack topdfcomment.sty
which will make the annotations clickable inevince
: A slight change: pdfcomment annot. for Evince
– sdaau
Apr 30 '11 at 13:48
In the case you don't monitor the forum: i wrote a reply ;-)
– Josef
Apr 30 '11 at 20:16
@Josef - sorry, just wanted to document the pdfcomment/evince trick :) Cheers!
– sdaau
May 1 '11 at 16:28
1
The link above seems to be dead (november 2012). My Evince doesn't properly detect the pdfannotations ; however, okular does anyway.
– rcabane
Nov 14 '12 at 8:15
|
show 1 more comment
As it doesn't seem to have been mentioned, what about the pdfcomment Latex package?
It will write pdf annotations (note that here you would write the annotations as Latex code - however, under Linux the pdf annotations would be only viewable in Adobe Reader - although evince
seems to start at least showing icons in the 11.04 Ubuntu...)
EDIT: Imagine, I didn't know this by now :) Check evince annotiations - Ubuntu Forums and Re: [evince] Annotation and evince - actually, evince
does support both adding and reading PDF annotations; and I'm having evince
version "GNOME Document Viewer 2.32.0" and "libpoppler13/natty uptodate 0.16.4-0ubuntu1" (i.e. I'm not even sure I'm having the recommended poppler 0.15 on Natty?).... Though, note you need to use the dropdown menu in sidebar to get a list of annotations and adding - and for some reason, annotations added through evince
itself are clickable (and their contents can be read) - those from pdfcomment aren't (and their contents are not shown in the list).
As it doesn't seem to have been mentioned, what about the pdfcomment Latex package?
It will write pdf annotations (note that here you would write the annotations as Latex code - however, under Linux the pdf annotations would be only viewable in Adobe Reader - although evince
seems to start at least showing icons in the 11.04 Ubuntu...)
EDIT: Imagine, I didn't know this by now :) Check evince annotiations - Ubuntu Forums and Re: [evince] Annotation and evince - actually, evince
does support both adding and reading PDF annotations; and I'm having evince
version "GNOME Document Viewer 2.32.0" and "libpoppler13/natty uptodate 0.16.4-0ubuntu1" (i.e. I'm not even sure I'm having the recommended poppler 0.15 on Natty?).... Though, note you need to use the dropdown menu in sidebar to get a list of annotations and adding - and for some reason, annotations added through evince
itself are clickable (and their contents can be read) - those from pdfcomment aren't (and their contents are not shown in the list).
edited Apr 30 '11 at 9:53
answered Apr 30 '11 at 9:15
sdaausdaau
9,189649131
9,189649131
And in this post: [[pdftex] pdf objects with references to each other?](tug.org/pipermail/pdftex/2002-March/002440.html) there is directpdftex
code that can make the annotation clickable inevince
...
– sdaau
Apr 30 '11 at 13:08
... and here is a small hack topdfcomment.sty
which will make the annotations clickable inevince
: A slight change: pdfcomment annot. for Evince
– sdaau
Apr 30 '11 at 13:48
In the case you don't monitor the forum: i wrote a reply ;-)
– Josef
Apr 30 '11 at 20:16
@Josef - sorry, just wanted to document the pdfcomment/evince trick :) Cheers!
– sdaau
May 1 '11 at 16:28
1
The link above seems to be dead (november 2012). My Evince doesn't properly detect the pdfannotations ; however, okular does anyway.
– rcabane
Nov 14 '12 at 8:15
|
show 1 more comment
And in this post: [[pdftex] pdf objects with references to each other?](tug.org/pipermail/pdftex/2002-March/002440.html) there is directpdftex
code that can make the annotation clickable inevince
...
– sdaau
Apr 30 '11 at 13:08
... and here is a small hack topdfcomment.sty
which will make the annotations clickable inevince
: A slight change: pdfcomment annot. for Evince
– sdaau
Apr 30 '11 at 13:48
In the case you don't monitor the forum: i wrote a reply ;-)
– Josef
Apr 30 '11 at 20:16
@Josef - sorry, just wanted to document the pdfcomment/evince trick :) Cheers!
– sdaau
May 1 '11 at 16:28
1
The link above seems to be dead (november 2012). My Evince doesn't properly detect the pdfannotations ; however, okular does anyway.
– rcabane
Nov 14 '12 at 8:15
And in this post: [[pdftex] pdf objects with references to each other?](tug.org/pipermail/pdftex/2002-March/002440.html) there is direct
pdftex
code that can make the annotation clickable in evince
...– sdaau
Apr 30 '11 at 13:08
And in this post: [[pdftex] pdf objects with references to each other?](tug.org/pipermail/pdftex/2002-March/002440.html) there is direct
pdftex
code that can make the annotation clickable in evince
...– sdaau
Apr 30 '11 at 13:08
... and here is a small hack to
pdfcomment.sty
which will make the annotations clickable in evince
: A slight change: pdfcomment annot. for Evince– sdaau
Apr 30 '11 at 13:48
... and here is a small hack to
pdfcomment.sty
which will make the annotations clickable in evince
: A slight change: pdfcomment annot. for Evince– sdaau
Apr 30 '11 at 13:48
In the case you don't monitor the forum: i wrote a reply ;-)
– Josef
Apr 30 '11 at 20:16
In the case you don't monitor the forum: i wrote a reply ;-)
– Josef
Apr 30 '11 at 20:16
@Josef - sorry, just wanted to document the pdfcomment/evince trick :) Cheers!
– sdaau
May 1 '11 at 16:28
@Josef - sorry, just wanted to document the pdfcomment/evince trick :) Cheers!
– sdaau
May 1 '11 at 16:28
1
1
The link above seems to be dead (november 2012). My Evince doesn't properly detect the pdfannotations ; however, okular does anyway.
– rcabane
Nov 14 '12 at 8:15
The link above seems to be dead (november 2012). My Evince doesn't properly detect the pdfannotations ; however, okular does anyway.
– rcabane
Nov 14 '12 at 8:15
|
show 1 more comment
There seem to be several pdf readers for Windows that allow you to add annotation to pdf documents, however, there does not seem to be anything like that for Linux, apart from PDFedit, which, in my experience, is rather hard to use and at the moment very unstable.
One Linux tool that couild be at least partially helpful is flpsed. it is a tool for adding annotation to Postscript files, and it can (to some extent) handle pdf files through external programs. I used it before to fill in pdf forms that were not "fillable".
I tried pdfedit yesterday, and indeed, I found it hard to use ;)
– maxschlepzig
Dec 2 '10 at 10:11
add a comment |
There seem to be several pdf readers for Windows that allow you to add annotation to pdf documents, however, there does not seem to be anything like that for Linux, apart from PDFedit, which, in my experience, is rather hard to use and at the moment very unstable.
One Linux tool that couild be at least partially helpful is flpsed. it is a tool for adding annotation to Postscript files, and it can (to some extent) handle pdf files through external programs. I used it before to fill in pdf forms that were not "fillable".
I tried pdfedit yesterday, and indeed, I found it hard to use ;)
– maxschlepzig
Dec 2 '10 at 10:11
add a comment |
There seem to be several pdf readers for Windows that allow you to add annotation to pdf documents, however, there does not seem to be anything like that for Linux, apart from PDFedit, which, in my experience, is rather hard to use and at the moment very unstable.
One Linux tool that couild be at least partially helpful is flpsed. it is a tool for adding annotation to Postscript files, and it can (to some extent) handle pdf files through external programs. I used it before to fill in pdf forms that were not "fillable".
There seem to be several pdf readers for Windows that allow you to add annotation to pdf documents, however, there does not seem to be anything like that for Linux, apart from PDFedit, which, in my experience, is rather hard to use and at the moment very unstable.
One Linux tool that couild be at least partially helpful is flpsed. it is a tool for adding annotation to Postscript files, and it can (to some extent) handle pdf files through external programs. I used it before to fill in pdf forms that were not "fillable".
answered Dec 1 '10 at 18:52
Jan HlavacekJan Hlavacek
15.8k34776
15.8k34776
I tried pdfedit yesterday, and indeed, I found it hard to use ;)
– maxschlepzig
Dec 2 '10 at 10:11
add a comment |
I tried pdfedit yesterday, and indeed, I found it hard to use ;)
– maxschlepzig
Dec 2 '10 at 10:11
I tried pdfedit yesterday, and indeed, I found it hard to use ;)
– maxschlepzig
Dec 2 '10 at 10:11
I tried pdfedit yesterday, and indeed, I found it hard to use ;)
– maxschlepzig
Dec 2 '10 at 10:11
add a comment |
I use xournal and jarnal for this sort of thing. I've no idea how they compare to Adobe and I almost never use Adobe, and I don't know if "annotations" has a special meaning in the context of this question so these might not be what you're looking for.
- Both are open source (xournal is a C++ program, jarnal is java)
- Both run on Linux (jarnal runs on any platform with java)
- Both can export to PDF
- Given that both can export to PDF, if "annotations" has no special connotations, this is certainly true
- Don't know about this one
1
I think the OP is talking about "annotations" as in the comments or highlights one can make on a document in Word or Acrobat Pro. These are (cool) apps for handwriting notes from scratch.
– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 13:57
@Matthew: I wondered about that, but since "annotation" is an ordinary word which makes sense in this setting, I couldn't be sure. As I don't use Acrobat (Pro or otherwise) or Word, I have little conception of what extra features are involved with these "super annotations".
– Loop Space
Dec 1 '10 at 19:16
add a comment |
I use xournal and jarnal for this sort of thing. I've no idea how they compare to Adobe and I almost never use Adobe, and I don't know if "annotations" has a special meaning in the context of this question so these might not be what you're looking for.
- Both are open source (xournal is a C++ program, jarnal is java)
- Both run on Linux (jarnal runs on any platform with java)
- Both can export to PDF
- Given that both can export to PDF, if "annotations" has no special connotations, this is certainly true
- Don't know about this one
1
I think the OP is talking about "annotations" as in the comments or highlights one can make on a document in Word or Acrobat Pro. These are (cool) apps for handwriting notes from scratch.
– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 13:57
@Matthew: I wondered about that, but since "annotation" is an ordinary word which makes sense in this setting, I couldn't be sure. As I don't use Acrobat (Pro or otherwise) or Word, I have little conception of what extra features are involved with these "super annotations".
– Loop Space
Dec 1 '10 at 19:16
add a comment |
I use xournal and jarnal for this sort of thing. I've no idea how they compare to Adobe and I almost never use Adobe, and I don't know if "annotations" has a special meaning in the context of this question so these might not be what you're looking for.
- Both are open source (xournal is a C++ program, jarnal is java)
- Both run on Linux (jarnal runs on any platform with java)
- Both can export to PDF
- Given that both can export to PDF, if "annotations" has no special connotations, this is certainly true
- Don't know about this one
I use xournal and jarnal for this sort of thing. I've no idea how they compare to Adobe and I almost never use Adobe, and I don't know if "annotations" has a special meaning in the context of this question so these might not be what you're looking for.
- Both are open source (xournal is a C++ program, jarnal is java)
- Both run on Linux (jarnal runs on any platform with java)
- Both can export to PDF
- Given that both can export to PDF, if "annotations" has no special connotations, this is certainly true
- Don't know about this one
answered Dec 1 '10 at 12:12
Loop SpaceLoop Space
113k30310610
113k30310610
1
I think the OP is talking about "annotations" as in the comments or highlights one can make on a document in Word or Acrobat Pro. These are (cool) apps for handwriting notes from scratch.
– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 13:57
@Matthew: I wondered about that, but since "annotation" is an ordinary word which makes sense in this setting, I couldn't be sure. As I don't use Acrobat (Pro or otherwise) or Word, I have little conception of what extra features are involved with these "super annotations".
– Loop Space
Dec 1 '10 at 19:16
add a comment |
1
I think the OP is talking about "annotations" as in the comments or highlights one can make on a document in Word or Acrobat Pro. These are (cool) apps for handwriting notes from scratch.
– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 13:57
@Matthew: I wondered about that, but since "annotation" is an ordinary word which makes sense in this setting, I couldn't be sure. As I don't use Acrobat (Pro or otherwise) or Word, I have little conception of what extra features are involved with these "super annotations".
– Loop Space
Dec 1 '10 at 19:16
1
1
I think the OP is talking about "annotations" as in the comments or highlights one can make on a document in Word or Acrobat Pro. These are (cool) apps for handwriting notes from scratch.
– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 13:57
I think the OP is talking about "annotations" as in the comments or highlights one can make on a document in Word or Acrobat Pro. These are (cool) apps for handwriting notes from scratch.
– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 13:57
@Matthew: I wondered about that, but since "annotation" is an ordinary word which makes sense in this setting, I couldn't be sure. As I don't use Acrobat (Pro or otherwise) or Word, I have little conception of what extra features are involved with these "super annotations".
– Loop Space
Dec 1 '10 at 19:16
@Matthew: I wondered about that, but since "annotation" is an ordinary word which makes sense in this setting, I couldn't be sure. As I don't use Acrobat (Pro or otherwise) or Word, I have little conception of what extra features are involved with these "super annotations".
– Loop Space
Dec 1 '10 at 19:16
add a comment |
Okular since some time in 2014 can save annotations inside files by saving it to a new file with:
"File > Save as .."
The annotations will then be saved inside that new file, and not just in the configuration/system files of okular.
Opposite to that, you can use "File > Save Copy as ..", that removes any annotations for the newly saved file.
Unfortunately there is no way to check where the annotations are saved that you see in any opened pdf file. But if you generally save the pdf as a new file with "Save as .." before sending to anyone, you are on the safe side.
What helped for Acrobat Reader for me, was adding:
pdfminorversion=4
before documentclass[pdftex]{...
Welcome to TeX.SX! You can highlight code in your post using back-ticks. For code-blocks indent them by four spaces or use the{}
on the gui.
– Andrew
Jul 6 '16 at 12:01
add a comment |
Okular since some time in 2014 can save annotations inside files by saving it to a new file with:
"File > Save as .."
The annotations will then be saved inside that new file, and not just in the configuration/system files of okular.
Opposite to that, you can use "File > Save Copy as ..", that removes any annotations for the newly saved file.
Unfortunately there is no way to check where the annotations are saved that you see in any opened pdf file. But if you generally save the pdf as a new file with "Save as .." before sending to anyone, you are on the safe side.
What helped for Acrobat Reader for me, was adding:
pdfminorversion=4
before documentclass[pdftex]{...
Welcome to TeX.SX! You can highlight code in your post using back-ticks. For code-blocks indent them by four spaces or use the{}
on the gui.
– Andrew
Jul 6 '16 at 12:01
add a comment |
Okular since some time in 2014 can save annotations inside files by saving it to a new file with:
"File > Save as .."
The annotations will then be saved inside that new file, and not just in the configuration/system files of okular.
Opposite to that, you can use "File > Save Copy as ..", that removes any annotations for the newly saved file.
Unfortunately there is no way to check where the annotations are saved that you see in any opened pdf file. But if you generally save the pdf as a new file with "Save as .." before sending to anyone, you are on the safe side.
What helped for Acrobat Reader for me, was adding:
pdfminorversion=4
before documentclass[pdftex]{...
Okular since some time in 2014 can save annotations inside files by saving it to a new file with:
"File > Save as .."
The annotations will then be saved inside that new file, and not just in the configuration/system files of okular.
Opposite to that, you can use "File > Save Copy as ..", that removes any annotations for the newly saved file.
Unfortunately there is no way to check where the annotations are saved that you see in any opened pdf file. But if you generally save the pdf as a new file with "Save as .." before sending to anyone, you are on the safe side.
What helped for Acrobat Reader for me, was adding:
pdfminorversion=4
before documentclass[pdftex]{...
edited Jul 6 '16 at 12:00
Andrew
30.9k34482
30.9k34482
answered Jul 6 '16 at 11:47
bluesceadabluesceada
6613
6613
Welcome to TeX.SX! You can highlight code in your post using back-ticks. For code-blocks indent them by four spaces or use the{}
on the gui.
– Andrew
Jul 6 '16 at 12:01
add a comment |
Welcome to TeX.SX! You can highlight code in your post using back-ticks. For code-blocks indent them by four spaces or use the{}
on the gui.
– Andrew
Jul 6 '16 at 12:01
Welcome to TeX.SX! You can highlight code in your post using back-ticks. For code-blocks indent them by four spaces or use the
{}
on the gui.– Andrew
Jul 6 '16 at 12:01
Welcome to TeX.SX! You can highlight code in your post using back-ticks. For code-blocks indent them by four spaces or use the
{}
on the gui.– Andrew
Jul 6 '16 at 12:01
add a comment |
I think PDF edit is able to do what you want, it's open source, free etc. it can be found at http://pdfedit.petricek.net/en/download.html
add a comment |
I think PDF edit is able to do what you want, it's open source, free etc. it can be found at http://pdfedit.petricek.net/en/download.html
add a comment |
I think PDF edit is able to do what you want, it's open source, free etc. it can be found at http://pdfedit.petricek.net/en/download.html
I think PDF edit is able to do what you want, it's open source, free etc. it can be found at http://pdfedit.petricek.net/en/download.html
answered Dec 1 '10 at 11:30
TimticoTimtico
1,22521428
1,22521428
add a comment |
add a comment |
If you want not just a marginpar box, but an object you can move in your viewer, another possible approach is to use attachfile
package, with something like: textattachfile[color=0 0 1,print=false]{empty}{parbox{linewidth}{$ partial S leq 0 $ is wrong!}}
, maybe folded inside a marginpar
or other thing to place it properly. It allows to use formulas, includegraphics
', etc. though it is a very ugly method (you are attaching an empty file
).
You can also use attachfile
's {subject
,description
} options to make a meta-comment, or make it from the pdf viewer.
It would be nice not to have to attach that ghost file. I've looked for something to tailor a comment icon with pdfcomment
but I haven't been able. attachfile
provides a way to embed some extra icons in the pdf, making them not viewer-dependent, maybe that way. Also there is an option to avoid the ghost file (notextattachfile
, with print=true), but then the object is locked.
add a comment |
If you want not just a marginpar box, but an object you can move in your viewer, another possible approach is to use attachfile
package, with something like: textattachfile[color=0 0 1,print=false]{empty}{parbox{linewidth}{$ partial S leq 0 $ is wrong!}}
, maybe folded inside a marginpar
or other thing to place it properly. It allows to use formulas, includegraphics
', etc. though it is a very ugly method (you are attaching an empty file
).
You can also use attachfile
's {subject
,description
} options to make a meta-comment, or make it from the pdf viewer.
It would be nice not to have to attach that ghost file. I've looked for something to tailor a comment icon with pdfcomment
but I haven't been able. attachfile
provides a way to embed some extra icons in the pdf, making them not viewer-dependent, maybe that way. Also there is an option to avoid the ghost file (notextattachfile
, with print=true), but then the object is locked.
add a comment |
If you want not just a marginpar box, but an object you can move in your viewer, another possible approach is to use attachfile
package, with something like: textattachfile[color=0 0 1,print=false]{empty}{parbox{linewidth}{$ partial S leq 0 $ is wrong!}}
, maybe folded inside a marginpar
or other thing to place it properly. It allows to use formulas, includegraphics
', etc. though it is a very ugly method (you are attaching an empty file
).
You can also use attachfile
's {subject
,description
} options to make a meta-comment, or make it from the pdf viewer.
It would be nice not to have to attach that ghost file. I've looked for something to tailor a comment icon with pdfcomment
but I haven't been able. attachfile
provides a way to embed some extra icons in the pdf, making them not viewer-dependent, maybe that way. Also there is an option to avoid the ghost file (notextattachfile
, with print=true), but then the object is locked.
If you want not just a marginpar box, but an object you can move in your viewer, another possible approach is to use attachfile
package, with something like: textattachfile[color=0 0 1,print=false]{empty}{parbox{linewidth}{$ partial S leq 0 $ is wrong!}}
, maybe folded inside a marginpar
or other thing to place it properly. It allows to use formulas, includegraphics
', etc. though it is a very ugly method (you are attaching an empty file
).
You can also use attachfile
's {subject
,description
} options to make a meta-comment, or make it from the pdf viewer.
It would be nice not to have to attach that ghost file. I've looked for something to tailor a comment icon with pdfcomment
but I haven't been able. attachfile
provides a way to embed some extra icons in the pdf, making them not viewer-dependent, maybe that way. Also there is an option to avoid the ghost file (notextattachfile
, with print=true), but then the object is locked.
edited Feb 11 '14 at 11:49
answered Feb 11 '14 at 11:10
AndrestandAndrestand
506320
506320
add a comment |
add a comment |
Five years later:
Under Windows, still pdf-xchange, but under Linux there is »Master PDF Editor«. With both you can add words, annotations, whatever to a PDF.
Old answer from 2012
I've been using flpsed (http://www.ecademix.com/JohannesHofmann/flpsed.html) to comment text in PDFs for years, easy, fast, slim.
add a comment |
Five years later:
Under Windows, still pdf-xchange, but under Linux there is »Master PDF Editor«. With both you can add words, annotations, whatever to a PDF.
Old answer from 2012
I've been using flpsed (http://www.ecademix.com/JohannesHofmann/flpsed.html) to comment text in PDFs for years, easy, fast, slim.
add a comment |
Five years later:
Under Windows, still pdf-xchange, but under Linux there is »Master PDF Editor«. With both you can add words, annotations, whatever to a PDF.
Old answer from 2012
I've been using flpsed (http://www.ecademix.com/JohannesHofmann/flpsed.html) to comment text in PDFs for years, easy, fast, slim.
Five years later:
Under Windows, still pdf-xchange, but under Linux there is »Master PDF Editor«. With both you can add words, annotations, whatever to a PDF.
Old answer from 2012
I've been using flpsed (http://www.ecademix.com/JohannesHofmann/flpsed.html) to comment text in PDFs for years, easy, fast, slim.
edited Jun 5 '17 at 20:21
answered Dec 5 '12 at 20:29
Keks DoseKeks Dose
21.5k35695
21.5k35695
add a comment |
add a comment |
Google Drive's PDF viewer supports adding "comments" on PDF files. Drive isn't open-source, but it's usable from Linux and the comments are saved to the file and, if the file is downloaded from Drive and opened in Adobe Acrobat, seem to show up as the same kind of annotations that Acrobat itself creates.
New contributor
add a comment |
Google Drive's PDF viewer supports adding "comments" on PDF files. Drive isn't open-source, but it's usable from Linux and the comments are saved to the file and, if the file is downloaded from Drive and opened in Adobe Acrobat, seem to show up as the same kind of annotations that Acrobat itself creates.
New contributor
add a comment |
Google Drive's PDF viewer supports adding "comments" on PDF files. Drive isn't open-source, but it's usable from Linux and the comments are saved to the file and, if the file is downloaded from Drive and opened in Adobe Acrobat, seem to show up as the same kind of annotations that Acrobat itself creates.
New contributor
Google Drive's PDF viewer supports adding "comments" on PDF files. Drive isn't open-source, but it's usable from Linux and the comments are saved to the file and, if the file is downloaded from Drive and opened in Adobe Acrobat, seem to show up as the same kind of annotations that Acrobat itself creates.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 3 mins ago
user570286user570286
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f6306%2fhow-to-annotate-pdf-files-generated-by-pdflatex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
What are the magic bits? It seems the simplest solution would be to pdflatex (perhaps with the
hyperref
package?) to write those bits to the pdf file.– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 12:58
Well, I don't really know - I guess it is some DRM-like signature. Googled some time ago for it - but could not find exact informations about it ...
– maxschlepzig
Dec 1 '10 at 13:08
2
Old (but not necessarily out of date) information here.
– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 13:46
1
There's always the pencil-and-paper approach...
– SamB
Dec 17 '10 at 0:15
Sure, but the point of using PDF annotations really is to be able to conveniently exchange them, e.g. send the result to people via email - or email the PDF to a reviewer and get the annotated document back via email. Very convenient - if it works.
– maxschlepzig
Feb 13 '11 at 9:57