How to annotate PDF files generated by pdflatex? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey...

60's-70's movie: home appliances revolting against the owners

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

Can I visit the Trinity College (Cambridge) library and see some of their rare books

Does Parliament hold absolute power in the UK?

Can a flute soloist sit?

How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

Can the DM override racial traits?

Is there a way to generate uniformly distributed points on a sphere from a fixed amount of random real numbers per point?

Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive

Can each chord in a progression create its own key?

Is 'stolen' appropriate word?

Match Roman Numerals

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?

Do warforged have souls?

Loose spokes after only a few rides

Homework question about an engine pulling a train

What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?

How to read αἱμύλιος or when to aspirate

The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551

What's the point in a preamp?

Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?

Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?



How to annotate PDF files generated by pdflatex?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraIs there are way to annotate pdfs with LaTeX?How to add todo notes?Tooltip that works with all pdf readersMake Notes from Lyx into Annotations on the PDFHow to comment on a PDF in LaTeXIs there a better package to add comment / annotations into your LaTeX pdf than pdfcomment today?What program can display PDF tooltips on a Linux system?Embed text in pgfplots or tikz generated pdf filesAdobe Acrobat's markup and annotate trough LaTeX?Retrieving coordinates of every character in a formulaPDF Preview not workingWhich hyperref variable can I set to make a pdf open with the “Comment” tool displayed in the right panel of the window?Attaching file into a pdf with pdfLaTeX will crash Adobe ReaderCan we have viewer specific text in a pdf generated by pdfLaTex?Adobe Acrobat's markup and annotate trough LaTeX?Is there a viewer command that will close only the current PDF document in TeXnicCenter?How do I open PDF in Adobe Reader DC without locking the file from being updated by pdflatex?WinEdt has stopped being able to close pdf filesIncompatible generated pdf file with Adobe Acrobat 11 XIShow document title instead of file name in PDF-Reader












83















I want to annotate some PDF files (created with pdflatex), e.g.




  • word x is missing here

  • this part of a sentence should be moved to the front

  • replace word x by y

  • highlight this sentence

  • insert a note


etc.



The current Acrobat Reader has some annotation capabilities, but the PDF has to contain some magic bits that 'allow' annotations in the Adobe Reader. And by default PDFs created with pdflatex do not contain these bits. Is there is a workaround available?



Adobe Acrobat does not need this permissions - but it do not have a license and the current version probably does not work on all systems I use.



Okular has some annotation features, but the annotations are not saved in the PDF - pretty useless for me, because I want to exchange these annotations.



Thus, what are the alternatives for annotating PDF files generated by pdflatex?



Basic requirements:




  • open source

  • run at least on Linux

  • Annotations should be saved in the PDF file

  • Annotations should be viewable with standard PDF viewers (e.g. Acrobat Reader)

  • It would be nice if a PDF viewer could skip from annotation to annotation and display them with color marks at the scrollbar (like compile errors/warnings in an IDE)


Edit: After some answers - it seems that there are 3 feasible routes to solve the annotation problem:




  1. An open source PDF-tool that implements the PDF annotation specification (looks like there is some WIP)

  2. A tool that patches the PDF file (i.e. adds some kind of signature), such that the reviewer can just use some Acrobat Reader Version > 5.0 (not available AFAIK, not open source)

  3. If the .tex-source is available and the reviewer knows LaTeX she can just use the pdfcomment package










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    What are the magic bits? It seems the simplest solution would be to pdflatex (perhaps with the hyperref package?) to write those bits to the pdf file.

    – Matthew Leingang
    Dec 1 '10 at 12:58











  • Well, I don't really know - I guess it is some DRM-like signature. Googled some time ago for it - but could not find exact informations about it ...

    – maxschlepzig
    Dec 1 '10 at 13:08






  • 2





    Old (but not necessarily out of date) information here.

    – Matthew Leingang
    Dec 1 '10 at 13:46






  • 1





    There's always the pencil-and-paper approach...

    – SamB
    Dec 17 '10 at 0:15











  • Sure, but the point of using PDF annotations really is to be able to conveniently exchange them, e.g. send the result to people via email - or email the PDF to a reviewer and get the annotated document back via email. Very convenient - if it works.

    – maxschlepzig
    Feb 13 '11 at 9:57
















83















I want to annotate some PDF files (created with pdflatex), e.g.




  • word x is missing here

  • this part of a sentence should be moved to the front

  • replace word x by y

  • highlight this sentence

  • insert a note


etc.



The current Acrobat Reader has some annotation capabilities, but the PDF has to contain some magic bits that 'allow' annotations in the Adobe Reader. And by default PDFs created with pdflatex do not contain these bits. Is there is a workaround available?



Adobe Acrobat does not need this permissions - but it do not have a license and the current version probably does not work on all systems I use.



Okular has some annotation features, but the annotations are not saved in the PDF - pretty useless for me, because I want to exchange these annotations.



Thus, what are the alternatives for annotating PDF files generated by pdflatex?



Basic requirements:




  • open source

  • run at least on Linux

  • Annotations should be saved in the PDF file

  • Annotations should be viewable with standard PDF viewers (e.g. Acrobat Reader)

  • It would be nice if a PDF viewer could skip from annotation to annotation and display them with color marks at the scrollbar (like compile errors/warnings in an IDE)


Edit: After some answers - it seems that there are 3 feasible routes to solve the annotation problem:




  1. An open source PDF-tool that implements the PDF annotation specification (looks like there is some WIP)

  2. A tool that patches the PDF file (i.e. adds some kind of signature), such that the reviewer can just use some Acrobat Reader Version > 5.0 (not available AFAIK, not open source)

  3. If the .tex-source is available and the reviewer knows LaTeX she can just use the pdfcomment package










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    What are the magic bits? It seems the simplest solution would be to pdflatex (perhaps with the hyperref package?) to write those bits to the pdf file.

    – Matthew Leingang
    Dec 1 '10 at 12:58











  • Well, I don't really know - I guess it is some DRM-like signature. Googled some time ago for it - but could not find exact informations about it ...

    – maxschlepzig
    Dec 1 '10 at 13:08






  • 2





    Old (but not necessarily out of date) information here.

    – Matthew Leingang
    Dec 1 '10 at 13:46






  • 1





    There's always the pencil-and-paper approach...

    – SamB
    Dec 17 '10 at 0:15











  • Sure, but the point of using PDF annotations really is to be able to conveniently exchange them, e.g. send the result to people via email - or email the PDF to a reviewer and get the annotated document back via email. Very convenient - if it works.

    – maxschlepzig
    Feb 13 '11 at 9:57














83












83








83


50






I want to annotate some PDF files (created with pdflatex), e.g.




  • word x is missing here

  • this part of a sentence should be moved to the front

  • replace word x by y

  • highlight this sentence

  • insert a note


etc.



The current Acrobat Reader has some annotation capabilities, but the PDF has to contain some magic bits that 'allow' annotations in the Adobe Reader. And by default PDFs created with pdflatex do not contain these bits. Is there is a workaround available?



Adobe Acrobat does not need this permissions - but it do not have a license and the current version probably does not work on all systems I use.



Okular has some annotation features, but the annotations are not saved in the PDF - pretty useless for me, because I want to exchange these annotations.



Thus, what are the alternatives for annotating PDF files generated by pdflatex?



Basic requirements:




  • open source

  • run at least on Linux

  • Annotations should be saved in the PDF file

  • Annotations should be viewable with standard PDF viewers (e.g. Acrobat Reader)

  • It would be nice if a PDF viewer could skip from annotation to annotation and display them with color marks at the scrollbar (like compile errors/warnings in an IDE)


Edit: After some answers - it seems that there are 3 feasible routes to solve the annotation problem:




  1. An open source PDF-tool that implements the PDF annotation specification (looks like there is some WIP)

  2. A tool that patches the PDF file (i.e. adds some kind of signature), such that the reviewer can just use some Acrobat Reader Version > 5.0 (not available AFAIK, not open source)

  3. If the .tex-source is available and the reviewer knows LaTeX she can just use the pdfcomment package










share|improve this question
















I want to annotate some PDF files (created with pdflatex), e.g.




  • word x is missing here

  • this part of a sentence should be moved to the front

  • replace word x by y

  • highlight this sentence

  • insert a note


etc.



The current Acrobat Reader has some annotation capabilities, but the PDF has to contain some magic bits that 'allow' annotations in the Adobe Reader. And by default PDFs created with pdflatex do not contain these bits. Is there is a workaround available?



Adobe Acrobat does not need this permissions - but it do not have a license and the current version probably does not work on all systems I use.



Okular has some annotation features, but the annotations are not saved in the PDF - pretty useless for me, because I want to exchange these annotations.



Thus, what are the alternatives for annotating PDF files generated by pdflatex?



Basic requirements:




  • open source

  • run at least on Linux

  • Annotations should be saved in the PDF file

  • Annotations should be viewable with standard PDF viewers (e.g. Acrobat Reader)

  • It would be nice if a PDF viewer could skip from annotation to annotation and display them with color marks at the scrollbar (like compile errors/warnings in an IDE)


Edit: After some answers - it seems that there are 3 feasible routes to solve the annotation problem:




  1. An open source PDF-tool that implements the PDF annotation specification (looks like there is some WIP)

  2. A tool that patches the PDF file (i.e. adds some kind of signature), such that the reviewer can just use some Acrobat Reader Version > 5.0 (not available AFAIK, not open source)

  3. If the .tex-source is available and the reviewer knows LaTeX she can just use the pdfcomment package







pdf pdftex viewers pdfcomment






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 30 '11 at 11:52









Josef

5,72222039




5,72222039










asked Dec 1 '10 at 11:20









maxschlepzigmaxschlepzig

5,987114253




5,987114253








  • 1





    What are the magic bits? It seems the simplest solution would be to pdflatex (perhaps with the hyperref package?) to write those bits to the pdf file.

    – Matthew Leingang
    Dec 1 '10 at 12:58











  • Well, I don't really know - I guess it is some DRM-like signature. Googled some time ago for it - but could not find exact informations about it ...

    – maxschlepzig
    Dec 1 '10 at 13:08






  • 2





    Old (but not necessarily out of date) information here.

    – Matthew Leingang
    Dec 1 '10 at 13:46






  • 1





    There's always the pencil-and-paper approach...

    – SamB
    Dec 17 '10 at 0:15











  • Sure, but the point of using PDF annotations really is to be able to conveniently exchange them, e.g. send the result to people via email - or email the PDF to a reviewer and get the annotated document back via email. Very convenient - if it works.

    – maxschlepzig
    Feb 13 '11 at 9:57














  • 1





    What are the magic bits? It seems the simplest solution would be to pdflatex (perhaps with the hyperref package?) to write those bits to the pdf file.

    – Matthew Leingang
    Dec 1 '10 at 12:58











  • Well, I don't really know - I guess it is some DRM-like signature. Googled some time ago for it - but could not find exact informations about it ...

    – maxschlepzig
    Dec 1 '10 at 13:08






  • 2





    Old (but not necessarily out of date) information here.

    – Matthew Leingang
    Dec 1 '10 at 13:46






  • 1





    There's always the pencil-and-paper approach...

    – SamB
    Dec 17 '10 at 0:15











  • Sure, but the point of using PDF annotations really is to be able to conveniently exchange them, e.g. send the result to people via email - or email the PDF to a reviewer and get the annotated document back via email. Very convenient - if it works.

    – maxschlepzig
    Feb 13 '11 at 9:57








1




1





What are the magic bits? It seems the simplest solution would be to pdflatex (perhaps with the hyperref package?) to write those bits to the pdf file.

– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 12:58





What are the magic bits? It seems the simplest solution would be to pdflatex (perhaps with the hyperref package?) to write those bits to the pdf file.

– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 12:58













Well, I don't really know - I guess it is some DRM-like signature. Googled some time ago for it - but could not find exact informations about it ...

– maxschlepzig
Dec 1 '10 at 13:08





Well, I don't really know - I guess it is some DRM-like signature. Googled some time ago for it - but could not find exact informations about it ...

– maxschlepzig
Dec 1 '10 at 13:08




2




2





Old (but not necessarily out of date) information here.

– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 13:46





Old (but not necessarily out of date) information here.

– Matthew Leingang
Dec 1 '10 at 13:46




1




1





There's always the pencil-and-paper approach...

– SamB
Dec 17 '10 at 0:15





There's always the pencil-and-paper approach...

– SamB
Dec 17 '10 at 0:15













Sure, but the point of using PDF annotations really is to be able to conveniently exchange them, e.g. send the result to people via email - or email the PDF to a reviewer and get the annotated document back via email. Very convenient - if it works.

– maxschlepzig
Feb 13 '11 at 9:57





Sure, but the point of using PDF annotations really is to be able to conveniently exchange them, e.g. send the result to people via email - or email the PDF to a reviewer and get the annotated document back via email. Very convenient - if it works.

– maxschlepzig
Feb 13 '11 at 9:57










10 Answers
10






active

oldest

votes


















84














Okay jumping on the old horse! ;-)



Meanwhile Acrobat Reader X offers some simple possibilities for PDF annotations. If you want to do more you can use the pdfcomment package, e.g. for your examples:



documentclass[a4paper]{article}
usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage[rgb]{xcolor}
usepackage[author={Max Schlepzig}]{pdfcomment}
begin{document}
Here wepdfcomment[color=red,icon=Insert]{insert: miss} a word!

You can do much more pdfmarkupcomment[markup=Squiggly,color=green]{with pdfcomment}{move to the front}.

This is a pdfmarkupcomment[markup=StrikeOut,color=red]{stupid}{replace stupid with funny} game!

pdfmarkupcomment[markup=Highlight,color=yellow]{Of course, you can highlight complete sentences.}{Highlight}

This is verypdfcomment[icon=Note,color=blue]{insert graphic!} interesting!
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    great to discover the pdfcomment package! looks nice.

    – user4686
    Apr 30 '11 at 21:42











  • good hint about pdfcomment - if you have the source available and the editor knows LaTeX, then this is a good option.

    – maxschlepzig
    May 6 '11 at 20:24






  • 1





    I have been working with the author of pdfcomment (because I have been working on a similar tool, which is now in the more-or-less deprecated pdfmarginpar package). My most recent knowledge about the state-of-the-art is that TeX will successfully generate annotations, and you can see them and move the popups. But you CANNOT EDIT them. They are purely read-only. I believe there is no way around this limitation because it would involve some sort of key encryption (I do not know the details).

    – Christian Feuersänger
    May 7 '11 at 10:44











  • @Christian Feuersänger I think maxschlepzig is talking about journal editors. You can edit PDF annotations if your reader does support it. Adobe Raeder X now has support for PDF text annotations and Highlight markup annotations and can edit them. Other viewers don't have to edit the PDF file itself they simply can write a new PDF file, like Foxit or X-Change viewer are doing. So editing is no problem if supported by the viewer the one way or the other. In the context of LaTeX it makes more sense to edit the LaTeX source anyway. Put it into a SVN repository and all work with the same document.

    – Josef
    May 7 '11 at 12:32











  • Maybe a silly question: is there by any chance an easy way to generate PDF with pdfcomments comments, send it to someone, receive a version with replies to the comments, and importing these replies back to the latex source (and possibly replying to them again)? If not, this feature is only half that useful it could be!

    – Martin Pecka
    Feb 19 '18 at 18:51



















10














Using wine you can install and run pdf-xchange. As far as I recall it is free and worked fine for me under linux. Should do the things you want.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    +1 for pdf-xchange viewer. After trying every tool available on Linux, at the end I came to this app. Works fine through wine, at least versions prior to the last one.

    – Meho R.
    Dec 1 '10 at 22:55











  • Foxit Phantom also works through wine and, at least on my machine, works smoother than pdf-xchange viewer and faster. Only trouble is that I could only get version 2.2.4.0225 to work, but not newer.

    – Roey Angel
    Oct 30 '12 at 11:24



















10














As it doesn't seem to have been mentioned, what about the pdfcomment Latex package?



It will write pdf annotations (note that here you would write the annotations as Latex code - however, under Linux the pdf annotations would be only viewable in Adobe Reader - although evince seems to start at least showing icons in the 11.04 Ubuntu...)



EDIT: Imagine, I didn't know this by now :) Check evince annotiations - Ubuntu Forums and Re: [evince] Annotation and evince - actually, evince does support both adding and reading PDF annotations; and I'm having evince version "GNOME Document Viewer 2.32.0" and "libpoppler13/natty uptodate 0.16.4-0ubuntu1" (i.e. I'm not even sure I'm having the recommended poppler 0.15 on Natty?).... Though, note you need to use the dropdown menu in sidebar to get a list of annotations and adding - and for some reason, annotations added through evince itself are clickable (and their contents can be read) - those from pdfcomment aren't (and their contents are not shown in the list).






share|improve this answer


























  • And in this post: [[pdftex] pdf objects with references to each other?](tug.org/pipermail/pdftex/2002-March/002440.html) there is direct pdftex code that can make the annotation clickable in evince...

    – sdaau
    Apr 30 '11 at 13:08











  • ... and here is a small hack to pdfcomment.sty which will make the annotations clickable in evince: A slight change: pdfcomment annot. for Evince

    – sdaau
    Apr 30 '11 at 13:48











  • In the case you don't monitor the forum: i wrote a reply ;-)

    – Josef
    Apr 30 '11 at 20:16













  • @Josef - sorry, just wanted to document the pdfcomment/evince trick :) Cheers!

    – sdaau
    May 1 '11 at 16:28






  • 1





    The link above seems to be dead (november 2012). My Evince doesn't properly detect the pdfannotations ; however, okular does anyway.

    – rcabane
    Nov 14 '12 at 8:15



















6














There seem to be several pdf readers for Windows that allow you to add annotation to pdf documents, however, there does not seem to be anything like that for Linux, apart from PDFedit, which, in my experience, is rather hard to use and at the moment very unstable.



One Linux tool that couild be at least partially helpful is flpsed. it is a tool for adding annotation to Postscript files, and it can (to some extent) handle pdf files through external programs. I used it before to fill in pdf forms that were not "fillable".






share|improve this answer
























  • I tried pdfedit yesterday, and indeed, I found it hard to use ;)

    – maxschlepzig
    Dec 2 '10 at 10:11



















5














I use xournal and jarnal for this sort of thing. I've no idea how they compare to Adobe and I almost never use Adobe, and I don't know if "annotations" has a special meaning in the context of this question so these might not be what you're looking for.




  1. Both are open source (xournal is a C++ program, jarnal is java)

  2. Both run on Linux (jarnal runs on any platform with java)

  3. Both can export to PDF

  4. Given that both can export to PDF, if "annotations" has no special connotations, this is certainly true

  5. Don't know about this one






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    I think the OP is talking about "annotations" as in the comments or highlights one can make on a document in Word or Acrobat Pro. These are (cool) apps for handwriting notes from scratch.

    – Matthew Leingang
    Dec 1 '10 at 13:57











  • @Matthew: I wondered about that, but since "annotation" is an ordinary word which makes sense in this setting, I couldn't be sure. As I don't use Acrobat (Pro or otherwise) or Word, I have little conception of what extra features are involved with these "super annotations".

    – Loop Space
    Dec 1 '10 at 19:16



















5














Okular since some time in 2014 can save annotations inside files by saving it to a new file with:



"File > Save as .."



The annotations will then be saved inside that new file, and not just in the configuration/system files of okular.



Opposite to that, you can use "File > Save Copy as ..", that removes any annotations for the newly saved file.



Unfortunately there is no way to check where the annotations are saved that you see in any opened pdf file. But if you generally save the pdf as a new file with "Save as .." before sending to anyone, you are on the safe side.



What helped for Acrobat Reader for me, was adding:



pdfminorversion=4


before documentclass[pdftex]{...






share|improve this answer


























  • Welcome to TeX.SX! You can highlight code in your post using back-ticks. For code-blocks indent them by four spaces or use the {} on the gui.

    – Andrew
    Jul 6 '16 at 12:01



















4














I think PDF edit is able to do what you want, it's open source, free etc. it can be found at http://pdfedit.petricek.net/en/download.html






share|improve this answer































    1














    If you want not just a marginpar box, but an object you can move in your viewer, another possible approach is to use attachfile package, with something like: textattachfile[color=0 0 1,print=false]{empty}{parbox{linewidth}{$ partial S leq 0 $ is wrong!}}, maybe folded inside a marginpar or other thing to place it properly. It allows to use formulas, includegraphics', etc. though it is a very ugly method (you are attaching an empty file).



    You can also use attachfile's {subject,description} options to make a meta-comment, or make it from the pdf viewer.



    It would be nice not to have to attach that ghost file. I've looked for something to tailor a comment icon with pdfcomment but I haven't been able. attachfile provides a way to embed some extra icons in the pdf, making them not viewer-dependent, maybe that way. Also there is an option to avoid the ghost file (notextattachfile, with print=true), but then the object is locked.






    share|improve this answer

































      1














      Five years later:



      Under Windows, still pdf-xchange, but under Linux there is »Master PDF Editor«. With both you can add words, annotations, whatever to a PDF.





      Old answer from 2012



      I've been using flpsed (http://www.ecademix.com/JohannesHofmann/flpsed.html) to comment text in PDFs for years, easy, fast, slim.






      share|improve this answer

































        0














        Google Drive's PDF viewer supports adding "comments" on PDF files. Drive isn't open-source, but it's usable from Linux and the comments are saved to the file and, if the file is downloaded from Drive and opened in Adobe Acrobat, seem to show up as the same kind of annotations that Acrobat itself creates.





        share








        New contributor




        user570286 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





















          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "85"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f6306%2fhow-to-annotate-pdf-files-generated-by-pdflatex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          10 Answers
          10






          active

          oldest

          votes








          10 Answers
          10






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          84














          Okay jumping on the old horse! ;-)



          Meanwhile Acrobat Reader X offers some simple possibilities for PDF annotations. If you want to do more you can use the pdfcomment package, e.g. for your examples:



          documentclass[a4paper]{article}
          usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
          usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
          usepackage{lmodern}
          usepackage[rgb]{xcolor}
          usepackage[author={Max Schlepzig}]{pdfcomment}
          begin{document}
          Here wepdfcomment[color=red,icon=Insert]{insert: miss} a word!

          You can do much more pdfmarkupcomment[markup=Squiggly,color=green]{with pdfcomment}{move to the front}.

          This is a pdfmarkupcomment[markup=StrikeOut,color=red]{stupid}{replace stupid with funny} game!

          pdfmarkupcomment[markup=Highlight,color=yellow]{Of course, you can highlight complete sentences.}{Highlight}

          This is verypdfcomment[icon=Note,color=blue]{insert graphic!} interesting!
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            great to discover the pdfcomment package! looks nice.

            – user4686
            Apr 30 '11 at 21:42











          • good hint about pdfcomment - if you have the source available and the editor knows LaTeX, then this is a good option.

            – maxschlepzig
            May 6 '11 at 20:24






          • 1





            I have been working with the author of pdfcomment (because I have been working on a similar tool, which is now in the more-or-less deprecated pdfmarginpar package). My most recent knowledge about the state-of-the-art is that TeX will successfully generate annotations, and you can see them and move the popups. But you CANNOT EDIT them. They are purely read-only. I believe there is no way around this limitation because it would involve some sort of key encryption (I do not know the details).

            – Christian Feuersänger
            May 7 '11 at 10:44











          • @Christian Feuersänger I think maxschlepzig is talking about journal editors. You can edit PDF annotations if your reader does support it. Adobe Raeder X now has support for PDF text annotations and Highlight markup annotations and can edit them. Other viewers don't have to edit the PDF file itself they simply can write a new PDF file, like Foxit or X-Change viewer are doing. So editing is no problem if supported by the viewer the one way or the other. In the context of LaTeX it makes more sense to edit the LaTeX source anyway. Put it into a SVN repository and all work with the same document.

            – Josef
            May 7 '11 at 12:32











          • Maybe a silly question: is there by any chance an easy way to generate PDF with pdfcomments comments, send it to someone, receive a version with replies to the comments, and importing these replies back to the latex source (and possibly replying to them again)? If not, this feature is only half that useful it could be!

            – Martin Pecka
            Feb 19 '18 at 18:51
















          84














          Okay jumping on the old horse! ;-)



          Meanwhile Acrobat Reader X offers some simple possibilities for PDF annotations. If you want to do more you can use the pdfcomment package, e.g. for your examples:



          documentclass[a4paper]{article}
          usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
          usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
          usepackage{lmodern}
          usepackage[rgb]{xcolor}
          usepackage[author={Max Schlepzig}]{pdfcomment}
          begin{document}
          Here wepdfcomment[color=red,icon=Insert]{insert: miss} a word!

          You can do much more pdfmarkupcomment[markup=Squiggly,color=green]{with pdfcomment}{move to the front}.

          This is a pdfmarkupcomment[markup=StrikeOut,color=red]{stupid}{replace stupid with funny} game!

          pdfmarkupcomment[markup=Highlight,color=yellow]{Of course, you can highlight complete sentences.}{Highlight}

          This is verypdfcomment[icon=Note,color=blue]{insert graphic!} interesting!
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            great to discover the pdfcomment package! looks nice.

            – user4686
            Apr 30 '11 at 21:42











          • good hint about pdfcomment - if you have the source available and the editor knows LaTeX, then this is a good option.

            – maxschlepzig
            May 6 '11 at 20:24






          • 1





            I have been working with the author of pdfcomment (because I have been working on a similar tool, which is now in the more-or-less deprecated pdfmarginpar package). My most recent knowledge about the state-of-the-art is that TeX will successfully generate annotations, and you can see them and move the popups. But you CANNOT EDIT them. They are purely read-only. I believe there is no way around this limitation because it would involve some sort of key encryption (I do not know the details).

            – Christian Feuersänger
            May 7 '11 at 10:44











          • @Christian Feuersänger I think maxschlepzig is talking about journal editors. You can edit PDF annotations if your reader does support it. Adobe Raeder X now has support for PDF text annotations and Highlight markup annotations and can edit them. Other viewers don't have to edit the PDF file itself they simply can write a new PDF file, like Foxit or X-Change viewer are doing. So editing is no problem if supported by the viewer the one way or the other. In the context of LaTeX it makes more sense to edit the LaTeX source anyway. Put it into a SVN repository and all work with the same document.

            – Josef
            May 7 '11 at 12:32











          • Maybe a silly question: is there by any chance an easy way to generate PDF with pdfcomments comments, send it to someone, receive a version with replies to the comments, and importing these replies back to the latex source (and possibly replying to them again)? If not, this feature is only half that useful it could be!

            – Martin Pecka
            Feb 19 '18 at 18:51














          84












          84








          84







          Okay jumping on the old horse! ;-)



          Meanwhile Acrobat Reader X offers some simple possibilities for PDF annotations. If you want to do more you can use the pdfcomment package, e.g. for your examples:



          documentclass[a4paper]{article}
          usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
          usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
          usepackage{lmodern}
          usepackage[rgb]{xcolor}
          usepackage[author={Max Schlepzig}]{pdfcomment}
          begin{document}
          Here wepdfcomment[color=red,icon=Insert]{insert: miss} a word!

          You can do much more pdfmarkupcomment[markup=Squiggly,color=green]{with pdfcomment}{move to the front}.

          This is a pdfmarkupcomment[markup=StrikeOut,color=red]{stupid}{replace stupid with funny} game!

          pdfmarkupcomment[markup=Highlight,color=yellow]{Of course, you can highlight complete sentences.}{Highlight}

          This is verypdfcomment[icon=Note,color=blue]{insert graphic!} interesting!
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer















          Okay jumping on the old horse! ;-)



          Meanwhile Acrobat Reader X offers some simple possibilities for PDF annotations. If you want to do more you can use the pdfcomment package, e.g. for your examples:



          documentclass[a4paper]{article}
          usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
          usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
          usepackage{lmodern}
          usepackage[rgb]{xcolor}
          usepackage[author={Max Schlepzig}]{pdfcomment}
          begin{document}
          Here wepdfcomment[color=red,icon=Insert]{insert: miss} a word!

          You can do much more pdfmarkupcomment[markup=Squiggly,color=green]{with pdfcomment}{move to the front}.

          This is a pdfmarkupcomment[markup=StrikeOut,color=red]{stupid}{replace stupid with funny} game!

          pdfmarkupcomment[markup=Highlight,color=yellow]{Of course, you can highlight complete sentences.}{Highlight}

          This is verypdfcomment[icon=Note,color=blue]{insert graphic!} interesting!
          end{document}


          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited May 3 '11 at 10:17

























          answered Apr 30 '11 at 10:18









          JosefJosef

          5,72222039




          5,72222039








          • 1





            great to discover the pdfcomment package! looks nice.

            – user4686
            Apr 30 '11 at 21:42











          • good hint about pdfcomment - if you have the source available and the editor knows LaTeX, then this is a good option.

            – maxschlepzig
            May 6 '11 at 20:24






          • 1





            I have been working with the author of pdfcomment (because I have been working on a similar tool, which is now in the more-or-less deprecated pdfmarginpar package). My most recent knowledge about the state-of-the-art is that TeX will successfully generate annotations, and you can see them and move the popups. But you CANNOT EDIT them. They are purely read-only. I believe there is no way around this limitation because it would involve some sort of key encryption (I do not know the details).

            – Christian Feuersänger
            May 7 '11 at 10:44











          • @Christian Feuersänger I think maxschlepzig is talking about journal editors. You can edit PDF annotations if your reader does support it. Adobe Raeder X now has support for PDF text annotations and Highlight markup annotations and can edit them. Other viewers don't have to edit the PDF file itself they simply can write a new PDF file, like Foxit or X-Change viewer are doing. So editing is no problem if supported by the viewer the one way or the other. In the context of LaTeX it makes more sense to edit the LaTeX source anyway. Put it into a SVN repository and all work with the same document.

            – Josef
            May 7 '11 at 12:32











          • Maybe a silly question: is there by any chance an easy way to generate PDF with pdfcomments comments, send it to someone, receive a version with replies to the comments, and importing these replies back to the latex source (and possibly replying to them again)? If not, this feature is only half that useful it could be!

            – Martin Pecka
            Feb 19 '18 at 18:51














          • 1





            great to discover the pdfcomment package! looks nice.

            – user4686
            Apr 30 '11 at 21:42











          • good hint about pdfcomment - if you have the source available and the editor knows LaTeX, then this is a good option.

            – maxschlepzig
            May 6 '11 at 20:24






          • 1





            I have been working with the author of pdfcomment (because I have been working on a similar tool, which is now in the more-or-less deprecated pdfmarginpar package). My most recent knowledge about the state-of-the-art is that TeX will successfully generate annotations, and you can see them and move the popups. But you CANNOT EDIT them. They are purely read-only. I believe there is no way around this limitation because it would involve some sort of key encryption (I do not know the details).

            – Christian Feuersänger
            May 7 '11 at 10:44











          • @Christian Feuersänger I think maxschlepzig is talking about journal editors. You can edit PDF annotations if your reader does support it. Adobe Raeder X now has support for PDF text annotations and Highlight markup annotations and can edit them. Other viewers don't have to edit the PDF file itself they simply can write a new PDF file, like Foxit or X-Change viewer are doing. So editing is no problem if supported by the viewer the one way or the other. In the context of LaTeX it makes more sense to edit the LaTeX source anyway. Put it into a SVN repository and all work with the same document.

            – Josef
            May 7 '11 at 12:32











          • Maybe a silly question: is there by any chance an easy way to generate PDF with pdfcomments comments, send it to someone, receive a version with replies to the comments, and importing these replies back to the latex source (and possibly replying to them again)? If not, this feature is only half that useful it could be!

            – Martin Pecka
            Feb 19 '18 at 18:51








          1




          1





          great to discover the pdfcomment package! looks nice.

          – user4686
          Apr 30 '11 at 21:42





          great to discover the pdfcomment package! looks nice.

          – user4686
          Apr 30 '11 at 21:42













          good hint about pdfcomment - if you have the source available and the editor knows LaTeX, then this is a good option.

          – maxschlepzig
          May 6 '11 at 20:24





          good hint about pdfcomment - if you have the source available and the editor knows LaTeX, then this is a good option.

          – maxschlepzig
          May 6 '11 at 20:24




          1




          1





          I have been working with the author of pdfcomment (because I have been working on a similar tool, which is now in the more-or-less deprecated pdfmarginpar package). My most recent knowledge about the state-of-the-art is that TeX will successfully generate annotations, and you can see them and move the popups. But you CANNOT EDIT them. They are purely read-only. I believe there is no way around this limitation because it would involve some sort of key encryption (I do not know the details).

          – Christian Feuersänger
          May 7 '11 at 10:44





          I have been working with the author of pdfcomment (because I have been working on a similar tool, which is now in the more-or-less deprecated pdfmarginpar package). My most recent knowledge about the state-of-the-art is that TeX will successfully generate annotations, and you can see them and move the popups. But you CANNOT EDIT them. They are purely read-only. I believe there is no way around this limitation because it would involve some sort of key encryption (I do not know the details).

          – Christian Feuersänger
          May 7 '11 at 10:44













          @Christian Feuersänger I think maxschlepzig is talking about journal editors. You can edit PDF annotations if your reader does support it. Adobe Raeder X now has support for PDF text annotations and Highlight markup annotations and can edit them. Other viewers don't have to edit the PDF file itself they simply can write a new PDF file, like Foxit or X-Change viewer are doing. So editing is no problem if supported by the viewer the one way or the other. In the context of LaTeX it makes more sense to edit the LaTeX source anyway. Put it into a SVN repository and all work with the same document.

          – Josef
          May 7 '11 at 12:32





          @Christian Feuersänger I think maxschlepzig is talking about journal editors. You can edit PDF annotations if your reader does support it. Adobe Raeder X now has support for PDF text annotations and Highlight markup annotations and can edit them. Other viewers don't have to edit the PDF file itself they simply can write a new PDF file, like Foxit or X-Change viewer are doing. So editing is no problem if supported by the viewer the one way or the other. In the context of LaTeX it makes more sense to edit the LaTeX source anyway. Put it into a SVN repository and all work with the same document.

          – Josef
          May 7 '11 at 12:32













          Maybe a silly question: is there by any chance an easy way to generate PDF with pdfcomments comments, send it to someone, receive a version with replies to the comments, and importing these replies back to the latex source (and possibly replying to them again)? If not, this feature is only half that useful it could be!

          – Martin Pecka
          Feb 19 '18 at 18:51





          Maybe a silly question: is there by any chance an easy way to generate PDF with pdfcomments comments, send it to someone, receive a version with replies to the comments, and importing these replies back to the latex source (and possibly replying to them again)? If not, this feature is only half that useful it could be!

          – Martin Pecka
          Feb 19 '18 at 18:51











          10














          Using wine you can install and run pdf-xchange. As far as I recall it is free and worked fine for me under linux. Should do the things you want.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            +1 for pdf-xchange viewer. After trying every tool available on Linux, at the end I came to this app. Works fine through wine, at least versions prior to the last one.

            – Meho R.
            Dec 1 '10 at 22:55











          • Foxit Phantom also works through wine and, at least on my machine, works smoother than pdf-xchange viewer and faster. Only trouble is that I could only get version 2.2.4.0225 to work, but not newer.

            – Roey Angel
            Oct 30 '12 at 11:24
















          10














          Using wine you can install and run pdf-xchange. As far as I recall it is free and worked fine for me under linux. Should do the things you want.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            +1 for pdf-xchange viewer. After trying every tool available on Linux, at the end I came to this app. Works fine through wine, at least versions prior to the last one.

            – Meho R.
            Dec 1 '10 at 22:55











          • Foxit Phantom also works through wine and, at least on my machine, works smoother than pdf-xchange viewer and faster. Only trouble is that I could only get version 2.2.4.0225 to work, but not newer.

            – Roey Angel
            Oct 30 '12 at 11:24














          10












          10








          10







          Using wine you can install and run pdf-xchange. As far as I recall it is free and worked fine for me under linux. Should do the things you want.






          share|improve this answer













          Using wine you can install and run pdf-xchange. As far as I recall it is free and worked fine for me under linux. Should do the things you want.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Dec 1 '10 at 12:16









          DrorDror

          11.2k1973150




          11.2k1973150








          • 1





            +1 for pdf-xchange viewer. After trying every tool available on Linux, at the end I came to this app. Works fine through wine, at least versions prior to the last one.

            – Meho R.
            Dec 1 '10 at 22:55











          • Foxit Phantom also works through wine and, at least on my machine, works smoother than pdf-xchange viewer and faster. Only trouble is that I could only get version 2.2.4.0225 to work, but not newer.

            – Roey Angel
            Oct 30 '12 at 11:24














          • 1





            +1 for pdf-xchange viewer. After trying every tool available on Linux, at the end I came to this app. Works fine through wine, at least versions prior to the last one.

            – Meho R.
            Dec 1 '10 at 22:55











          • Foxit Phantom also works through wine and, at least on my machine, works smoother than pdf-xchange viewer and faster. Only trouble is that I could only get version 2.2.4.0225 to work, but not newer.

            – Roey Angel
            Oct 30 '12 at 11:24








          1




          1





          +1 for pdf-xchange viewer. After trying every tool available on Linux, at the end I came to this app. Works fine through wine, at least versions prior to the last one.

          – Meho R.
          Dec 1 '10 at 22:55





          +1 for pdf-xchange viewer. After trying every tool available on Linux, at the end I came to this app. Works fine through wine, at least versions prior to the last one.

          – Meho R.
          Dec 1 '10 at 22:55













          Foxit Phantom also works through wine and, at least on my machine, works smoother than pdf-xchange viewer and faster. Only trouble is that I could only get version 2.2.4.0225 to work, but not newer.

          – Roey Angel
          Oct 30 '12 at 11:24





          Foxit Phantom also works through wine and, at least on my machine, works smoother than pdf-xchange viewer and faster. Only trouble is that I could only get version 2.2.4.0225 to work, but not newer.

          – Roey Angel
          Oct 30 '12 at 11:24











          10














          As it doesn't seem to have been mentioned, what about the pdfcomment Latex package?



          It will write pdf annotations (note that here you would write the annotations as Latex code - however, under Linux the pdf annotations would be only viewable in Adobe Reader - although evince seems to start at least showing icons in the 11.04 Ubuntu...)



          EDIT: Imagine, I didn't know this by now :) Check evince annotiations - Ubuntu Forums and Re: [evince] Annotation and evince - actually, evince does support both adding and reading PDF annotations; and I'm having evince version "GNOME Document Viewer 2.32.0" and "libpoppler13/natty uptodate 0.16.4-0ubuntu1" (i.e. I'm not even sure I'm having the recommended poppler 0.15 on Natty?).... Though, note you need to use the dropdown menu in sidebar to get a list of annotations and adding - and for some reason, annotations added through evince itself are clickable (and their contents can be read) - those from pdfcomment aren't (and their contents are not shown in the list).






          share|improve this answer


























          • And in this post: [[pdftex] pdf objects with references to each other?](tug.org/pipermail/pdftex/2002-March/002440.html) there is direct pdftex code that can make the annotation clickable in evince...

            – sdaau
            Apr 30 '11 at 13:08











          • ... and here is a small hack to pdfcomment.sty which will make the annotations clickable in evince: A slight change: pdfcomment annot. for Evince

            – sdaau
            Apr 30 '11 at 13:48











          • In the case you don't monitor the forum: i wrote a reply ;-)

            – Josef
            Apr 30 '11 at 20:16













          • @Josef - sorry, just wanted to document the pdfcomment/evince trick :) Cheers!

            – sdaau
            May 1 '11 at 16:28






          • 1





            The link above seems to be dead (november 2012). My Evince doesn't properly detect the pdfannotations ; however, okular does anyway.

            – rcabane
            Nov 14 '12 at 8:15
















          10














          As it doesn't seem to have been mentioned, what about the pdfcomment Latex package?



          It will write pdf annotations (note that here you would write the annotations as Latex code - however, under Linux the pdf annotations would be only viewable in Adobe Reader - although evince seems to start at least showing icons in the 11.04 Ubuntu...)



          EDIT: Imagine, I didn't know this by now :) Check evince annotiations - Ubuntu Forums and Re: [evince] Annotation and evince - actually, evince does support both adding and reading PDF annotations; and I'm having evince version "GNOME Document Viewer 2.32.0" and "libpoppler13/natty uptodate 0.16.4-0ubuntu1" (i.e. I'm not even sure I'm having the recommended poppler 0.15 on Natty?).... Though, note you need to use the dropdown menu in sidebar to get a list of annotations and adding - and for some reason, annotations added through evince itself are clickable (and their contents can be read) - those from pdfcomment aren't (and their contents are not shown in the list).






          share|improve this answer


























          • And in this post: [[pdftex] pdf objects with references to each other?](tug.org/pipermail/pdftex/2002-March/002440.html) there is direct pdftex code that can make the annotation clickable in evince...

            – sdaau
            Apr 30 '11 at 13:08











          • ... and here is a small hack to pdfcomment.sty which will make the annotations clickable in evince: A slight change: pdfcomment annot. for Evince

            – sdaau
            Apr 30 '11 at 13:48











          • In the case you don't monitor the forum: i wrote a reply ;-)

            – Josef
            Apr 30 '11 at 20:16













          • @Josef - sorry, just wanted to document the pdfcomment/evince trick :) Cheers!

            – sdaau
            May 1 '11 at 16:28






          • 1





            The link above seems to be dead (november 2012). My Evince doesn't properly detect the pdfannotations ; however, okular does anyway.

            – rcabane
            Nov 14 '12 at 8:15














          10












          10








          10







          As it doesn't seem to have been mentioned, what about the pdfcomment Latex package?



          It will write pdf annotations (note that here you would write the annotations as Latex code - however, under Linux the pdf annotations would be only viewable in Adobe Reader - although evince seems to start at least showing icons in the 11.04 Ubuntu...)



          EDIT: Imagine, I didn't know this by now :) Check evince annotiations - Ubuntu Forums and Re: [evince] Annotation and evince - actually, evince does support both adding and reading PDF annotations; and I'm having evince version "GNOME Document Viewer 2.32.0" and "libpoppler13/natty uptodate 0.16.4-0ubuntu1" (i.e. I'm not even sure I'm having the recommended poppler 0.15 on Natty?).... Though, note you need to use the dropdown menu in sidebar to get a list of annotations and adding - and for some reason, annotations added through evince itself are clickable (and their contents can be read) - those from pdfcomment aren't (and their contents are not shown in the list).






          share|improve this answer















          As it doesn't seem to have been mentioned, what about the pdfcomment Latex package?



          It will write pdf annotations (note that here you would write the annotations as Latex code - however, under Linux the pdf annotations would be only viewable in Adobe Reader - although evince seems to start at least showing icons in the 11.04 Ubuntu...)



          EDIT: Imagine, I didn't know this by now :) Check evince annotiations - Ubuntu Forums and Re: [evince] Annotation and evince - actually, evince does support both adding and reading PDF annotations; and I'm having evince version "GNOME Document Viewer 2.32.0" and "libpoppler13/natty uptodate 0.16.4-0ubuntu1" (i.e. I'm not even sure I'm having the recommended poppler 0.15 on Natty?).... Though, note you need to use the dropdown menu in sidebar to get a list of annotations and adding - and for some reason, annotations added through evince itself are clickable (and their contents can be read) - those from pdfcomment aren't (and their contents are not shown in the list).







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Apr 30 '11 at 9:53

























          answered Apr 30 '11 at 9:15









          sdaausdaau

          9,189649131




          9,189649131













          • And in this post: [[pdftex] pdf objects with references to each other?](tug.org/pipermail/pdftex/2002-March/002440.html) there is direct pdftex code that can make the annotation clickable in evince...

            – sdaau
            Apr 30 '11 at 13:08











          • ... and here is a small hack to pdfcomment.sty which will make the annotations clickable in evince: A slight change: pdfcomment annot. for Evince

            – sdaau
            Apr 30 '11 at 13:48











          • In the case you don't monitor the forum: i wrote a reply ;-)

            – Josef
            Apr 30 '11 at 20:16













          • @Josef - sorry, just wanted to document the pdfcomment/evince trick :) Cheers!

            – sdaau
            May 1 '11 at 16:28






          • 1





            The link above seems to be dead (november 2012). My Evince doesn't properly detect the pdfannotations ; however, okular does anyway.

            – rcabane
            Nov 14 '12 at 8:15



















          • And in this post: [[pdftex] pdf objects with references to each other?](tug.org/pipermail/pdftex/2002-March/002440.html) there is direct pdftex code that can make the annotation clickable in evince...

            – sdaau
            Apr 30 '11 at 13:08











          • ... and here is a small hack to pdfcomment.sty which will make the annotations clickable in evince: A slight change: pdfcomment annot. for Evince

            – sdaau
            Apr 30 '11 at 13:48











          • In the case you don't monitor the forum: i wrote a reply ;-)

            – Josef
            Apr 30 '11 at 20:16













          • @Josef - sorry, just wanted to document the pdfcomment/evince trick :) Cheers!

            – sdaau
            May 1 '11 at 16:28






          • 1





            The link above seems to be dead (november 2012). My Evince doesn't properly detect the pdfannotations ; however, okular does anyway.

            – rcabane
            Nov 14 '12 at 8:15

















          And in this post: [[pdftex] pdf objects with references to each other?](tug.org/pipermail/pdftex/2002-March/002440.html) there is direct pdftex code that can make the annotation clickable in evince...

          – sdaau
          Apr 30 '11 at 13:08





          And in this post: [[pdftex] pdf objects with references to each other?](tug.org/pipermail/pdftex/2002-March/002440.html) there is direct pdftex code that can make the annotation clickable in evince...

          – sdaau
          Apr 30 '11 at 13:08













          ... and here is a small hack to pdfcomment.sty which will make the annotations clickable in evince: A slight change: pdfcomment annot. for Evince

          – sdaau
          Apr 30 '11 at 13:48





          ... and here is a small hack to pdfcomment.sty which will make the annotations clickable in evince: A slight change: pdfcomment annot. for Evince

          – sdaau
          Apr 30 '11 at 13:48













          In the case you don't monitor the forum: i wrote a reply ;-)

          – Josef
          Apr 30 '11 at 20:16







          In the case you don't monitor the forum: i wrote a reply ;-)

          – Josef
          Apr 30 '11 at 20:16















          @Josef - sorry, just wanted to document the pdfcomment/evince trick :) Cheers!

          – sdaau
          May 1 '11 at 16:28





          @Josef - sorry, just wanted to document the pdfcomment/evince trick :) Cheers!

          – sdaau
          May 1 '11 at 16:28




          1




          1





          The link above seems to be dead (november 2012). My Evince doesn't properly detect the pdfannotations ; however, okular does anyway.

          – rcabane
          Nov 14 '12 at 8:15





          The link above seems to be dead (november 2012). My Evince doesn't properly detect the pdfannotations ; however, okular does anyway.

          – rcabane
          Nov 14 '12 at 8:15











          6














          There seem to be several pdf readers for Windows that allow you to add annotation to pdf documents, however, there does not seem to be anything like that for Linux, apart from PDFedit, which, in my experience, is rather hard to use and at the moment very unstable.



          One Linux tool that couild be at least partially helpful is flpsed. it is a tool for adding annotation to Postscript files, and it can (to some extent) handle pdf files through external programs. I used it before to fill in pdf forms that were not "fillable".






          share|improve this answer
























          • I tried pdfedit yesterday, and indeed, I found it hard to use ;)

            – maxschlepzig
            Dec 2 '10 at 10:11
















          6














          There seem to be several pdf readers for Windows that allow you to add annotation to pdf documents, however, there does not seem to be anything like that for Linux, apart from PDFedit, which, in my experience, is rather hard to use and at the moment very unstable.



          One Linux tool that couild be at least partially helpful is flpsed. it is a tool for adding annotation to Postscript files, and it can (to some extent) handle pdf files through external programs. I used it before to fill in pdf forms that were not "fillable".






          share|improve this answer
























          • I tried pdfedit yesterday, and indeed, I found it hard to use ;)

            – maxschlepzig
            Dec 2 '10 at 10:11














          6












          6








          6







          There seem to be several pdf readers for Windows that allow you to add annotation to pdf documents, however, there does not seem to be anything like that for Linux, apart from PDFedit, which, in my experience, is rather hard to use and at the moment very unstable.



          One Linux tool that couild be at least partially helpful is flpsed. it is a tool for adding annotation to Postscript files, and it can (to some extent) handle pdf files through external programs. I used it before to fill in pdf forms that were not "fillable".






          share|improve this answer













          There seem to be several pdf readers for Windows that allow you to add annotation to pdf documents, however, there does not seem to be anything like that for Linux, apart from PDFedit, which, in my experience, is rather hard to use and at the moment very unstable.



          One Linux tool that couild be at least partially helpful is flpsed. it is a tool for adding annotation to Postscript files, and it can (to some extent) handle pdf files through external programs. I used it before to fill in pdf forms that were not "fillable".







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Dec 1 '10 at 18:52









          Jan HlavacekJan Hlavacek

          15.8k34776




          15.8k34776













          • I tried pdfedit yesterday, and indeed, I found it hard to use ;)

            – maxschlepzig
            Dec 2 '10 at 10:11



















          • I tried pdfedit yesterday, and indeed, I found it hard to use ;)

            – maxschlepzig
            Dec 2 '10 at 10:11

















          I tried pdfedit yesterday, and indeed, I found it hard to use ;)

          – maxschlepzig
          Dec 2 '10 at 10:11





          I tried pdfedit yesterday, and indeed, I found it hard to use ;)

          – maxschlepzig
          Dec 2 '10 at 10:11











          5














          I use xournal and jarnal for this sort of thing. I've no idea how they compare to Adobe and I almost never use Adobe, and I don't know if "annotations" has a special meaning in the context of this question so these might not be what you're looking for.




          1. Both are open source (xournal is a C++ program, jarnal is java)

          2. Both run on Linux (jarnal runs on any platform with java)

          3. Both can export to PDF

          4. Given that both can export to PDF, if "annotations" has no special connotations, this is certainly true

          5. Don't know about this one






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            I think the OP is talking about "annotations" as in the comments or highlights one can make on a document in Word or Acrobat Pro. These are (cool) apps for handwriting notes from scratch.

            – Matthew Leingang
            Dec 1 '10 at 13:57











          • @Matthew: I wondered about that, but since "annotation" is an ordinary word which makes sense in this setting, I couldn't be sure. As I don't use Acrobat (Pro or otherwise) or Word, I have little conception of what extra features are involved with these "super annotations".

            – Loop Space
            Dec 1 '10 at 19:16
















          5














          I use xournal and jarnal for this sort of thing. I've no idea how they compare to Adobe and I almost never use Adobe, and I don't know if "annotations" has a special meaning in the context of this question so these might not be what you're looking for.




          1. Both are open source (xournal is a C++ program, jarnal is java)

          2. Both run on Linux (jarnal runs on any platform with java)

          3. Both can export to PDF

          4. Given that both can export to PDF, if "annotations" has no special connotations, this is certainly true

          5. Don't know about this one






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            I think the OP is talking about "annotations" as in the comments or highlights one can make on a document in Word or Acrobat Pro. These are (cool) apps for handwriting notes from scratch.

            – Matthew Leingang
            Dec 1 '10 at 13:57











          • @Matthew: I wondered about that, but since "annotation" is an ordinary word which makes sense in this setting, I couldn't be sure. As I don't use Acrobat (Pro or otherwise) or Word, I have little conception of what extra features are involved with these "super annotations".

            – Loop Space
            Dec 1 '10 at 19:16














          5












          5








          5







          I use xournal and jarnal for this sort of thing. I've no idea how they compare to Adobe and I almost never use Adobe, and I don't know if "annotations" has a special meaning in the context of this question so these might not be what you're looking for.




          1. Both are open source (xournal is a C++ program, jarnal is java)

          2. Both run on Linux (jarnal runs on any platform with java)

          3. Both can export to PDF

          4. Given that both can export to PDF, if "annotations" has no special connotations, this is certainly true

          5. Don't know about this one






          share|improve this answer













          I use xournal and jarnal for this sort of thing. I've no idea how they compare to Adobe and I almost never use Adobe, and I don't know if "annotations" has a special meaning in the context of this question so these might not be what you're looking for.




          1. Both are open source (xournal is a C++ program, jarnal is java)

          2. Both run on Linux (jarnal runs on any platform with java)

          3. Both can export to PDF

          4. Given that both can export to PDF, if "annotations" has no special connotations, this is certainly true

          5. Don't know about this one







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Dec 1 '10 at 12:12









          Loop SpaceLoop Space

          113k30310610




          113k30310610








          • 1





            I think the OP is talking about "annotations" as in the comments or highlights one can make on a document in Word or Acrobat Pro. These are (cool) apps for handwriting notes from scratch.

            – Matthew Leingang
            Dec 1 '10 at 13:57











          • @Matthew: I wondered about that, but since "annotation" is an ordinary word which makes sense in this setting, I couldn't be sure. As I don't use Acrobat (Pro or otherwise) or Word, I have little conception of what extra features are involved with these "super annotations".

            – Loop Space
            Dec 1 '10 at 19:16














          • 1





            I think the OP is talking about "annotations" as in the comments or highlights one can make on a document in Word or Acrobat Pro. These are (cool) apps for handwriting notes from scratch.

            – Matthew Leingang
            Dec 1 '10 at 13:57











          • @Matthew: I wondered about that, but since "annotation" is an ordinary word which makes sense in this setting, I couldn't be sure. As I don't use Acrobat (Pro or otherwise) or Word, I have little conception of what extra features are involved with these "super annotations".

            – Loop Space
            Dec 1 '10 at 19:16








          1




          1





          I think the OP is talking about "annotations" as in the comments or highlights one can make on a document in Word or Acrobat Pro. These are (cool) apps for handwriting notes from scratch.

          – Matthew Leingang
          Dec 1 '10 at 13:57





          I think the OP is talking about "annotations" as in the comments or highlights one can make on a document in Word or Acrobat Pro. These are (cool) apps for handwriting notes from scratch.

          – Matthew Leingang
          Dec 1 '10 at 13:57













          @Matthew: I wondered about that, but since "annotation" is an ordinary word which makes sense in this setting, I couldn't be sure. As I don't use Acrobat (Pro or otherwise) or Word, I have little conception of what extra features are involved with these "super annotations".

          – Loop Space
          Dec 1 '10 at 19:16





          @Matthew: I wondered about that, but since "annotation" is an ordinary word which makes sense in this setting, I couldn't be sure. As I don't use Acrobat (Pro or otherwise) or Word, I have little conception of what extra features are involved with these "super annotations".

          – Loop Space
          Dec 1 '10 at 19:16











          5














          Okular since some time in 2014 can save annotations inside files by saving it to a new file with:



          "File > Save as .."



          The annotations will then be saved inside that new file, and not just in the configuration/system files of okular.



          Opposite to that, you can use "File > Save Copy as ..", that removes any annotations for the newly saved file.



          Unfortunately there is no way to check where the annotations are saved that you see in any opened pdf file. But if you generally save the pdf as a new file with "Save as .." before sending to anyone, you are on the safe side.



          What helped for Acrobat Reader for me, was adding:



          pdfminorversion=4


          before documentclass[pdftex]{...






          share|improve this answer


























          • Welcome to TeX.SX! You can highlight code in your post using back-ticks. For code-blocks indent them by four spaces or use the {} on the gui.

            – Andrew
            Jul 6 '16 at 12:01
















          5














          Okular since some time in 2014 can save annotations inside files by saving it to a new file with:



          "File > Save as .."



          The annotations will then be saved inside that new file, and not just in the configuration/system files of okular.



          Opposite to that, you can use "File > Save Copy as ..", that removes any annotations for the newly saved file.



          Unfortunately there is no way to check where the annotations are saved that you see in any opened pdf file. But if you generally save the pdf as a new file with "Save as .." before sending to anyone, you are on the safe side.



          What helped for Acrobat Reader for me, was adding:



          pdfminorversion=4


          before documentclass[pdftex]{...






          share|improve this answer


























          • Welcome to TeX.SX! You can highlight code in your post using back-ticks. For code-blocks indent them by four spaces or use the {} on the gui.

            – Andrew
            Jul 6 '16 at 12:01














          5












          5








          5







          Okular since some time in 2014 can save annotations inside files by saving it to a new file with:



          "File > Save as .."



          The annotations will then be saved inside that new file, and not just in the configuration/system files of okular.



          Opposite to that, you can use "File > Save Copy as ..", that removes any annotations for the newly saved file.



          Unfortunately there is no way to check where the annotations are saved that you see in any opened pdf file. But if you generally save the pdf as a new file with "Save as .." before sending to anyone, you are on the safe side.



          What helped for Acrobat Reader for me, was adding:



          pdfminorversion=4


          before documentclass[pdftex]{...






          share|improve this answer















          Okular since some time in 2014 can save annotations inside files by saving it to a new file with:



          "File > Save as .."



          The annotations will then be saved inside that new file, and not just in the configuration/system files of okular.



          Opposite to that, you can use "File > Save Copy as ..", that removes any annotations for the newly saved file.



          Unfortunately there is no way to check where the annotations are saved that you see in any opened pdf file. But if you generally save the pdf as a new file with "Save as .." before sending to anyone, you are on the safe side.



          What helped for Acrobat Reader for me, was adding:



          pdfminorversion=4


          before documentclass[pdftex]{...







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Jul 6 '16 at 12:00









          Andrew

          30.9k34482




          30.9k34482










          answered Jul 6 '16 at 11:47









          bluesceadabluesceada

          6613




          6613













          • Welcome to TeX.SX! You can highlight code in your post using back-ticks. For code-blocks indent them by four spaces or use the {} on the gui.

            – Andrew
            Jul 6 '16 at 12:01



















          • Welcome to TeX.SX! You can highlight code in your post using back-ticks. For code-blocks indent them by four spaces or use the {} on the gui.

            – Andrew
            Jul 6 '16 at 12:01

















          Welcome to TeX.SX! You can highlight code in your post using back-ticks. For code-blocks indent them by four spaces or use the {} on the gui.

          – Andrew
          Jul 6 '16 at 12:01





          Welcome to TeX.SX! You can highlight code in your post using back-ticks. For code-blocks indent them by four spaces or use the {} on the gui.

          – Andrew
          Jul 6 '16 at 12:01











          4














          I think PDF edit is able to do what you want, it's open source, free etc. it can be found at http://pdfedit.petricek.net/en/download.html






          share|improve this answer




























            4














            I think PDF edit is able to do what you want, it's open source, free etc. it can be found at http://pdfedit.petricek.net/en/download.html






            share|improve this answer


























              4












              4








              4







              I think PDF edit is able to do what you want, it's open source, free etc. it can be found at http://pdfedit.petricek.net/en/download.html






              share|improve this answer













              I think PDF edit is able to do what you want, it's open source, free etc. it can be found at http://pdfedit.petricek.net/en/download.html







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Dec 1 '10 at 11:30









              TimticoTimtico

              1,22521428




              1,22521428























                  1














                  If you want not just a marginpar box, but an object you can move in your viewer, another possible approach is to use attachfile package, with something like: textattachfile[color=0 0 1,print=false]{empty}{parbox{linewidth}{$ partial S leq 0 $ is wrong!}}, maybe folded inside a marginpar or other thing to place it properly. It allows to use formulas, includegraphics', etc. though it is a very ugly method (you are attaching an empty file).



                  You can also use attachfile's {subject,description} options to make a meta-comment, or make it from the pdf viewer.



                  It would be nice not to have to attach that ghost file. I've looked for something to tailor a comment icon with pdfcomment but I haven't been able. attachfile provides a way to embed some extra icons in the pdf, making them not viewer-dependent, maybe that way. Also there is an option to avoid the ghost file (notextattachfile, with print=true), but then the object is locked.






                  share|improve this answer






























                    1














                    If you want not just a marginpar box, but an object you can move in your viewer, another possible approach is to use attachfile package, with something like: textattachfile[color=0 0 1,print=false]{empty}{parbox{linewidth}{$ partial S leq 0 $ is wrong!}}, maybe folded inside a marginpar or other thing to place it properly. It allows to use formulas, includegraphics', etc. though it is a very ugly method (you are attaching an empty file).



                    You can also use attachfile's {subject,description} options to make a meta-comment, or make it from the pdf viewer.



                    It would be nice not to have to attach that ghost file. I've looked for something to tailor a comment icon with pdfcomment but I haven't been able. attachfile provides a way to embed some extra icons in the pdf, making them not viewer-dependent, maybe that way. Also there is an option to avoid the ghost file (notextattachfile, with print=true), but then the object is locked.






                    share|improve this answer




























                      1












                      1








                      1







                      If you want not just a marginpar box, but an object you can move in your viewer, another possible approach is to use attachfile package, with something like: textattachfile[color=0 0 1,print=false]{empty}{parbox{linewidth}{$ partial S leq 0 $ is wrong!}}, maybe folded inside a marginpar or other thing to place it properly. It allows to use formulas, includegraphics', etc. though it is a very ugly method (you are attaching an empty file).



                      You can also use attachfile's {subject,description} options to make a meta-comment, or make it from the pdf viewer.



                      It would be nice not to have to attach that ghost file. I've looked for something to tailor a comment icon with pdfcomment but I haven't been able. attachfile provides a way to embed some extra icons in the pdf, making them not viewer-dependent, maybe that way. Also there is an option to avoid the ghost file (notextattachfile, with print=true), but then the object is locked.






                      share|improve this answer















                      If you want not just a marginpar box, but an object you can move in your viewer, another possible approach is to use attachfile package, with something like: textattachfile[color=0 0 1,print=false]{empty}{parbox{linewidth}{$ partial S leq 0 $ is wrong!}}, maybe folded inside a marginpar or other thing to place it properly. It allows to use formulas, includegraphics', etc. though it is a very ugly method (you are attaching an empty file).



                      You can also use attachfile's {subject,description} options to make a meta-comment, or make it from the pdf viewer.



                      It would be nice not to have to attach that ghost file. I've looked for something to tailor a comment icon with pdfcomment but I haven't been able. attachfile provides a way to embed some extra icons in the pdf, making them not viewer-dependent, maybe that way. Also there is an option to avoid the ghost file (notextattachfile, with print=true), but then the object is locked.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Feb 11 '14 at 11:49

























                      answered Feb 11 '14 at 11:10









                      AndrestandAndrestand

                      506320




                      506320























                          1














                          Five years later:



                          Under Windows, still pdf-xchange, but under Linux there is »Master PDF Editor«. With both you can add words, annotations, whatever to a PDF.





                          Old answer from 2012



                          I've been using flpsed (http://www.ecademix.com/JohannesHofmann/flpsed.html) to comment text in PDFs for years, easy, fast, slim.






                          share|improve this answer






























                            1














                            Five years later:



                            Under Windows, still pdf-xchange, but under Linux there is »Master PDF Editor«. With both you can add words, annotations, whatever to a PDF.





                            Old answer from 2012



                            I've been using flpsed (http://www.ecademix.com/JohannesHofmann/flpsed.html) to comment text in PDFs for years, easy, fast, slim.






                            share|improve this answer




























                              1












                              1








                              1







                              Five years later:



                              Under Windows, still pdf-xchange, but under Linux there is »Master PDF Editor«. With both you can add words, annotations, whatever to a PDF.





                              Old answer from 2012



                              I've been using flpsed (http://www.ecademix.com/JohannesHofmann/flpsed.html) to comment text in PDFs for years, easy, fast, slim.






                              share|improve this answer















                              Five years later:



                              Under Windows, still pdf-xchange, but under Linux there is »Master PDF Editor«. With both you can add words, annotations, whatever to a PDF.





                              Old answer from 2012



                              I've been using flpsed (http://www.ecademix.com/JohannesHofmann/flpsed.html) to comment text in PDFs for years, easy, fast, slim.







                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited Jun 5 '17 at 20:21

























                              answered Dec 5 '12 at 20:29









                              Keks DoseKeks Dose

                              21.5k35695




                              21.5k35695























                                  0














                                  Google Drive's PDF viewer supports adding "comments" on PDF files. Drive isn't open-source, but it's usable from Linux and the comments are saved to the file and, if the file is downloaded from Drive and opened in Adobe Acrobat, seem to show up as the same kind of annotations that Acrobat itself creates.





                                  share








                                  New contributor




                                  user570286 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                                    0














                                    Google Drive's PDF viewer supports adding "comments" on PDF files. Drive isn't open-source, but it's usable from Linux and the comments are saved to the file and, if the file is downloaded from Drive and opened in Adobe Acrobat, seem to show up as the same kind of annotations that Acrobat itself creates.





                                    share








                                    New contributor




                                    user570286 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.























                                      0












                                      0








                                      0







                                      Google Drive's PDF viewer supports adding "comments" on PDF files. Drive isn't open-source, but it's usable from Linux and the comments are saved to the file and, if the file is downloaded from Drive and opened in Adobe Acrobat, seem to show up as the same kind of annotations that Acrobat itself creates.





                                      share








                                      New contributor




                                      user570286 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.










                                      Google Drive's PDF viewer supports adding "comments" on PDF files. Drive isn't open-source, but it's usable from Linux and the comments are saved to the file and, if the file is downloaded from Drive and opened in Adobe Acrobat, seem to show up as the same kind of annotations that Acrobat itself creates.






                                      share








                                      New contributor




                                      user570286 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.








                                      share


                                      share






                                      New contributor




                                      user570286 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                      answered 3 mins ago









                                      user570286user570286

                                      11




                                      11




                                      New contributor




                                      user570286 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                      New contributor





                                      user570286 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                      user570286 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded




















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f6306%2fhow-to-annotate-pdf-files-generated-by-pdflatex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          El tren de la libertad Índice Antecedentes "Porque yo decido" Desarrollo de la...

                                          Puerta de Hutt Referencias Enlaces externos Menú de navegación15°58′00″S 5°42′00″O /...

                                          Castillo d'Acher Características Menú de navegación