Sort list of array linked objects by keys and values The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey...
ELI5: Why do they say that Israel would have been the fourth country to land a spacecraft on the Moon and why do they call it low cost?
Do I have Disadvantage attacking with an off-hand weapon?
Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit
Can a flute soloist sit?
Why doesn't a hydraulic lever violate conservation of energy?
How to determine omitted units in a publication
Single author papers against my advisor's will?
Can each chord in a progression create its own key?
Why are PDP-7-style microprogrammed instructions out of vogue?
Could an empire control the whole planet with today's comunication methods?
Student Loan from years ago pops up and is taking my salary
Do working physicists consider Newtonian mechanics to be "falsified"?
Make it rain characters
60's-70's movie: home appliances revolting against the owners
How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?
Is this wall load bearing? Blueprints and photos attached
Why can't wing-mounted spoilers be used to steepen approaches?
Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?
What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?
Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?
Are there continuous functions who are the same in an interval but differ in at least one other point?
What happens to a Warlock's expended Spell Slots when they gain a Level?
What is the role of 'For' here?
Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?
Sort list of array linked objects by keys and values
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraFunctional Knapsack Problem in PythonSorting movie search results by similaritySorting a list and another list inside each itemGeneric natural merge sort a linked-list in CIce Cream ParlorFlight combinations between two citiesCompute the minimum distance between two points in a 2-D planeConvert a JS DataTable to an array of objectsSorting a 2-dimensional array with counting sortRemove nth node from last position in linked list
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
I have this sample data:
let trips = [
{
from: "DEN",
to: "JFK"
},
{
from: "SEA",
to: "DEN"
},
{
from: 'JFK',
to: 'SEA'
},
];
and my origin is 'JFK', I want to sort the list by how I have traveled. So for instance, this should be the end result:
let trips = [
{
from: 'JFK',
to: 'SEA'
},
{
from: "SEA",
to: "DEN"
},
{
from: "DEN",
to: "JFK"
},
];
My solution works but it's not very well written, but I tried!
function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') {
let sortedArray = [];
let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];
sortedArray.push(first);
for(var i = 0; i < trips.length; i++) {
if(sortedArray[0].to === trips[i].from) {
sortedArray.push(trips[i]);
}
}
for(var i = 0; i < trips.length; i++) {
if(sortedArray[1].to === trips[i].from) {
sortedArray.push(trips[i]);
}
}
return sortedArray;
}
sortByLinked(trips)
javascript algorithm sorting graph
$endgroup$
migrated from stackoverflow.com 4 hours ago
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have this sample data:
let trips = [
{
from: "DEN",
to: "JFK"
},
{
from: "SEA",
to: "DEN"
},
{
from: 'JFK',
to: 'SEA'
},
];
and my origin is 'JFK', I want to sort the list by how I have traveled. So for instance, this should be the end result:
let trips = [
{
from: 'JFK',
to: 'SEA'
},
{
from: "SEA",
to: "DEN"
},
{
from: "DEN",
to: "JFK"
},
];
My solution works but it's not very well written, but I tried!
function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') {
let sortedArray = [];
let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];
sortedArray.push(first);
for(var i = 0; i < trips.length; i++) {
if(sortedArray[0].to === trips[i].from) {
sortedArray.push(trips[i]);
}
}
for(var i = 0; i < trips.length; i++) {
if(sortedArray[1].to === trips[i].from) {
sortedArray.push(trips[i]);
}
}
return sortedArray;
}
sortByLinked(trips)
javascript algorithm sorting graph
$endgroup$
migrated from stackoverflow.com 4 hours ago
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
$begingroup$
is it like the origin and final destination always the same? and how many intermediate trips are going to be present?
$endgroup$
– karthick
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Isfrom
unique for all elements?
$endgroup$
– Taplar
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@karthick yes the origin and final should be the same.
$endgroup$
– Shivam Bhalla
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Taplar yes from is unique
$endgroup$
– Shivam Bhalla
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
The task you want to perform is a simple kind of topological sorting.
$endgroup$
– 200_success
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have this sample data:
let trips = [
{
from: "DEN",
to: "JFK"
},
{
from: "SEA",
to: "DEN"
},
{
from: 'JFK',
to: 'SEA'
},
];
and my origin is 'JFK', I want to sort the list by how I have traveled. So for instance, this should be the end result:
let trips = [
{
from: 'JFK',
to: 'SEA'
},
{
from: "SEA",
to: "DEN"
},
{
from: "DEN",
to: "JFK"
},
];
My solution works but it's not very well written, but I tried!
function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') {
let sortedArray = [];
let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];
sortedArray.push(first);
for(var i = 0; i < trips.length; i++) {
if(sortedArray[0].to === trips[i].from) {
sortedArray.push(trips[i]);
}
}
for(var i = 0; i < trips.length; i++) {
if(sortedArray[1].to === trips[i].from) {
sortedArray.push(trips[i]);
}
}
return sortedArray;
}
sortByLinked(trips)
javascript algorithm sorting graph
$endgroup$
I have this sample data:
let trips = [
{
from: "DEN",
to: "JFK"
},
{
from: "SEA",
to: "DEN"
},
{
from: 'JFK',
to: 'SEA'
},
];
and my origin is 'JFK', I want to sort the list by how I have traveled. So for instance, this should be the end result:
let trips = [
{
from: 'JFK',
to: 'SEA'
},
{
from: "SEA",
to: "DEN"
},
{
from: "DEN",
to: "JFK"
},
];
My solution works but it's not very well written, but I tried!
function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') {
let sortedArray = [];
let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];
sortedArray.push(first);
for(var i = 0; i < trips.length; i++) {
if(sortedArray[0].to === trips[i].from) {
sortedArray.push(trips[i]);
}
}
for(var i = 0; i < trips.length; i++) {
if(sortedArray[1].to === trips[i].from) {
sortedArray.push(trips[i]);
}
}
return sortedArray;
}
sortByLinked(trips)
javascript algorithm sorting graph
javascript algorithm sorting graph
edited 3 hours ago
200_success
131k17157422
131k17157422
asked 5 hours ago
Shivam BhallaShivam Bhalla
1875
1875
migrated from stackoverflow.com 4 hours ago
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
migrated from stackoverflow.com 4 hours ago
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
$begingroup$
is it like the origin and final destination always the same? and how many intermediate trips are going to be present?
$endgroup$
– karthick
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Isfrom
unique for all elements?
$endgroup$
– Taplar
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@karthick yes the origin and final should be the same.
$endgroup$
– Shivam Bhalla
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Taplar yes from is unique
$endgroup$
– Shivam Bhalla
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
The task you want to perform is a simple kind of topological sorting.
$endgroup$
– 200_success
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
is it like the origin and final destination always the same? and how many intermediate trips are going to be present?
$endgroup$
– karthick
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Isfrom
unique for all elements?
$endgroup$
– Taplar
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@karthick yes the origin and final should be the same.
$endgroup$
– Shivam Bhalla
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Taplar yes from is unique
$endgroup$
– Shivam Bhalla
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
The task you want to perform is a simple kind of topological sorting.
$endgroup$
– 200_success
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
is it like the origin and final destination always the same? and how many intermediate trips are going to be present?
$endgroup$
– karthick
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
is it like the origin and final destination always the same? and how many intermediate trips are going to be present?
$endgroup$
– karthick
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is
from
unique for all elements?$endgroup$
– Taplar
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is
from
unique for all elements?$endgroup$
– Taplar
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@karthick yes the origin and final should be the same.
$endgroup$
– Shivam Bhalla
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@karthick yes the origin and final should be the same.
$endgroup$
– Shivam Bhalla
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Taplar yes from is unique
$endgroup$
– Shivam Bhalla
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Taplar yes from is unique
$endgroup$
– Shivam Bhalla
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
The task you want to perform is a simple kind of topological sorting.
$endgroup$
– 200_success
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
The task you want to perform is a simple kind of topological sorting.
$endgroup$
– 200_success
3 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your solution only works if there's exactly 3 trips. After you find the first trip, put it at the front of the array and then find each subsequent one but instead of using a for
loop like you're doing there are other ways to find the next trip like using Array.map()
or Array.filter()
.
Here's one way to sort it in place and can handle any number of trips greater than 1.
function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') {
// this will be useful
function swap(array, index1, index2){
let temp = array[index1];
array[index1] = array[index2];
array[index2] = temp;
}
// find first one
let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];
// put him in the front of the list
swap(trips, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(first.from), 0);
// sort it in place
for(let i=1; i<trips.length; i++){
swap(trips, i, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(trips[i-1].to));
}
}
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Because ecmascript-6 is used here: "Two variables values can be swapped in one destructuring expression."
$endgroup$
– Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It would be good if your function could work for more than 3 trips.
And for larger chains of trips it becomes important to make it efficient. It is not efficient to search for the next trip by scanning the whole array. This will make the solution have O(n²) time complexity. So I would suggest creating a Map
first, so that you can access a trip by its from
property in constant time:
function sortByLinked(trips, origin = "JFK") {
const map = new Map(trips.map(trip => [trip.from, trip]));
const result = [];
for (let trip; trip = map.get(origin); origin = trip.to) {
result.push(trip);
map.delete(origin);
}
return result;
}
const trips = [{from: "DEN",to: "JFK"},{from: "SEA",to: "DEN"},{from: 'JFK', to: 'SEA'}];
const sorted = sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");
console.log(sorted);
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Code style
Use constants for variables that do not change. Eg
const sortedArray = [];
Don't include the type in the name, Eg
const sortedArray = [];
can be Egconst sorted = [];
The default parameter in this case seams inappropriate as it is likely that
"JFK"
is not an origin in all calls to this function. If no origin is given one could assume that the first item in trips contains the origin.function sortByLinked(trips, origin = trips[0].from) {
which will throw an error if trips is empty so the function should not be called with an empty trips array if you don't pass thefrom
parameter.
However in this example best to leave the default as
undefined
if not passed as that will return an empty array which is more fitting the input parameters.
The name
sort
is inappropriate as in JS it implies that the array be sorted in place, that all items be sorted (may not be possible).You have declared
i
two times. As avar
you should put the declaration at the top of the function and not in thefor
loop.Rather than use
Array.filter
you can useArray.find
. It will find the first instance.Using
for...of
rather thanfor(;;)
reduces the code complexity.No point continuing the search inside the for loops when you have found a match. Use the
break
token to stop a loop earlyPut a space between
if
and(
Don't forget to add the
;
where appropriate. It is missing from the callsortByLinked(trips)
You call the origin
origin
andfrom
this can get confusing. Keep the naming unambiguous. As the trip items usefrom
then that would be the better name for the second input argument.
Using the above points to modify your code we get
function tripFrom(trips, from) {
const sorted = [];
const first = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from);
sorted.push(first);
for (const trip of trips) {
if (first.to === trip.from) {
sorted.push(trip);
break;
}
}
for (const trip of trips) {
if (sorted[sorted.length - 1].to === trip.from) {
sorted.push(trips);
break;
}
}
return sorted;
}
sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");
This is still not a good solution. Its not at all DRY (don't repeat yourself) and is hard coded to a single use case.
Improving the function.
It can all be done within a single loop and work for any length array.
To create the function we must add some constraints on the array trips
and what to do when we encounter any problems.
- That the array
trips
contains objects that each have the propertyfrom
andto
that are correctly formatted static strings. The resulting array is erroneous or indeterminate if not so. - That the array does not contain circular trips shorter than the array length.
- That a complete trip length is no longer than the array, or when a matching
trip.to
can not be found. The returned array can be 0 totrips.length
in size. - Locations are case sensitive.
- If there is more than one matching
trip.from
it is assumed that the first match in trips is the correct one. (It would be interesting to extract the longest possible trip from? or the shortest trip that returns to the origin?)
Example
function tripFrom(trips, from) {
const result = [];
while (result.length < trips.length) {
const trip = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from);
if (!trip) { break }
from = trip.to;
result.push(trip);
}
return result;
}
tripFrom(trips, "JFK");
Or if it is known that the trip is the same length as the input array.
function tripFrom(trips, from) {
const res = [];
while (res.length < trips.length) {
from = (res[res.length] = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from)).to;
}
return res;
}
tripFrom(trips, "JFK");
It is unclear if you want the array sorted in place. If that is a requirement then the above version can be modified to do that by simply copying the results array res
to the trips
array. You can empty an array by setting its length to zero. The spread ...
operator in this case spreads the array items over the functions arguments trips.push(...res)
thus pushing all the items to the array.
function tripFrom(trips, from) {
const res = [];
while (res.length < trips.length) {
from = (res[res.length] = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from)).to;
}
trips.length = 0;
trips.push(...res);
return trips;
}
tripFrom(trips, "JFK");
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217351%2fsort-list-of-array-linked-objects-by-keys-and-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your solution only works if there's exactly 3 trips. After you find the first trip, put it at the front of the array and then find each subsequent one but instead of using a for
loop like you're doing there are other ways to find the next trip like using Array.map()
or Array.filter()
.
Here's one way to sort it in place and can handle any number of trips greater than 1.
function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') {
// this will be useful
function swap(array, index1, index2){
let temp = array[index1];
array[index1] = array[index2];
array[index2] = temp;
}
// find first one
let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];
// put him in the front of the list
swap(trips, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(first.from), 0);
// sort it in place
for(let i=1; i<trips.length; i++){
swap(trips, i, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(trips[i-1].to));
}
}
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Because ecmascript-6 is used here: "Two variables values can be swapped in one destructuring expression."
$endgroup$
– Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your solution only works if there's exactly 3 trips. After you find the first trip, put it at the front of the array and then find each subsequent one but instead of using a for
loop like you're doing there are other ways to find the next trip like using Array.map()
or Array.filter()
.
Here's one way to sort it in place and can handle any number of trips greater than 1.
function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') {
// this will be useful
function swap(array, index1, index2){
let temp = array[index1];
array[index1] = array[index2];
array[index2] = temp;
}
// find first one
let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];
// put him in the front of the list
swap(trips, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(first.from), 0);
// sort it in place
for(let i=1; i<trips.length; i++){
swap(trips, i, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(trips[i-1].to));
}
}
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Because ecmascript-6 is used here: "Two variables values can be swapped in one destructuring expression."
$endgroup$
– Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your solution only works if there's exactly 3 trips. After you find the first trip, put it at the front of the array and then find each subsequent one but instead of using a for
loop like you're doing there are other ways to find the next trip like using Array.map()
or Array.filter()
.
Here's one way to sort it in place and can handle any number of trips greater than 1.
function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') {
// this will be useful
function swap(array, index1, index2){
let temp = array[index1];
array[index1] = array[index2];
array[index2] = temp;
}
// find first one
let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];
// put him in the front of the list
swap(trips, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(first.from), 0);
// sort it in place
for(let i=1; i<trips.length; i++){
swap(trips, i, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(trips[i-1].to));
}
}
New contributor
$endgroup$
Your solution only works if there's exactly 3 trips. After you find the first trip, put it at the front of the array and then find each subsequent one but instead of using a for
loop like you're doing there are other ways to find the next trip like using Array.map()
or Array.filter()
.
Here's one way to sort it in place and can handle any number of trips greater than 1.
function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') {
// this will be useful
function swap(array, index1, index2){
let temp = array[index1];
array[index1] = array[index2];
array[index2] = temp;
}
// find first one
let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];
// put him in the front of the list
swap(trips, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(first.from), 0);
// sort it in place
for(let i=1; i<trips.length; i++){
swap(trips, i, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(trips[i-1].to));
}
}
function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') {
// this will be useful
function swap(array, index1, index2){
let temp = array[index1];
array[index1] = array[index2];
array[index2] = temp;
}
// find first one
let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];
// put him in the front of the list
swap(trips, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(first.from), 0);
// sort it in place
for(let i=1; i<trips.length; i++){
swap(trips, i, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(trips[i-1].to));
}
}
function sortByLinked(trips, origin = 'JFK') {
// this will be useful
function swap(array, index1, index2){
let temp = array[index1];
array[index1] = array[index2];
array[index2] = temp;
}
// find first one
let first = trips.filter(trip => trip.from === origin)[0];
// put him in the front of the list
swap(trips, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(first.from), 0);
// sort it in place
for(let i=1; i<trips.length; i++){
swap(trips, i, trips.map(trip => trip.from).indexOf(trips[i-1].to));
}
}
New contributor
edited 4 hours ago
Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
10.3k62168
10.3k62168
New contributor
answered 4 hours ago
matthewlam.jsmatthewlam.js
311
311
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
Because ecmascript-6 is used here: "Two variables values can be swapped in one destructuring expression."
$endgroup$
– Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because ecmascript-6 is used here: "Two variables values can be swapped in one destructuring expression."
$endgroup$
– Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Because ecmascript-6 is used here: "Two variables values can be swapped in one destructuring expression."
$endgroup$
– Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Because ecmascript-6 is used here: "Two variables values can be swapped in one destructuring expression."
$endgroup$
– Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It would be good if your function could work for more than 3 trips.
And for larger chains of trips it becomes important to make it efficient. It is not efficient to search for the next trip by scanning the whole array. This will make the solution have O(n²) time complexity. So I would suggest creating a Map
first, so that you can access a trip by its from
property in constant time:
function sortByLinked(trips, origin = "JFK") {
const map = new Map(trips.map(trip => [trip.from, trip]));
const result = [];
for (let trip; trip = map.get(origin); origin = trip.to) {
result.push(trip);
map.delete(origin);
}
return result;
}
const trips = [{from: "DEN",to: "JFK"},{from: "SEA",to: "DEN"},{from: 'JFK', to: 'SEA'}];
const sorted = sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");
console.log(sorted);
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It would be good if your function could work for more than 3 trips.
And for larger chains of trips it becomes important to make it efficient. It is not efficient to search for the next trip by scanning the whole array. This will make the solution have O(n²) time complexity. So I would suggest creating a Map
first, so that you can access a trip by its from
property in constant time:
function sortByLinked(trips, origin = "JFK") {
const map = new Map(trips.map(trip => [trip.from, trip]));
const result = [];
for (let trip; trip = map.get(origin); origin = trip.to) {
result.push(trip);
map.delete(origin);
}
return result;
}
const trips = [{from: "DEN",to: "JFK"},{from: "SEA",to: "DEN"},{from: 'JFK', to: 'SEA'}];
const sorted = sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");
console.log(sorted);
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It would be good if your function could work for more than 3 trips.
And for larger chains of trips it becomes important to make it efficient. It is not efficient to search for the next trip by scanning the whole array. This will make the solution have O(n²) time complexity. So I would suggest creating a Map
first, so that you can access a trip by its from
property in constant time:
function sortByLinked(trips, origin = "JFK") {
const map = new Map(trips.map(trip => [trip.from, trip]));
const result = [];
for (let trip; trip = map.get(origin); origin = trip.to) {
result.push(trip);
map.delete(origin);
}
return result;
}
const trips = [{from: "DEN",to: "JFK"},{from: "SEA",to: "DEN"},{from: 'JFK', to: 'SEA'}];
const sorted = sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");
console.log(sorted);
$endgroup$
It would be good if your function could work for more than 3 trips.
And for larger chains of trips it becomes important to make it efficient. It is not efficient to search for the next trip by scanning the whole array. This will make the solution have O(n²) time complexity. So I would suggest creating a Map
first, so that you can access a trip by its from
property in constant time:
function sortByLinked(trips, origin = "JFK") {
const map = new Map(trips.map(trip => [trip.from, trip]));
const result = [];
for (let trip; trip = map.get(origin); origin = trip.to) {
result.push(trip);
map.delete(origin);
}
return result;
}
const trips = [{from: "DEN",to: "JFK"},{from: "SEA",to: "DEN"},{from: 'JFK', to: 'SEA'}];
const sorted = sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");
console.log(sorted);
function sortByLinked(trips, origin = "JFK") {
const map = new Map(trips.map(trip => [trip.from, trip]));
const result = [];
for (let trip; trip = map.get(origin); origin = trip.to) {
result.push(trip);
map.delete(origin);
}
return result;
}
const trips = [{from: "DEN",to: "JFK"},{from: "SEA",to: "DEN"},{from: 'JFK', to: 'SEA'}];
const sorted = sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");
console.log(sorted);
function sortByLinked(trips, origin = "JFK") {
const map = new Map(trips.map(trip => [trip.from, trip]));
const result = [];
for (let trip; trip = map.get(origin); origin = trip.to) {
result.push(trip);
map.delete(origin);
}
return result;
}
const trips = [{from: "DEN",to: "JFK"},{from: "SEA",to: "DEN"},{from: 'JFK', to: 'SEA'}];
const sorted = sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");
console.log(sorted);
answered 4 hours ago
trincottrincot
44937
44937
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Code style
Use constants for variables that do not change. Eg
const sortedArray = [];
Don't include the type in the name, Eg
const sortedArray = [];
can be Egconst sorted = [];
The default parameter in this case seams inappropriate as it is likely that
"JFK"
is not an origin in all calls to this function. If no origin is given one could assume that the first item in trips contains the origin.function sortByLinked(trips, origin = trips[0].from) {
which will throw an error if trips is empty so the function should not be called with an empty trips array if you don't pass thefrom
parameter.
However in this example best to leave the default as
undefined
if not passed as that will return an empty array which is more fitting the input parameters.
The name
sort
is inappropriate as in JS it implies that the array be sorted in place, that all items be sorted (may not be possible).You have declared
i
two times. As avar
you should put the declaration at the top of the function and not in thefor
loop.Rather than use
Array.filter
you can useArray.find
. It will find the first instance.Using
for...of
rather thanfor(;;)
reduces the code complexity.No point continuing the search inside the for loops when you have found a match. Use the
break
token to stop a loop earlyPut a space between
if
and(
Don't forget to add the
;
where appropriate. It is missing from the callsortByLinked(trips)
You call the origin
origin
andfrom
this can get confusing. Keep the naming unambiguous. As the trip items usefrom
then that would be the better name for the second input argument.
Using the above points to modify your code we get
function tripFrom(trips, from) {
const sorted = [];
const first = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from);
sorted.push(first);
for (const trip of trips) {
if (first.to === trip.from) {
sorted.push(trip);
break;
}
}
for (const trip of trips) {
if (sorted[sorted.length - 1].to === trip.from) {
sorted.push(trips);
break;
}
}
return sorted;
}
sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");
This is still not a good solution. Its not at all DRY (don't repeat yourself) and is hard coded to a single use case.
Improving the function.
It can all be done within a single loop and work for any length array.
To create the function we must add some constraints on the array trips
and what to do when we encounter any problems.
- That the array
trips
contains objects that each have the propertyfrom
andto
that are correctly formatted static strings. The resulting array is erroneous or indeterminate if not so. - That the array does not contain circular trips shorter than the array length.
- That a complete trip length is no longer than the array, or when a matching
trip.to
can not be found. The returned array can be 0 totrips.length
in size. - Locations are case sensitive.
- If there is more than one matching
trip.from
it is assumed that the first match in trips is the correct one. (It would be interesting to extract the longest possible trip from? or the shortest trip that returns to the origin?)
Example
function tripFrom(trips, from) {
const result = [];
while (result.length < trips.length) {
const trip = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from);
if (!trip) { break }
from = trip.to;
result.push(trip);
}
return result;
}
tripFrom(trips, "JFK");
Or if it is known that the trip is the same length as the input array.
function tripFrom(trips, from) {
const res = [];
while (res.length < trips.length) {
from = (res[res.length] = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from)).to;
}
return res;
}
tripFrom(trips, "JFK");
It is unclear if you want the array sorted in place. If that is a requirement then the above version can be modified to do that by simply copying the results array res
to the trips
array. You can empty an array by setting its length to zero. The spread ...
operator in this case spreads the array items over the functions arguments trips.push(...res)
thus pushing all the items to the array.
function tripFrom(trips, from) {
const res = [];
while (res.length < trips.length) {
from = (res[res.length] = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from)).to;
}
trips.length = 0;
trips.push(...res);
return trips;
}
tripFrom(trips, "JFK");
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Code style
Use constants for variables that do not change. Eg
const sortedArray = [];
Don't include the type in the name, Eg
const sortedArray = [];
can be Egconst sorted = [];
The default parameter in this case seams inappropriate as it is likely that
"JFK"
is not an origin in all calls to this function. If no origin is given one could assume that the first item in trips contains the origin.function sortByLinked(trips, origin = trips[0].from) {
which will throw an error if trips is empty so the function should not be called with an empty trips array if you don't pass thefrom
parameter.
However in this example best to leave the default as
undefined
if not passed as that will return an empty array which is more fitting the input parameters.
The name
sort
is inappropriate as in JS it implies that the array be sorted in place, that all items be sorted (may not be possible).You have declared
i
two times. As avar
you should put the declaration at the top of the function and not in thefor
loop.Rather than use
Array.filter
you can useArray.find
. It will find the first instance.Using
for...of
rather thanfor(;;)
reduces the code complexity.No point continuing the search inside the for loops when you have found a match. Use the
break
token to stop a loop earlyPut a space between
if
and(
Don't forget to add the
;
where appropriate. It is missing from the callsortByLinked(trips)
You call the origin
origin
andfrom
this can get confusing. Keep the naming unambiguous. As the trip items usefrom
then that would be the better name for the second input argument.
Using the above points to modify your code we get
function tripFrom(trips, from) {
const sorted = [];
const first = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from);
sorted.push(first);
for (const trip of trips) {
if (first.to === trip.from) {
sorted.push(trip);
break;
}
}
for (const trip of trips) {
if (sorted[sorted.length - 1].to === trip.from) {
sorted.push(trips);
break;
}
}
return sorted;
}
sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");
This is still not a good solution. Its not at all DRY (don't repeat yourself) and is hard coded to a single use case.
Improving the function.
It can all be done within a single loop and work for any length array.
To create the function we must add some constraints on the array trips
and what to do when we encounter any problems.
- That the array
trips
contains objects that each have the propertyfrom
andto
that are correctly formatted static strings. The resulting array is erroneous or indeterminate if not so. - That the array does not contain circular trips shorter than the array length.
- That a complete trip length is no longer than the array, or when a matching
trip.to
can not be found. The returned array can be 0 totrips.length
in size. - Locations are case sensitive.
- If there is more than one matching
trip.from
it is assumed that the first match in trips is the correct one. (It would be interesting to extract the longest possible trip from? or the shortest trip that returns to the origin?)
Example
function tripFrom(trips, from) {
const result = [];
while (result.length < trips.length) {
const trip = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from);
if (!trip) { break }
from = trip.to;
result.push(trip);
}
return result;
}
tripFrom(trips, "JFK");
Or if it is known that the trip is the same length as the input array.
function tripFrom(trips, from) {
const res = [];
while (res.length < trips.length) {
from = (res[res.length] = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from)).to;
}
return res;
}
tripFrom(trips, "JFK");
It is unclear if you want the array sorted in place. If that is a requirement then the above version can be modified to do that by simply copying the results array res
to the trips
array. You can empty an array by setting its length to zero. The spread ...
operator in this case spreads the array items over the functions arguments trips.push(...res)
thus pushing all the items to the array.
function tripFrom(trips, from) {
const res = [];
while (res.length < trips.length) {
from = (res[res.length] = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from)).to;
}
trips.length = 0;
trips.push(...res);
return trips;
}
tripFrom(trips, "JFK");
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Code style
Use constants for variables that do not change. Eg
const sortedArray = [];
Don't include the type in the name, Eg
const sortedArray = [];
can be Egconst sorted = [];
The default parameter in this case seams inappropriate as it is likely that
"JFK"
is not an origin in all calls to this function. If no origin is given one could assume that the first item in trips contains the origin.function sortByLinked(trips, origin = trips[0].from) {
which will throw an error if trips is empty so the function should not be called with an empty trips array if you don't pass thefrom
parameter.
However in this example best to leave the default as
undefined
if not passed as that will return an empty array which is more fitting the input parameters.
The name
sort
is inappropriate as in JS it implies that the array be sorted in place, that all items be sorted (may not be possible).You have declared
i
two times. As avar
you should put the declaration at the top of the function and not in thefor
loop.Rather than use
Array.filter
you can useArray.find
. It will find the first instance.Using
for...of
rather thanfor(;;)
reduces the code complexity.No point continuing the search inside the for loops when you have found a match. Use the
break
token to stop a loop earlyPut a space between
if
and(
Don't forget to add the
;
where appropriate. It is missing from the callsortByLinked(trips)
You call the origin
origin
andfrom
this can get confusing. Keep the naming unambiguous. As the trip items usefrom
then that would be the better name for the second input argument.
Using the above points to modify your code we get
function tripFrom(trips, from) {
const sorted = [];
const first = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from);
sorted.push(first);
for (const trip of trips) {
if (first.to === trip.from) {
sorted.push(trip);
break;
}
}
for (const trip of trips) {
if (sorted[sorted.length - 1].to === trip.from) {
sorted.push(trips);
break;
}
}
return sorted;
}
sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");
This is still not a good solution. Its not at all DRY (don't repeat yourself) and is hard coded to a single use case.
Improving the function.
It can all be done within a single loop and work for any length array.
To create the function we must add some constraints on the array trips
and what to do when we encounter any problems.
- That the array
trips
contains objects that each have the propertyfrom
andto
that are correctly formatted static strings. The resulting array is erroneous or indeterminate if not so. - That the array does not contain circular trips shorter than the array length.
- That a complete trip length is no longer than the array, or when a matching
trip.to
can not be found. The returned array can be 0 totrips.length
in size. - Locations are case sensitive.
- If there is more than one matching
trip.from
it is assumed that the first match in trips is the correct one. (It would be interesting to extract the longest possible trip from? or the shortest trip that returns to the origin?)
Example
function tripFrom(trips, from) {
const result = [];
while (result.length < trips.length) {
const trip = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from);
if (!trip) { break }
from = trip.to;
result.push(trip);
}
return result;
}
tripFrom(trips, "JFK");
Or if it is known that the trip is the same length as the input array.
function tripFrom(trips, from) {
const res = [];
while (res.length < trips.length) {
from = (res[res.length] = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from)).to;
}
return res;
}
tripFrom(trips, "JFK");
It is unclear if you want the array sorted in place. If that is a requirement then the above version can be modified to do that by simply copying the results array res
to the trips
array. You can empty an array by setting its length to zero. The spread ...
operator in this case spreads the array items over the functions arguments trips.push(...res)
thus pushing all the items to the array.
function tripFrom(trips, from) {
const res = [];
while (res.length < trips.length) {
from = (res[res.length] = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from)).to;
}
trips.length = 0;
trips.push(...res);
return trips;
}
tripFrom(trips, "JFK");
$endgroup$
Code style
Use constants for variables that do not change. Eg
const sortedArray = [];
Don't include the type in the name, Eg
const sortedArray = [];
can be Egconst sorted = [];
The default parameter in this case seams inappropriate as it is likely that
"JFK"
is not an origin in all calls to this function. If no origin is given one could assume that the first item in trips contains the origin.function sortByLinked(trips, origin = trips[0].from) {
which will throw an error if trips is empty so the function should not be called with an empty trips array if you don't pass thefrom
parameter.
However in this example best to leave the default as
undefined
if not passed as that will return an empty array which is more fitting the input parameters.
The name
sort
is inappropriate as in JS it implies that the array be sorted in place, that all items be sorted (may not be possible).You have declared
i
two times. As avar
you should put the declaration at the top of the function and not in thefor
loop.Rather than use
Array.filter
you can useArray.find
. It will find the first instance.Using
for...of
rather thanfor(;;)
reduces the code complexity.No point continuing the search inside the for loops when you have found a match. Use the
break
token to stop a loop earlyPut a space between
if
and(
Don't forget to add the
;
where appropriate. It is missing from the callsortByLinked(trips)
You call the origin
origin
andfrom
this can get confusing. Keep the naming unambiguous. As the trip items usefrom
then that would be the better name for the second input argument.
Using the above points to modify your code we get
function tripFrom(trips, from) {
const sorted = [];
const first = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from);
sorted.push(first);
for (const trip of trips) {
if (first.to === trip.from) {
sorted.push(trip);
break;
}
}
for (const trip of trips) {
if (sorted[sorted.length - 1].to === trip.from) {
sorted.push(trips);
break;
}
}
return sorted;
}
sortByLinked(trips, "JFK");
This is still not a good solution. Its not at all DRY (don't repeat yourself) and is hard coded to a single use case.
Improving the function.
It can all be done within a single loop and work for any length array.
To create the function we must add some constraints on the array trips
and what to do when we encounter any problems.
- That the array
trips
contains objects that each have the propertyfrom
andto
that are correctly formatted static strings. The resulting array is erroneous or indeterminate if not so. - That the array does not contain circular trips shorter than the array length.
- That a complete trip length is no longer than the array, or when a matching
trip.to
can not be found. The returned array can be 0 totrips.length
in size. - Locations are case sensitive.
- If there is more than one matching
trip.from
it is assumed that the first match in trips is the correct one. (It would be interesting to extract the longest possible trip from? or the shortest trip that returns to the origin?)
Example
function tripFrom(trips, from) {
const result = [];
while (result.length < trips.length) {
const trip = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from);
if (!trip) { break }
from = trip.to;
result.push(trip);
}
return result;
}
tripFrom(trips, "JFK");
Or if it is known that the trip is the same length as the input array.
function tripFrom(trips, from) {
const res = [];
while (res.length < trips.length) {
from = (res[res.length] = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from)).to;
}
return res;
}
tripFrom(trips, "JFK");
It is unclear if you want the array sorted in place. If that is a requirement then the above version can be modified to do that by simply copying the results array res
to the trips
array. You can empty an array by setting its length to zero. The spread ...
operator in this case spreads the array items over the functions arguments trips.push(...res)
thus pushing all the items to the array.
function tripFrom(trips, from) {
const res = [];
while (res.length < trips.length) {
from = (res[res.length] = trips.find(trip => trip.from === from)).to;
}
trips.length = 0;
trips.push(...res);
return trips;
}
tripFrom(trips, "JFK");
answered 42 mins ago
Blindman67Blindman67
9,3801622
9,3801622
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217351%2fsort-list-of-array-linked-objects-by-keys-and-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
is it like the origin and final destination always the same? and how many intermediate trips are going to be present?
$endgroup$
– karthick
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is
from
unique for all elements?$endgroup$
– Taplar
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@karthick yes the origin and final should be the same.
$endgroup$
– Shivam Bhalla
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Taplar yes from is unique
$endgroup$
– Shivam Bhalla
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
The task you want to perform is a simple kind of topological sorting.
$endgroup$
– 200_success
3 hours ago