Inject Signed Operation Fails With Unrevealed_Key Error2019 Community Moderator ElectionStuck in “Waiting...
The change directory (cd) command is not working with a USB drive
Why is working on the same position for more than 15 years not a red flag?
How to mitigate "bandwagon attacking" from players?
How to properly claim credit for peer review?
What am I? I am in theaters and computer programs
What is meant by "mushroom grandeur" in this context?
Unexpected behavior of Bash script: First executes function, afterwards executes alias
Should I choose Itemized or Standard deduction?
Skis versus snow shoes - when to choose which for travelling the backcountry?
Copying files interactively: "cp: overwrite"
How can I be pwned if I'm not registered on that site?
How to tighten battery clamp?
It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)
Why zero tolerance on nudity in space?
Multiplication via squaring and addition
What type of postprocessing gives the effect of people standing out
Can chords be played on the flute?
Reason Why Dimensional Travelling Would be Restricted
Sometimes a banana is just a banana
What is the difference between throw e and throw new Exception(e)?
Custom itemize alignment
Where was Karl Mordo in Infinity War?
Make me a metasequence
Is there any relevance to Thor getting his hair cut other than comedic value?
Inject Signed Operation Fails With Unrevealed_Key Error
2019 Community Moderator ElectionStuck in “Waiting for the operation to be included…” InfinitelyFees for various operationHow do I use RPC to get operation through hashWhy a reveal operation?Is it possible to have a transaction operation in any operation's “contents”?Sotez Forge Method Returns “Type Error: Expected String”
I've learned a lot today, and I couldn't have gotten this far so quickly without this StackExchange. I've almost got sending worked out, but I can't for the life of me figure out why this is failing at the point of injection with a "unrevealed_key" error.
I am aware that I should decode the forged transaction and reverify the values to ensure the remote node hasn't tried to change my transaction, but I removed that bit from this post for the sake of simplicity.
const send = (from, to, amount, sk) => {
sotez.rpc.getHead()
.then(head => {
const operation = {
branch: head.hash,
contents: [{
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
counter: '31204',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: amount,
destination: to,
}],
}
sotez.tezos.forge(head, operation)
.then(unsigned => {
const binary = unsigned.opbytes
sotez.crypto.sign(binary, sk, '0x03')
.then(signed => {
operation.signature = signed.edsig
sotez.rpc.inject(operation, signed.sbytes)
.then(result => {
console.log(result)
})
})
})
})
}
send('tz1htPf3VPXrHBTX1E7y3tBteib6hA9Teosj', 'tz3WXYtyDUNL91qfiCJtVUX746QpNv5i5ve5', '1000000', 'edskS6KrT1G365PsuQiMVvPgZCS1CKTC5EFc7N...')
Returns: [{"kind":"branch","id":"proto.003-PsddFKi3.contract.unrevealed_key","contract":"tz1htPf3VPXrHBTX1E7y3tBteib6hA9Teosj"}]
Edit:
So I need to reveal this account first. I modified my send method to check if the account has been revealed before, and if not then add the revealing to the list of operations. Now I get {"kind":"permanent","id":"proto.003-PsddFKi3.operation.invalid_signature"}.
const send = (from, to, amount, keys, revealed) => {
tezos.rpc.getHead()
.then(head => {
const operation = {
branch: head.hash,
contents: [{
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
counter: '31205',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: amount,
destination: to
}],
}
if (!revealed) {
operation.contents.unshift({
kind: 'reveal',
fee: '1269',
counter: '31204',
public_key: keys.pk,
source: from,
gas_limit: '10000',
storage_limit: '0',
})
}
tezos.tezos.forge(head, operation)
.then(unsigned => {
const binary = unsigned.opbytes
tezos.crypto.sign(binary, keys.sk, '0x03')
.then(signed => {
operation.signature = signed.edsig
tezos.rpc.inject(operation, signed.sbytes)
.then(result => {
console.log(result)
})
})
})
})
}
send('tz1htPf3VPXrHBTX1E7y3tBteib6hA9Teosj', 'tz3WXYtyDUNL91qfiCJtVUX746QpNv5i5ve5', '1000000', keys, false)
Edit2:
This worked, using sendOperation
const send = (from, to, amount, keys) => {
sotez.rpc.getHead()
.then(head => {
const operation = {
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: amount,
destination: to
}
const params = {
from,
operation,
keys
}
sotez.rpc.sendOperation({from, operation, keys})
.then(result => {
console.log(result)
})
})
}
send('tz1htPf3VPXrHBTX1E7y3tBteib6hA9Teosj', 'tz3WXYtyDUNL91qfiCJtVUX746QpNv5i5ve5', '1000000', keys)
operation
asked 20 hours ago
Michael RodriguezMichael Rodriguez
375
New contributor
Michael Rodriguez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I've learned a lot today, and I couldn't have gotten this far so quickly without this StackExchange. I've almost got sending worked out, but I can't for the life of me figure out why this is failing at the point of injection with a "unrevealed_key" error.
I am aware that I should decode the forged transaction and reverify the values to ensure the remote node hasn't tried to change my transaction, but I removed that bit from this post for the sake of simplicity.
const send = (from, to, amount, sk) => {
sotez.rpc.getHead()
.then(head => {
const operation = {
branch: head.hash,
contents: [{
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
counter: '31204',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: amount,
destination: to,
}],
}
sotez.tezos.forge(head, operation)
.then(unsigned => {
const binary = unsigned.opbytes
sotez.crypto.sign(binary, sk, '0x03')
.then(signed => {
operation.signature = signed.edsig
sotez.rpc.inject(operation, signed.sbytes)
.then(result => {
console.log(result)
})
})
})
})
}
send('tz1htPf3VPXrHBTX1E7y3tBteib6hA9Teosj', 'tz3WXYtyDUNL91qfiCJtVUX746QpNv5i5ve5', '1000000', 'edskS6KrT1G365PsuQiMVvPgZCS1CKTC5EFc7N...')
Returns: [{"kind":"branch","id":"proto.003-PsddFKi3.contract.unrevealed_key","contract":"tz1htPf3VPXrHBTX1E7y3tBteib6hA9Teosj"}]
Edit:
So I need to reveal this account first. I modified my send method to check if the account has been revealed before, and if not then add the revealing to the list of operations. Now I get {"kind":"permanent","id":"proto.003-PsddFKi3.operation.invalid_signature"}.
const send = (from, to, amount, keys, revealed) => {
tezos.rpc.getHead()
.then(head => {
const operation = {
branch: head.hash,
contents: [{
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
counter: '31205',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: amount,
destination: to
}],
}
if (!revealed) {
operation.contents.unshift({
kind: 'reveal',
fee: '1269',
counter: '31204',
public_key: keys.pk,
source: from,
gas_limit: '10000',
storage_limit: '0',
})
}
tezos.tezos.forge(head, operation)
.then(unsigned => {
const binary = unsigned.opbytes
tezos.crypto.sign(binary, keys.sk, '0x03')
.then(signed => {
operation.signature = signed.edsig
tezos.rpc.inject(operation, signed.sbytes)
.then(result => {
console.log(result)
})
})
})
})
}
send('tz1htPf3VPXrHBTX1E7y3tBteib6hA9Teosj', 'tz3WXYtyDUNL91qfiCJtVUX746QpNv5i5ve5', '1000000', keys, false)
Edit2:
This worked, using sendOperation
const send = (from, to, amount, keys) => {
sotez.rpc.getHead()
.then(head => {
const operation = {
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: amount,
destination: to
}
const params = {
from,
operation,
keys
}
sotez.rpc.sendOperation({from, operation, keys})
.then(result => {
console.log(result)
})
})
}
send('tz1htPf3VPXrHBTX1E7y3tBteib6hA9Teosj', 'tz3WXYtyDUNL91qfiCJtVUX746QpNv5i5ve5', '1000000', keys)
operation
asked 20 hours ago
Michael RodriguezMichael Rodriguez
375
New contributor
Michael Rodriguez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I've learned a lot today, and I couldn't have gotten this far so quickly without this StackExchange. I've almost got sending worked out, but I can't for the life of me figure out why this is failing at the point of injection with a "unrevealed_key" error.
I am aware that I should decode the forged transaction and reverify the values to ensure the remote node hasn't tried to change my transaction, but I removed that bit from this post for the sake of simplicity.
const send = (from, to, amount, sk) => {
sotez.rpc.getHead()
.then(head => {
const operation = {
branch: head.hash,
contents: [{
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
counter: '31204',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: amount,
destination: to,
}],
}
sotez.tezos.forge(head, operation)
.then(unsigned => {
const binary = unsigned.opbytes
sotez.crypto.sign(binary, sk, '0x03')
.then(signed => {
operation.signature = signed.edsig
sotez.rpc.inject(operation, signed.sbytes)
.then(result => {
console.log(result)
})
})
})
})
}
send('tz1htPf3VPXrHBTX1E7y3tBteib6hA9Teosj', 'tz3WXYtyDUNL91qfiCJtVUX746QpNv5i5ve5', '1000000', 'edskS6KrT1G365PsuQiMVvPgZCS1CKTC5EFc7N...')
Returns: [{"kind":"branch","id":"proto.003-PsddFKi3.contract.unrevealed_key","contract":"tz1htPf3VPXrHBTX1E7y3tBteib6hA9Teosj"}]
Edit:
So I need to reveal this account first. I modified my send method to check if the account has been revealed before, and if not then add the revealing to the list of operations. Now I get {"kind":"permanent","id":"proto.003-PsddFKi3.operation.invalid_signature"}.
const send = (from, to, amount, keys, revealed) => {
tezos.rpc.getHead()
.then(head => {
const operation = {
branch: head.hash,
contents: [{
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
counter: '31205',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: amount,
destination: to
}],
}
if (!revealed) {
operation.contents.unshift({
kind: 'reveal',
fee: '1269',
counter: '31204',
public_key: keys.pk,
source: from,
gas_limit: '10000',
storage_limit: '0',
})
}
tezos.tezos.forge(head, operation)
.then(unsigned => {
const binary = unsigned.opbytes
tezos.crypto.sign(binary, keys.sk, '0x03')
.then(signed => {
operation.signature = signed.edsig
tezos.rpc.inject(operation, signed.sbytes)
.then(result => {
console.log(result)
})
})
})
})
}
send('tz1htPf3VPXrHBTX1E7y3tBteib6hA9Teosj', 'tz3WXYtyDUNL91qfiCJtVUX746QpNv5i5ve5', '1000000', keys, false)
Edit2:
This worked, using sendOperation
const send = (from, to, amount, keys) => {
sotez.rpc.getHead()
.then(head => {
const operation = {
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: amount,
destination: to
}
const params = {
from,
operation,
keys
}
sotez.rpc.sendOperation({from, operation, keys})
.then(result => {
console.log(result)
})
})
}
send('tz1htPf3VPXrHBTX1E7y3tBteib6hA9Teosj', 'tz3WXYtyDUNL91qfiCJtVUX746QpNv5i5ve5', '1000000', keys)
operation
asked 20 hours ago
Michael RodriguezMichael Rodriguez
375
New contributor
Michael Rodriguez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I've learned a lot today, and I couldn't have gotten this far so quickly without this StackExchange. I've almost got sending worked out, but I can't for the life of me figure out why this is failing at the point of injection with a "unrevealed_key" error.
I am aware that I should decode the forged transaction and reverify the values to ensure the remote node hasn't tried to change my transaction, but I removed that bit from this post for the sake of simplicity.
const send = (from, to, amount, sk) => {
sotez.rpc.getHead()
.then(head => {
const operation = {
branch: head.hash,
contents: [{
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
counter: '31204',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: amount,
destination: to,
}],
}
sotez.tezos.forge(head, operation)
.then(unsigned => {
const binary = unsigned.opbytes
sotez.crypto.sign(binary, sk, '0x03')
.then(signed => {
operation.signature = signed.edsig
sotez.rpc.inject(operation, signed.sbytes)
.then(result => {
console.log(result)
})
})
})
})
}
send('tz1htPf3VPXrHBTX1E7y3tBteib6hA9Teosj', 'tz3WXYtyDUNL91qfiCJtVUX746QpNv5i5ve5', '1000000', 'edskS6KrT1G365PsuQiMVvPgZCS1CKTC5EFc7N...')
Returns: [{"kind":"branch","id":"proto.003-PsddFKi3.contract.unrevealed_key","contract":"tz1htPf3VPXrHBTX1E7y3tBteib6hA9Teosj"}]
Edit:
So I need to reveal this account first. I modified my send method to check if the account has been revealed before, and if not then add the revealing to the list of operations. Now I get {"kind":"permanent","id":"proto.003-PsddFKi3.operation.invalid_signature"}.
const send = (from, to, amount, keys, revealed) => {
tezos.rpc.getHead()
.then(head => {
const operation = {
branch: head.hash,
contents: [{
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
counter: '31205',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: amount,
destination: to
}],
}
if (!revealed) {
operation.contents.unshift({
kind: 'reveal',
fee: '1269',
counter: '31204',
public_key: keys.pk,
source: from,
gas_limit: '10000',
storage_limit: '0',
})
}
tezos.tezos.forge(head, operation)
.then(unsigned => {
const binary = unsigned.opbytes
tezos.crypto.sign(binary, keys.sk, '0x03')
.then(signed => {
operation.signature = signed.edsig
tezos.rpc.inject(operation, signed.sbytes)
.then(result => {
console.log(result)
})
})
})
})
}
send('tz1htPf3VPXrHBTX1E7y3tBteib6hA9Teosj', 'tz3WXYtyDUNL91qfiCJtVUX746QpNv5i5ve5', '1000000', keys, false)
Edit2:
This worked, using sendOperation
const send = (from, to, amount, keys) => {
sotez.rpc.getHead()
.then(head => {
const operation = {
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: amount,
destination: to
}
const params = {
from,
operation,
keys
}
sotez.rpc.sendOperation({from, operation, keys})
.then(result => {
console.log(result)
})
})
}
send('tz1htPf3VPXrHBTX1E7y3tBteib6hA9Teosj', 'tz3WXYtyDUNL91qfiCJtVUX746QpNv5i5ve5', '1000000', keys)
operation
operation
asked 20 hours ago
Michael RodriguezMichael Rodriguez
375
New contributor
Michael Rodriguez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 20 hours ago
Michael RodriguezMichael Rodriguez
375
New contributor
Michael Rodriguez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 19 hours ago
Michael Rodriguez
asked 20 hours ago
Michael RodriguezMichael Rodriguez
375
New contributor
Michael Rodriguez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 20 hours ago
Michael RodriguezMichael Rodriguez
375
asked 20 hours ago
Michael RodriguezMichael Rodriguez
375
375
New contributor
Michael Rodriguez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Michael Rodriguez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Michael Rodriguez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Before sending transactions from an account, a 'reveal' operation must be made for the account. It looks like this account may have been activated, but not yet revealed. To make this work we would need to include the reveal operation in the list of operations:
sotez.rpc.getHead()
.then(head => {
const operation = {
branch: head.hash,
contents: [
{
kind: 'reveal',
fee: '1269',
counter: '31204',
public_key: keys.pk,
source: from,
gas_limit: '10000',
storage_limit: '0',
},
{
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
counter: '31205',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: amount,
destination: to,
}
],
}
...
})
After the account has been revealed, the reveal is not needed to be included in the operations thereafter.
SendOperation Answer:
const send = (from, to, amount, keys) => {
const operation = {
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: `${amount}`,
destination: to,
};
rpc.sendOperation({ from, operation, keys })
.then(result => console.log(result));
};
answered 20 hours ago
AKISHAKISH
1963
New contributor
AKISH is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks! I edited my question with the reveal operation added. When I run it now, it just hangs with no result or error.
– Michael Rodriguez
20 hours ago
Ah nevermind, it was because of the counter increment. I noticed your edit and fixed it in my method. Oddly, though, now I'm getting this error: {"kind":"permanent","id":"proto.003-PsddFKi3.operation.invalid_signature"}
– Michael Rodriguez
20 hours ago
Have you tried the same transfer using rpc.sendOperation? sendOperation should handle whether the transaction needs a reveal and all the counters for the operations.
– AKISH
19 hours ago
1
I'll have to see what is making the responses hang, bit I think I tried one of your examples from earlier and noticed that the amount key wasn't being handled correctly in sotez (was supposed to be coerced into a string). If you try your sendOperation and make the amount a string, as well as adding a fee, gas_limit, and storage_limit that may work.
– AKISH
19 hours ago
1
I just remembered that sendOperation takes a params object containing the from, the operation, and the keys. I've updated my question, and it worked!
– Michael Rodriguez
19 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "698"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Michael Rodriguez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftezos.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f670%2finject-signed-operation-fails-with-unrevealed-key-error%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Before sending transactions from an account, a 'reveal' operation must be made for the account. It looks like this account may have been activated, but not yet revealed. To make this work we would need to include the reveal operation in the list of operations:
sotez.rpc.getHead()
.then(head => {
const operation = {
branch: head.hash,
contents: [
{
kind: 'reveal',
fee: '1269',
counter: '31204',
public_key: keys.pk,
source: from,
gas_limit: '10000',
storage_limit: '0',
},
{
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
counter: '31205',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: amount,
destination: to,
}
],
}
...
})
After the account has been revealed, the reveal is not needed to be included in the operations thereafter.
SendOperation Answer:
const send = (from, to, amount, keys) => {
const operation = {
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: `${amount}`,
destination: to,
};
rpc.sendOperation({ from, operation, keys })
.then(result => console.log(result));
};
answered 20 hours ago
AKISHAKISH
1963
New contributor
AKISH is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks! I edited my question with the reveal operation added. When I run it now, it just hangs with no result or error.
– Michael Rodriguez
20 hours ago
Ah nevermind, it was because of the counter increment. I noticed your edit and fixed it in my method. Oddly, though, now I'm getting this error: {"kind":"permanent","id":"proto.003-PsddFKi3.operation.invalid_signature"}
– Michael Rodriguez
20 hours ago
Have you tried the same transfer using rpc.sendOperation? sendOperation should handle whether the transaction needs a reveal and all the counters for the operations.
– AKISH
19 hours ago
1
I'll have to see what is making the responses hang, bit I think I tried one of your examples from earlier and noticed that the amount key wasn't being handled correctly in sotez (was supposed to be coerced into a string). If you try your sendOperation and make the amount a string, as well as adding a fee, gas_limit, and storage_limit that may work.
– AKISH
19 hours ago
1
I just remembered that sendOperation takes a params object containing the from, the operation, and the keys. I've updated my question, and it worked!
– Michael Rodriguez
19 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Before sending transactions from an account, a 'reveal' operation must be made for the account. It looks like this account may have been activated, but not yet revealed. To make this work we would need to include the reveal operation in the list of operations:
sotez.rpc.getHead()
.then(head => {
const operation = {
branch: head.hash,
contents: [
{
kind: 'reveal',
fee: '1269',
counter: '31204',
public_key: keys.pk,
source: from,
gas_limit: '10000',
storage_limit: '0',
},
{
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
counter: '31205',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: amount,
destination: to,
}
],
}
...
})
After the account has been revealed, the reveal is not needed to be included in the operations thereafter.
SendOperation Answer:
const send = (from, to, amount, keys) => {
const operation = {
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: `${amount}`,
destination: to,
};
rpc.sendOperation({ from, operation, keys })
.then(result => console.log(result));
};
answered 20 hours ago
AKISHAKISH
1963
New contributor
AKISH is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks! I edited my question with the reveal operation added. When I run it now, it just hangs with no result or error.
– Michael Rodriguez
20 hours ago
Ah nevermind, it was because of the counter increment. I noticed your edit and fixed it in my method. Oddly, though, now I'm getting this error: {"kind":"permanent","id":"proto.003-PsddFKi3.operation.invalid_signature"}
– Michael Rodriguez
20 hours ago
Have you tried the same transfer using rpc.sendOperation? sendOperation should handle whether the transaction needs a reveal and all the counters for the operations.
– AKISH
19 hours ago
1
I'll have to see what is making the responses hang, bit I think I tried one of your examples from earlier and noticed that the amount key wasn't being handled correctly in sotez (was supposed to be coerced into a string). If you try your sendOperation and make the amount a string, as well as adding a fee, gas_limit, and storage_limit that may work.
– AKISH
19 hours ago
1
I just remembered that sendOperation takes a params object containing the from, the operation, and the keys. I've updated my question, and it worked!
– Michael Rodriguez
19 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Before sending transactions from an account, a 'reveal' operation must be made for the account. It looks like this account may have been activated, but not yet revealed. To make this work we would need to include the reveal operation in the list of operations:
sotez.rpc.getHead()
.then(head => {
const operation = {
branch: head.hash,
contents: [
{
kind: 'reveal',
fee: '1269',
counter: '31204',
public_key: keys.pk,
source: from,
gas_limit: '10000',
storage_limit: '0',
},
{
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
counter: '31205',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: amount,
destination: to,
}
],
}
...
})
After the account has been revealed, the reveal is not needed to be included in the operations thereafter.
SendOperation Answer:
const send = (from, to, amount, keys) => {
const operation = {
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: `${amount}`,
destination: to,
};
rpc.sendOperation({ from, operation, keys })
.then(result => console.log(result));
};
answered 20 hours ago
AKISHAKISH
1963
New contributor
AKISH is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Before sending transactions from an account, a 'reveal' operation must be made for the account. It looks like this account may have been activated, but not yet revealed. To make this work we would need to include the reveal operation in the list of operations:
sotez.rpc.getHead()
.then(head => {
const operation = {
branch: head.hash,
contents: [
{
kind: 'reveal',
fee: '1269',
counter: '31204',
public_key: keys.pk,
source: from,
gas_limit: '10000',
storage_limit: '0',
},
{
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
counter: '31205',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: amount,
destination: to,
}
],
}
...
})
After the account has been revealed, the reveal is not needed to be included in the operations thereafter.
SendOperation Answer:
const send = (from, to, amount, keys) => {
const operation = {
kind: 'transaction',
source: from,
fee: '50000',
gas_limit: '10200',
storage_limit: '0',
amount: `${amount}`,
destination: to,
};
rpc.sendOperation({ from, operation, keys })
.then(result => console.log(result));
};
answered 20 hours ago
AKISHAKISH
1963
New contributor
AKISH is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 19 hours ago
answered 20 hours ago
AKISHAKISH
1963
New contributor
AKISH is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 20 hours ago
AKISHAKISH
1963
answered 20 hours ago
AKISHAKISH
1963
1963
New contributor
AKISH is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
AKISH is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
AKISH is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks! I edited my question with the reveal operation added. When I run it now, it just hangs with no result or error.
– Michael Rodriguez
20 hours ago
Ah nevermind, it was because of the counter increment. I noticed your edit and fixed it in my method. Oddly, though, now I'm getting this error: {"kind":"permanent","id":"proto.003-PsddFKi3.operation.invalid_signature"}
– Michael Rodriguez
20 hours ago
Have you tried the same transfer using rpc.sendOperation? sendOperation should handle whether the transaction needs a reveal and all the counters for the operations.
– AKISH
19 hours ago
1
I'll have to see what is making the responses hang, bit I think I tried one of your examples from earlier and noticed that the amount key wasn't being handled correctly in sotez (was supposed to be coerced into a string). If you try your sendOperation and make the amount a string, as well as adding a fee, gas_limit, and storage_limit that may work.
– AKISH
19 hours ago
1
I just remembered that sendOperation takes a params object containing the from, the operation, and the keys. I've updated my question, and it worked!
– Michael Rodriguez
19 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Thanks! I edited my question with the reveal operation added. When I run it now, it just hangs with no result or error.
– Michael Rodriguez
20 hours ago
Ah nevermind, it was because of the counter increment. I noticed your edit and fixed it in my method. Oddly, though, now I'm getting this error: {"kind":"permanent","id":"proto.003-PsddFKi3.operation.invalid_signature"}
– Michael Rodriguez
20 hours ago
Have you tried the same transfer using rpc.sendOperation? sendOperation should handle whether the transaction needs a reveal and all the counters for the operations.
– AKISH
19 hours ago
1
I'll have to see what is making the responses hang, bit I think I tried one of your examples from earlier and noticed that the amount key wasn't being handled correctly in sotez (was supposed to be coerced into a string). If you try your sendOperation and make the amount a string, as well as adding a fee, gas_limit, and storage_limit that may work.
– AKISH
19 hours ago
1
I just remembered that sendOperation takes a params object containing the from, the operation, and the keys. I've updated my question, and it worked!
– Michael Rodriguez
19 hours ago
Thanks! I edited my question with the reveal operation added. When I run it now, it just hangs with no result or error.
– Michael Rodriguez
20 hours ago
Thanks! I edited my question with the reveal operation added. When I run it now, it just hangs with no result or error.
– Michael Rodriguez
20 hours ago
Ah nevermind, it was because of the counter increment. I noticed your edit and fixed it in my method. Oddly, though, now I'm getting this error: {"kind":"permanent","id":"proto.003-PsddFKi3.operation.invalid_signature"}
– Michael Rodriguez
20 hours ago
Ah nevermind, it was because of the counter increment. I noticed your edit and fixed it in my method. Oddly, though, now I'm getting this error: {"kind":"permanent","id":"proto.003-PsddFKi3.operation.invalid_signature"}
– Michael Rodriguez
20 hours ago
Have you tried the same transfer using rpc.sendOperation? sendOperation should handle whether the transaction needs a reveal and all the counters for the operations.
– AKISH
19 hours ago
Have you tried the same transfer using rpc.sendOperation? sendOperation should handle whether the transaction needs a reveal and all the counters for the operations.
– AKISH
19 hours ago
1
1
I'll have to see what is making the responses hang, bit I think I tried one of your examples from earlier and noticed that the amount key wasn't being handled correctly in sotez (was supposed to be coerced into a string). If you try your sendOperation and make the amount a string, as well as adding a fee, gas_limit, and storage_limit that may work.
– AKISH
19 hours ago
I'll have to see what is making the responses hang, bit I think I tried one of your examples from earlier and noticed that the amount key wasn't being handled correctly in sotez (was supposed to be coerced into a string). If you try your sendOperation and make the amount a string, as well as adding a fee, gas_limit, and storage_limit that may work.
– AKISH
19 hours ago
1
1
I just remembered that sendOperation takes a params object containing the from, the operation, and the keys. I've updated my question, and it worked!
– Michael Rodriguez
19 hours ago
I just remembered that sendOperation takes a params object containing the from, the operation, and the keys. I've updated my question, and it worked!
– Michael Rodriguez
19 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Michael Rodriguez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Michael Rodriguez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Michael Rodriguez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Michael Rodriguez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Tezos Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftezos.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f670%2finject-signed-operation-fails-with-unrevealed-key-error%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
