I've given my players a lot of magic items. Is it reasonable for me to give them harder encounters?How rare...
Was it really inappropriate to write a pull request for the company I interviewed with?
How can friction do no work in case of pure rolling?
What's Bob's age again?
How can I handle a player who pre-plans arguments about my rulings on RAW?
Is being socially reclusive okay for a graduate student?
Are small insurances worth it
Did Amazon pay $0 in taxes last year?
Plagiarism of code by other PhD student
Quitting employee has privileged access to critical information
Why are special aircraft used for the carriers in the United States Navy?
Does it cost more to counter Sphinx of New Prahv?
GPL code private and stolen
What is brightness?
How to develop an internal intuition for note timings?
Learning to quickly identify valid fingering for piano?
Are there other characters in the Star Wars universe who had damaged bodies and needed to wear an outfit like Darth Vader?
Has a sovereign Communist government ever run, and conceded loss, on a fair election?
Being asked to review a paper in conference one has submitted to
An Undercover Army
How do we objectively assess if a dialogue sounds unnatural or cringy?
Why is it "take a leak?"
Label layer as symbol colors with QGIS 3
What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?
Can an earth elemental drown/bury its opponent underground using earth glide?
I've given my players a lot of magic items. Is it reasonable for me to give them harder encounters?
How rare are magic items and how many should I be handing out?Can players use crafting to improve beloved magic items instead of churning gear?How can players learn the nature of magic items?Should I allow a Wondrous Item on level 1 character creation?Without a magic item economy, what is gold for?Are these homebrew magic items balanced at low levels?What magic items are good to add non-combat versatility at high levels for a fighter?What are the mechanics for special-trigger magic items?How would 15 points point buy affect my game?Reasonable Price/Value for gear-buffing, consumable items?I gave my players far too much wealth and they have far too much power. What do I do to get things back on track?
$begingroup$
I'm running a campaign for a group of 6 level 8 characters. Last session, they went shopping, and I let them buy about 2 magic items each. On top of this, I let them each start with an extra feat and a free magic item when the campaign started (at level 8).
(Selling magic items to my players was a lot of fun for all of us! My question is not about whether that was a good idea - I believe it was the right call.)
Given how many nice things my players have, I'm thinking about balancing my encounters as though they were for a party of level 9 characters instead of level 8. Is this a reasonable approach for me to take?
dnd-5e magic-items balance cr-calculation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm running a campaign for a group of 6 level 8 characters. Last session, they went shopping, and I let them buy about 2 magic items each. On top of this, I let them each start with an extra feat and a free magic item when the campaign started (at level 8).
(Selling magic items to my players was a lot of fun for all of us! My question is not about whether that was a good idea - I believe it was the right call.)
Given how many nice things my players have, I'm thinking about balancing my encounters as though they were for a party of level 9 characters instead of level 8. Is this a reasonable approach for me to take?
dnd-5e magic-items balance cr-calculation
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Answerers should remember to support their answers by citing relevant evidence or experience, per Good Subjective. (Good question!)
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
For a well-informed answer it would be helpful to know the specific items. Including the benefits of each item would be convenient. Otherwise respondents will have to look up 18 magic items.
$endgroup$
– lightcat
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@lightcat makes a good point, though perhaps only include details for combat relevant items. Bag of Holding is a useful item but it unlikely to significantly effect combat difficulty. (Barring very clever play)
$endgroup$
– linksassin
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Unfortunately, I don't remember all of the specific items I gave my players. Most of them are definitely combat-oriented, though.
$endgroup$
– Kevin
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm running a campaign for a group of 6 level 8 characters. Last session, they went shopping, and I let them buy about 2 magic items each. On top of this, I let them each start with an extra feat and a free magic item when the campaign started (at level 8).
(Selling magic items to my players was a lot of fun for all of us! My question is not about whether that was a good idea - I believe it was the right call.)
Given how many nice things my players have, I'm thinking about balancing my encounters as though they were for a party of level 9 characters instead of level 8. Is this a reasonable approach for me to take?
dnd-5e magic-items balance cr-calculation
$endgroup$
I'm running a campaign for a group of 6 level 8 characters. Last session, they went shopping, and I let them buy about 2 magic items each. On top of this, I let them each start with an extra feat and a free magic item when the campaign started (at level 8).
(Selling magic items to my players was a lot of fun for all of us! My question is not about whether that was a good idea - I believe it was the right call.)
Given how many nice things my players have, I'm thinking about balancing my encounters as though they were for a party of level 9 characters instead of level 8. Is this a reasonable approach for me to take?
dnd-5e magic-items balance cr-calculation
dnd-5e magic-items balance cr-calculation
asked 12 hours ago
KevinKevin
9371917
9371917
3
$begingroup$
Answerers should remember to support their answers by citing relevant evidence or experience, per Good Subjective. (Good question!)
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
For a well-informed answer it would be helpful to know the specific items. Including the benefits of each item would be convenient. Otherwise respondents will have to look up 18 magic items.
$endgroup$
– lightcat
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@lightcat makes a good point, though perhaps only include details for combat relevant items. Bag of Holding is a useful item but it unlikely to significantly effect combat difficulty. (Barring very clever play)
$endgroup$
– linksassin
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Unfortunately, I don't remember all of the specific items I gave my players. Most of them are definitely combat-oriented, though.
$endgroup$
– Kevin
10 hours ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Answerers should remember to support their answers by citing relevant evidence or experience, per Good Subjective. (Good question!)
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
For a well-informed answer it would be helpful to know the specific items. Including the benefits of each item would be convenient. Otherwise respondents will have to look up 18 magic items.
$endgroup$
– lightcat
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@lightcat makes a good point, though perhaps only include details for combat relevant items. Bag of Holding is a useful item but it unlikely to significantly effect combat difficulty. (Barring very clever play)
$endgroup$
– linksassin
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Unfortunately, I don't remember all of the specific items I gave my players. Most of them are definitely combat-oriented, though.
$endgroup$
– Kevin
10 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Answerers should remember to support their answers by citing relevant evidence or experience, per Good Subjective. (Good question!)
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Answerers should remember to support their answers by citing relevant evidence or experience, per Good Subjective. (Good question!)
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
11 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
For a well-informed answer it would be helpful to know the specific items. Including the benefits of each item would be convenient. Otherwise respondents will have to look up 18 magic items.
$endgroup$
– lightcat
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
For a well-informed answer it would be helpful to know the specific items. Including the benefits of each item would be convenient. Otherwise respondents will have to look up 18 magic items.
$endgroup$
– lightcat
11 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
@lightcat makes a good point, though perhaps only include details for combat relevant items. Bag of Holding is a useful item but it unlikely to significantly effect combat difficulty. (Barring very clever play)
$endgroup$
– linksassin
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@lightcat makes a good point, though perhaps only include details for combat relevant items. Bag of Holding is a useful item but it unlikely to significantly effect combat difficulty. (Barring very clever play)
$endgroup$
– linksassin
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Unfortunately, I don't remember all of the specific items I gave my players. Most of them are definitely combat-oriented, though.
$endgroup$
– Kevin
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Unfortunately, I don't remember all of the specific items I gave my players. Most of them are definitely combat-oriented, though.
$endgroup$
– Kevin
10 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In part it depends on the magic items. Did you give them magic items that were useful in combat? Like, have they mostly got +3 plate armor or have they mostly got sovereign glue?
Broadly, the answer to your question is yes: it's probably appropriate to give them more difficult encounters because they have nice stuff. But, especially at higher levels, the encounter tables are a very loose guideline anyway. You'll have to get a feel for what your group can handle.
Here is what I do when I'm uncertain: I start with an encounter that I'm expecting to be fairly easy, and then if the players seem to be winning too hard, I tell them reinforcements are showing up and I add more monsters of the same type.
The good news is that most players don't really want or need you to give them a super-difficult-but-still-survivable battle. If you give them a battle where everyone gets attacked once, and everyone gets to show off their cool abilities or items at least once, generally they'll be happy.
(source: I run a lot of games and this is what I do)
$endgroup$
8
$begingroup$
As an aside, don't underestimate sovereign glue. My party has gotten into some sticky situations with that stuff.
$endgroup$
– anaximander
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@anaximander Our chaotic rogue: "I use sovereign glue on our warrior and stick our mage to him while they're asleep."rolls natural 20 on the checkMe: "Well, I guess the mage will have to stick with the warrior for the rest of this game [session]..."
$endgroup$
– John Hamilton
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think I have to answer this question with a question:
Are your current encounters challenging the players appropriately?
If yes, then there's no need to increase the difficulty. If they're already getting close to dying in every fight they get in, or if they're blowing all their abilities just to stay alive, then there's no need to make things harder on them.
If no, then you should definitely think about making your encounters harder. I'm in a similar situation with my players. I have been particularly generous with magic items, possibly a little too much. Each player has more items than they can attune to, and our paladin had an AC of 23 at one point. As a result, when they were level 10, they were blowing through CR 11 encounters without breaking a sweat. I had to start using action economy more to my advantage, giving boss monsters additional abilities and Legendary Resistances, and coming up with better tactics for monsters.
Remember, 5e is balanced around the players having no magic items at all and still being able to take on threats at their CR. Players having more magic items than usual is a good a reason as any to make encounters more difficult. Depending on how good these magic items are, you might need to treat them as if they were level 10 or higher - although I'd work up to that, and not just drop a Beholder in their lap with no warning.
New contributor
theCerealKillr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Don't increase the difficulity. Let the players do this.
The players have some new item. Thus they grow in power. 5e assumes no (to few) magic itemsAs better answerd here. Eventually, more magic items in a grow means to power of a group grows.
However, keep in mind the players just bought new items. They want to use them. They want to feel powerful. They want to have an encounter and notice how they don't just survive, but how they survive more easily, and can obliterate a group they struggled with previously.
You want them to grow more confident. You want them to feel that their magic items help. The reward they got for struggling and adventuring is a true reward. They can now tackle problems they couldn't before. It will bolster their confidence, and now you know you can give them harder enemies.
My key point is: If you always perfectly compensate for the increased power the players have, they will never move forward. You end putting the players kind in a Red Queen's Race.
If I buy a Shortsword +1, and after buying every enemy gets buffed by +1 AC, just because I bought the new sword, my purchase doesn't matter. I end up at the same spot, where the effects are canceled out.
New contributor
Paaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This is a good point. You want the power curve of the enemy to be staggered in relationship to the players: before they hit a major upgrade, milestone, or magic item, things should be starting to get tough. After they get it, things should be easy for a while. Let them feel badass with their new items. Then, bring the difficulty up to match until their next milestone.
$endgroup$
– theCerealKillr
57 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142638%2five-given-my-players-a-lot-of-magic-items-is-it-reasonable-for-me-to-give-them%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In part it depends on the magic items. Did you give them magic items that were useful in combat? Like, have they mostly got +3 plate armor or have they mostly got sovereign glue?
Broadly, the answer to your question is yes: it's probably appropriate to give them more difficult encounters because they have nice stuff. But, especially at higher levels, the encounter tables are a very loose guideline anyway. You'll have to get a feel for what your group can handle.
Here is what I do when I'm uncertain: I start with an encounter that I'm expecting to be fairly easy, and then if the players seem to be winning too hard, I tell them reinforcements are showing up and I add more monsters of the same type.
The good news is that most players don't really want or need you to give them a super-difficult-but-still-survivable battle. If you give them a battle where everyone gets attacked once, and everyone gets to show off their cool abilities or items at least once, generally they'll be happy.
(source: I run a lot of games and this is what I do)
$endgroup$
8
$begingroup$
As an aside, don't underestimate sovereign glue. My party has gotten into some sticky situations with that stuff.
$endgroup$
– anaximander
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@anaximander Our chaotic rogue: "I use sovereign glue on our warrior and stick our mage to him while they're asleep."rolls natural 20 on the checkMe: "Well, I guess the mage will have to stick with the warrior for the rest of this game [session]..."
$endgroup$
– John Hamilton
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In part it depends on the magic items. Did you give them magic items that were useful in combat? Like, have they mostly got +3 plate armor or have they mostly got sovereign glue?
Broadly, the answer to your question is yes: it's probably appropriate to give them more difficult encounters because they have nice stuff. But, especially at higher levels, the encounter tables are a very loose guideline anyway. You'll have to get a feel for what your group can handle.
Here is what I do when I'm uncertain: I start with an encounter that I'm expecting to be fairly easy, and then if the players seem to be winning too hard, I tell them reinforcements are showing up and I add more monsters of the same type.
The good news is that most players don't really want or need you to give them a super-difficult-but-still-survivable battle. If you give them a battle where everyone gets attacked once, and everyone gets to show off their cool abilities or items at least once, generally they'll be happy.
(source: I run a lot of games and this is what I do)
$endgroup$
8
$begingroup$
As an aside, don't underestimate sovereign glue. My party has gotten into some sticky situations with that stuff.
$endgroup$
– anaximander
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@anaximander Our chaotic rogue: "I use sovereign glue on our warrior and stick our mage to him while they're asleep."rolls natural 20 on the checkMe: "Well, I guess the mage will have to stick with the warrior for the rest of this game [session]..."
$endgroup$
– John Hamilton
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In part it depends on the magic items. Did you give them magic items that were useful in combat? Like, have they mostly got +3 plate armor or have they mostly got sovereign glue?
Broadly, the answer to your question is yes: it's probably appropriate to give them more difficult encounters because they have nice stuff. But, especially at higher levels, the encounter tables are a very loose guideline anyway. You'll have to get a feel for what your group can handle.
Here is what I do when I'm uncertain: I start with an encounter that I'm expecting to be fairly easy, and then if the players seem to be winning too hard, I tell them reinforcements are showing up and I add more monsters of the same type.
The good news is that most players don't really want or need you to give them a super-difficult-but-still-survivable battle. If you give them a battle where everyone gets attacked once, and everyone gets to show off their cool abilities or items at least once, generally they'll be happy.
(source: I run a lot of games and this is what I do)
$endgroup$
In part it depends on the magic items. Did you give them magic items that were useful in combat? Like, have they mostly got +3 plate armor or have they mostly got sovereign glue?
Broadly, the answer to your question is yes: it's probably appropriate to give them more difficult encounters because they have nice stuff. But, especially at higher levels, the encounter tables are a very loose guideline anyway. You'll have to get a feel for what your group can handle.
Here is what I do when I'm uncertain: I start with an encounter that I'm expecting to be fairly easy, and then if the players seem to be winning too hard, I tell them reinforcements are showing up and I add more monsters of the same type.
The good news is that most players don't really want or need you to give them a super-difficult-but-still-survivable battle. If you give them a battle where everyone gets attacked once, and everyone gets to show off their cool abilities or items at least once, generally they'll be happy.
(source: I run a lot of games and this is what I do)
answered 11 hours ago
Dan BDan B
37.9k869145
37.9k869145
8
$begingroup$
As an aside, don't underestimate sovereign glue. My party has gotten into some sticky situations with that stuff.
$endgroup$
– anaximander
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@anaximander Our chaotic rogue: "I use sovereign glue on our warrior and stick our mage to him while they're asleep."rolls natural 20 on the checkMe: "Well, I guess the mage will have to stick with the warrior for the rest of this game [session]..."
$endgroup$
– John Hamilton
5 hours ago
add a comment |
8
$begingroup$
As an aside, don't underestimate sovereign glue. My party has gotten into some sticky situations with that stuff.
$endgroup$
– anaximander
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@anaximander Our chaotic rogue: "I use sovereign glue on our warrior and stick our mage to him while they're asleep."rolls natural 20 on the checkMe: "Well, I guess the mage will have to stick with the warrior for the rest of this game [session]..."
$endgroup$
– John Hamilton
5 hours ago
8
8
$begingroup$
As an aside, don't underestimate sovereign glue. My party has gotten into some sticky situations with that stuff.
$endgroup$
– anaximander
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
As an aside, don't underestimate sovereign glue. My party has gotten into some sticky situations with that stuff.
$endgroup$
– anaximander
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@anaximander Our chaotic rogue: "I use sovereign glue on our warrior and stick our mage to him while they're asleep."
rolls natural 20 on the check Me: "Well, I guess the mage will have to stick with the warrior for the rest of this game [session]..."$endgroup$
– John Hamilton
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@anaximander Our chaotic rogue: "I use sovereign glue on our warrior and stick our mage to him while they're asleep."
rolls natural 20 on the check Me: "Well, I guess the mage will have to stick with the warrior for the rest of this game [session]..."$endgroup$
– John Hamilton
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think I have to answer this question with a question:
Are your current encounters challenging the players appropriately?
If yes, then there's no need to increase the difficulty. If they're already getting close to dying in every fight they get in, or if they're blowing all their abilities just to stay alive, then there's no need to make things harder on them.
If no, then you should definitely think about making your encounters harder. I'm in a similar situation with my players. I have been particularly generous with magic items, possibly a little too much. Each player has more items than they can attune to, and our paladin had an AC of 23 at one point. As a result, when they were level 10, they were blowing through CR 11 encounters without breaking a sweat. I had to start using action economy more to my advantage, giving boss monsters additional abilities and Legendary Resistances, and coming up with better tactics for monsters.
Remember, 5e is balanced around the players having no magic items at all and still being able to take on threats at their CR. Players having more magic items than usual is a good a reason as any to make encounters more difficult. Depending on how good these magic items are, you might need to treat them as if they were level 10 or higher - although I'd work up to that, and not just drop a Beholder in their lap with no warning.
New contributor
theCerealKillr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think I have to answer this question with a question:
Are your current encounters challenging the players appropriately?
If yes, then there's no need to increase the difficulty. If they're already getting close to dying in every fight they get in, or if they're blowing all their abilities just to stay alive, then there's no need to make things harder on them.
If no, then you should definitely think about making your encounters harder. I'm in a similar situation with my players. I have been particularly generous with magic items, possibly a little too much. Each player has more items than they can attune to, and our paladin had an AC of 23 at one point. As a result, when they were level 10, they were blowing through CR 11 encounters without breaking a sweat. I had to start using action economy more to my advantage, giving boss monsters additional abilities and Legendary Resistances, and coming up with better tactics for monsters.
Remember, 5e is balanced around the players having no magic items at all and still being able to take on threats at their CR. Players having more magic items than usual is a good a reason as any to make encounters more difficult. Depending on how good these magic items are, you might need to treat them as if they were level 10 or higher - although I'd work up to that, and not just drop a Beholder in their lap with no warning.
New contributor
theCerealKillr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think I have to answer this question with a question:
Are your current encounters challenging the players appropriately?
If yes, then there's no need to increase the difficulty. If they're already getting close to dying in every fight they get in, or if they're blowing all their abilities just to stay alive, then there's no need to make things harder on them.
If no, then you should definitely think about making your encounters harder. I'm in a similar situation with my players. I have been particularly generous with magic items, possibly a little too much. Each player has more items than they can attune to, and our paladin had an AC of 23 at one point. As a result, when they were level 10, they were blowing through CR 11 encounters without breaking a sweat. I had to start using action economy more to my advantage, giving boss monsters additional abilities and Legendary Resistances, and coming up with better tactics for monsters.
Remember, 5e is balanced around the players having no magic items at all and still being able to take on threats at their CR. Players having more magic items than usual is a good a reason as any to make encounters more difficult. Depending on how good these magic items are, you might need to treat them as if they were level 10 or higher - although I'd work up to that, and not just drop a Beholder in their lap with no warning.
New contributor
theCerealKillr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I think I have to answer this question with a question:
Are your current encounters challenging the players appropriately?
If yes, then there's no need to increase the difficulty. If they're already getting close to dying in every fight they get in, or if they're blowing all their abilities just to stay alive, then there's no need to make things harder on them.
If no, then you should definitely think about making your encounters harder. I'm in a similar situation with my players. I have been particularly generous with magic items, possibly a little too much. Each player has more items than they can attune to, and our paladin had an AC of 23 at one point. As a result, when they were level 10, they were blowing through CR 11 encounters without breaking a sweat. I had to start using action economy more to my advantage, giving boss monsters additional abilities and Legendary Resistances, and coming up with better tactics for monsters.
Remember, 5e is balanced around the players having no magic items at all and still being able to take on threats at their CR. Players having more magic items than usual is a good a reason as any to make encounters more difficult. Depending on how good these magic items are, you might need to treat them as if they were level 10 or higher - although I'd work up to that, and not just drop a Beholder in their lap with no warning.
New contributor
theCerealKillr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 9 hours ago
New contributor
theCerealKillr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 10 hours ago
theCerealKillrtheCerealKillr
561515
561515
New contributor
theCerealKillr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
theCerealKillr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
theCerealKillr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Don't increase the difficulity. Let the players do this.
The players have some new item. Thus they grow in power. 5e assumes no (to few) magic itemsAs better answerd here. Eventually, more magic items in a grow means to power of a group grows.
However, keep in mind the players just bought new items. They want to use them. They want to feel powerful. They want to have an encounter and notice how they don't just survive, but how they survive more easily, and can obliterate a group they struggled with previously.
You want them to grow more confident. You want them to feel that their magic items help. The reward they got for struggling and adventuring is a true reward. They can now tackle problems they couldn't before. It will bolster their confidence, and now you know you can give them harder enemies.
My key point is: If you always perfectly compensate for the increased power the players have, they will never move forward. You end putting the players kind in a Red Queen's Race.
If I buy a Shortsword +1, and after buying every enemy gets buffed by +1 AC, just because I bought the new sword, my purchase doesn't matter. I end up at the same spot, where the effects are canceled out.
New contributor
Paaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This is a good point. You want the power curve of the enemy to be staggered in relationship to the players: before they hit a major upgrade, milestone, or magic item, things should be starting to get tough. After they get it, things should be easy for a while. Let them feel badass with their new items. Then, bring the difficulty up to match until their next milestone.
$endgroup$
– theCerealKillr
57 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Don't increase the difficulity. Let the players do this.
The players have some new item. Thus they grow in power. 5e assumes no (to few) magic itemsAs better answerd here. Eventually, more magic items in a grow means to power of a group grows.
However, keep in mind the players just bought new items. They want to use them. They want to feel powerful. They want to have an encounter and notice how they don't just survive, but how they survive more easily, and can obliterate a group they struggled with previously.
You want them to grow more confident. You want them to feel that their magic items help. The reward they got for struggling and adventuring is a true reward. They can now tackle problems they couldn't before. It will bolster their confidence, and now you know you can give them harder enemies.
My key point is: If you always perfectly compensate for the increased power the players have, they will never move forward. You end putting the players kind in a Red Queen's Race.
If I buy a Shortsword +1, and after buying every enemy gets buffed by +1 AC, just because I bought the new sword, my purchase doesn't matter. I end up at the same spot, where the effects are canceled out.
New contributor
Paaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This is a good point. You want the power curve of the enemy to be staggered in relationship to the players: before they hit a major upgrade, milestone, or magic item, things should be starting to get tough. After they get it, things should be easy for a while. Let them feel badass with their new items. Then, bring the difficulty up to match until their next milestone.
$endgroup$
– theCerealKillr
57 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Don't increase the difficulity. Let the players do this.
The players have some new item. Thus they grow in power. 5e assumes no (to few) magic itemsAs better answerd here. Eventually, more magic items in a grow means to power of a group grows.
However, keep in mind the players just bought new items. They want to use them. They want to feel powerful. They want to have an encounter and notice how they don't just survive, but how they survive more easily, and can obliterate a group they struggled with previously.
You want them to grow more confident. You want them to feel that their magic items help. The reward they got for struggling and adventuring is a true reward. They can now tackle problems they couldn't before. It will bolster their confidence, and now you know you can give them harder enemies.
My key point is: If you always perfectly compensate for the increased power the players have, they will never move forward. You end putting the players kind in a Red Queen's Race.
If I buy a Shortsword +1, and after buying every enemy gets buffed by +1 AC, just because I bought the new sword, my purchase doesn't matter. I end up at the same spot, where the effects are canceled out.
New contributor
Paaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Don't increase the difficulity. Let the players do this.
The players have some new item. Thus they grow in power. 5e assumes no (to few) magic itemsAs better answerd here. Eventually, more magic items in a grow means to power of a group grows.
However, keep in mind the players just bought new items. They want to use them. They want to feel powerful. They want to have an encounter and notice how they don't just survive, but how they survive more easily, and can obliterate a group they struggled with previously.
You want them to grow more confident. You want them to feel that their magic items help. The reward they got for struggling and adventuring is a true reward. They can now tackle problems they couldn't before. It will bolster their confidence, and now you know you can give them harder enemies.
My key point is: If you always perfectly compensate for the increased power the players have, they will never move forward. You end putting the players kind in a Red Queen's Race.
If I buy a Shortsword +1, and after buying every enemy gets buffed by +1 AC, just because I bought the new sword, my purchase doesn't matter. I end up at the same spot, where the effects are canceled out.
New contributor
Paaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Paaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 1 hour ago
PaajPaaj
211
211
New contributor
Paaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Paaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Paaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
$begingroup$
This is a good point. You want the power curve of the enemy to be staggered in relationship to the players: before they hit a major upgrade, milestone, or magic item, things should be starting to get tough. After they get it, things should be easy for a while. Let them feel badass with their new items. Then, bring the difficulty up to match until their next milestone.
$endgroup$
– theCerealKillr
57 mins ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
This is a good point. You want the power curve of the enemy to be staggered in relationship to the players: before they hit a major upgrade, milestone, or magic item, things should be starting to get tough. After they get it, things should be easy for a while. Let them feel badass with their new items. Then, bring the difficulty up to match until their next milestone.
$endgroup$
– theCerealKillr
57 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
This is a good point. You want the power curve of the enemy to be staggered in relationship to the players: before they hit a major upgrade, milestone, or magic item, things should be starting to get tough. After they get it, things should be easy for a while. Let them feel badass with their new items. Then, bring the difficulty up to match until their next milestone.
$endgroup$
– theCerealKillr
57 mins ago
$begingroup$
This is a good point. You want the power curve of the enemy to be staggered in relationship to the players: before they hit a major upgrade, milestone, or magic item, things should be starting to get tough. After they get it, things should be easy for a while. Let them feel badass with their new items. Then, bring the difficulty up to match until their next milestone.
$endgroup$
– theCerealKillr
57 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142638%2five-given-my-players-a-lot-of-magic-items-is-it-reasonable-for-me-to-give-them%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Answerers should remember to support their answers by citing relevant evidence or experience, per Good Subjective. (Good question!)
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
For a well-informed answer it would be helpful to know the specific items. Including the benefits of each item would be convenient. Otherwise respondents will have to look up 18 magic items.
$endgroup$
– lightcat
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@lightcat makes a good point, though perhaps only include details for combat relevant items. Bag of Holding is a useful item but it unlikely to significantly effect combat difficulty. (Barring very clever play)
$endgroup$
– linksassin
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Unfortunately, I don't remember all of the specific items I gave my players. Most of them are definitely combat-oriented, though.
$endgroup$
– Kevin
10 hours ago