PTIJ: Mordechai mourningParashat PekudeiPurim and Shushan PurimIs wearing masks on Purim a Biblical...

How to concatenate two command in shell

What is the oldest European royal house?

Faulty RAID1 disk now shows as foreign

How do you write a macro that takes arguments containing paragraphs?

What's Bob's age again?

Are Wave equations equivalent to Maxwell equations in free space?

The need of reserving one's ability in job interviews

What is brightness?

Giving a talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?

Is being socially reclusive okay for a graduate student?

The orphan's family

How do we objectively assess if a dialogue sounds unnatural or cringy?

Practical reasons to have both a large police force and bounty hunting network?

Remove object from array based on array of some property of that object

« Rendre » et « render » (the meaning)

Effect of "wrong" driver with slightly long RS-485 stubs

A bug in Excel? Conditional formatting for marking duplicates also highlights unique value

Create chunks from an array

Did Amazon pay $0 in taxes last year?

Why aren't there more gauls like Obelix?

Plagiarism of code by other PhD student

Adjust starting of second line

Convert an array of objects to array of the objects' values

Difference between 'stomach' and 'uterus'



PTIJ: Mordechai mourning



Parashat Pekudei
Purim and Shushan PurimIs wearing masks on Purim a Biblical Commandment or a Rabbinic Commandment?Why didn't Mordechai keep Mitzvos?How big did Mordechai get, and was it only in the king's palace?PTIJ: whats the diffrencePTIJ - Why does Rabeinu Hanan'el wear that hat?Why did Esther Knas all the Jews?Mordechai's politicsPTIJ: What's the difference between Arur Mordechai and Baruch Haman?PTIJ: Who were the two maidservants of Shushan?PTIJ: When will the Purim story take place?












7















When Mordechai hears of the plot against the Jewish people, he displays his sadness by appearing בִּלְב֥וּשׁ שָֽׂק, bilvush sock Esther 4:2.



What is the halachic source that appearing with a sock denotes mourning? Is it that wearing only one sock points to loss? Is it about a lack of shoes?





This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.










share|improve this question



























    7















    When Mordechai hears of the plot against the Jewish people, he displays his sadness by appearing בִּלְב֥וּשׁ שָֽׂק, bilvush sock Esther 4:2.



    What is the halachic source that appearing with a sock denotes mourning? Is it that wearing only one sock points to loss? Is it about a lack of shoes?





    This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.










    share|improve this question

























      7












      7








      7








      When Mordechai hears of the plot against the Jewish people, he displays his sadness by appearing בִּלְב֥וּשׁ שָֽׂק, bilvush sock Esther 4:2.



      What is the halachic source that appearing with a sock denotes mourning? Is it that wearing only one sock points to loss? Is it about a lack of shoes?





      This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.










      share|improve this question














      When Mordechai hears of the plot against the Jewish people, he displays his sadness by appearing בִּלְב֥וּשׁ שָֽׂק, bilvush sock Esther 4:2.



      What is the halachic source that appearing with a sock denotes mourning? Is it that wearing only one sock points to loss? Is it about a lack of shoes?





      This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.







      purim-torah-in-jest






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 13 hours ago









      rosendsrosends

      20.7k32670




      20.7k32670






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          10














          David HaMelech said of this practice (Tehillim 30:12):




          הפכת מספידי למחול לי פתחת שקי ותאזרני שמחה



          You turned my mourning into dancing for me, you removed my socks and girded me with happiness.




          So we see that it’s not simply not wearing shoes, but actively wearing socks that indicates mourning. (Perhaps the common custom nowadays to wear socks under our shoes is meant to be a sign of mourning the Beis HaMikdash.)



          What is the reason for this? David HaMelech says further in Tehillim 147:9:




          נוֹתֵ֣ן לִבְהֵמָ֣ה לַחְמָ֑הּ לִבְנֵ֥י עֹ֝רֵ֗ב אֲשֶׁ֣ר יִקְרָֽאוּ׃



          Who gives to an animal its bread, to young ravens when they call out?




          Who, indeed, is it who gives food to young ravens? It must be the Angel of Death, who smites creatures, which the ravens then eat.



          “Bread,” of course, is a euphemism for living creatures; as we find in Bereishis 39:6:




          הַלֶּ֖חֶם אֲשֶׁר־ה֣וּא אוֹכֵ֑ל



          The bread which he eats




          which, as Rashi explains,




          הִיא אִשְׁתּוֹ



          This is [Potiphar’s] wife




          Rashi further notes on Bereishis 37:33:




          חיה רעה אכלתהו. [...] סוֹפוֹ שֶׁתִּתְגָּרֶה בוֹ אֵשֶׁת פּוֹטִיפַר.



          ”A wild animal ate him” - [...] His end is that the wife of Potiphar will drag him.




          So we see that Potifar’s wife is a wild animal, and she is called “bread,” so we may deduce that living creatures in general are called “bread.”



          Okay, back to the passuk in Tehillim 147. Having established that we’re talking about the Angel of Death, the passuk continues (v. 10):




          לֹ֤א בִגְבוּרַ֣ת הַסּ֣וּס יֶחְפָּ֑ץ לֹֽא־בְשׁוֹקֵ֖י הָאִ֣ישׁ יִרְצֶֽה׃



          Not in the strength of a horse does he desire, nor in the shins of man is he appeased.




          The Angel of Death doesn’t desire strength, so the practice is to mourn and refrain from many activities. He is not appeased by the shins of man, so the practice is to cover them with socks.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            You're saying we must repent from our many shins? +1

            – Y     e     z
            1 hour ago











          • The final sentence strongly implies that knee-high socks are necessary. I'm curious what the various commentaries in the modern era have to say about the prevalence of crew socks (which cover the ankle, but none of the shin) in contemporary society.

            – Codes with Hammer
            56 mins ago



















          7














          You ask a hole-y question. This has nothing to do with or the lack of shoes. It means a complete outfit made out of Sock. By wearing an outfit that smells to the high heavens, people will come to turn to heaven and beg for redemption. (Source: Pitachta Saki - Esther 4:2)






          share|improve this answer

































            2














            Actually, as the verse before says,




            ויקרע מרדכי את בגדיו, וילבש שק ואפר



            Mordechai tore his clothes, and then wore Wafer Socks




            Since his previous pair of socks ripped so easily, he decided to get some of these.






            share|improve this answer































              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              10














              David HaMelech said of this practice (Tehillim 30:12):




              הפכת מספידי למחול לי פתחת שקי ותאזרני שמחה



              You turned my mourning into dancing for me, you removed my socks and girded me with happiness.




              So we see that it’s not simply not wearing shoes, but actively wearing socks that indicates mourning. (Perhaps the common custom nowadays to wear socks under our shoes is meant to be a sign of mourning the Beis HaMikdash.)



              What is the reason for this? David HaMelech says further in Tehillim 147:9:




              נוֹתֵ֣ן לִבְהֵמָ֣ה לַחְמָ֑הּ לִבְנֵ֥י עֹ֝רֵ֗ב אֲשֶׁ֣ר יִקְרָֽאוּ׃



              Who gives to an animal its bread, to young ravens when they call out?




              Who, indeed, is it who gives food to young ravens? It must be the Angel of Death, who smites creatures, which the ravens then eat.



              “Bread,” of course, is a euphemism for living creatures; as we find in Bereishis 39:6:




              הַלֶּ֖חֶם אֲשֶׁר־ה֣וּא אוֹכֵ֑ל



              The bread which he eats




              which, as Rashi explains,




              הִיא אִשְׁתּוֹ



              This is [Potiphar’s] wife




              Rashi further notes on Bereishis 37:33:




              חיה רעה אכלתהו. [...] סוֹפוֹ שֶׁתִּתְגָּרֶה בוֹ אֵשֶׁת פּוֹטִיפַר.



              ”A wild animal ate him” - [...] His end is that the wife of Potiphar will drag him.




              So we see that Potifar’s wife is a wild animal, and she is called “bread,” so we may deduce that living creatures in general are called “bread.”



              Okay, back to the passuk in Tehillim 147. Having established that we’re talking about the Angel of Death, the passuk continues (v. 10):




              לֹ֤א בִגְבוּרַ֣ת הַסּ֣וּס יֶחְפָּ֑ץ לֹֽא־בְשׁוֹקֵ֖י הָאִ֣ישׁ יִרְצֶֽה׃



              Not in the strength of a horse does he desire, nor in the shins of man is he appeased.




              The Angel of Death doesn’t desire strength, so the practice is to mourn and refrain from many activities. He is not appeased by the shins of man, so the practice is to cover them with socks.






              share|improve this answer



















              • 1





                You're saying we must repent from our many shins? +1

                – Y     e     z
                1 hour ago











              • The final sentence strongly implies that knee-high socks are necessary. I'm curious what the various commentaries in the modern era have to say about the prevalence of crew socks (which cover the ankle, but none of the shin) in contemporary society.

                – Codes with Hammer
                56 mins ago
















              10














              David HaMelech said of this practice (Tehillim 30:12):




              הפכת מספידי למחול לי פתחת שקי ותאזרני שמחה



              You turned my mourning into dancing for me, you removed my socks and girded me with happiness.




              So we see that it’s not simply not wearing shoes, but actively wearing socks that indicates mourning. (Perhaps the common custom nowadays to wear socks under our shoes is meant to be a sign of mourning the Beis HaMikdash.)



              What is the reason for this? David HaMelech says further in Tehillim 147:9:




              נוֹתֵ֣ן לִבְהֵמָ֣ה לַחְמָ֑הּ לִבְנֵ֥י עֹ֝רֵ֗ב אֲשֶׁ֣ר יִקְרָֽאוּ׃



              Who gives to an animal its bread, to young ravens when they call out?




              Who, indeed, is it who gives food to young ravens? It must be the Angel of Death, who smites creatures, which the ravens then eat.



              “Bread,” of course, is a euphemism for living creatures; as we find in Bereishis 39:6:




              הַלֶּ֖חֶם אֲשֶׁר־ה֣וּא אוֹכֵ֑ל



              The bread which he eats




              which, as Rashi explains,




              הִיא אִשְׁתּוֹ



              This is [Potiphar’s] wife




              Rashi further notes on Bereishis 37:33:




              חיה רעה אכלתהו. [...] סוֹפוֹ שֶׁתִּתְגָּרֶה בוֹ אֵשֶׁת פּוֹטִיפַר.



              ”A wild animal ate him” - [...] His end is that the wife of Potiphar will drag him.




              So we see that Potifar’s wife is a wild animal, and she is called “bread,” so we may deduce that living creatures in general are called “bread.”



              Okay, back to the passuk in Tehillim 147. Having established that we’re talking about the Angel of Death, the passuk continues (v. 10):




              לֹ֤א בִגְבוּרַ֣ת הַסּ֣וּס יֶחְפָּ֑ץ לֹֽא־בְשׁוֹקֵ֖י הָאִ֣ישׁ יִרְצֶֽה׃



              Not in the strength of a horse does he desire, nor in the shins of man is he appeased.




              The Angel of Death doesn’t desire strength, so the practice is to mourn and refrain from many activities. He is not appeased by the shins of man, so the practice is to cover them with socks.






              share|improve this answer



















              • 1





                You're saying we must repent from our many shins? +1

                – Y     e     z
                1 hour ago











              • The final sentence strongly implies that knee-high socks are necessary. I'm curious what the various commentaries in the modern era have to say about the prevalence of crew socks (which cover the ankle, but none of the shin) in contemporary society.

                – Codes with Hammer
                56 mins ago














              10












              10








              10







              David HaMelech said of this practice (Tehillim 30:12):




              הפכת מספידי למחול לי פתחת שקי ותאזרני שמחה



              You turned my mourning into dancing for me, you removed my socks and girded me with happiness.




              So we see that it’s not simply not wearing shoes, but actively wearing socks that indicates mourning. (Perhaps the common custom nowadays to wear socks under our shoes is meant to be a sign of mourning the Beis HaMikdash.)



              What is the reason for this? David HaMelech says further in Tehillim 147:9:




              נוֹתֵ֣ן לִבְהֵמָ֣ה לַחְמָ֑הּ לִבְנֵ֥י עֹ֝רֵ֗ב אֲשֶׁ֣ר יִקְרָֽאוּ׃



              Who gives to an animal its bread, to young ravens when they call out?




              Who, indeed, is it who gives food to young ravens? It must be the Angel of Death, who smites creatures, which the ravens then eat.



              “Bread,” of course, is a euphemism for living creatures; as we find in Bereishis 39:6:




              הַלֶּ֖חֶם אֲשֶׁר־ה֣וּא אוֹכֵ֑ל



              The bread which he eats




              which, as Rashi explains,




              הִיא אִשְׁתּוֹ



              This is [Potiphar’s] wife




              Rashi further notes on Bereishis 37:33:




              חיה רעה אכלתהו. [...] סוֹפוֹ שֶׁתִּתְגָּרֶה בוֹ אֵשֶׁת פּוֹטִיפַר.



              ”A wild animal ate him” - [...] His end is that the wife of Potiphar will drag him.




              So we see that Potifar’s wife is a wild animal, and she is called “bread,” so we may deduce that living creatures in general are called “bread.”



              Okay, back to the passuk in Tehillim 147. Having established that we’re talking about the Angel of Death, the passuk continues (v. 10):




              לֹ֤א בִגְבוּרַ֣ת הַסּ֣וּס יֶחְפָּ֑ץ לֹֽא־בְשׁוֹקֵ֖י הָאִ֣ישׁ יִרְצֶֽה׃



              Not in the strength of a horse does he desire, nor in the shins of man is he appeased.




              The Angel of Death doesn’t desire strength, so the practice is to mourn and refrain from many activities. He is not appeased by the shins of man, so the practice is to cover them with socks.






              share|improve this answer













              David HaMelech said of this practice (Tehillim 30:12):




              הפכת מספידי למחול לי פתחת שקי ותאזרני שמחה



              You turned my mourning into dancing for me, you removed my socks and girded me with happiness.




              So we see that it’s not simply not wearing shoes, but actively wearing socks that indicates mourning. (Perhaps the common custom nowadays to wear socks under our shoes is meant to be a sign of mourning the Beis HaMikdash.)



              What is the reason for this? David HaMelech says further in Tehillim 147:9:




              נוֹתֵ֣ן לִבְהֵמָ֣ה לַחְמָ֑הּ לִבְנֵ֥י עֹ֝רֵ֗ב אֲשֶׁ֣ר יִקְרָֽאוּ׃



              Who gives to an animal its bread, to young ravens when they call out?




              Who, indeed, is it who gives food to young ravens? It must be the Angel of Death, who smites creatures, which the ravens then eat.



              “Bread,” of course, is a euphemism for living creatures; as we find in Bereishis 39:6:




              הַלֶּ֖חֶם אֲשֶׁר־ה֣וּא אוֹכֵ֑ל



              The bread which he eats




              which, as Rashi explains,




              הִיא אִשְׁתּוֹ



              This is [Potiphar’s] wife




              Rashi further notes on Bereishis 37:33:




              חיה רעה אכלתהו. [...] סוֹפוֹ שֶׁתִּתְגָּרֶה בוֹ אֵשֶׁת פּוֹטִיפַר.



              ”A wild animal ate him” - [...] His end is that the wife of Potiphar will drag him.




              So we see that Potifar’s wife is a wild animal, and she is called “bread,” so we may deduce that living creatures in general are called “bread.”



              Okay, back to the passuk in Tehillim 147. Having established that we’re talking about the Angel of Death, the passuk continues (v. 10):




              לֹ֤א בִגְבוּרַ֣ת הַסּ֣וּס יֶחְפָּ֑ץ לֹֽא־בְשׁוֹקֵ֖י הָאִ֣ישׁ יִרְצֶֽה׃



              Not in the strength of a horse does he desire, nor in the shins of man is he appeased.




              The Angel of Death doesn’t desire strength, so the practice is to mourn and refrain from many activities. He is not appeased by the shins of man, so the practice is to cover them with socks.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 12 hours ago









              DonielFDonielF

              14.6k12481




              14.6k12481








              • 1





                You're saying we must repent from our many shins? +1

                – Y     e     z
                1 hour ago











              • The final sentence strongly implies that knee-high socks are necessary. I'm curious what the various commentaries in the modern era have to say about the prevalence of crew socks (which cover the ankle, but none of the shin) in contemporary society.

                – Codes with Hammer
                56 mins ago














              • 1





                You're saying we must repent from our many shins? +1

                – Y     e     z
                1 hour ago











              • The final sentence strongly implies that knee-high socks are necessary. I'm curious what the various commentaries in the modern era have to say about the prevalence of crew socks (which cover the ankle, but none of the shin) in contemporary society.

                – Codes with Hammer
                56 mins ago








              1




              1





              You're saying we must repent from our many shins? +1

              – Y     e     z
              1 hour ago





              You're saying we must repent from our many shins? +1

              – Y     e     z
              1 hour ago













              The final sentence strongly implies that knee-high socks are necessary. I'm curious what the various commentaries in the modern era have to say about the prevalence of crew socks (which cover the ankle, but none of the shin) in contemporary society.

              – Codes with Hammer
              56 mins ago





              The final sentence strongly implies that knee-high socks are necessary. I'm curious what the various commentaries in the modern era have to say about the prevalence of crew socks (which cover the ankle, but none of the shin) in contemporary society.

              – Codes with Hammer
              56 mins ago











              7














              You ask a hole-y question. This has nothing to do with or the lack of shoes. It means a complete outfit made out of Sock. By wearing an outfit that smells to the high heavens, people will come to turn to heaven and beg for redemption. (Source: Pitachta Saki - Esther 4:2)






              share|improve this answer






























                7














                You ask a hole-y question. This has nothing to do with or the lack of shoes. It means a complete outfit made out of Sock. By wearing an outfit that smells to the high heavens, people will come to turn to heaven and beg for redemption. (Source: Pitachta Saki - Esther 4:2)






                share|improve this answer




























                  7












                  7








                  7







                  You ask a hole-y question. This has nothing to do with or the lack of shoes. It means a complete outfit made out of Sock. By wearing an outfit that smells to the high heavens, people will come to turn to heaven and beg for redemption. (Source: Pitachta Saki - Esther 4:2)






                  share|improve this answer















                  You ask a hole-y question. This has nothing to do with or the lack of shoes. It means a complete outfit made out of Sock. By wearing an outfit that smells to the high heavens, people will come to turn to heaven and beg for redemption. (Source: Pitachta Saki - Esther 4:2)







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 12 hours ago









                  mbloch

                  25.9k545131




                  25.9k545131










                  answered 13 hours ago









                  Gershon GoldGershon Gold

                  111k8178425




                  111k8178425























                      2














                      Actually, as the verse before says,




                      ויקרע מרדכי את בגדיו, וילבש שק ואפר



                      Mordechai tore his clothes, and then wore Wafer Socks




                      Since his previous pair of socks ripped so easily, he decided to get some of these.






                      share|improve this answer




























                        2














                        Actually, as the verse before says,




                        ויקרע מרדכי את בגדיו, וילבש שק ואפר



                        Mordechai tore his clothes, and then wore Wafer Socks




                        Since his previous pair of socks ripped so easily, he decided to get some of these.






                        share|improve this answer


























                          2












                          2








                          2







                          Actually, as the verse before says,




                          ויקרע מרדכי את בגדיו, וילבש שק ואפר



                          Mordechai tore his clothes, and then wore Wafer Socks




                          Since his previous pair of socks ripped so easily, he decided to get some of these.






                          share|improve this answer













                          Actually, as the verse before says,




                          ויקרע מרדכי את בגדיו, וילבש שק ואפר



                          Mordechai tore his clothes, and then wore Wafer Socks




                          Since his previous pair of socks ripped so easily, he decided to get some of these.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 11 hours ago









                          Y     e     zY     e     z

                          43.4k364193




                          43.4k364193















                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Installing LyX: “No textclass is found.”LyX installation error- text class not found- 'Reconfigure' or...

                              (1602) Indiana Índice Designación y nombre Características orbitales Véase...

                              Universidad Autónoma de Occidente Índice Historia Campus Facultades Programas Académicos Medios de...