CBP Reminds Travelers to Allow 72 Hours for ESTA. Why?Renew or reapply for ESTA visa to re-enter...
Heating basement floor with water heater
Wiring up text parts
Six real numbers so that product of any five is the sixth one
Did Amazon pay $0 in taxes last year?
How to make a mimic a challenging fight for high level party?
Rationale to prefer local variables over instance variables?
Filling in Area Under Curve Causes Alignment Issues
How to mitigate "bandwagon attacking" from players?
Is the helper verb 'werden' mandatory in both passive clauses separated by an 'oder', or only at the very the end?
Why is s'abonner reflexive?
How do you say "powers of ten"?
How can I handle a player who pre-plans arguments about my rulings on RAW?
Reason why dimensional travelling would be restricted
In the comics did Thanos "kill" just sentient beings or all creatures with the snap?
Can I send almost 1MB transaction?
How can atoms be electrically neutral when there is a difference in the positions of the charges?
How do ISS astronauts "get their stripes"?
Misplaced tyre lever - Alternatives?
Levi-Civita symbol: 3D matrix
Practical reasons to have both a large police force and bounty hunting network?
I can't die. Who am I?
Borrowing Characters
Plagiarism of code by other PhD student
Is there any relevance to Thor getting his hair cut other than comedic value?
CBP Reminds Travelers to Allow 72 Hours for ESTA. Why?
Renew or reapply for ESTA visa to re-enter USA?Travelling to the US on the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) to attend a job interviewWhen to apply for US ESTA?Can I have multiple valid ESTAs in different passports?ESTA application status stuck at “Authorization Pending”. What can I do?When entering the US on VWP, are you required to have proof of onward travel within the 90 days?ESTA and B1/B2 visa refusals for UK citizenCan I apply for a F1 Visa while in the U.S. on a Visa Waiver (VWP ESTA) (NO Status change in the U.S.)?Is 1h30 enough time at Chicago O'Hare for transit between 2 international flights for a non-US citizen with ESTA?Visiting the USA from the UK on a passport with 3-months expiration
ESTA website has this alert on top in red.
REMINDER: Apply for ESTA no later than 72 hours before departing for the United States. Real-time approvals will no longer be available and arriving at the airport without a previously approved ESTA will likely result in being denied boarding.
Why is that so? ESTA approval previously used to be granted within minutes if not seconds. Is this a generic statement or a policy change?
This press release does confirm the policy change but does not list any reason as to why this was changed.
Due to changes in ESTA application processing, real-time approvals will no longer be available. Citizens of participating Visa Waiver Program (VWP) countries traveling to the United States are strongly encouraged to apply for an ESTA at the time of booking their trip and no later than 72 hours prior to departure. Applicants who apply on the same day of their flight’s departure risk not having an approved ESTA prior to their scheduled departure. International travelers without an approved ESTA will not be authorized to board their flight.
(the emphasis is mine)
usa esta us-visa-waiver-program
add a comment |
ESTA website has this alert on top in red.
REMINDER: Apply for ESTA no later than 72 hours before departing for the United States. Real-time approvals will no longer be available and arriving at the airport without a previously approved ESTA will likely result in being denied boarding.
Why is that so? ESTA approval previously used to be granted within minutes if not seconds. Is this a generic statement or a policy change?
This press release does confirm the policy change but does not list any reason as to why this was changed.
Due to changes in ESTA application processing, real-time approvals will no longer be available. Citizens of participating Visa Waiver Program (VWP) countries traveling to the United States are strongly encouraged to apply for an ESTA at the time of booking their trip and no later than 72 hours prior to departure. Applicants who apply on the same day of their flight’s departure risk not having an approved ESTA prior to their scheduled departure. International travelers without an approved ESTA will not be authorized to board their flight.
(the emphasis is mine)
usa esta us-visa-waiver-program
Speculation: the changes might be delivered the distributed computer infrastructure (e.g. airlines, ground services) in batch. Batch processes occur usually overnight, but in case a computer system fails there is the need for the technicians to work on the issue, get it fixed, and wait for the next batch.
– usr-local-ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ
yesterday
3
"ESTA approval previously used to be granted within minutes if not seconds." Usually, yes. Not always. The 72 hours is in part to accommodate for those situations that aren't the norm.
– Mast
yesterday
3
The statement doesn't preclude granting an ESTA within minutes, if not seconds. It just doesn't guarantee that fast of a turnaround.
– A C
21 hours ago
1
I don’t think it means that. Apply no later than 72 hours before departing looks like clear and strong instructions rather than a disclaimer for service guarantees.
– Hanky Panky
15 hours ago
add a comment |
ESTA website has this alert on top in red.
REMINDER: Apply for ESTA no later than 72 hours before departing for the United States. Real-time approvals will no longer be available and arriving at the airport without a previously approved ESTA will likely result in being denied boarding.
Why is that so? ESTA approval previously used to be granted within minutes if not seconds. Is this a generic statement or a policy change?
This press release does confirm the policy change but does not list any reason as to why this was changed.
Due to changes in ESTA application processing, real-time approvals will no longer be available. Citizens of participating Visa Waiver Program (VWP) countries traveling to the United States are strongly encouraged to apply for an ESTA at the time of booking their trip and no later than 72 hours prior to departure. Applicants who apply on the same day of their flight’s departure risk not having an approved ESTA prior to their scheduled departure. International travelers without an approved ESTA will not be authorized to board their flight.
(the emphasis is mine)
usa esta us-visa-waiver-program
ESTA website has this alert on top in red.
REMINDER: Apply for ESTA no later than 72 hours before departing for the United States. Real-time approvals will no longer be available and arriving at the airport without a previously approved ESTA will likely result in being denied boarding.
Why is that so? ESTA approval previously used to be granted within minutes if not seconds. Is this a generic statement or a policy change?
This press release does confirm the policy change but does not list any reason as to why this was changed.
Due to changes in ESTA application processing, real-time approvals will no longer be available. Citizens of participating Visa Waiver Program (VWP) countries traveling to the United States are strongly encouraged to apply for an ESTA at the time of booking their trip and no later than 72 hours prior to departure. Applicants who apply on the same day of their flight’s departure risk not having an approved ESTA prior to their scheduled departure. International travelers without an approved ESTA will not be authorized to board their flight.
(the emphasis is mine)
usa esta us-visa-waiver-program
usa esta us-visa-waiver-program
edited yesterday
Hanky Panky
asked yesterday
Hanky PankyHanky Panky
25.5k476123
25.5k476123
Speculation: the changes might be delivered the distributed computer infrastructure (e.g. airlines, ground services) in batch. Batch processes occur usually overnight, but in case a computer system fails there is the need for the technicians to work on the issue, get it fixed, and wait for the next batch.
– usr-local-ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ
yesterday
3
"ESTA approval previously used to be granted within minutes if not seconds." Usually, yes. Not always. The 72 hours is in part to accommodate for those situations that aren't the norm.
– Mast
yesterday
3
The statement doesn't preclude granting an ESTA within minutes, if not seconds. It just doesn't guarantee that fast of a turnaround.
– A C
21 hours ago
1
I don’t think it means that. Apply no later than 72 hours before departing looks like clear and strong instructions rather than a disclaimer for service guarantees.
– Hanky Panky
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Speculation: the changes might be delivered the distributed computer infrastructure (e.g. airlines, ground services) in batch. Batch processes occur usually overnight, but in case a computer system fails there is the need for the technicians to work on the issue, get it fixed, and wait for the next batch.
– usr-local-ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ
yesterday
3
"ESTA approval previously used to be granted within minutes if not seconds." Usually, yes. Not always. The 72 hours is in part to accommodate for those situations that aren't the norm.
– Mast
yesterday
3
The statement doesn't preclude granting an ESTA within minutes, if not seconds. It just doesn't guarantee that fast of a turnaround.
– A C
21 hours ago
1
I don’t think it means that. Apply no later than 72 hours before departing looks like clear and strong instructions rather than a disclaimer for service guarantees.
– Hanky Panky
15 hours ago
Speculation: the changes might be delivered the distributed computer infrastructure (e.g. airlines, ground services) in batch. Batch processes occur usually overnight, but in case a computer system fails there is the need for the technicians to work on the issue, get it fixed, and wait for the next batch.
– usr-local-ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ
yesterday
Speculation: the changes might be delivered the distributed computer infrastructure (e.g. airlines, ground services) in batch. Batch processes occur usually overnight, but in case a computer system fails there is the need for the technicians to work on the issue, get it fixed, and wait for the next batch.
– usr-local-ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ
yesterday
3
3
"ESTA approval previously used to be granted within minutes if not seconds." Usually, yes. Not always. The 72 hours is in part to accommodate for those situations that aren't the norm.
– Mast
yesterday
"ESTA approval previously used to be granted within minutes if not seconds." Usually, yes. Not always. The 72 hours is in part to accommodate for those situations that aren't the norm.
– Mast
yesterday
3
3
The statement doesn't preclude granting an ESTA within minutes, if not seconds. It just doesn't guarantee that fast of a turnaround.
– A C
21 hours ago
The statement doesn't preclude granting an ESTA within minutes, if not seconds. It just doesn't guarantee that fast of a turnaround.
– A C
21 hours ago
1
1
I don’t think it means that. Apply no later than 72 hours before departing looks like clear and strong instructions rather than a disclaimer for service guarantees.
– Hanky Panky
15 hours ago
I don’t think it means that. Apply no later than 72 hours before departing looks like clear and strong instructions rather than a disclaimer for service guarantees.
– Hanky Panky
15 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The reason is right there. You don’t see it because you’re expecting something elaborate.
Due to changes in ESTA application processing
That’s the reason. They don’t need to explain the details of the change.
https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/national-media-release/cbp-reminds-travelers-allow-72-hours-esta
Expectations...
– Harper
yesterday
2
I wonder if there are actually any changes in place. Someone who's recently applied for an ESTA could confirm how much it took for an approval to be received.
– JonathanReez♦
21 hours ago
@JonathanReez You would need more than one data point to be able to draw meaningful conclusions.
– ThE iLlEgAl aLiEn
20 hours ago
3
@ThEiLlEgAlaLiEn if at least one person gets an instant approval then "Real-time approvals will no longer be available" is wrong.
– JonathanReez♦
20 hours ago
@JonathanReez Turns out I last applied for an ESTA... the day before the press release linked in the question. Doh!
– David Richerby
19 hours ago
add a comment |
Not an official reason but I've had an ESTA delayed because of payment difficulties. I'd used the same card to pay for a plane ticket, a seat upgrade and an ESTA in rapid succession, all to US companies; my bank flagged that as potential fraud and refused the ESTA payment. The next morning, I got an email from CBP saying that I couldn't have my ESTA until I'd paid for it.
So it certainly seems prudent for CBP to recommend that people don't apply right at the last minute. Even completely routine applications can get delayed. As far as I recall, CBP have always advised people to apply at least 72 hours in advance of their planned travel.
1
Hmm. Actually, I'm not sure this really answers the question. Downvote if you think it doesn't; I'll delete it if people think it's not relevant.
– David Richerby
yesterday
1
It doesn't answer the question but it's still good/relevant information... if you end up deleting it maybe put it into a comment.
– Mehrdad
20 hours ago
2
+1 for 'CBP have always advised...' - I remember flying to the US in 2012-13 and the warning/advise being there.
– Rogem
11 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "273"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f133222%2fcbp-reminds-travelers-to-allow-72-hours-for-esta-why%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The reason is right there. You don’t see it because you’re expecting something elaborate.
Due to changes in ESTA application processing
That’s the reason. They don’t need to explain the details of the change.
https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/national-media-release/cbp-reminds-travelers-allow-72-hours-esta
Expectations...
– Harper
yesterday
2
I wonder if there are actually any changes in place. Someone who's recently applied for an ESTA could confirm how much it took for an approval to be received.
– JonathanReez♦
21 hours ago
@JonathanReez You would need more than one data point to be able to draw meaningful conclusions.
– ThE iLlEgAl aLiEn
20 hours ago
3
@ThEiLlEgAlaLiEn if at least one person gets an instant approval then "Real-time approvals will no longer be available" is wrong.
– JonathanReez♦
20 hours ago
@JonathanReez Turns out I last applied for an ESTA... the day before the press release linked in the question. Doh!
– David Richerby
19 hours ago
add a comment |
The reason is right there. You don’t see it because you’re expecting something elaborate.
Due to changes in ESTA application processing
That’s the reason. They don’t need to explain the details of the change.
https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/national-media-release/cbp-reminds-travelers-allow-72-hours-esta
Expectations...
– Harper
yesterday
2
I wonder if there are actually any changes in place. Someone who's recently applied for an ESTA could confirm how much it took for an approval to be received.
– JonathanReez♦
21 hours ago
@JonathanReez You would need more than one data point to be able to draw meaningful conclusions.
– ThE iLlEgAl aLiEn
20 hours ago
3
@ThEiLlEgAlaLiEn if at least one person gets an instant approval then "Real-time approvals will no longer be available" is wrong.
– JonathanReez♦
20 hours ago
@JonathanReez Turns out I last applied for an ESTA... the day before the press release linked in the question. Doh!
– David Richerby
19 hours ago
add a comment |
The reason is right there. You don’t see it because you’re expecting something elaborate.
Due to changes in ESTA application processing
That’s the reason. They don’t need to explain the details of the change.
https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/national-media-release/cbp-reminds-travelers-allow-72-hours-esta
The reason is right there. You don’t see it because you’re expecting something elaborate.
Due to changes in ESTA application processing
That’s the reason. They don’t need to explain the details of the change.
https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/national-media-release/cbp-reminds-travelers-allow-72-hours-esta
answered yesterday
ThE iLlEgAl aLiEnThE iLlEgAl aLiEn
24.3k368124
24.3k368124
Expectations...
– Harper
yesterday
2
I wonder if there are actually any changes in place. Someone who's recently applied for an ESTA could confirm how much it took for an approval to be received.
– JonathanReez♦
21 hours ago
@JonathanReez You would need more than one data point to be able to draw meaningful conclusions.
– ThE iLlEgAl aLiEn
20 hours ago
3
@ThEiLlEgAlaLiEn if at least one person gets an instant approval then "Real-time approvals will no longer be available" is wrong.
– JonathanReez♦
20 hours ago
@JonathanReez Turns out I last applied for an ESTA... the day before the press release linked in the question. Doh!
– David Richerby
19 hours ago
add a comment |
Expectations...
– Harper
yesterday
2
I wonder if there are actually any changes in place. Someone who's recently applied for an ESTA could confirm how much it took for an approval to be received.
– JonathanReez♦
21 hours ago
@JonathanReez You would need more than one data point to be able to draw meaningful conclusions.
– ThE iLlEgAl aLiEn
20 hours ago
3
@ThEiLlEgAlaLiEn if at least one person gets an instant approval then "Real-time approvals will no longer be available" is wrong.
– JonathanReez♦
20 hours ago
@JonathanReez Turns out I last applied for an ESTA... the day before the press release linked in the question. Doh!
– David Richerby
19 hours ago
Expectations...
– Harper
yesterday
Expectations...
– Harper
yesterday
2
2
I wonder if there are actually any changes in place. Someone who's recently applied for an ESTA could confirm how much it took for an approval to be received.
– JonathanReez♦
21 hours ago
I wonder if there are actually any changes in place. Someone who's recently applied for an ESTA could confirm how much it took for an approval to be received.
– JonathanReez♦
21 hours ago
@JonathanReez You would need more than one data point to be able to draw meaningful conclusions.
– ThE iLlEgAl aLiEn
20 hours ago
@JonathanReez You would need more than one data point to be able to draw meaningful conclusions.
– ThE iLlEgAl aLiEn
20 hours ago
3
3
@ThEiLlEgAlaLiEn if at least one person gets an instant approval then "Real-time approvals will no longer be available" is wrong.
– JonathanReez♦
20 hours ago
@ThEiLlEgAlaLiEn if at least one person gets an instant approval then "Real-time approvals will no longer be available" is wrong.
– JonathanReez♦
20 hours ago
@JonathanReez Turns out I last applied for an ESTA... the day before the press release linked in the question. Doh!
– David Richerby
19 hours ago
@JonathanReez Turns out I last applied for an ESTA... the day before the press release linked in the question. Doh!
– David Richerby
19 hours ago
add a comment |
Not an official reason but I've had an ESTA delayed because of payment difficulties. I'd used the same card to pay for a plane ticket, a seat upgrade and an ESTA in rapid succession, all to US companies; my bank flagged that as potential fraud and refused the ESTA payment. The next morning, I got an email from CBP saying that I couldn't have my ESTA until I'd paid for it.
So it certainly seems prudent for CBP to recommend that people don't apply right at the last minute. Even completely routine applications can get delayed. As far as I recall, CBP have always advised people to apply at least 72 hours in advance of their planned travel.
1
Hmm. Actually, I'm not sure this really answers the question. Downvote if you think it doesn't; I'll delete it if people think it's not relevant.
– David Richerby
yesterday
1
It doesn't answer the question but it's still good/relevant information... if you end up deleting it maybe put it into a comment.
– Mehrdad
20 hours ago
2
+1 for 'CBP have always advised...' - I remember flying to the US in 2012-13 and the warning/advise being there.
– Rogem
11 hours ago
add a comment |
Not an official reason but I've had an ESTA delayed because of payment difficulties. I'd used the same card to pay for a plane ticket, a seat upgrade and an ESTA in rapid succession, all to US companies; my bank flagged that as potential fraud and refused the ESTA payment. The next morning, I got an email from CBP saying that I couldn't have my ESTA until I'd paid for it.
So it certainly seems prudent for CBP to recommend that people don't apply right at the last minute. Even completely routine applications can get delayed. As far as I recall, CBP have always advised people to apply at least 72 hours in advance of their planned travel.
1
Hmm. Actually, I'm not sure this really answers the question. Downvote if you think it doesn't; I'll delete it if people think it's not relevant.
– David Richerby
yesterday
1
It doesn't answer the question but it's still good/relevant information... if you end up deleting it maybe put it into a comment.
– Mehrdad
20 hours ago
2
+1 for 'CBP have always advised...' - I remember flying to the US in 2012-13 and the warning/advise being there.
– Rogem
11 hours ago
add a comment |
Not an official reason but I've had an ESTA delayed because of payment difficulties. I'd used the same card to pay for a plane ticket, a seat upgrade and an ESTA in rapid succession, all to US companies; my bank flagged that as potential fraud and refused the ESTA payment. The next morning, I got an email from CBP saying that I couldn't have my ESTA until I'd paid for it.
So it certainly seems prudent for CBP to recommend that people don't apply right at the last minute. Even completely routine applications can get delayed. As far as I recall, CBP have always advised people to apply at least 72 hours in advance of their planned travel.
Not an official reason but I've had an ESTA delayed because of payment difficulties. I'd used the same card to pay for a plane ticket, a seat upgrade and an ESTA in rapid succession, all to US companies; my bank flagged that as potential fraud and refused the ESTA payment. The next morning, I got an email from CBP saying that I couldn't have my ESTA until I'd paid for it.
So it certainly seems prudent for CBP to recommend that people don't apply right at the last minute. Even completely routine applications can get delayed. As far as I recall, CBP have always advised people to apply at least 72 hours in advance of their planned travel.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
David RicherbyDavid Richerby
13.2k84486
13.2k84486
1
Hmm. Actually, I'm not sure this really answers the question. Downvote if you think it doesn't; I'll delete it if people think it's not relevant.
– David Richerby
yesterday
1
It doesn't answer the question but it's still good/relevant information... if you end up deleting it maybe put it into a comment.
– Mehrdad
20 hours ago
2
+1 for 'CBP have always advised...' - I remember flying to the US in 2012-13 and the warning/advise being there.
– Rogem
11 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Hmm. Actually, I'm not sure this really answers the question. Downvote if you think it doesn't; I'll delete it if people think it's not relevant.
– David Richerby
yesterday
1
It doesn't answer the question but it's still good/relevant information... if you end up deleting it maybe put it into a comment.
– Mehrdad
20 hours ago
2
+1 for 'CBP have always advised...' - I remember flying to the US in 2012-13 and the warning/advise being there.
– Rogem
11 hours ago
1
1
Hmm. Actually, I'm not sure this really answers the question. Downvote if you think it doesn't; I'll delete it if people think it's not relevant.
– David Richerby
yesterday
Hmm. Actually, I'm not sure this really answers the question. Downvote if you think it doesn't; I'll delete it if people think it's not relevant.
– David Richerby
yesterday
1
1
It doesn't answer the question but it's still good/relevant information... if you end up deleting it maybe put it into a comment.
– Mehrdad
20 hours ago
It doesn't answer the question but it's still good/relevant information... if you end up deleting it maybe put it into a comment.
– Mehrdad
20 hours ago
2
2
+1 for 'CBP have always advised...' - I remember flying to the US in 2012-13 and the warning/advise being there.
– Rogem
11 hours ago
+1 for 'CBP have always advised...' - I remember flying to the US in 2012-13 and the warning/advise being there.
– Rogem
11 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f133222%2fcbp-reminds-travelers-to-allow-72-hours-for-esta-why%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Speculation: the changes might be delivered the distributed computer infrastructure (e.g. airlines, ground services) in batch. Batch processes occur usually overnight, but in case a computer system fails there is the need for the technicians to work on the issue, get it fixed, and wait for the next batch.
– usr-local-ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ
yesterday
3
"ESTA approval previously used to be granted within minutes if not seconds." Usually, yes. Not always. The 72 hours is in part to accommodate for those situations that aren't the norm.
– Mast
yesterday
3
The statement doesn't preclude granting an ESTA within minutes, if not seconds. It just doesn't guarantee that fast of a turnaround.
– A C
21 hours ago
1
I don’t think it means that. Apply no later than 72 hours before departing looks like clear and strong instructions rather than a disclaimer for service guarantees.
– Hanky Panky
15 hours ago