Is Fable (1996) connected in any way to the Fable franchise from Lionhead Studios?Is Fable III going to be...
Are cabin dividers used to "hide" the flex of the airplane?
Need help identifying/translating a plaque in Tangier, Morocco
Shall I use personal or official e-mail account when registering to external websites for work purpose?
Pristine Bit Checking
Is this food a bread or a loaf?
Patience, young "Padovan"
Can the Produce Flame cantrip be used to grapple, or as an unarmed strike, in the right circumstances?
Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?
Extreme, but not acceptable situation and I can't start the work tomorrow morning
Copycat chess is back
Denied boarding due to overcrowding, Sparpreis ticket. What are my rights?
Is ipsum/ipsa/ipse a third person pronoun, or can it serve other functions?
Why airport relocation isn't done gradually?
Where to refill my bottle in India?
Prime joint compound before latex paint?
What to wear for invited talk in Canada
Can a planet have a different gravitational pull depending on its location in orbit around its sun?
Should the British be getting ready for a no-deal Brexit?
How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?
What causes the sudden spool-up sound from an F-16 when enabling afterburner?
What does it exactly mean if a random variable follows a distribution
Doomsday-clock for my fantasy planet
What does "enim et" mean?
Where else does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name?
Is Fable (1996) connected in any way to the Fable franchise from Lionhead Studios?
Is Fable III going to be available on the PC?Fable III: Is it possible to balance the real estate system to maximize rent and keep morality neutral?Are the Fable games' stories continuous?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I'm a big fan of the Fable games, have played them all on Xbox 360, and recently discovered the DOS game by the same name. I just started playing it and am wondering if it's at all connected to the Fable franchise. It was developed by Simbiosis Interactive and was apparently the company's only release. The vibe that the game gives off, the settings and the cheeky dialogue is reminiscent of the Fable games in my opinion, but I couldn't find a 'yes or no' to my question when I googled it.
msdos fable-series
New contributor
add a comment |
I'm a big fan of the Fable games, have played them all on Xbox 360, and recently discovered the DOS game by the same name. I just started playing it and am wondering if it's at all connected to the Fable franchise. It was developed by Simbiosis Interactive and was apparently the company's only release. The vibe that the game gives off, the settings and the cheeky dialogue is reminiscent of the Fable games in my opinion, but I couldn't find a 'yes or no' to my question when I googled it.
msdos fable-series
New contributor
add a comment |
I'm a big fan of the Fable games, have played them all on Xbox 360, and recently discovered the DOS game by the same name. I just started playing it and am wondering if it's at all connected to the Fable franchise. It was developed by Simbiosis Interactive and was apparently the company's only release. The vibe that the game gives off, the settings and the cheeky dialogue is reminiscent of the Fable games in my opinion, but I couldn't find a 'yes or no' to my question when I googled it.
msdos fable-series
New contributor
I'm a big fan of the Fable games, have played them all on Xbox 360, and recently discovered the DOS game by the same name. I just started playing it and am wondering if it's at all connected to the Fable franchise. It was developed by Simbiosis Interactive and was apparently the company's only release. The vibe that the game gives off, the settings and the cheeky dialogue is reminiscent of the Fable games in my opinion, but I couldn't find a 'yes or no' to my question when I googled it.
msdos fable-series
msdos fable-series
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 19 hours ago
P. M. B.P. M. B.
5114
5114
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
No, the games are unrelated.
- As you note, Fable was Simbiosis only release and received very middling reviews.
Peter Molyneux still worked for Bullfrog at this time, working on Dungeon Keeper. So he had nothing to do with Simbiosis title.- Neither the 1996 nor the Lionhead game wikipedia entries list any connection to each other
Fable is a common english word describing a story, where animals act with human characteristics. Funnily enough, both games pretty much ignore this definition and just use Fable as a different word Story.
11
The dictionaries on the front page of a Google search for "fable definition" all mention fables "often" or "sometimes" featuring animals in some manner, so that doesn't seem like a requirement of a fable.
– NotThatGuy
17 hours ago
1
The linked Wikipedia article itself contradicts the sentence it's quoted in: "a succinct fictional story, in prose or verse, that features animals, legendary creatures, plants, inanimate objects, or forces of nature that are anthropomorphized". Speaking animals may be common, it is not more a requirement for a fable than any other anthropomorphized object or creature.
– zakinster
13 hours ago
1
@zakinster: I don't know about the DOS game, but the Xbox game definitely wasn't anthropomorphizing much of anything.
– Kevin
11 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "41"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
P. M. B. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgaming.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f348760%2fis-fable-1996-connected-in-any-way-to-the-fable-franchise-from-lionhead-studio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No, the games are unrelated.
- As you note, Fable was Simbiosis only release and received very middling reviews.
Peter Molyneux still worked for Bullfrog at this time, working on Dungeon Keeper. So he had nothing to do with Simbiosis title.- Neither the 1996 nor the Lionhead game wikipedia entries list any connection to each other
Fable is a common english word describing a story, where animals act with human characteristics. Funnily enough, both games pretty much ignore this definition and just use Fable as a different word Story.
11
The dictionaries on the front page of a Google search for "fable definition" all mention fables "often" or "sometimes" featuring animals in some manner, so that doesn't seem like a requirement of a fable.
– NotThatGuy
17 hours ago
1
The linked Wikipedia article itself contradicts the sentence it's quoted in: "a succinct fictional story, in prose or verse, that features animals, legendary creatures, plants, inanimate objects, or forces of nature that are anthropomorphized". Speaking animals may be common, it is not more a requirement for a fable than any other anthropomorphized object or creature.
– zakinster
13 hours ago
1
@zakinster: I don't know about the DOS game, but the Xbox game definitely wasn't anthropomorphizing much of anything.
– Kevin
11 hours ago
add a comment |
No, the games are unrelated.
- As you note, Fable was Simbiosis only release and received very middling reviews.
Peter Molyneux still worked for Bullfrog at this time, working on Dungeon Keeper. So he had nothing to do with Simbiosis title.- Neither the 1996 nor the Lionhead game wikipedia entries list any connection to each other
Fable is a common english word describing a story, where animals act with human characteristics. Funnily enough, both games pretty much ignore this definition and just use Fable as a different word Story.
11
The dictionaries on the front page of a Google search for "fable definition" all mention fables "often" or "sometimes" featuring animals in some manner, so that doesn't seem like a requirement of a fable.
– NotThatGuy
17 hours ago
1
The linked Wikipedia article itself contradicts the sentence it's quoted in: "a succinct fictional story, in prose or verse, that features animals, legendary creatures, plants, inanimate objects, or forces of nature that are anthropomorphized". Speaking animals may be common, it is not more a requirement for a fable than any other anthropomorphized object or creature.
– zakinster
13 hours ago
1
@zakinster: I don't know about the DOS game, but the Xbox game definitely wasn't anthropomorphizing much of anything.
– Kevin
11 hours ago
add a comment |
No, the games are unrelated.
- As you note, Fable was Simbiosis only release and received very middling reviews.
Peter Molyneux still worked for Bullfrog at this time, working on Dungeon Keeper. So he had nothing to do with Simbiosis title.- Neither the 1996 nor the Lionhead game wikipedia entries list any connection to each other
Fable is a common english word describing a story, where animals act with human characteristics. Funnily enough, both games pretty much ignore this definition and just use Fable as a different word Story.
No, the games are unrelated.
- As you note, Fable was Simbiosis only release and received very middling reviews.
Peter Molyneux still worked for Bullfrog at this time, working on Dungeon Keeper. So he had nothing to do with Simbiosis title.- Neither the 1996 nor the Lionhead game wikipedia entries list any connection to each other
Fable is a common english word describing a story, where animals act with human characteristics. Funnily enough, both games pretty much ignore this definition and just use Fable as a different word Story.
edited 17 hours ago
Aibobot
1032
1032
answered 19 hours ago
DulkanDulkan
13.6k13774
13.6k13774
11
The dictionaries on the front page of a Google search for "fable definition" all mention fables "often" or "sometimes" featuring animals in some manner, so that doesn't seem like a requirement of a fable.
– NotThatGuy
17 hours ago
1
The linked Wikipedia article itself contradicts the sentence it's quoted in: "a succinct fictional story, in prose or verse, that features animals, legendary creatures, plants, inanimate objects, or forces of nature that are anthropomorphized". Speaking animals may be common, it is not more a requirement for a fable than any other anthropomorphized object or creature.
– zakinster
13 hours ago
1
@zakinster: I don't know about the DOS game, but the Xbox game definitely wasn't anthropomorphizing much of anything.
– Kevin
11 hours ago
add a comment |
11
The dictionaries on the front page of a Google search for "fable definition" all mention fables "often" or "sometimes" featuring animals in some manner, so that doesn't seem like a requirement of a fable.
– NotThatGuy
17 hours ago
1
The linked Wikipedia article itself contradicts the sentence it's quoted in: "a succinct fictional story, in prose or verse, that features animals, legendary creatures, plants, inanimate objects, or forces of nature that are anthropomorphized". Speaking animals may be common, it is not more a requirement for a fable than any other anthropomorphized object or creature.
– zakinster
13 hours ago
1
@zakinster: I don't know about the DOS game, but the Xbox game definitely wasn't anthropomorphizing much of anything.
– Kevin
11 hours ago
11
11
The dictionaries on the front page of a Google search for "fable definition" all mention fables "often" or "sometimes" featuring animals in some manner, so that doesn't seem like a requirement of a fable.
– NotThatGuy
17 hours ago
The dictionaries on the front page of a Google search for "fable definition" all mention fables "often" or "sometimes" featuring animals in some manner, so that doesn't seem like a requirement of a fable.
– NotThatGuy
17 hours ago
1
1
The linked Wikipedia article itself contradicts the sentence it's quoted in: "a succinct fictional story, in prose or verse, that features animals, legendary creatures, plants, inanimate objects, or forces of nature that are anthropomorphized". Speaking animals may be common, it is not more a requirement for a fable than any other anthropomorphized object or creature.
– zakinster
13 hours ago
The linked Wikipedia article itself contradicts the sentence it's quoted in: "a succinct fictional story, in prose or verse, that features animals, legendary creatures, plants, inanimate objects, or forces of nature that are anthropomorphized". Speaking animals may be common, it is not more a requirement for a fable than any other anthropomorphized object or creature.
– zakinster
13 hours ago
1
1
@zakinster: I don't know about the DOS game, but the Xbox game definitely wasn't anthropomorphizing much of anything.
– Kevin
11 hours ago
@zakinster: I don't know about the DOS game, but the Xbox game definitely wasn't anthropomorphizing much of anything.
– Kevin
11 hours ago
add a comment |
P. M. B. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
P. M. B. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
P. M. B. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
P. M. B. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Arqade!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgaming.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f348760%2fis-fable-1996-connected-in-any-way-to-the-fable-franchise-from-lionhead-studio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown