Weird behaviour when using querySelectorWhen are you supposed to use escape instead of encodeURI /...

Need help identifying/translating a plaque in Tangier, Morocco

What to wear for invited talk in Canada

Crop image to path created in TikZ?

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

Add an angle to a sphere

What happens when a metallic dragon and a chromatic dragon mate?

Why airport relocation isn't done gradually?

Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium

Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?

Domain expired, GoDaddy holds it and is asking more money

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files

Does bootstrapped regression allow for inference?

Is domain driven design an anti-SQL pattern?

What does 'script /dev/null' do?

Landing in very high winds

Typesetting a double Over Dot on top of a symbol

Prime joint compound before latex paint?

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

Is there any use for defining additional entity types in a SOQL FROM clause?

Symmetry in quantum mechanics

What does it exactly mean if a random variable follows a distribution

When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?

How would photo IDs work for shapeshifters?



Weird behaviour when using querySelector


When are you supposed to use escape instead of encodeURI / encodeURIComponent?When to use double or single quotes in JavaScript?How to execute a JavaScript function when I have its name as a stringChange the selected value of a drop-down list with jQueryWhat is the purpose of the var keyword and when should I use it (or omit it)?How to decide when to use Node.js?What is the explanation for these bizarre JavaScript behaviours mentioned in the 'Wat' talk for CodeMash 2012?Get current applied style with JSRunning JavaScript function to gives “Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected token }”Accessing elements from HTML in JavaScript






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







22















As my understanding, when using element.querySelector(), the query should be start on particular element.



However, when I run using code below, it keep selected the first DIV tag in particular element.






const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div > div').innerHTML);

<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>





As you can see, the first few results is the same.
This this a bug? Or it will query from start of the document?










share|improve this question































    22















    As my understanding, when using element.querySelector(), the query should be start on particular element.



    However, when I run using code below, it keep selected the first DIV tag in particular element.






    const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
    console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div').innerHTML);
    console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div').innerHTML);
    console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div').innerHTML);
    console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
    console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div > div').innerHTML);

    <div>
    <div>
    <div id="test">
    <div>
    <div>
    This is content
    </div>
    </div>
    </div>
    </div>
    </div>





    As you can see, the first few results is the same.
    This this a bug? Or it will query from start of the document?










    share|improve this question



























      22












      22








      22


      2






      As my understanding, when using element.querySelector(), the query should be start on particular element.



      However, when I run using code below, it keep selected the first DIV tag in particular element.






      const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div > div').innerHTML);

      <div>
      <div>
      <div id="test">
      <div>
      <div>
      This is content
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>





      As you can see, the first few results is the same.
      This this a bug? Or it will query from start of the document?










      share|improve this question
















      As my understanding, when using element.querySelector(), the query should be start on particular element.



      However, when I run using code below, it keep selected the first DIV tag in particular element.






      const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div > div').innerHTML);

      <div>
      <div>
      <div id="test">
      <div>
      <div>
      This is content
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>





      As you can see, the first few results is the same.
      This this a bug? Or it will query from start of the document?






      const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div > div').innerHTML);

      <div>
      <div>
      <div id="test">
      <div>
      <div>
      This is content
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>





      const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div > div').innerHTML);

      <div>
      <div>
      <div id="test">
      <div>
      <div>
      This is content
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>






      javascript






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 19 hours ago









      Abana Clara

      1,6651020




      1,6651020










      asked 21 hours ago









      Joey ChongJoey Chong

      1,0371016




      1,0371016
























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          22














          What querySelector does is it finds an element somewhere in the document that matches the CSS selector passed, and then checks that the found element is a descendant of the element you called querySelector on. It doesn't start at the element it was called on and search downwards - rather, it always starts at the document level, looks for elements that match the selector, and checks that the element is also a descendant of the calling context element. It's a bit unintuitive.



          So:



          someElement.querySelector(selectorStr)


          is like



          [...document.querySelectorAll(selectorStr)]
          .find(elm => someElement.contains(elm));


          A possible solution is to use :scope to indicate that you want the selection to start at the rootDiv, rather than at document:






          const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
          alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div').innerHTML);
          alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div').innerHTML);
          alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div > div').innerHTML);

          <div>
          <div>
          <div id="test">
          <div>
          <div>
          This is content
          </div>
          </div>
          </div>
          </div>
          </div>





          :scope is supported in all modern browsers but Edge.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Neat trick! Thanks!

            – Tico
            20 hours ago











          • :scope is not supported by all but most of the major browsers. Anyways, thank for explanation and this should be the answer. Thanks.

            – Joey Chong
            20 hours ago













          • :scope doesn't work with IE and Edge, I think it's important to point this out

            – Cristian Traìna
            20 hours ago











          • Here is the browser compatibility table - we have to resist just few months more since Edge is implementing Chromium engine :P

            – Cristian Traìna
            20 hours ago













          • Do you have any sources for the browser engine actually working this way ? - The query would have the same result, if the engine would start with the first div and check if it matches the query selector...

            – Falco
            17 hours ago



















          5














          The currently accepted answer somehow provides a valid logical explanation as to what happens, but they are factually wrong.



          Element.querySelector triggers the match a selector against tree algorithm, which goes from the root element and checks if its descendants do match the selector.



          The selector itself is absolute, it doesn't have any knowledge of a Document and doesn't even require that your Element be appended to any. And apart from the :scope attribute, it doesn't either care with which root you called the querySelector method.



          If we wanted to rewrite it ourselves, it would be more like



          const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element, {
          NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
          { acceptNode: (node) => return node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT }
          });
          return walker.nextNode();





          const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
          console.log(querySelector(rootDiv, 'div>div').innerHTML);

          function querySelector(element, selector) {
          const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
          NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
          {
          acceptNode: (node) => node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
          });
          return walker.nextNode();
          };

          <div>
          <div>
          <div id="test">
          <div>
          <div>
          This is content
          </div>
          </div>
          </div>
          </div>
          </div>





          With the big difference that this implementation doesn't support the special :scope selector.



          You may think it's the same going from the document or going from the root element, but not only will it make a difference in terms of performances, it will also allow for using this method while the element is not appended to any document.






          const div = document.createElement('div');
          div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', '<div id="test"><div class="bar"></div></div>')

          console.log(div.querySelector('div>.bar')); // found
          console.log(document.querySelector('div>.bar')); // null





          In the same way, matching elements in the Shadow-DOM would not be possible if we only had Document.querySelector.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Goood explanaition - especially the bit about Nodes not part of the document. This represents more clearly what the browser engine actually does.

            – Falco
            14 hours ago



















          1














          The query selector div > div > div only means:



          Find a div which has a parent and a granparent which are both also a div.



          And if you start with the first child of test and check the selector, it is true. And this is the reason why only your last query selects the innermost div, since it has the first predicate (find a div with a great-great-grandparent-div) which is not fulfilled by the first child of test.



          The query-selector will only test descendants, but it will evaluate the expression in scope of the whole document. Just imagine a selector like checking properties of an element - even if you only view the child element, it is still the child of its parent.






          share|improve this answer
























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55568211%2fweird-behaviour-when-using-queryselector%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            22














            What querySelector does is it finds an element somewhere in the document that matches the CSS selector passed, and then checks that the found element is a descendant of the element you called querySelector on. It doesn't start at the element it was called on and search downwards - rather, it always starts at the document level, looks for elements that match the selector, and checks that the element is also a descendant of the calling context element. It's a bit unintuitive.



            So:



            someElement.querySelector(selectorStr)


            is like



            [...document.querySelectorAll(selectorStr)]
            .find(elm => someElement.contains(elm));


            A possible solution is to use :scope to indicate that you want the selection to start at the rootDiv, rather than at document:






            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div > div').innerHTML);

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            :scope is supported in all modern browsers but Edge.






            share|improve this answer


























            • Neat trick! Thanks!

              – Tico
              20 hours ago











            • :scope is not supported by all but most of the major browsers. Anyways, thank for explanation and this should be the answer. Thanks.

              – Joey Chong
              20 hours ago













            • :scope doesn't work with IE and Edge, I think it's important to point this out

              – Cristian Traìna
              20 hours ago











            • Here is the browser compatibility table - we have to resist just few months more since Edge is implementing Chromium engine :P

              – Cristian Traìna
              20 hours ago













            • Do you have any sources for the browser engine actually working this way ? - The query would have the same result, if the engine would start with the first div and check if it matches the query selector...

              – Falco
              17 hours ago
















            22














            What querySelector does is it finds an element somewhere in the document that matches the CSS selector passed, and then checks that the found element is a descendant of the element you called querySelector on. It doesn't start at the element it was called on and search downwards - rather, it always starts at the document level, looks for elements that match the selector, and checks that the element is also a descendant of the calling context element. It's a bit unintuitive.



            So:



            someElement.querySelector(selectorStr)


            is like



            [...document.querySelectorAll(selectorStr)]
            .find(elm => someElement.contains(elm));


            A possible solution is to use :scope to indicate that you want the selection to start at the rootDiv, rather than at document:






            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div > div').innerHTML);

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            :scope is supported in all modern browsers but Edge.






            share|improve this answer


























            • Neat trick! Thanks!

              – Tico
              20 hours ago











            • :scope is not supported by all but most of the major browsers. Anyways, thank for explanation and this should be the answer. Thanks.

              – Joey Chong
              20 hours ago













            • :scope doesn't work with IE and Edge, I think it's important to point this out

              – Cristian Traìna
              20 hours ago











            • Here is the browser compatibility table - we have to resist just few months more since Edge is implementing Chromium engine :P

              – Cristian Traìna
              20 hours ago













            • Do you have any sources for the browser engine actually working this way ? - The query would have the same result, if the engine would start with the first div and check if it matches the query selector...

              – Falco
              17 hours ago














            22












            22








            22







            What querySelector does is it finds an element somewhere in the document that matches the CSS selector passed, and then checks that the found element is a descendant of the element you called querySelector on. It doesn't start at the element it was called on and search downwards - rather, it always starts at the document level, looks for elements that match the selector, and checks that the element is also a descendant of the calling context element. It's a bit unintuitive.



            So:



            someElement.querySelector(selectorStr)


            is like



            [...document.querySelectorAll(selectorStr)]
            .find(elm => someElement.contains(elm));


            A possible solution is to use :scope to indicate that you want the selection to start at the rootDiv, rather than at document:






            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div > div').innerHTML);

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            :scope is supported in all modern browsers but Edge.






            share|improve this answer















            What querySelector does is it finds an element somewhere in the document that matches the CSS selector passed, and then checks that the found element is a descendant of the element you called querySelector on. It doesn't start at the element it was called on and search downwards - rather, it always starts at the document level, looks for elements that match the selector, and checks that the element is also a descendant of the calling context element. It's a bit unintuitive.



            So:



            someElement.querySelector(selectorStr)


            is like



            [...document.querySelectorAll(selectorStr)]
            .find(elm => someElement.contains(elm));


            A possible solution is to use :scope to indicate that you want the selection to start at the rootDiv, rather than at document:






            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div > div').innerHTML);

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            :scope is supported in all modern browsers but Edge.






            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div > div').innerHTML);

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div > div').innerHTML);

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 20 hours ago

























            answered 21 hours ago









            CertainPerformanceCertainPerformance

            98.3k165989




            98.3k165989













            • Neat trick! Thanks!

              – Tico
              20 hours ago











            • :scope is not supported by all but most of the major browsers. Anyways, thank for explanation and this should be the answer. Thanks.

              – Joey Chong
              20 hours ago













            • :scope doesn't work with IE and Edge, I think it's important to point this out

              – Cristian Traìna
              20 hours ago











            • Here is the browser compatibility table - we have to resist just few months more since Edge is implementing Chromium engine :P

              – Cristian Traìna
              20 hours ago













            • Do you have any sources for the browser engine actually working this way ? - The query would have the same result, if the engine would start with the first div and check if it matches the query selector...

              – Falco
              17 hours ago



















            • Neat trick! Thanks!

              – Tico
              20 hours ago











            • :scope is not supported by all but most of the major browsers. Anyways, thank for explanation and this should be the answer. Thanks.

              – Joey Chong
              20 hours ago













            • :scope doesn't work with IE and Edge, I think it's important to point this out

              – Cristian Traìna
              20 hours ago











            • Here is the browser compatibility table - we have to resist just few months more since Edge is implementing Chromium engine :P

              – Cristian Traìna
              20 hours ago













            • Do you have any sources for the browser engine actually working this way ? - The query would have the same result, if the engine would start with the first div and check if it matches the query selector...

              – Falco
              17 hours ago

















            Neat trick! Thanks!

            – Tico
            20 hours ago





            Neat trick! Thanks!

            – Tico
            20 hours ago













            :scope is not supported by all but most of the major browsers. Anyways, thank for explanation and this should be the answer. Thanks.

            – Joey Chong
            20 hours ago







            :scope is not supported by all but most of the major browsers. Anyways, thank for explanation and this should be the answer. Thanks.

            – Joey Chong
            20 hours ago















            :scope doesn't work with IE and Edge, I think it's important to point this out

            – Cristian Traìna
            20 hours ago





            :scope doesn't work with IE and Edge, I think it's important to point this out

            – Cristian Traìna
            20 hours ago













            Here is the browser compatibility table - we have to resist just few months more since Edge is implementing Chromium engine :P

            – Cristian Traìna
            20 hours ago







            Here is the browser compatibility table - we have to resist just few months more since Edge is implementing Chromium engine :P

            – Cristian Traìna
            20 hours ago















            Do you have any sources for the browser engine actually working this way ? - The query would have the same result, if the engine would start with the first div and check if it matches the query selector...

            – Falco
            17 hours ago





            Do you have any sources for the browser engine actually working this way ? - The query would have the same result, if the engine would start with the first div and check if it matches the query selector...

            – Falco
            17 hours ago













            5














            The currently accepted answer somehow provides a valid logical explanation as to what happens, but they are factually wrong.



            Element.querySelector triggers the match a selector against tree algorithm, which goes from the root element and checks if its descendants do match the selector.



            The selector itself is absolute, it doesn't have any knowledge of a Document and doesn't even require that your Element be appended to any. And apart from the :scope attribute, it doesn't either care with which root you called the querySelector method.



            If we wanted to rewrite it ourselves, it would be more like



            const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element, {
            NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
            { acceptNode: (node) => return node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT }
            });
            return walker.nextNode();





            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            console.log(querySelector(rootDiv, 'div>div').innerHTML);

            function querySelector(element, selector) {
            const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
            NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
            {
            acceptNode: (node) => node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
            });
            return walker.nextNode();
            };

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            With the big difference that this implementation doesn't support the special :scope selector.



            You may think it's the same going from the document or going from the root element, but not only will it make a difference in terms of performances, it will also allow for using this method while the element is not appended to any document.






            const div = document.createElement('div');
            div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', '<div id="test"><div class="bar"></div></div>')

            console.log(div.querySelector('div>.bar')); // found
            console.log(document.querySelector('div>.bar')); // null





            In the same way, matching elements in the Shadow-DOM would not be possible if we only had Document.querySelector.






            share|improve this answer
























            • Goood explanaition - especially the bit about Nodes not part of the document. This represents more clearly what the browser engine actually does.

              – Falco
              14 hours ago
















            5














            The currently accepted answer somehow provides a valid logical explanation as to what happens, but they are factually wrong.



            Element.querySelector triggers the match a selector against tree algorithm, which goes from the root element and checks if its descendants do match the selector.



            The selector itself is absolute, it doesn't have any knowledge of a Document and doesn't even require that your Element be appended to any. And apart from the :scope attribute, it doesn't either care with which root you called the querySelector method.



            If we wanted to rewrite it ourselves, it would be more like



            const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element, {
            NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
            { acceptNode: (node) => return node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT }
            });
            return walker.nextNode();





            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            console.log(querySelector(rootDiv, 'div>div').innerHTML);

            function querySelector(element, selector) {
            const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
            NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
            {
            acceptNode: (node) => node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
            });
            return walker.nextNode();
            };

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            With the big difference that this implementation doesn't support the special :scope selector.



            You may think it's the same going from the document or going from the root element, but not only will it make a difference in terms of performances, it will also allow for using this method while the element is not appended to any document.






            const div = document.createElement('div');
            div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', '<div id="test"><div class="bar"></div></div>')

            console.log(div.querySelector('div>.bar')); // found
            console.log(document.querySelector('div>.bar')); // null





            In the same way, matching elements in the Shadow-DOM would not be possible if we only had Document.querySelector.






            share|improve this answer
























            • Goood explanaition - especially the bit about Nodes not part of the document. This represents more clearly what the browser engine actually does.

              – Falco
              14 hours ago














            5












            5








            5







            The currently accepted answer somehow provides a valid logical explanation as to what happens, but they are factually wrong.



            Element.querySelector triggers the match a selector against tree algorithm, which goes from the root element and checks if its descendants do match the selector.



            The selector itself is absolute, it doesn't have any knowledge of a Document and doesn't even require that your Element be appended to any. And apart from the :scope attribute, it doesn't either care with which root you called the querySelector method.



            If we wanted to rewrite it ourselves, it would be more like



            const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element, {
            NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
            { acceptNode: (node) => return node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT }
            });
            return walker.nextNode();





            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            console.log(querySelector(rootDiv, 'div>div').innerHTML);

            function querySelector(element, selector) {
            const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
            NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
            {
            acceptNode: (node) => node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
            });
            return walker.nextNode();
            };

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            With the big difference that this implementation doesn't support the special :scope selector.



            You may think it's the same going from the document or going from the root element, but not only will it make a difference in terms of performances, it will also allow for using this method while the element is not appended to any document.






            const div = document.createElement('div');
            div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', '<div id="test"><div class="bar"></div></div>')

            console.log(div.querySelector('div>.bar')); // found
            console.log(document.querySelector('div>.bar')); // null





            In the same way, matching elements in the Shadow-DOM would not be possible if we only had Document.querySelector.






            share|improve this answer













            The currently accepted answer somehow provides a valid logical explanation as to what happens, but they are factually wrong.



            Element.querySelector triggers the match a selector against tree algorithm, which goes from the root element and checks if its descendants do match the selector.



            The selector itself is absolute, it doesn't have any knowledge of a Document and doesn't even require that your Element be appended to any. And apart from the :scope attribute, it doesn't either care with which root you called the querySelector method.



            If we wanted to rewrite it ourselves, it would be more like



            const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element, {
            NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
            { acceptNode: (node) => return node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT }
            });
            return walker.nextNode();





            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            console.log(querySelector(rootDiv, 'div>div').innerHTML);

            function querySelector(element, selector) {
            const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
            NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
            {
            acceptNode: (node) => node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
            });
            return walker.nextNode();
            };

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            With the big difference that this implementation doesn't support the special :scope selector.



            You may think it's the same going from the document or going from the root element, but not only will it make a difference in terms of performances, it will also allow for using this method while the element is not appended to any document.






            const div = document.createElement('div');
            div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', '<div id="test"><div class="bar"></div></div>')

            console.log(div.querySelector('div>.bar')); // found
            console.log(document.querySelector('div>.bar')); // null





            In the same way, matching elements in the Shadow-DOM would not be possible if we only had Document.querySelector.






            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            console.log(querySelector(rootDiv, 'div>div').innerHTML);

            function querySelector(element, selector) {
            const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
            NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
            {
            acceptNode: (node) => node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
            });
            return walker.nextNode();
            };

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            console.log(querySelector(rootDiv, 'div>div').innerHTML);

            function querySelector(element, selector) {
            const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
            NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
            {
            acceptNode: (node) => node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
            });
            return walker.nextNode();
            };

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            const div = document.createElement('div');
            div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', '<div id="test"><div class="bar"></div></div>')

            console.log(div.querySelector('div>.bar')); // found
            console.log(document.querySelector('div>.bar')); // null





            const div = document.createElement('div');
            div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', '<div id="test"><div class="bar"></div></div>')

            console.log(div.querySelector('div>.bar')); // found
            console.log(document.querySelector('div>.bar')); // null






            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 15 hours ago









            KaiidoKaiido

            45.5k467108




            45.5k467108













            • Goood explanaition - especially the bit about Nodes not part of the document. This represents more clearly what the browser engine actually does.

              – Falco
              14 hours ago



















            • Goood explanaition - especially the bit about Nodes not part of the document. This represents more clearly what the browser engine actually does.

              – Falco
              14 hours ago

















            Goood explanaition - especially the bit about Nodes not part of the document. This represents more clearly what the browser engine actually does.

            – Falco
            14 hours ago





            Goood explanaition - especially the bit about Nodes not part of the document. This represents more clearly what the browser engine actually does.

            – Falco
            14 hours ago











            1














            The query selector div > div > div only means:



            Find a div which has a parent and a granparent which are both also a div.



            And if you start with the first child of test and check the selector, it is true. And this is the reason why only your last query selects the innermost div, since it has the first predicate (find a div with a great-great-grandparent-div) which is not fulfilled by the first child of test.



            The query-selector will only test descendants, but it will evaluate the expression in scope of the whole document. Just imagine a selector like checking properties of an element - even if you only view the child element, it is still the child of its parent.






            share|improve this answer




























              1














              The query selector div > div > div only means:



              Find a div which has a parent and a granparent which are both also a div.



              And if you start with the first child of test and check the selector, it is true. And this is the reason why only your last query selects the innermost div, since it has the first predicate (find a div with a great-great-grandparent-div) which is not fulfilled by the first child of test.



              The query-selector will only test descendants, but it will evaluate the expression in scope of the whole document. Just imagine a selector like checking properties of an element - even if you only view the child element, it is still the child of its parent.






              share|improve this answer


























                1












                1








                1







                The query selector div > div > div only means:



                Find a div which has a parent and a granparent which are both also a div.



                And if you start with the first child of test and check the selector, it is true. And this is the reason why only your last query selects the innermost div, since it has the first predicate (find a div with a great-great-grandparent-div) which is not fulfilled by the first child of test.



                The query-selector will only test descendants, but it will evaluate the expression in scope of the whole document. Just imagine a selector like checking properties of an element - even if you only view the child element, it is still the child of its parent.






                share|improve this answer













                The query selector div > div > div only means:



                Find a div which has a parent and a granparent which are both also a div.



                And if you start with the first child of test and check the selector, it is true. And this is the reason why only your last query selects the innermost div, since it has the first predicate (find a div with a great-great-grandparent-div) which is not fulfilled by the first child of test.



                The query-selector will only test descendants, but it will evaluate the expression in scope of the whole document. Just imagine a selector like checking properties of an element - even if you only view the child element, it is still the child of its parent.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 17 hours ago









                FalcoFalco

                2,8521620




                2,8521620






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55568211%2fweird-behaviour-when-using-queryselector%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Why does my Macbook overheat and use so much CPU and energy when on YouTube?Why do so many insist on using...

                    How to prevent page numbers from appearing on glossaries?How to remove a dot and a page number in the...

                    Puerta de Hutt Referencias Enlaces externos Menú de navegación15°58′00″S 5°42′00″O /...